http://www.tmz.com/2009/0...-in-vitro/

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.

Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.

In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.

We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were.

Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.

We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts.

Why would she even want 2 be involved if it is not MONEY related?

Although this thread again will be deleted, I dont believe Debbie is not the biological mother. Both children look far too much like her

Arnotts said:

So everything related 2 MJ goes under 1 topic?

They dont look like bi-racial kids either
There is more to this

I guess adoption would have been difficult because of the allegations so he thought this was the best course of action.

asg said:

This presumption exists for MJ too due to their marriage, but I've always believed that neither were the bio parents of the oldest two. Considering that both of the older kids were born in Europe, this could get very complicated if she chooses to put up a fuss. Let's just hope she doesn't and the trasition to Katherine goes smoothly.

Biology shouldn't matter here cuz he was their parent...all 3 kids, end of.

That whole report is phony. There was another that said Debbie Rowe wanted no contact w/ the kids. They are just "animals", and she was there to breed for MJ through invitro.

Her lawyer has since said that whole report was phony and the interview never happened.

asg said:

It's known it's not his sperm, but she is the biological mother.

Graycap23 said:

Yes unfortunetly.

I heard Deepak Chopra mention that he thinks the children will be separated because one was from Debbie Rowe, and "two from other sources". And the interviewer on CNN stopped and was like "wait, we thought two of those children were from Debbie Rowe?" and Deepak says "well, point is I think they will be separated unfortunately."
[Edited 6/30/09 8:37am]

With over 10 pages and 320 responses, these stickys are out of control. Who's going to dig through all that just to see if their point or whatever has already been posted? Right now, it's too big of a subject to relegate to a sticky. I don't even read them. 300+ replies? Pffft, please. Not even gonna touch it.

i can't wait until the world sees those kids at the funeral.

ernestsewell said:

might i suggest

http://www.maximum-jackso...iscussion/

meanwhile, mj threads on this PRINCE fan site go to the MJ stickys at the top of this forum.