errant said:

get in line with dudes that only want to be friends.

matthewgrant said:

Yeah because Janet career has always came first. She has pretty much been a mother figure for her nieces and nephews all these years anyway. This opportunity could level Janet out, so she can see it's other things in life that are a lot better than a damn singing career!

Chic35 said:

it might also give her some some other life experience to write/sing about rather than her vagina.

errant said:

errant said:

I love when she sings about her vagina!

midiscover said:

Shit me too, she can sing about that all day long! Honey express yourself...

someone please re-write one of janet's hits to reflect her new role as a mother

The media frenzy surrounding MJ's death is insane now!
Janet's on the front cover of OK! magazine



BULLSHIT! BULLSHIT! BULLSHIT!
[Edited 7/14/09 23:11pm]

Timmy84 said:

theres gonna be a part 2 to that film????


damn, i learn so much from the org

midiscover said:

please it's time people realize that tabs most of the time the right story. i can remember the day MJ died we had a mod and a few others saying that even though TMZ had all ready put it out that he had died they wouldn't call it official until they saw it on CNN. which was about 2 hours later.

i have a feeling this story has legs since now contact music and ok have stated it and what is wrong with that?

ehuffnsd said:

She's in Atlanta right now already back to work
So I'm sure if this story had legs she wouldn't have gone back to the set already! Plus the tabloids don't have access to what Janet wants and what the kids want! It's all rubbish!

midiscover said:

contracts are contracts and j knows that hince returning back to work. movies have to be done or the studios get upset. it's funny with things like telephones, snail mail, ups, fedex, the internet, and other various modern means of communcation families can still keep in contact with each other even when across the country from each other.

like my sister in law and i are fighting via facebook and the telephone. it's amazing what modern technology can do, you may want to check it out...oh wait you're here.

ehuffnsd said:

Ehh all I'm saying is that the media doesn't know what the kids want so it's all rubbish! They're probably just going off what they saw at the memorial

This is what people want! So of course the media is going to milk the shit out of this story! I'm just kind of sad that Janet is caught up in this mess Why not Latoya? She would appreciate it!

midiscover said:

i read what was on ok and one of the sources they quote is Jackie.

i was wondering about this

thanks for the news i hope she gets them

RnBAmbassador said:

Okay, I'm really sick of hearing people say this, because it's bullshit, plain and simple. Nowadays, in our society, there are soo many men (actually more like boys pretending to be men) who just get girls pregnant and then take off; leaving the girl to be both mother and father. What makes these fucktards worthy of being called a 'father'? Because they donated a few ounces of sperm to the cause? Just because some dude donates some sperm doesn't mean he automatically should deserve the title of 'dad'.

From all the reports I've heard and read on these children from several different people, they are well-behaved, polite, and very intelligent, so obviously Michael was doing a damn good job of being a parent. In all the pictures I've seen lately of Prince (the oldest) and young Michael, they do have similar facial features if people who uttered this nonsense bothered to actually use those to things embedded in their face, commonly referred to as 'eyes'. Paris looks like Debbie Rowe, hands down. Blanket shares similar features with his older brother and since I don't know what Blanket's mother looked like, I can't say that he doesn't look like her.

It really pisses me off when people just look at a child and make an uneducated ASSumption about whether their parents are actually biologically related to them. Some people really should pick up a book at their local library or bookstore or take a few classes about genetics before they start talking out of their asses on this subject, but that's just my . Not all kids are going to look like one parent...I've met kids who don't look like either parent, but they look just like an aunt, uncle, cousin, or a grandparent...and when it's a biracial child; dude, there's no way you can say who's biologically the parent without blood testing.

God doesn't always give people children that look just like them, that's why you have people who will say, "He has my nose and that's it"; or, "She has my eyes and nose; and, her father's ears and chin." Genetics is still a mystery to educated scientists, so I know people who haven't taken a single college course in biology or genetics really shouldn't be pretending to have any intelligence on the subject. Until I see a paternity test saying that those aren't biologically his kids, than those are his children because he fed them, clothed them, sheltered them, educated them, and loved them unconditionally. That's what a real father is...that's what a real MAN is and Michael was their daddy. Period, exclamation point.

Last I heard, Debbie Rowe didn't even want custody. She was only considering custody if Joe got the kids and even now she's saying that she may only seek visitation. She was the womb in which Prince and Paris resided in for 9 months and that's about it. Everything I said about what a real father is also applies to women. Surrogates carry babies for 9 months and go through labor. Once the baby is out, they hand the newborn over to the woman who really wants it and usually is the one who paid the surrogate for the rental her womb for the 9 months. Whoever raises that baby is the mother IMO...don't care who carried it because babies can be made in test tubes nowadays and sperm can come in little plastic cups. In the end, who the donors are really isn't all that relevant unless the child needs a kidney or ends up having some unusual hereditary disease.

Oh, and I want Janet to get the kids because she and Michael were always the closest in the family (pictures through the years show that to be true) so I know he would want her to be in their lives. Plus, Janet really doesn't put her private life on display...that's obvious considering that she was married for 11 years and nobody knew anything about it until she got divorced. I think she would benefit from having the kids and like someone else posted, she doesn't need any money because she has her own.

In the latest issue of Us Weekly, they have two pages about all of Michael's sibling.

*Rebbie is still married to her husband and has three kids.

*Jackie is divorced with 2.

*Marlon is still married and has 3 kids and 2 grandchildren and supposedly is stocking shelves because of some bad business deals in Nigeria, Africa.

*Randy was a wife beater and is divorced with 3 kids and supposedly earns a living doing odd jobs.

*Tito is also divorced with three sons (the R&B trio '3T').

*LaToya is doing the reality TV thing and she has been the one Jackson who has spoken on pretty much every Michael Jackson special that has aired since his death. LaToya has never seemed stable to me and I really don't think she would be able to handle 3 children, but that's just my opinion.

*Janet may be single, but she's also the one who the kids seem closest to and she's actually got her own cash flow...$150 million net worth according to this magazing. Plus, she reportedly purchased a home for her parents in Las Vegas.

*Jermaine has eight kids, has been on two reality shows ('Gone Country' and 'Big Brother' U.K. ), and has been married 3 times. One of his wives was one of his brother's ex-girlfriends/baby mama...so his kids with her would be half-brothers(half-sisters)/cousins to his brother's kids with this woman; my brain hurts thinking about this because it's pretty gross and only a few steps up from actual inbreeding.

I think either Katherine, Rebbie, or Janet should get the kids because they seem to be the more responsible ones. Honestly, as long as Joe doesn't get them, I'm fine.
[Edited 7/15/09 15:31pm]

ehuffnsd said:

Plus, I'm pretty sure she wants to take her mind off of losing her big brother and since Katherine is on the job and is taking care of soo many of her other grandbabies, she probably told Janet to do what she gotta do. I'm pretty sure that Janet will be front and center helping her mom once her contractual obligations have been completed.

Bullshit.

Now they're making statements for her



And you don't have to read it (read it)
And you don't have to eat it (eat it)
To buy it is to feed it (feed it)
Then why do we keep foolin' ourselves

janet to me seemed like the natural choice from the start of all this mess.

estelle81 said:

omg, did he fall for one of those scam/spam emails asking for a bank account so a Nigerian prince could get his money out of the country?

errant said:

The magazine says that he had planned to open a resort in Nigeria that included a museum that those who saw it described as being a 'slavery theme park'. Poor Marlon.

Well, I believe that Janet can handle the responsibility. She's in her 40's and very financially and emotionally secure. Besides, she and MJ were very close.

Sometimes complete strangers can be more family to someone than those with their actual bloodline.