MuthaFunka said: Timmy84 said: Both Dwele and Raheem put me to sleep but Anthony's my dawg! Yeah, Raheem tried too hard with his forced poetry on his 1st CD, that's what threw me off for him and Dwele's singing style is kinda boring. I kind of dug raheem's woman but when i saw him doing a track show in charlotte he sounded awful. He was trying to hard. Dwele's first album was decent and his second was nothing special. I liked his collaboration with boney james. Dwele does seem one dimensional. Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bobsteezy said: Timmy84 said: Both Dwele and Raheem put me to sleep but Anthony's my dawg! I'm glad to hear someone co-sign on them. Really, the only Dwele cut I like is "Find a Way", and I really only felt the Switch sample on Raheem's Love Experience. I like that one song Dwele did called "Hold On" but Eric Roberson's version, while not as different, is technically better. But I cannot STAND "Find a Way". OMG, I've tried my best to escape it. To be honest every time I listen to a "neo-soul" song, I'm like " " Much the same reaction I give a fake hop song, lol. Anthony Hamilton to me don't seem "neo" but unfortunately he's been stagnated by that tag. Plus as Andy said, he can rock it LIVE but studio work he's got the same kinda digitized production as every contemporary R&B artist has. He's that dude I can see around just live instruments tearin' it up Otis Redding/Bobby Womack/Al Green style. [Edited 4/25/09 21:30pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: MuthaFunka said: Yeah, Raheem tried too hard with his forced poetry on his 1st CD, that's what threw me off for him and Dwele's singing style is kinda boring. I kind of dug raheem's woman but when i saw him doing a track show in charlotte he sounded awful. He was trying to hard. Dwele's first album was decent and his second was nothing special. I liked his collaboration with boney james. Dwele does seem one dimensional. I actually saw Raheem on Lyric Cafe. He doesn't have no stage presence whatsofuckinever. And all he was doing was yelling at the ladies to do something for him while he moaned, lol. Dwele just stands there and breathes a song rather than sings it. Michael Baisden promotes their music heavily every afternoon on the radio. One reason I don't listen to the radio anymore. [Edited 4/25/09 21:30pm] [Edited 4/25/09 21:31pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: CalhounSq said: I swear every single time this topic comes up I try to understand why folks get irate over the name. New soul, old soul, neo myasshole - I really don't care. I just know that some of the mf's who fall under the banner are artists I dig
Alice Smith - she feels like she falls under this banner at times but is way more broad & crazy talented... Martin Luther - his voice is buttery & NICE, I wanna let it slide up my thigh... & the usual suspects: Me'Shell, Badu, Jill Scott, India (though she's not exciting me lately), Maxwell, where IS D'Angelo, Van Hunt!, Leela James, Chrisette Michelle, Anthony Hamilton, John Legend... Somebody just told me to check out Sy Smith, I gotta do that soon... Calhoun, my girl, you have inspired my new signature. God bless you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: Well, I welcome a sund counter, if you have one? They are by no means carrying on with the 60s/80s traditions of Soul music. "Neo-Soul" is nothing but contemporary R&B ... just a bit better than what you usually get to hear on commercial radio today. But this has little to do with vintage Soul. It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: I disagree. Now, it can be disputed that SOME artists don't strive for that mark, but the heavies in the genre do. How so? Everything is different. From the recording technology to production to marketing to vocal style to music production to promotion. It's a whole different bag. The new artists act like they do it the oldschool way, but that's little more than a marketing scheme. It's pure image, and people fall for it. It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.
- Lammastide | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
phunkdaddy said: MuthaFunka said: Yeah, Raheem tried too hard with his forced poetry on his 1st CD, that's what threw me off for him and Dwele's singing style is kinda boring. I kind of dug raheem's woman but when i saw him doing a track show in charlotte he sounded awful. He was trying to hard. Dwele's first album was decent and his second was nothing special. I liked his collaboration with boney james. Dwele does seem one dimensional. You pretty much nailed my sentiments about Dwele. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: bobsteezy said: I'm glad to hear someone co-sign on them. Really, the only Dwele cut I like is "Find a Way", and I really only felt the Switch sample on Raheem's Love Experience. I like that one song Dwele did called "Hold On" but Eric Roberson's version, while not as different, is technically better. But I cannot STAND "Find a Way". OMG, I've tried my best to escape it. To be honest every time I listen to a "neo-soul" song, I'm like " " Much the same reaction I give a fake hop song, lol. Anthony Hamilton to me don't seem "neo" but unfortunately he's been stagnated by that tag. Plus as Andy said, he can rock it LIVE but studio work he's got the same kinda digitized production as every contemporary R&B artist has. He's that dude I can see around just live instruments tearin' it up Otis Redding/Bobby Womack/Al Green style. [Edited 4/25/09 21:30pm] AH is the closest to a true "Soul Sanga" for the males and Ledisi is it for the females. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
could you people stop speaking in absolutes?
it's not funny anymore [Edited 4/26/09 6:32am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anthony Hamilton >>>>>Dwele & Raheem combined | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yall should also check out Muhsinah 's "day.break 2.0", Georgia Anne Muldrow's "Worthnothings" or "Olesi:fragments of an Earth", and Eric Lau "New Territories"...
3 of my favorite artists right now | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
junebug18 said: Anthony Hamilton >>>>>Dwele & Raheem combined
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: MrSoulpower said: How so? Everything is different. From the recording technology to production to marketing to vocal style to music production to promotion. It's a whole different bag. The new artists act like they do it the oldschool way, but that's little more than a marketing scheme. It's pure image, and people fall for it. Well, of COURSE the technology is gonna be different, it's 40 years later. You want people recording on 8/16 tracks? Not gon' happen. Of course it's happening! There are tons of artists who record analog with as little as four tracks. Daptone Studios in Brooklyn, where Sharon Jones records, is a new Mecca for analog recording. And the tracks are being released on vinyl 45s, just like back in the day. And that's keeping the old ways alive! That and all the other factors that I listed, which you didn't address. What they ARE doing is keeping the soul music ITSELF around. It's not the "HOW" that's important. I agree with you here, they are keeping Soul music around (even though it's very watered down compared to the real thing). But it's not in the "old tradition", as you claimed. That's what I argued against. None of the artists you listed do it the traditonal way. [Edited 4/26/09 9:56am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: AH is the closest to a true "Soul Sanga" for the males and Ledisi is it for the females. You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: AH is the closest to a true "Soul Sanga" for the males and Ledisi is it for the females. You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] Dap Kings baybeeeee...If memory serves my man Kenny "Dope" Gonzales brought her on the scene on his own "Kay-Dee" label | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IAintTheOne said: MrSoulpower said: You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] Dap Kings baybeeeee...If memory serves my man Kenny "Dope" Gonzales brought her on the scene on his own "Kay-Dee" label Actually, no. Keb Darge and Kenny started Kay-Dee after Sharon hit the market. Gabe Roth and Neal Sugarman started Daptone in 2002 and the first release was Dap Dippin' with Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings. Sharon has never released anything on Kay-Dee, but Daptone licensed one Dap-Kings 45 to them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] - Sharon Jones was doing it long before anyone knew of Amy Winehouse? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: IAintTheOne said: Dap Kings baybeeeee...If memory serves my man Kenny "Dope" Gonzales brought her on the scene on his own "Kay-Dee" label Actually, no. Keb Darge and Kenny started Kay-Dee after Sharon hit the market. Gabe Roth and Neal Sugarman started Daptone in 2002 and the first release was Dap Dippin' with Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings. Sharon has never released anything on Kay-Dee, but Daptone licensed one Dap-Kings 45 to them. Well that got straightened out. Kenny talks alot of shit | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mstrustme said: MrSoulpower said: You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] - Sharon Jones was doing it long before anyone knew of Amy Winehouse? Yeah, long before ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: Yeah, long before ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mstrustme said: MrSoulpower said: Yeah, long before ... It was after Mark Ronson teamed her up with the Dap-Kings that she blew up ... The Dap-Kings being the hottest Soul/Funk band in America these days, that really helped her ... these guys are truly keeping the old traditions alive. But of course Amy can't touch Sharon with the Dap-Kings ... which is why it makes me chuckle when I hear about "Neo-Soul" artists keeping the old traditions alive .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: It was after Mark Ronson teamed her up with the Dap-Kings that she blew up ... The Dap-Kings being the hottest Soul/Funk band in America these days, that really helped her ... these guys are truly keeping the old traditions alive. But of course Amy can't touch Sharon with the Dap-Kings ... which is why it makes me chuckle when I hear about "Neo-Soul" artists keeping the old traditions alive .. - You right, you right | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: Well, of COURSE the technology is gonna be different, it's 40 years later. You want people recording on 8/16 tracks? Not gon' happen. Of course it's happening! There are tons of artists who record analog with as little as four tracks. Daptone Studios in Brooklyn, where Sharon Jones records, is a new Mecca for analog recording. And the tracks are being released on vinyl 45s, just like back in the day. And that's keeping the old ways alive! What they ARE doing is keeping the soul music ITSELF around. It's not the "HOW" that's important. I agree with you here, they are keeping Soul music around. But it's not in the "old tradition", as you claimed. That's what I argued against. None of the artists you listed do it the traditonal way. Dude, "tons" ISN'T "A FEW ARTIST"! And it's the TRADITIONAL SOUND, not the HOW. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: AH is the closest to a true "Soul Sanga" for the males and Ledisi is it for the females. You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] And again, that's YOUR opinion. You're entitled to that just as I'm entitled to mine. Fine, you think Sharon is the TRUE Soul Sanga. I'm takin' Ledisi. And you're hung up on "the making of the music" and I'm not. I could care less about how it's done, it's about the finished product not the journey itself. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: MrSoulpower said: You see, once again you ignore an entire movement of artists. Ledisi may be the closest to a true "Soul Sanga", but Sharon Jones is a true "Soul Sanga", and she's been #1 of the oldschool sound for almost ten years now. If you dig a little deeper, you'll find an entire new generation of artists who make music just like in the Stax/Motown/Fame/Atlantic way, so there's not even a need to wonder about which "Neo-Soul" artists are the closest to the sound you speak of. [Edited 4/26/09 8:22am] And again, that's YOUR opinion. You're entitled to that just as I'm entitled to mine. Fine, you think Sharon is the TRUE Soul Sanga. I'm takin' Ledisi. And you're hung up on "the making of the music" and I'm not. I could care less about how it's done, it's about the finished product not the journey itself. I think you're not getting what I'm saying. Your initial point, the way I understood it, is that the "Neo-Soul" artists keep Soul music and its original traditions alive. I argued against that, because I say they don't. They are modern R&B artists who have very little to do with traditional Soul music. You said that to you it doesn't matter how Soul music is created/recorded, but that's all what Soul music is about. That's what makes it Soul music, and it's what sets it apart from the stale and boring R&B sounds that dominate the charts today. Bottom line is, the artists that you listed do not work in the tradition of Soul music, they just act like they do. I could be a snob and call them posers, but I'm not gonna go there. Maybe you haven't figured out the difference because you don't seem to be aware of the traditional Soul music that is still being created today (Sharon Jones just happens to be the most popular artist, because she crossed over to the mainstream). The artists that I listed - and I could list many more - are in fact those who keep the traditions of Soul music alive. Not the Neo-Soul artists, because most of them are sell-outs who are trying to cash in on the little bit of retro-vibe they are trying to put on people. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: MrSoulpower said: Dude, "tons" ISN'T "A FEW ARTIST"! And it's the TRADITIONAL SOUND, not the HOW. It seems like you are avoiding my actual points. You claimed that new Soul artists are not going to record analog, and I said that they already do just that, and it's common practice today. And yes, it is the traditional sound - but the sound and the how go hand in hand. Where do you think the sound is coming from? It's made, and how it is made determines how it sounds in the end. In Soul music, especially traditional Soul music, the how is what matters the most. You can have a great track and great lyrics, but if you record it the wrong way because you don't know how to record it, then you won't get that traditional sound that we are talking about. [Edited 4/26/09 10:15am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: MuthaFunka said: And again, that's YOUR opinion. You're entitled to that just as I'm entitled to mine. Fine, you think Sharon is the TRUE Soul Sanga. I'm takin' Ledisi. And you're hung up on "the making of the music" and I'm not. I could care less about how it's done, it's about the finished product not the journey itself. I think you're not getting what I'm saying. Your initial point, the way I understood it, is that the "Neo-Soul" artists keep Soul music and its original traditions alive. I argued against that, because I say they don't. They are modern R&B artists who have very little to do with traditional Soul music. You said that to you it doesn't matter how Soul music is created/recorded, but that's all what Soul music is about. That's what makes it Soul music, and it's what sets it apart from the stale and boring R&B sounds that dominate the charts today. Bottom line is, the artists that you listed do not work in the tradition of Soul music, they just act like they do. I could be a snob and call them posers, but I'm not gonna go there. Maybe you haven't figured out the difference because you don't seem to be aware of the traditional Soul music that is still being created today (Sharon Jones just happens to be the most popular artist, because she crossed over to the mainstream). The artists that I listed - and I could list many more - are in fact those who keep the traditions of Soul music alive. Not the Neo-Soul artists, because most of them are sell-outs who are trying to cash in on the little bit of retro-vibe they are trying to put on people. No, that's not ALL Soul Music is about. That's your interpretation that it's ONLY about how it's "prepared". For me, it's the sound itself, no matter how it's attained. Every Soul Artist doesn't work like the next person, just like in any other music genre. And what I meant by "tradition" was "the sound itself". Keeping the sound alive. Being the torch-bearers for the next generation. And you don't know how ALL of those artists I listed "work" so you can't say that they DON'T work in the tradition that you see the artists that you listed work in. Also, every genre has its sell-outs that are trying to cash in the genre they're reppin', so Neo Soul isn't the only one that this has happened to. nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher
MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MuthaFunka said: No, that's not ALL Soul Music is about. Okay, let me rephrase: It is one of the most important components of Soul music. You can have a great Soul singer, but if you don't know how to record her/him, you won't have a great Soul song, but you might end up with a pop song with some soulful vocals on top. That's your interpretation that it's ONLY about how it's "prepared". For me, it's the sound itself, no matter how it's attained. Because you are a listener. But for a producer, how to obtain the sound is the most important issue. Every Soul Artist doesn't work like the next person, just like in any other music genre. That's true, but in traditional Soul music, the how of recording often even defined the artist. If you play me an old track, I can tell you with a 90% success rate who produced it, where it was recorded and what label released it. Every label and every producer worked different, but all were very driven to obtain a certain sound. Stax sounds different from Fame from Atlantic from Motown. They all worked different, but they all focused on their sound, no matter who the artist was. That's what makes Soul music so special. And what I meant by "tradition" was "the sound itself". Keeping the sound alive. Being the torch-bearers for the next generation. You continue talking about "the sound", yet you say it doesn't matter how the sound is obtained. You are shooting yourself in the foot here, because from a musician/s/producer's view, you are contradicting yourself.You also fail to define how these artists are "torchebearers". Torchbearers of what? Tradtional Soul? But they don't record traditional Soul!! That's why it is called Neo-Soul in the first place, because it's a new thing. And you don't know how ALL of those artists I listed "work" so you can't say that they DON'T work in the tradition that you see the artists that you listed work in. No, I have not listened to all of them, even though I'm familiar with most of them. And yes, when I hear a track, I can tell you how it's recorded. That's what I do. Also, every genre has its sell-outs that are trying to cash in the genre they're reppin', so Neo Soul isn't the only one that this has happened to. I didn't say that, and that's a different discussion. But those artists recording traditional Soul music today are in it for the music first. The genre is not going to make you rich today. So it takes more enthusiasm and idealism to be willing to record records like that. So no, you won't really find sell-outs among artists who record traditional Soul music, because if there were, they wouldn't record this music in the first place. Because it doesn't sell as much. [Edited 4/26/09 10:30am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Al Green is a good example of how the how matters in recording.
Back in the day, Green was signed to Hi Records from Memphis, and he recorded exclusively at Royal Recording Studios, owned by Willie Mitchell, who also owned Hi. Mitchell produced all of Al's records, and his careful use of mics and the way he sets up in the studio led to a signature sound at Hi Records, which many artists and producers tried to imitate. You can hear any record of that era by Ann Peebles, Syl Johnson, etc .. and you'll know it comes from Hi. When Al decided to try a comeback in secular music a few years ago (he had not recorded a Soul album since the 1970s), he went straight to Willie Mitchell, because he knew he had to have the same sound as back in the day in order to make it right. Willie recorded both of Al's recent albums with the same equipment and in the same studio, which is why the music picks up where Al left it in the 70s. Of course Al could have hired another producer and recorded in the best hi-tech studio in L.A. or N.Y. if he had wanted to, but the records would have never sounded the same ... and they would not have had the same Al Green sound that we all love so much. And that is why the how matters so much in Soul music. [Edited 4/26/09 10:47am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: estelle81 said: I've been digging alot of Neo-Soul artists lately. I just got my Wanya album today and it's awesom and I was jammin out to Algebra and Liv Warfield on Youtube earlier. Any other good neo-soul artists that I should be checking out?
BTW, what category is J*Davey in because I'm lovin the song, "Sloow" but she's not one of those artists that I would consider to be easy to stick in just one category. You did ask question before others went off on a tangent. (It's all Timmy's fault) Frank McComb - "Straight From The Vault"? "Live In Alanta Vol. 2" This was released in 05 but it's a smooth Cd. Checkout some of his other albums, tight. CD Baby and iTunes. Nic Jackson Band - http://www.myspace.com/th...acksonband Ran up on this guy, nice couple of cuts doesn't have a deal yet or made a full Cd yet. Thanks for the recommends. I'm going to have to check them out. Prince Rogers Nelson
Sunrise: June 7, 1958 Sunset: April 21, 2016 ~My Heart Loudly Weeps "My Creativity Is My Life." ~ Prince Life is merely a dress rehearsal for eternity. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |