independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Name some musical genuises
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 04/06/09 10:48am

Timmy84

Geniuses of soul:
Sam Cooke
Marvin Gaye
Donny Hathaway
Stevie Wonder
Maurice White
Booker T. & the MGs
Otis Redding
Gamble & Huff/MFSB
Thom Bell
Curtis Mayfield
Ron Isley
Bobby Womack
Ike & Tina Turner
Al Green
Aretha Franklin
Etta James
Isaac Hayes

Geniuses of funk:
Sly Stone
James Brown
Norman Whitfield/Barrett Strong
George Clinton
The Funk Brothers (yes I put them in the "funk" category and for a good damn reason)
Bennie Worrell
Eddie Hazel
Ernie Isley
Chris Jasper
Betty Davis
Bootsy!
Catfish Collins

Geniuses of pop:
Michael Jackson
The Beatles
Holland-Dozier-Holland
Brian Wilson/The Beach Boys
Berry Gordy/Smokey Robinson
Richard Carpenter (don't let their 1970s conservatism fool you, dude actually brought out the power ballad before there was such a thing)
Phil Spector (in spite of the tragedy in his life)
Carole King/Gerry Goffin
Burt Bacharach/Hal David

Geniuses of rock:
Wynonnie Harris
Little Richard
Chuck Berry
Bo Diddley
Buddy Holly
Larry Williams
Johnny "Guitar" Watson
Jimi Hendrix
Bob Dylan
Neil Young
Jimmy Page/Led Zeppelin
Genesis
Keith, Mick & Brian of The (original) Rolling Stones

Geniuses that defy labels:
Ray Charles (genius of soul, blues, pop, country, rock, jazz, whatever!)
Elton John (I feel he's very versatile so I couldn't just put him in the pop or rock category)
Frank Zappa
Todd Rundgren
Quincy Jones
All them classical dudes (Mozart/Beethoven/Chopin/Tchaikovsky, etc.)
Kris Kristofferson (yeah I agree, he's one of the greatest writers in music period)
Billy Preston (I put him in this category because his music was mixed: it had soul, gospel, rock AND funk and he did do some pop ballads from time to time, lol)
Prince (I had to put him in bold so you guys don't think I forgot him, lol)
Miles Davis
John Coltrane
Robert Johnson
Patrice Rushen
Sarah Vaughn
Ella Fitzgerald
Nat "King" Cole
Kool Moe Dee (the way he flowed was fucking ridiculous)
Melle Mel (there was poetry in his rhymes)
J Dilla
Jam Master Jay (RIP)
Jim Steinman
Freddie Mercury/Queen
Tom Moulton
CHIC (Bernard, Nile & Tony)
James Jamerson (though I put "The Funk Brothers", this guy deserved to be in here)
Benny Benjamin/Uriel Jones/Pistol Allen (the drummers of the funk)
The ORIGINAL Who (Keith, Pete, Roger, John)
Sheila E. (great drummer and percussionist)
B.B. King
Willie Dixon
Howlin' Wolf
Little Walter
Muddy Waters
Louis Jordan

----
That's just off the top of my head now... so don't get mad if I forget your favorite. razz
[Edited 4/6/09 10:52am]
[Edited 4/6/09 11:04am]
[Edited 4/6/09 11:06am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 04/06/09 10:53am

Allnall

Maurice White
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 04/06/09 11:12am

TD3

avatar

daPrettyMan: Thank you for the 60 MIN. link. hug
[Edited 4/6/09 11:15am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 04/06/09 11:25am

LightOfArt

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 04/06/09 11:26am

LightOfArt

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 04/06/09 11:33am

chuckaducci

The word "genius" gets tossed off so cavalierly these days, I'm almost positive that the original meaning has been diluted. And although I agree with Edison's maxim that perhaps genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, most of the musicians in these lists are, in my opinion, are only mentioned because they are simply the established paradigms of their respective genres. Being a paradigm does not automatically qualify you as a genius, however.

now that I'm thinking about it, I'm pretty sure that the study of genius is incomplete and definitely full of controversy. But I think it is safe to say geniuses are a rare occurrence, so the lists of geniuses that contain 10-30 artists dominated by modern musicians in this thread are a bit of a stretch.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 04/06/09 12:44pm

3121

chuckaducci said:

The word "genius" gets tossed off so cavalierly these days, I'm almost positive that the original meaning has been diluted. And although I agree with Edison's maxim that perhaps genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, most of the musicians in these lists are, in my opinion, are only mentioned because they are simply the established paradigms of their respective genres. Being a paradigm does not automatically qualify you as a genius, however.

now that I'm thinking about it, I'm pretty sure that the study of genius is incomplete and definitely full of controversy. But I think it is safe to say geniuses are a rare occurrence, so the lists of geniuses that contain 10-30 artists dominated by modern musicians in this thread are a bit of a stretch.



Agreed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 04/06/09 12:48pm

Graycap23

3121 said:

chuckaducci said:

The word "genius" gets tossed off so cavalierly these days, I'm almost positive that the original meaning has been diluted. And although I agree with Edison's maxim that perhaps genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, most of the musicians in these lists are, in my opinion, are only mentioned because they are simply the established paradigms of their respective genres. Being a paradigm does not automatically qualify you as a genius, however.

now that I'm thinking about it, I'm pretty sure that the study of genius is incomplete and definitely full of controversy. But I think it is safe to say geniuses are a rare occurrence, so the lists of geniuses that contain 10-30 artists dominated by modern musicians in this thread are a bit of a stretch.



Agreed.


That is why my list is so short.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 04/06/09 12:53pm

daPrettyman

avatar

TD3 said:

daPrettyMan: Thank you for the 60 MIN. link. hug
[Edited 4/6/09 11:15am]

No problem.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 04/06/09 1:56pm

Mstrustme

avatar

chuckaducci said:

The word "genius" gets tossed off so cavalierly these days, I'm almost positive that the original meaning has been diluted. And although I agree with Edison's maxim that perhaps genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration, most of the musicians in these lists are, in my opinion, are only mentioned because they are simply the established paradigms of their respective genres. Being a paradigm does not automatically qualify you as a genius, however.

now that I'm thinking about it, I'm pretty sure that the study of genius is incomplete and definitely full of controversy. But I think it is safe to say geniuses are a rare occurrence, so the lists of geniuses that contain 10-30 artists dominated by modern musicians in this thread are a bit of a stretch.


- Love your response; who would you declare a genuis if any at all?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 04/06/09 2:55pm

Brendan

avatar

There are almost 7 billion people on this planet, so any list here is going to be unbelievably miniscule based on our own definition and limitations of time.

Yes, the term has been watered down, in that it has been applied to virtually all 7 billion people at one time or another.

And since we didn’t have recorded music prior to the 20th century, many of the musical “geniuses” -- if we could even agree on the application of such a term -- have been lost to the ravages of time. All we have left from most of human history are the privileged few that had written scores leftover for us to revisit.

But thanks to 20th century recording equipment and cheap access to the art form, we all now get to enjoy far more than even kings or queens could in the past.

The pursuit of course is an impossible tale, but one that I think is wholly worth chasing.

And these lists just add to the pursuit.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 04/06/09 3:49pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Geniuses of soul:
Sam Cooke
Marvin Gaye
Donny Hathaway
Stevie Wonder
Maurice White
Booker T. & the MGs
Otis Redding
Gamble & Huff/MFSB
Thom Bell
Curtis Mayfield
Ron Isley
Bobby Womack
Ike & Tina Turner
Al Green
Aretha Franklin
Etta James
Isaac Hayes

Geniuses of funk:
Sly Stone
James Brown
Norman Whitfield/Barrett Strong
George Clinton
The Funk Brothers (yes I put them in the "funk" category and for a good damn reason)
Bennie Worrell
Eddie Hazel
Ernie Isley
Chris Jasper
Betty Davis
Bootsy!
Catfish Collins

Geniuses of pop:
Michael Jackson
The Beatles
Holland-Dozier-Holland
Brian Wilson/The Beach Boys
Berry Gordy/Smokey Robinson
Richard Carpenter (don't let their 1970s conservatism fool you, dude actually brought out the power ballad before there was such a thing)
Phil Spector (in spite of the tragedy in his life)
Carole King/Gerry Goffin
Burt Bacharach/Hal David

Geniuses of rock:
Wynonnie Harris
Little Richard
Chuck Berry
Bo Diddley
Buddy Holly
Larry Williams
Johnny "Guitar" Watson
Jimi Hendrix
Bob Dylan
Neil Young
Jimmy Page/Led Zeppelin
Genesis
Keith, Mick & Brian of The (original) Rolling Stones

Geniuses that defy labels:
Ray Charles (genius of soul, blues, pop, country, rock, jazz, whatever!)
Elton John (I feel he's very versatile so I couldn't just put him in the pop or rock category)
Frank Zappa
Todd Rundgren
Quincy Jones
All them classical dudes (Mozart/Beethoven/Chopin/Tchaikovsky, etc.)
Kris Kristofferson (yeah I agree, he's one of the greatest writers in music period)
Billy Preston (I put him in this category because his music was mixed: it had soul, gospel, rock AND funk and he did do some pop ballads from time to time, lol)
Prince (I had to put him in bold so you guys don't think I forgot him, lol)
Miles Davis
John Coltrane
Robert Johnson
Patrice Rushen
Sarah Vaughn
Ella Fitzgerald
Nat "King" Cole
Kool Moe Dee (the way he flowed was fucking ridiculous)
Melle Mel (there was poetry in his rhymes)
J Dilla
Jam Master Jay (RIP)
Jim Steinman
Freddie Mercury/Queen
Tom Moulton
CHIC (Bernard, Nile & Tony)
James Jamerson (though I put "The Funk Brothers", this guy deserved to be in here)
Benny Benjamin/Uriel Jones/Pistol Allen (the drummers of the funk)
The ORIGINAL Who (Keith, Pete, Roger, John)
Sheila E. (great drummer and percussionist)
B.B. King
Willie Dixon
Howlin' Wolf
Little Walter
Muddy Waters
Louis Jordan

----
That's just off the top of my head now... so don't get mad if I forget your favorite. razz
[Edited 4/6/09 10:52am]
[Edited 4/6/09 11:04am]
[Edited 4/6/09 11:06am]


That was too much..... lol

Great List dude. biggrin
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 04/06/09 4:11pm

chuckaducci

Brendan said:

There are almost 7 billion people on this planet, so any list here is going to be unbelievably miniscule based on our own definition and limitations of time. Yes, the term has been watered down, in that it has been applied to virtually all 7 billion people at one time or another.


Wha...? If a list of musical genius is miniscule, it's because examples of genius is miniscule. Judging from these lists, geniuses are every where! If you go to the nerd science forum and ask for a math or science genius list, I'm pretty sure it will also be miniscule. There is a difference between Isaac Newton and your published university chemistry professor.

And since we didn’t have recorded music prior to the 20th century, many of the musical “geniuses” -- if we could even agree on the application of such a term -- have been lost to the ravages of time. All we have left from most of human history are the privileged few that had written scores leftover for us to revisit.


That's insane. Composers who left written scores for future generations to admire are not a "privileged few." If you were composing, you left behind scores. There are thousands of composers who left behind hundreds of thousands scores for future generations to admire and listen to. People know who Louis Spohr, Carl Czerny, Hugo Wolf and Scott Joplin (for the most part, a bunch of unsung composers) are because they wrote down their music. They are hardly a privileged few. Did you ever think that perhaps an educated musician doesn't really need the benefits that recording technology provide in order to establish a lasting musical legacy? Maybe all they really need is a pen and a piece of paper!

The pursuit of course is an impossible tale, but one that I think is wholly worth chasing. And these lists just add to the pursuit.


I agree! All I wanted to say was that the term of genius gets bantied about so often in English, it's lost some of it's original lustre.

Because I think actual genius is such a rarity and the topic and study mostly under-researched, misunderstood, Euro-centric and probably racist, I'm not comfortable in rambling off a bunch of musical luminaries that I would assign that appellation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 04/06/09 4:20pm

SenseOfDoubt

huge list already, but since I listen right now to Moondog (his 1956 self titled album on Prestige and the 1969, also self titled, one from the Columbia label) I had to mention him.

and I have to point out Frank Zappa one more time...

cool
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 04/06/09 5:35pm

Brendan

avatar

chuckaducci said:



Wha...? If a list of musical genius is miniscule, it's because examples of genius is miniscule. Judging from these lists, geniuses are every where! If you go to the nerd science forum and ask for a math or science genius list, I'm pretty sure it will also be miniscule. There is a difference between Isaac Newton and your published university chemistry professor.


That‘s all I’m try to communicate. Whether one makes the criteria so rigid that only one genius in a billion rises to that specific level, or 10,000, it’s still minuscule compared to the overall population.

chuckaducci said:



That's insane. Composers who left written scores for future generations to admire are not a "privileged few." If you were composing, you left behind scores. There are thousands of composers who left behind hundreds of thousands scores for future generations to admire and listen to. People know who Louis Spohr, Carl Czerny, Hugo Wolf and Scott Joplin (for the most part, a bunch of unsung composers) are because they wrote down their music. They are hardly a privileged few. Did you ever think that perhaps an educated musician doesn't really need the benefits that recording technology provide in order to establish a lasting musical legacy? Maybe all they really need is a pen and a piece of paper!


I have no disagreement with this.

I don’t think that genius has increased or decreased in time, but access to the art from in both the participant and listener has taken off way beyond the elitism of the past. Miles Davis can pick up a trumpet at a pawn shop for a few bucks and start putting in that 99% perspiration and we are all the benefactors of that hard work -- and, yes, genius.

There’s no disrespect here at all to the giants of the past who’ve shaped the music of today.

The digital camera is also currently making the art of cinema similarly more democratic. But that's no disrespect to Kubrick, Bergman, Wells, Kurosawa, etc.

Which mean we'll probably all have access to a hell of a lot more genius and garbage. But I don't think that the level of genius is changing with time, just the inherent democracy of it. And with more participation, faster evolution.

chuckaducci said:



I agree! All I wanted to say was that the term of genius gets bantied about so often in English, it's lost some of it's original lustre.

Because I think actual genius is such a rarity and the topic and study mostly under-researched, misunderstood, Euro-centric and probably racist, I'm not comfortable in rambling off a bunch of musical luminaries that I would assign that appellation.


Absolutely. It’s damn rare. I don't think any of us are going to decipher just how rare on this thread. wink

I just love the impossible goal of finding the cream of the crop. It inspires me to no end to hear what mostly hard work, talent, and a little bit of good fortune can do when combined.

Can I ever achieve perfection with such a list? Of course not. But there is much treasure in taking the journey.

There are couple names here that I’m not that familiar with that are pressed against other known quantities. That makes me hunt more. That expands my horizons.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 04/06/09 6:24pm

dilwithers

avatar

Thelonious Monk
Cecil Taylor
Anthony Braxton
Sun Ra
Duke Ellington
Larry Graham
Elviin Jones
Charlie Parker
Dilla
Tony Williams
Rakim
John Cage
Madlib
Juan Atkins
Serge Gainsbourg
Charles Mingus
Gil Evans
Milton Nascimento
Caetano Veloso
Hermeto Pascoal
Jose Roberto Bertrami
Teo Macero
Jackie Mittoo
John Coltrane
Rza
Miles Davis
João Donato
Tom Ze
Todd Rundgren
Jaco Pastorius
Canibus
James Jamerson
Nas
Larry Young
Tony Allen
Herbie Hancock
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 04/07/09 2:53am

TyphoonTip

Just throwing this out there.....

I think some people's definition of 'Genius' is perhaps a little too broad. eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 04/07/09 9:01am

dseann

TyphoonTip said:

Just throwing this out there.....

I think some people's definition of 'Genius' is perhaps a little too broad. eek


falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Name some musical genuises