New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Janet Wants Michael's Children ANET JACKSON WANTS MICHAEL'S KIDS
Michael Jackson's sister Janet wants to care for the late pop superstar's three children. Janet Jackson wants custody of Michael Jackson's three children. The late 'Man in the Mirror' star had reportedly discussed his wishes for his kids - Prince Michael I, 12, Paris, 11, and Prince Michael II, seven, known as 'Blanket' - in the event of his death and was even planning to draft a new will to amend custody details. A source said: "There was a lot of rifts in the family, but Janet was the one person he spoke to regularly and he made sure the children kept in touch with her too. "Ultimately, he wanted Janet to look after the children, with help from his mother Katherine, and was planning to draft a new will to reflect those wishes. He trusted Janet implicitly. "When he had health concerns, he had a talk with Janet about how much she meant to him and the children, and how if anything happened to him, he wanted her to make sure the children would be loved and cared for in the same way he was raising them. She told him of course she would." Michael's most recent will, written in 2002, named Katherine as the children's guardian but Janet - who accompanied the children to their family home to retrieve their belongings after the singer's death last month - has the support of her siblings in taking over as primary carer. The source added to Britain's Grazia magazine: "The family think this could be a great idea - they are supportive of Katherine, but although she is in good health, she is nearly 80 and they are worried she is not up to the task. "Janet is blossoming into a woman with tremendous untapped maternal instincts. The children automatically turn to her for comfort and direction." http://www.contactmusic.c...ds_1109685 You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
I would love to see this happen. Not that you can judge something like this from a TV screen but she looks very natural with them and they with her. 2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: ANET JACKSON WANTS MICHAEL'S KIDS
Michael Jackson's sister Janet wants to care for the late pop superstar's three children. Janet Jackson wants custody of Michael Jackson's three children. The late 'Man in the Mirror' star had reportedly discussed his wishes for his kids - Prince Michael I, 12, Paris, 11, and Prince Michael II, seven, known as 'Blanket' - in the event of his death and was even planning to draft a new will to amend custody details. A source said: "There was a lot of rifts in the family, but Janet was the one person he spoke to regularly and he made sure the children kept in touch with her too. "Ultimately, he wanted Janet to look after the children, with help from his mother Katherine, and was planning to draft a new will to reflect those wishes. He trusted Janet implicitly. "When he had health concerns, he had a talk with Janet about how much she meant to him and the children, and how if anything happened to him, he wanted her to make sure the children would be loved and cared for in the same way he was raising them. She told him of course she would." Michael's most recent will, written in 2002, named Katherine as the children's guardian but Janet - who accompanied the children to their family home to retrieve their belongings after the singer's death last month - has the support of her siblings in taking over as primary carer. The source added to Britain's Grazia magazine: "The family think this could be a great idea - they are supportive of Katherine, but although she is in good health, she is nearly 80 and they are worried she is not up to the task. "Janet is blossoming into a woman with tremendous untapped maternal instincts. The children automatically turn to her for comfort and direction." http://www.contactmusic.c...ds_1109685 Ever since Michael's passing,I have always felt that Janet should have the kids. Her,and Michael always seemed to be close. Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. ~Berthold Auerbach | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I would love to see this happen. Not that you can judge something like this from a TV screen but she looks very natural with them and they with her.
I don't see her having kids of her own but Aunt Janet taking over I could see. 12/05/2011 
P*$$y so bad, if u throw it into da air, it would turn into sunshine!!!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I would love to see this happen. Not that you can judge something like this from a TV screen but she looks very natural with them and they with her.
So would I. LaToya...like we can really believe her...  said that there may be another Will surfacing because Michael always updated his Will every 5 years. So there should be one from 2007...if so...I hope Michael realized that Janet would have been a better choice.I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paris seemed close to her. And Michel and her were close, the kids are in good care. GO JANET! YES! I SAID IT!
[You know how long I been on ya? Since Prince was on Apollonia.] R.I.P Michael! Sad, the only time he was in peace, was when he wasn't alive. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HatrinaHaterwitz said: SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: I would love to see this happen. Not that you can judge something like this from a TV screen but she looks very natural with them and they with her.
So would I. LaToya...like we can really believe her... said that there may be another Will surfacing because Michael always updated his Will every 5 years. So there should be one from 2007...if so...I hope Michael realized that Janet would have been a better choice.I guess now the rumors can be put to rest as to whether or not LaCoyta and MJ were the same person  2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) just judgeing by who Paris turned to on stage i'd say Janet should have them. If they had turned to Rebbie I would have said the same thing. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
errant said: Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) Because that's what the FANS want to hear. The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything. |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) what does being married or unmarried have to do with it? I think people keep saying Janet because if they are as comfortable with her as it looks and has been told, she should have a part in raising them. Yeah other siblings have families and are out of the spotlight (which IS a really good case for anyone else getting the kids) but if the kids don't even know their other aunts or uncles why make them stay with them? Even if Janet gets them they'll never be surrounded by as many people or fans as when they went out with their father unless they have no respect for the man and only hunt Janet down to see his kids. PLUS, since she still has the career, she's pretty well off, as far as we know she doesn't spend money like her late brother, so I don't see her exploiting them to gain more. [Edited 7/14/09 14:17pm] 12/05/2011
P*$$y so bad, if u throw it into da air, it would turn into sunshine!!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it's a great idea.I could see Janet being a good mother. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: She's unmarried. She has never had children.
Allegedly | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lazycrockett said: errant said: Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) Because that's what the FANS want to hear. If anything Janet's fans shouldn't be saying it at all. Her career wasn't in the best shape to begin with. Taking in 3 kids will slow things down to a crawl. and not to mention her album subject matter. (that might actually mature tho so...  )[Edited 7/14/09 14:10pm] 12/05/2011
P*$$y so bad, if u throw it into da air, it would turn into sunshine!!! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said: HatrinaHaterwitz said: So would I. LaToya...like we can really believe her... said that there may be another Will surfacing because Michael always updated his Will every 5 years. So there should be one from 2007...if so...I hope Michael realized that Janet would have been a better choice.I guess now the rumors can be put to rest as to whether or not LaCoyta and MJ were the same person Maybe but you know how the internet is...I can see it being said that he just wanted to live out the rest of his days as LaToya so he came up with this elaborate scheme and faked his own death to do just that.  I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
errant said: Why does anyone think Janet should have them?
She is still pretty famous. She has something left of a viable career, at which she attempts to mount comebacks semi-frequently. She's unmarried. She has never had children. Of all the Jackson siblings, many of whom are married and have raised kids, why on earth would anyone think Janet should get them for any other reason than that she's the 2nd most famous of them all? (Which is exactly what those kids DO NOT NEED right now.) I can't speak for everyone else but speaking for myself...I think Janet should have them because it always seemed to me that Janet and Michael were the closest as siblings and as such would have been closer to his children than the rest, which to me was evident at his memorial by the way Michael's children leaned on and clung to her when they needed someone the most. [Edited 7/14/09 14:17pm] I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Give the kids to their biological parents. Rowe carried two of them, but teh 3rd one was picked up at a hospital and brought to Michael Jackson - wtf!
These are not his kids, they are not even biologically Jacksons. What a mess! Yuck! Music Royalty in Motion | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RnBAmbassador said: These are not his kids
he brought each of them up a lot longer than nine months. 
like, sorry mj didn't grow them in his womb | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cinnie said: RnBAmbassador said: These are not his kids
he brought each of them up a lot longer than nine months.
like, sorry mj didn't grow them in his womb MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P مايكل جاكسون للأبد 1958 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RnBAmbassador said: Give the kids to their biological parents. Rowe carried two of them, but teh 3rd one was picked up at a hospital and brought to Michael Jackson - wtf!
These are not his kids, they are not even biologically Jacksons. What a mess! Yuck! So by your "logic". Children of adoptive or foster parents all over the world should just automatically be given to their biological parents if something were to happen to their adoptive or foster parents. That's just brilliant.
... [Edited 7/14/09 14:24pm] I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RnBAmbassador said: Give the kids to their biological parents. Rowe carried two of them, but teh 3rd one was picked up at a hospital and brought to Michael Jackson - wtf!
These are not his kids, they are not even biologically Jacksons. What a mess! Yuck! Debbie Rowe doesn't care about these kids.She accepted millions of dollars to stay OUT of their lives.Surely you aren't suggesting that she be given custody? She sold her own children! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HatrinaHaterwitz said: RnBAmbassador said: Give the kids to their biological parents. Rowe carried two of them, but teh 3rd one was picked up at a hospital and brought to Michael Jackson - wtf!
These are not his kids, they are not even biologically Jacksons. What a mess! Yuck! So by your "logic". Children of adopted or foster parents all over the world should just automatically be given to their biological parents if something were to happen to their adoptive or foster parents. That's just brilliant. Exactly... 
Some people make me wonder MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P مايكل جاكسون للأبد 1958 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
HatrinaHaterwitz said: RnBAmbassador said: Give the kids to their biological parents. Rowe carried two of them, but teh 3rd one was picked up at a hospital and brought to Michael Jackson - wtf!
These are not his kids, they are not even biologically Jacksons. What a mess! Yuck! So by your "logic". Children of adopted or foster parents all over the world should just automatically be given to their biological parents if something were to happen to their adoptive or foster parents. That's just brilliant. And if the biological parents do NOT get the children... "wtf", "what a mess", and "yuck". | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yea, bullshit rumor!
Janet is already back on the set of "Why Did I Get Married Too?" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Someone once said it makes sense if the primary caregiver was someone who grew up in the spotlight. It may be stressful, but they are used to that lifestyle and to live in isolation completely would traumatize them just as much as being out there. Janet can have them, and personally, I have a feeling she is going to retire and not do big albums and tours now. I don't want to lose her like mike, maybe she can just do the movie career with an occasional single here and there for soundtracks, and she won't get as much spotlight as mike would have. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
alphastreet said: Someone once said it makes sense if the primary caregiver was someone who grew up in the spotlight. It may be stressful, but they are used to that lifestyle and to live in isolation completely would traumatize them just as much as being out there. Janet can have them, and personally, I have a feeling she is going to retire and not do big albums and tours now. I don't want to lose her like mike, maybe she can just do the movie career with an occasional single here and there for soundtracks, and she won't get as much spotlight as mike would have.
Too late for that she's back at work  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: alphastreet said: Someone once said it makes sense if the primary caregiver was someone who grew up in the spotlight. It may be stressful, but they are used to that lifestyle and to live in isolation completely would traumatize them just as much as being out there. Janet can have them, and personally, I have a feeling she is going to retire and not do big albums and tours now. I don't want to lose her like mike, maybe she can just do the movie career with an occasional single here and there for soundtracks, and she won't get as much spotlight as mike would have.
Too late for that she's back at work I haven't heard Janet news. What is she back at work doing? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cinnie said: midiscover said: Too late for that she's back at work I haven't heard Janet news. What is she back at work doing? Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married, Pt. 2 She was working on the film when she heard Mike had passed on. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Yea, bullshit rumor!
Janet is already back on the set of "Why Did I Get Married Too?" oh! cool! I love the first one!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cinnie said: midiscover said: Yea, bullshit rumor!
Janet is already back on the set of "Why Did I Get Married Too?" oh! cool! I love the first one! we're so not making out. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |