independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > is Genesis really just Phil Collins with a band?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/02/09 6:11am

Fury

avatar

is Genesis really just Phil Collins with a band?

music


MAMA



IN TOO DEEP


LAND OF CONFUSION (Prince cameo at 3:38 lol )


TONIGHT TONIGHT TONIGHT

[Edited 6/2/09 6:20am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/02/09 8:53am

paligap

avatar

...

lol Well, not at first (although it sure seems like that now)...


Peter Gabriel was their first lead singer, and Phil Collins was their drummer, starting in 1970..

In 1976, when Gabriel left to pursue a solo career, they looked for a number of lead singers...finally Collins came from behind the drums and started doing vocals as well.....






...
" I've got six things on my mind --you're no longer one of them." - Paddy McAloon, Prefab Sprout
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/04/09 4:15am

TonyVanDam

avatar

paligap said:

...

lol Well, not at first (although it sure seems like that now)...


Peter Gabriel was their first lead singer, and Phil Collins was their drummer, starting in 1970..

In 1976, when Gabriel left to pursue a solo career, they looked for a number of lead singers...finally Collins came from behind the drums and started doing vocals as well.....






...


That is just about right.

Under the leadership of Peter Gabriel, Genesis were one of forerunners of the progressive rock movement. But under the leadership of Phil Collins was when Genesis finally were making serious crossover hits.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/04/09 4:17am

japanrocks

never thought i would see a Genesis thread here

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/04/09 6:17am

paligap

avatar

...

BTW one of my Genesis favorites--I love to hear Chester Thompson and Phil Collins slap the hell out of the drums!

Dodo






...
" I've got six things on my mind --you're no longer one of them." - Paddy McAloon, Prefab Sprout
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/04/09 7:42am

Sdldawn

absolutely not, Tony and Mike do some of the songwriting.. they bring that "darker" appeal to the music.. you can see when tho as the years went by and Phil did most of the songwriting it got more "pop" and less dark.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/04/09 8:58am

ernestsewell

Not even close. Phil as a solo artist is much more pop friendly. Genesis has always had a foot deep in the Progressive Rock genre, and it almost seems that songs like "Invisible Touch" or "Tonight, Tonight, Tonight" are the sore thumbs and odd balls of their discography. I can't hear Genesis playing "Sussudio" and being real about it.

It's actually a great example of a singer leaving a group and truly doing something different. Genesis would have never recorded "In The Air Tonight", but Phil alone, writing his own music and doing his own thing...it was perfect for him as an artist. So many lead singers leave their groups, and they basically sound the same. Oh, it might have some other ideas in the album, but in short it's the same. Vince Neil left Motley Crue...still made a rock album; never stood out. Brett Michaels went solo. Still made a rock album; never stood out. Michael Jackson left The Jacksons. Still made a pop/R&B record but did well at it. But Phil leaving Genesis? I dare to say he was bigger than Genesis ever was.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/04/09 9:11am

rocknrolldave

avatar

I have to say, Phil Collins and that singer chap out of Genesis sound DAMN similar nod
This is not an exit
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/04/09 1:30pm

bobzilla77

No.

For the first eight years of their career he was "only" the drummer, though a very good one. Didn't write or sing hardly anything except for the odd track like More Fool Me.

After Peter Gabriel left, Phil became the singer but was not the main writer. Their first few albums with him as singer sounded a lot like the old ones, then after 1980 they started having some mainstream pop hits. But before 1983, they were still nowhere near as mainstream as his solo stuff.

By the time of Invisible Touch and that stuff in the mid-80s, you can hardly tell the difference, even though the other two guys are still writing some songs. I think they decided to sell out collectively. Most fans of the old, progresso Genesis didn't like those albums at all.

Genesis did make an album without Phil in 1998, using a different singer, but that was a total failure. It wasn't progressive enough for the old school fans, nor was it catchy enough to play on the radio.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/04/09 1:39pm

whistle

avatar

that's what they slowly became--the Phil Collins band.
everyone's a fruit & nut case
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > is Genesis really just Phil Collins with a band?