independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > History seems to prefer black MJ over white MJ
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 07/15/09 2:58pm

LightOfArt

and apparantly you are too scared to respond to this:

The MJ songs in order are "Man in the Mirror," "Smooth Criminal," "Billie Jean," "Thriller," "They Don't Care About Us," "Black or White," "Dirty Diana," "Beat It," "Who's Lovin' You," "Earth Song," and "You Are Not Alone." That certainly doesn't reflect the trend you claim.


read it and weep lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 07/15/09 3:03pm

midnightmover

LightOfArt said:

^^
you can twist it as much as you like sweetie...all it comes down to is his biggest hit in the UK now is not on Off The Wall cool

Errr, no. You can't twist an album chart, son. It is what it is. Please take your head out of the sand. Did you see the news reports after his death and documentaries? The focus was all on the earlier stuff. MITM is one of the last soulful MJ tunes. Tellingly, it was one of the few songs he didn't write on that album.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 07/15/09 3:04pm

ElectricBlue

avatar

The first 25 Years = His Music Career

The second 25 Years = His Jacko Career

This isnt anything new, I have said this for 15 of those 25 years online about his "Yes Men", Pepsi Burn, etc.. Now we see more and more agree. It wasn't hard to see.

If you grew up in the first 25 years you wouldnt settle for what happened in the second half - if more were like me, he probably would still be alive.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 07/15/09 3:05pm

LightOfArt

midnightmover said:

LightOfArt said:

^^
you can twist it as much as you like sweetie...all it comes down to is his biggest hit in the UK now is not on Off The Wall cool

Errr, no. You can't twist an album chart, son. It is what it is. Please take your head out of the sand. Did you see the news reports after his death and documentaries? The focus was all on the earlier stuff. MITM is one of the last soulful MJ tunes. Tellingly, it was one of the few songs he didn't write on that album.


obviously you have an agenda to push....open your eyes i will lay them all out for you that even you can get it

1) his biggest single in the UK is from the bad album
2) his biggest selling album in the UK is a compilation
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 07/15/09 3:27pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

ElectricBlue said:

The first 25 Years = His Music Career

The second 25 Years = His Jacko Career

This isnt anything new, I have said this for 15 of those 25 years online about his "Yes Men", Pepsi Burn, etc.. Now we see more and more agree. It wasn't hard to see.

If you grew up in the first 25 years you wouldnt settle for what happened in the second half - if more were like me, he probably would still be alive.

But you saw MJ as a one-hit album wonder. You didn't even realize how well Jermaine could sing, considering Jermaine use to share lead with Michael on many songs at Motown. You know jack about Michael's career.
[Edited 7/15/09 15:32pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 07/15/09 3:31pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

LightOfArt said:

and apparantly you are too scared to respond to this:

The MJ songs in order are "Man in the Mirror," "Smooth Criminal," "Billie Jean," "Thriller," "They Don't Care About Us," "Black or White," "Dirty Diana," "Beat It," "Who's Lovin' You," "Earth Song," and "You Are Not Alone." That certainly doesn't reflect the trend you claim.


read it and weep lol


But the fact of the matter is albums play a more important part than singles. It is how an artist is critically and commercially assessed. The fact of the matter is MJ older albums are doing better than the latter. Everyone and their mama has Thriller, so there is no reason why that album should still be out-selling Bad and Dangerous now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 07/15/09 3:33pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

midnightmover said:

Here is the current UK album chart. OTW, Thriller and Jackson 5 compilations are riding high while the later albums are NOWHERE TO BE SEEN apart from compilations. Read it and weep.

Check it again. You overlooked HIStory, which was #17.

Anyway, I still contend that the UK success of Off the Wall is greatly affected by its previous lackluster (relatively speaking, of course) performance there. That's the same reason I believe "Man in the Mirror" is doing so well there also.

I find it interesting that OTW is doing so well as an album while its songs aren't being bought and spun that much in comparison. Then again, it's easily his most consistent album IMO, so they may have something to do with it. At any rate, I think there are plenty of possible reasons for this that have nothing to do with his looks at the time.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 07/15/09 3:43pm

LightOfArt

whatsgoingon said:

LightOfArt said:

and apparantly you are too scared to respond to this:



read it and weep lol


But the fact of the matter is albums play a more important part than singles. It is how an artist is critically and commercially assessed. The fact of the matter is MJ older albums are doing better than the latter. Everyone and their mama has Thriller, so there is no reason why that album should still be out-selling Bad and Dangerous now.


and his newer songs are doing better than his older songs...

anyway this thread is pointless and silly. people buy the albums because they like the music. it has nothing to do with one's skin tone...how stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 07/15/09 4:00pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

LightOfArt said:

whatsgoingon said:



But the fact of the matter is albums play a more important part than singles. It is how an artist is critically and commercially assessed. The fact of the matter is MJ older albums are doing better than the latter. Everyone and their mama has Thriller, so there is no reason why that album should still be out-selling Bad and Dangerous now.


and his newer songs are doing better than his older songs...

anyway this thread is pointless and silly. people buy the albums because they like the music. it has nothing to do with one's skin tone...how stupid


My observation in general is that since his death its almost like he has been reclaim for what he once was. I just notice that so many people are paying homage to little Michael Jackson, as opposed to the Michael of recent years. I think many people just want to remember Michael how he use to be and it's manifesting it's self in T-shirts, posters and album sales.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 07/15/09 4:00pm

dreamfactory31
3

KING OF POP = KING OF THE CHARTS

By Steve Gorman

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Michael Jackson's memorial proved to be good for business, sparking another nostalgic frenzy for his music that continues to put the King of Pop atop music charts since his sudden death three weeks ago.

Jackson's catalog of solo albums sold 1.1 million U.S. copies in the week ended July 12, and his greatest-hits set "Number Ones" ranked as the top-selling album for a third straight week, Nielsen SoundScan reported on Wednesday.

Physical CDs, rather than Internet downloads, accounted for 90 percent of the business as music stores rushed to restock their Jackson inventory. Downloads had dominated sales immediately after his death.

The bulk of last week's sales came in the days following a two-hour-plus memorial salute to Jackson, which was televised live from the Staples Center in Los Angeles last Tuesday and featured numerous recording stars performing musical tributes.

The 1.1 million tally marked a 37 percent increase from the week before, when 800,000 Jackson albums sold, which in turn almost doubled the previous sales week, 422,000 units, ending just three days after his June 25 death.

By comparison, Jackson's entire catalog sold fewer than 10,000 albums the week before he died, and the last time he had a top-selling album while alive was his last studio release, "Invincible," which debuted at No. 1 with 366,000 copies sold in 2001.

Jackson's post-mortem sales total has now reached 2.3 million copies, led by "Number Ones," the first catalog album in SoundScan history to best a newly debuting album, a feat achieved for three weeks in a row.

"We never thought that could happen, and it turns out that the only person who could ever do it was Michael Jackson,' said Billboard magazine chart editor Keith Caulfield.

Ironically, "Number Ones" climbed no higher in the charts than No. 13 when it first came out in 2003.

This past week, it sold 349,000 copies to eclipse R&B star Maxwell's "BLACKsummer's Night," the No. 1 album on the Billboard 200 chart of new releases with 316,000 units sold.

In fact, Jackson had six of the top 10 bestsellers last week, including his 1982 blockbuster "Thriller," "The Essential Michael Jackson," "Off the Wall," "Bad" and "Dangerous." All saw sharp increases over the previous week.

Five of Jackson's solo albums reached No. 1 in the charts during his lifetime -- "Thriller," "Bad," "Dangerous," "HIStory" and "Invincible."

All-time sales for "Number Ones" now stand at 2.6 million copies, and it also ranks as the eighth-best-selling album so far this year. If sales remain robust through the year, it could eventually even surpass the reigning No. 1 album, Taylor Swift's "Fearless."

(Editing by Bob Tourtellotte)


http://www.reuters.com/ar...EN20090715
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 07/15/09 4:28pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

If people are going to buy a compilation, they really should put in a few more bucks and spring for The Essential Michael Jackson.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 07/15/09 4:28pm

OldTeenager

avatar

midnightmover said:

MJ's albums are all over the chart right now, but I can't help noticing the albums people are buying are all the earlier ones. Off The Wall was nowhere near as successful in it's day as later blockbusters like Bad and Dangerous, but those albums are nowhere to be seen while Off The Wall and even Jackson 5 compilations are selling like hotcakes.

I'm seeing posters of him in shop windows and people's cars and all the pictures are from the 70s or 80s when he was young, gifted and black (he was always black of course, but you know what I mean). I've seen some posters of him from 1987 when he was caramel coloured, but none after that.

Is history saying that the later MJ was shit? Or is it because the later MJ is associated with disturbing behaviour and people see the younger MJ as less tainted?
[Edited 7/15/09 8:41am]


In a nutshell...
I am not sure what's wrong, but it's probably your fault!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 07/15/09 4:39pm

estelle81

avatar

I prefer actual albums instead of compilations and re-releases, which were really a large part of recent Michael's (or as he's being referred to in these thread as 'white MJ') career. What skin color he had really didn't have any relevance to his musical output for me; but that's just me shrug .He could have been purple with pink polka dots for all I cared; because, when I put the CD in the player, I don't see anything; I only hear; and, his older stuff is just lightyears better than the newer stuff. Just my twocents
Prince Rogers Nelson
Sunrise: June 7, 1958
Sunset: April 21, 2016
~My Heart Loudly Weeps

"My Creativity Is My Life." ~ Prince

Life is merely a dress rehearsal for eternity.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 07/15/09 10:15pm

Arnotts

Its because just like with Elvis they are focusing on the young hot looking Michael. Another thing I noticed is the media is hyping up the Off The Wall and Thriller album more than the others. Actually they've always done this. A few of my friends brought his albums that they heard were good, and were dissapointed with Off The Wall as I think most young people will be. I encouraged them to get the better albums 'Bad' and 'Dangerous', and as I expected they liked them more. I don't think Off The Wall is hooky enough for the young kids of today.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 07/16/09 1:02am

RONNYRON

avatar

Rogue588 said:

"It doesn't matter if you're black or white".

It does matter, however, if you put out good music. Maybe people think Mike's music wasn't as strong as it was during Off the Wall, Thriller and even Bad.



Exactly - MJ's GOLDEN PERIOD was obviously the 80s - BIGGER than Prince, BIGGER tha Madonna, BIGGER than anyone, and it had nothing to do with his skin color, great music and great albums is exactly that.

1979 - 1989... that decade MJ was unstoppable, and is the period that he's most remembered for, hence the current sales and interest.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 07/16/09 1:06am

RONNYRON

avatar

AlexdeParis said:

If people are going to buy a compilation, they really should put in a few more bucks and spring for The Essential Michael Jackson.


Is that the one that's missing "I'll Be There" and "Never Can Say Goodbye"?...

Hmmm... it's a good collection, but still a bit incomplete.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 07/16/09 1:12am

RONNYRON

avatar

Arnotts said:

Its because just like with Elvis they are focusing on the young hot looking Michael. Another thing I noticed is the media is hyping up the Off The Wall and Thriller album more than the others. Actually they've always done this. A few of my friends brought his albums that they heard were good, and were dissapointed with Off The Wall as I think most young people will be. I encouraged them to get the better albums 'Bad' and 'Dangerous', and as I expected they liked them more. I don't think Off The Wall is hooky enough for the young kids of today.



Agreed, "OFF THE WALL" would just be a retro disco album to the kids today, the tuff snares and new jack beats of "BAD" and "DANGEROUS" would be more their speed.

"OFF THE WALL" is simply a well crafted soul and R&B album - brilliant, without the crossover appeal of "THRILLER", but a smoother listen (IMHO).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 07/16/09 1:23am

vainandy

avatar

RONNYRON said:

Arnotts said:

Its because just like with Elvis they are focusing on the young hot looking Michael. Another thing I noticed is the media is hyping up the Off The Wall and Thriller album more than the others. Actually they've always done this. A few of my friends brought his albums that they heard were good, and were dissapointed with Off The Wall as I think most young people will be. I encouraged them to get the better albums 'Bad' and 'Dangerous', and as I expected they liked them more. I don't think Off The Wall is hooky enough for the young kids of today.



Agreed, "OFF THE WALL" would just be a retro disco album to the kids today, the tuff snares and new jack beats of "BAD" and "DANGEROUS" would be more their speed.

"OFF THE WALL" is simply a well crafted soul and R&B album - brilliant, without the crossover appeal of "THRILLER", but a smoother listen (IMHO).


"Off The Wall" is way too fast and funky for most of the kids today. "Invincible" (the only Michael Jackson album I never bought) would be more their speed. They just didn't buy it while he was alive because it was Michael Jackson that made it.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 07/16/09 5:57am

graecophilos

avatar

midnightmover said:

ernestsewell said:



Worldwide sales were as follows:

Off The Wall - 20 million
Thriller - 109 million
Bad - 30 million
Dangerous - 32 million
HIStory - 20 million (40 million units aka 2 disk set)
Blood On The Dance Floor - 6 million
Invincible - 10 million

Dangerous was a lot bigger in the US than Off The Wall as far as publicity and output. The tour, the Black or White video controversy, the Super Bowl, the plethora of videos, the Oprah interview. That was miles above any promotion he did for Off The Wall, or even Thriller. His first solo tour wasn't until 1988's BAD tour. Thriller had 3 videos, plus a making of. Off The Wall had what....3 videos?

Agree. Those later MJ albums were MUCH MORE high profile and sold much more. But dude, Thriller DID NOT sell 109 million. lol


I agree, I disblieve it sold that much. Seemed like a made-up fact for his appereance in the EMAs 2006.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 07/16/09 6:10am

midnightmover

AlexdeParis said:

midnightmover said:

Here is the current UK album chart. OTW, Thriller and Jackson 5 compilations are riding high while the later albums are NOWHERE TO BE SEEN apart from compilations. Read it and weep.

Check it again. You overlooked HIStory, which was #17.

Anyway, I still contend that the UK success of Off the Wall is greatly affected by its previous lackluster (relatively speaking, of course) performance there. That's the same reason I believe "Man in the Mirror" is doing so well there also.

I find it interesting that OTW is doing so well as an album while its songs aren't being bought and spun that much in comparison. Then again, it's easily his most consistent album IMO, so they may have something to do with it. At any rate, I think there are plenty of possible reasons for this that have nothing to do with his looks at the time.

Dude, let's not play silly games. You know History is half a greatest hits album, and that that is why it's in there. Why else would it be outselling Dangerous?

You say MITM is doing well because it did badly before, but surely if everyone has the Bad album already there'd be no need to buy that single since they'd already have that song.

I think we might have found some agreement though when you say that OTW is more consistent than the later albums. I think people see it as more of a must have item, whereas with Bad and Dangerous they'd rather just cherry pick the songs they want instead of buying the whole CD. Dangerous in particular is one hell of a bumpy ride to listen to.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 07/16/09 6:12am

suga10

I think most young kids would like Dangerous.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 07/16/09 6:13am

suga10

RONNYRON said:

AlexdeParis said:

If people are going to buy a compilation, they really should put in a few more bucks and spring for The Essential Michael Jackson.


Is that the one that's missing "I'll Be There" and "Never Can Say Goodbye"?...

Hmmm... it's a good collection, but still a bit incomplete.


I like the Ultimate Collection.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 07/16/09 6:20am

midnightmover

Arnotts said:

Its because just like with Elvis they are focusing on the young hot looking Michael. Another thing I noticed is the media is hyping up the Off The Wall and Thriller album more than the others. Actually they've always done this. A few of my friends brought his albums that they heard were good, and were dissapointed with Off The Wall as I think most young people will be. I encouraged them to get the better albums 'Bad' and 'Dangerous', and as I expected they liked them more. I don't think Off The Wall is hooky enough for the young kids of today.

I have to say I have mixed feelings about OTW (as I do about most MJ albums). I love the innocence of it, and how brilliantly produced it is. It seems to be his most RESPECTED album because it's not trying too hard like the others, but somehow I've never really loved it. I can't quite explain why.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 07/16/09 6:29am

midnightmover

whatsgoingon said:

LightOfArt said:

and apparantly you are too scared to respond to this:



read it and weep lol


But the fact of the matter is albums play a more important part than singles. It is how an artist is critically and commercially assessed. The fact of the matter is MJ older albums are doing better than the latter. Everyone and their mama has Thriller, so there is no reason why that album should still be out-selling Bad and Dangerous now.

Exactly. It's such an obvious point that I was overcome with boredom at just the thought of typing it out. Next thing you know I'll be expected to explain why day is brighter than night.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 07/16/09 6:41am

StillDirrty

I'm 23 so I guess that's still kind of young. I disagree somewhat with some of the sentiments in this post. For my childhood, Remember the Time, Scream (video), Will You Be There (the Free Willy song) were highlights. & I personally feel that Stranger in Moscow and Earth Song are better than Bad, Dangerous, and Invincible combined. There are a few fillers on HIStory so I could see people going for the singles. I didn't like Invincible because I felt it was too urban influenced. It sounded like Michael was trying to remain relevant and wasn't doing the music he was known for. Hardly anyone bought Madonna's Hard Candy and to my knowledge Mariah's E=MC2. It's because no one my age wants to hear that music from them. Let the Britneys of our age do that and keep doing what you do best. Oh and I love Bad and I was surprised to learn that it wasn't well received at the time.& I don't like Dangerous that much as an album but I do like the hits from it. Nothing beats Thriller though!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 07/16/09 6:52am

COMPUTERBLUE19
84

avatar

MJ is/was one of those rare artists in history that spanned across several generations.

My parents fell in love with the old school MJ (1969-1979) since it provided the soundtrack for their childhood/teenage years all the way through until the bitrth of my last brother, who was named after MJ. They remember when MJ and his brothers would come on TV and if one person in the neighborhood had the TV to see MJ on Soul Train, American Bandstand, Dinah Shore, the WHOLE neighborhood would rush to see MJ. Here was this young black kid with vocals of someone 2-3 times his age who could move like James Brown. When my parents moved to NY in the 1970's, MJ was there with the whole disco movement, so MJ was a constant, not only for them, but for millions that watched him grow before their eyes.

I grew up in the era of Thriller and Bad and discovered Off The Wall after the fact. History was OK, Invincible was bloated, and Blood on the Dance Floor was forgettable for the most part. I own the Motown compilations, collaborations, and other MJ odds and ends, but I gravitate towards the younger MJ moreso than the older one because it was all about the music.
"Old man's gotta be the old man. Fish has got to be the fish."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 07/16/09 6:56am

AlexdeParis

avatar

midnightmover said:

AlexdeParis said:


Check it again. You overlooked HIStory, which was #17.

Anyway, I still contend that the UK success of Off the Wall is greatly affected by its previous lackluster (relatively speaking, of course) performance there. That's the same reason I believe "Man in the Mirror" is doing so well there also.

I find it interesting that OTW is doing so well as an album while its songs aren't being bought and spun that much in comparison. Then again, it's easily his most consistent album IMO, so they may have something to do with it. At any rate, I think there are plenty of possible reasons for this that have nothing to do with his looks at the time.

Dude, let's not play silly games. You know History is half a greatest hits album, and that that is why it's in there. Why else would it be outselling Dangerous?

The hits album of HIStory is available separately, so that's obviously not why it's in there.

Anyway, make up your mind. This entire thread has been one silly game from the beginning.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 07/16/09 7:06am

StillDirrty

Oh yeah and some of you are forgetting that the younger generation is all about singles. It's the digital age now. It makes more sense to us to just get a Greatest Hits CD and Thriller.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 07/16/09 8:01am

scatwoman

People often struggle with allowing artists to grow and evolve. For Bob Dylan it was considered sacrilege by many to pick up an electric guitar; for the Beatles, the shift from sentimental love songs to social statements and psychedelia caused them to lose, in some people's minds, their initial charm and mass appeal. For Michael Jackson, the conventional wisdom meant every album post-Thriller that didn't sound or sell like Thriller was considered a failure; this, in spite of the fact that some of his most significant and challenging work came later. Call it the curse of expectational stasis.

Or it could be that people are simply replacing their old vinyl albums with CDs.
His post Bad albums sold more CD copies than vinyl/cassette copies.
"The Pentagon controls every word and image the American people reads or sees in mass media."
Richard Perle 2004, at a press conference in the Pentagon.
doody
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 07/16/09 8:13am

whatsgoingon

avatar

vainandy said:



"Off The Wall" is way too fast and funky for most of the kids today. "Invincible" (the only Michael Jackson album I never bought) would be more their speed. They just didn't buy it while he was alive because it was Michael Jackson that made it.

I wouldn't expect the kids with the rubbish they listen to today would get something as wonderful as OFF The Wall. The less funk and the less soul the more they prefer it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > History seems to prefer black MJ over white MJ