independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Jackie and Marlon, the solo years.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 07/08/09 6:03pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Jackie and Marlon, the solo years.

Um, don't lock this thread. mad

Just like the Randy and Jermaine thread that mysteriously got locked, let's talk about the careers of the other members solo attempts.









http://prince.org/msg/8/312965
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 07/08/09 6:26pm

thesexofit

avatar

Jackie's "be the one" album in the late 80's is probably, to me, the most underated. Anyone who liked Robert Brookins "let it be me" album should definately get it, as he is involved on all the tracks.

Whilst it is lacking in slowjams, the midtempo's are great fun. Nothing deep, but solid rnb nonetheless. Infact, as an album, its a real fav of mine. Its got one great slowjam on it though called "stuck on you". Funny, its the uptempo's that let Robert Brookins album down, but here, he gets the funkier tracks right this time (probably because of no Foster and McElroy to meddle with). Still, the slowjams on Brookins album are killer, but only a few on Jackies album.

Jackie of course is not as gifted vocally as Robert, but his falsetto is nice enough. Better then Marlon's voice anyway. The "cruizin'" remix is hot aswell.

Marlons album "baby tonight" did have some sucsess apparantly. Still, no second album, but whilst Jackie's album is mostly the work of Robert Brookins, Marlon does alot of his own work here.

Not surprisenly, considering his rather average voice, its dominated by uptempo's with whizz bang synths covering them up LOL. Thats fine by me as I love some of the hi-tech, synth heavy production on this album. Reminds me of Mic Murphy and David Frank. "Baby tonight", the track, is great "lite funk" for example. Its a fun album, but more pop then Jackie's album and altogether, not as satisfying. I still love some of it though, and its much better then you think its going to be.

Overall, I love both albums, but I definately feel Jackie's album, if you like Brookins or late 80's rnb in general, is worth a real look.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 07/08/09 7:22pm

midiscover

I don't know why my thread got mysteriously locked up sad
It was getting interesting too!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 07/08/09 7:29pm

midiscover

Can we merge my thread into this???
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 07/08/09 7:30pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

midiscover said:

I don't know why my thread got mysteriously locked up sad
It was getting interesting too!

I seen it when you first created it, (was it Saturday?) Well I was out of town so just read it and was gonna post on Sunday night when I got back, but boom, it was locked. I had a long post too. lol

It was a nice thread.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 07/08/09 7:31pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

midiscover said:

Can we merge my thread into this???

Only a mod can. But I'm afraid if we get a mods attention, this thread will be HIStory.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 07/08/09 8:06pm

thesexofit

avatar

Am I the only one that owns both their albums LOL. Iam sure bboy87 does too, but its an obscure thread I guess lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 07/08/09 8:18pm

Arnotts

midiscover said:

I don't know why my thread got mysteriously locked up sad
It was getting interesting too!

Yeah it's not fair. The sticky is about Michael. Not the rest of the Jacksons. Its unfair that we have to use MJ's sticky to talk about other people.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 07/08/09 8:24pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

LittleBLUECorvette said:

midiscover said:

Can we merge my thread into this???

Only a mod can. But I'm afraid if we get a mods attention, this thread will be HIStory.


Anyone and/or Anything that is related, connected, or commonly link to MJJ will get locked.

And BTW, have you notice that no one in talking about the solo career of Rebbie OR Latoya yet?!?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 07/08/09 8:36pm

midiscover

Arnotts said:

midiscover said:

I don't know why my thread got mysteriously locked up sad
It was getting interesting too!

Yeah it's not fair. The sticky is about Michael. Not the rest of the Jacksons. Its unfair that we have to use MJ's sticky to talk about other people.


I know they're all artists in their own right!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 07/09/09 7:35am

Graycap23

Janet and Mj got 90% of the talent in this family.
The other 10% was spread very thin.....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 07/09/09 7:40am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Janet and Mj got 90% of the talent in this family.
The other 10% was spread very thin.....

I wouldn't go that far, you're saying Jermaine has only 10% of talent, what about Randy and Tito? Most would say most of the bros are more talented than Janet (most, not me partically)?
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 07/09/09 7:41am

Se7en

avatar

Neither of these examples are very good at all. "Background"-singer voices over what sound like preset keyboard beats. Nothing standout here.

Even most of the non-MJ stuff on "Victory" isn't very good.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 07/09/09 7:42am

Graycap23

LittleBLUECorvette said:

Graycap23 said:

Janet and Mj got 90% of the talent in this family.
The other 10% was spread very thin.....

I wouldn't go that far, you're saying Jermaine has only 10% of talent, what about Randy and Tito? Most would say most of the bros are more talented than Janet (most, not me partically)?

Ok.....89%...and 11%
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 07/09/09 7:57am

Arnotts

Graycap23 said:

Janet and Mj got 90% of the talent in this family.
The other 10% was spread very thin.....

Thats the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, success doesnt necessarily mean talent. The boys talents lie in different areas to Janet. Janet is a good performer, but Jackie and Randy are FAR more talented at songwriting and producing than Janet. I mean does she even do that? It just depends on what you think makes someone more talented
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 07/09/09 8:00am

Graycap23

Arnotts said:

Graycap23 said:

Janet and Mj got 90% of the talent in this family.
The other 10% was spread very thin.....

Thats the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, success doesnt necessarily mean talent. The boys talents lie in different areas to Janet. Janet is a good performer, but Jackie and Randy are FAR more talented at songwriting and producing than Janet. I mean does she even do that? It just depends on what you think makes someone more talented

thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 07/09/09 8:08am

Arnotts

Graycap23 said:

Arnotts said:


Thats the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, success doesnt necessarily mean talent. The boys talents lie in different areas to Janet. Janet is a good performer, but Jackie and Randy are FAR more talented at songwriting and producing than Janet. I mean does she even do that? It just depends on what you think makes someone more talented

thumbs up!

So you think performance is a superior talent to creating a song? I'm not saying either one is, but just wondering if thats what you mean by the thumbs up
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 07/09/09 8:10am

Graycap23

Arnotts said:

Graycap23 said:


thumbs up!

So you think performance is a superior talent to creating a song? I'm not saying either one is, but just wondering if thats what you mean by the thumbs up

I really loved the Jacksons growing up.....but I have always saw the brothers including Jermaine as marginally talented. Still do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 07/09/09 8:16am

Arnotts

Graycap23 said:

Arnotts said:


So you think performance is a superior talent to creating a song? I'm not saying either one is, but just wondering if thats what you mean by the thumbs up

I really loved the Jacksons growing up.....but I have always saw the brothers including Jermaine as marginally talented. Still do.

I would too if I didn't know Randy and Jackie wrote the best songs on Triumph. I underestimate the other 3 boys because I don't know as much about them musically speaking, but I'm willing to admit that that doesnt necessarily mean that they arent talented.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 07/09/09 8:18am

Graycap23

Arnotts said:

Graycap23 said:


I really loved the Jacksons growing up.....but I have always saw the brothers including Jermaine as marginally talented. Still do.

I would too if I didn't know Randy and Jackie wrote the best songs on Triumph. I underestimate the other 3 boys because I don't know as much about them musically speaking, but I'm willing to admit that that doesnt necessarily mean that they arent talented.

I hear u, but sense I've never looked into who were writing the songs, I can only go by what I see/hear.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 07/09/09 8:48am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Arnotts said:


I would too if I didn't know Randy and Jackie wrote the best songs on Triumph. I underestimate the other 3 boys because I don't know as much about them musically speaking, but I'm willing to admit that that doesnt necessarily mean that they arent talented.

I hear u, but sense I've never looked into who were writing the songs, I can only go by what I see/hear.

Randy was like Mike's little right hand man (or the other way around?) They wrote Shake Your Body, That's What You, Can You Feel It and Randy and Jackie wrote Time Waits for No One, I belive Lovely One and Mike and Jackie did Push Me Away, Give It Up. Mike and Tito did Everybody.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 07/09/09 8:50am

Graycap23

LittleBLUECorvette said:

Graycap23 said:


I hear u, but sense I've never looked into who were writing the songs, I can only go by what I see/hear.

Randy was like Mike's little right hand man (or the other way around?) They wrote Shake Your Body, That's What You, Can You Feel It and Randy and Jackie wrote Time Waits for No One, I belive Lovely One and Mike and Jackie did Push Me Away, Give It Up. Mike and Tito did Everybody.

I never knew that.....good info. Thanks.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 07/09/09 8:53am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Graycap23 said:

LittleBLUECorvette said:


Randy was like Mike's little right hand man (or the other way around?) They wrote Shake Your Body, That's What You, Can You Feel It and Randy and Jackie wrote Time Waits for No One, I belive Lovely One and Mike and Jackie did Push Me Away, Give It Up. Mike and Tito did Everybody.

I never knew that.....good info. Thanks.

With the group, Marlon seemed to be the least talented writer (besides Body from Victory, I don't believe he co-wrote any Jacksons track.) But away from the band, he did some nic stuff with Betty Wright, little sister Janet and his own album.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 07/09/09 9:20am

Aeneiden

avatar

Marlon was the next best dancer after MJ, Jackie and Randy were awesome songwriters.

I always saw Tito as the least talented brother, but I might be wrong, but I always thought he was a pretty average guitar player also.

Rebbie is a great singer, Janet was good in the early 80's but after Rhythm Nation it got worse, IMO.
Long Live The True Funk Soldiers
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 07/09/09 9:27am

TheResurrectio
n

I chatted with someone who toured with tito in the passed few years. He said that Tito is VERY underrated as a musician and is very well respected as a guitarist.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 07/09/09 9:27am

TheResurrectio
n

Aeneiden said:

Marlon was the next best dancer after MJ, Jackie and Randy were awesome songwriters.

I always saw Tito as the least talented brother, but I might be wrong, but I always thought he was a pretty average guitar player also.

Rebbie is a great singer, Janet was good in the early 80's but after Rhythm Nation it got worse, IMO.



GREAT?

NO.

Better than Janet?

Yes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 07/09/09 9:30am

midiscover

TheResurrection said:

Aeneiden said:

Marlon was the next best dancer after MJ, Jackie and Randy were awesome songwriters.

I always saw Tito as the least talented brother, but I might be wrong, but I always thought he was a pretty average guitar player also.

Rebbie is a great singer, Janet was good in the early 80's but after Rhythm Nation it got worse, IMO.



GREAT?

NO.

Better than Janet?

Hell no.


Fixed!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 07/09/09 9:34am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

TheResurrection said:

I chatted with someone who toured with tito in the passed few years. He said that Tito is VERY underrated as a musician and is very well respected as a guitarist.

Yep,when the J5 toured Mexico in 75, Tito played with the band while the other brother went to the back for about 15 minutes to rest. It was nice and surprised me. I always thought Tito was average until I seen that.
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 07/09/09 10:09am

TheResurrectio
n

midiscover said:

TheResurrection said:




GREAT?

NO.

Better than Janet?

Hell no.


Fixed!



I think I knew what i was saying when I typed it.

But thanks for your unnecessary correction.

As I said...she was a better singer than Janet.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 07/09/09 10:36am

trueiopian

TheResurrection said:

midiscover said:



Fixed!



I think I knew what i was saying when I typed it.

But thanks for your unnecessary correction.

As I said...she was a better singer than Janet.



Um no.


There's a reason why her career was short lived wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Jackie and Marlon, the solo years.