independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > UK Music Fans - RE: Popstars: The Rivals Backlash
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/09/02 12:47pm

MiaBocca

avatar

UK Music Fans - RE: Popstars: The Rivals Backlash

Received this email todya, thought it was quite funny really!

Take a peek at it, I agreed with most of it.

Received this email this morning, I thought it was quite funny - seems like it's circulating fast too!

===
Hello

Please read this short and important message if you love music and live in the UK.

This isn't sales, doesn't cost anything - it's regarding this years Christmas No.1, and the Popstars: The Rivals Bands - One True Voice and Girls Aloud (for those outside the UK, yes they ARE the real names!)

If you agree with the message below, please forward this message to everyone you think loves music too, and post on as many internet bulletin and message boards as you know.

===
OPEN LETTER TO ALL MUSIC FANS IN THE UK
Re: Popstars: The Rivals Bands and the UK Christmas #1
07.12.02
===

Ever since this TV series was announced, the premise of the show was to be which of the two manufactured groups could reach Christmas #1 2002.

Are we, the public, so gullible, that we will let these record and media conglomerates tell us months in advance of any auditions for these bands that one will be #1, and we will be racing out to buy both to do them battle on the charts?

The songs chosen for these bands were decided on months in advance from any final line-up of the bands, as were, presumably, the names of the bands. So basically it didn't matter which identikit young adults joined the band, the groups were already created long before anyone was chosen, all they needed were a few gullible kids with dreams of fame.

The kids in each bands are probably good kids, and are only guilty of wanting what is promoted to them through today’s media: A quick root to money, fame, happiness and ever after.

It’s quite clear the record companies don’t care about the groups or their music; all the details were decided before anyone even joined the bands.

“It’s just harmless pop music” I hear you say. Well think about what they are actually doing here.

The record companies, in league with the TV companies, are creating these groups and performers for one reason only – to make money.

The programme generates TV advertising revenue, the record companies are selling the final end product to the audience of the TV show like some conveyor belt made product.

We all know that these bands have a very short shelf life - Hear’Say are now considered a national joke – imagine how the kids in that band feel, all they wanted was to be famous, and they sure got it didn’t they!

They don’t care about the groups, or if they fail after the first year or two, they can just run off another TV show, get a bunch of starry-eyed kids to audition, and BANG! They got another way to make money from old rope for another 2 years!

The worldwide conglomerate record companies on the other hand have, for far too long now, dictated to the public what to buy.

Methods they have used to increase profits, and viciously kill any artistry involved in the music record making process include:

>>> Merging and take-over madness: To the point where you can count the number of major record companies on one hand.

This has lead to them being able to do whatever they like really with concerns to pricing, quality, releases, and promotion.

With fewer record companies, they now have less competition, and less need for more diverse artists. A lack of competition is never healthy for a market, and the music business is no different.

>>> Dropping artists and not extending their contracts because of minor set-backs and setting of near-impossible expectations.

In a chart system where first week sales are all-important, it isn't surprising that the marketing machines kick into overdrive the weeks running up to and of release. This leads to high first week sales, and a drop off afterwards for all but a few releases.

Record companies still demand longevity in chart sales, but they usually lay the blame with their competitors, artists, their producers and management, never with themselves for creating such a paradoxical system.

Newspapers are full of stories about pop music performers leading up to a single or albums release. This isn't investigative journalism, this is promotion, a mere advertisement dressed as news.

Acts, groups and bands, especially the ones created by record companies to make money and sell merchandise, are dropped from their careers, often with unfinished legal and copyright issues, not to mention financial debt and psychological distress.

>>> Reducing music to a simple commodity or disposable product.

It doesn't matter to the record companies that they legally strangle or drop acts that, with direction and artistic freedom, could be very profitable for them, and produce worthwhile enjoyable music for us.

The quality of music has gone down considerably since the late 1980s, and so has the value of CDs and releases.

Singles are now restricted to a 3 format release, usually 2 CDs and a tape/DVD/12" - CD singles, to be chart eligible, must contain not more than 20 minutes of music, and a limit of 3 individual songs. The average CD single price is £3.99.

Go back 5 or 6 years and we were able to purchase CD singles with 8 or 9 tracks on for 99p each.

CD albums are now being released several times, with so-called "special editions" appearing a few months after the original release, usually with a couple of extra remixes or tracks, most of which are pulled from the CD single releases, which most fans will already have purchased.

If record companies are complaining of dropping sales, they should look at their own practices before blaming occurrences such as internet file downloading and mp3 trading.

By reducing the music the release to a mere commodity, a disposable product comparable to buying a new T-shirt or a magazine, they are squeezing out all artistry, and not giving us a reason to purchase their products, since they don't even value them themselves.


===
===

IN SHORT (TOO LATE!) HERE IS WHAT YOU CAN DO:

- BUY ANY SINGLES AT CHART ELIGIBLE STORES (HMV & VIRGIN) *EXCEPT* THE POPSTARS: THE RIVALS BANDS' SINGLES - One True Voice & Girls Aloud.

- SEND THIS MESSAGE TO ANYONE AND EVERYONE, COPY AND PASTE IT TO AS MANY MESSAGE/BULLETIN BOARDS THAT YOU FREQUENT.

LET'S SHOW THE RECORD COMPANIES THAT WE REQUIRE REAL MUSIC, NOT MANUFACTURED TRASH THAT HAS MORE TO DO WITH REVENUE AND TV VIEWING FIGURES THAN GOOD MUSIC.


The League of Music Lovers.

===
--------------------
I am internet forum artiste, do not be alarmed.
--------------------
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/09/02 1:21pm

AprilMichelle

woot! good point...wish i was in the u.k. 2 help!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/09/02 4:09pm

WildheartXXX

avatar

I agree with what is written the major thing people could've done though is have not tuned in to the show. No ratings means no pop stars. I wonder how many people sat glued to their TV screens watching popstars the rivals whilst talking about the decline of music and how its all gone downhill. People are basically stupid and we, the public, really do get what we deserve. The type of people who will buy pop stars will buy it from a chain store as most of them are blindly led consumers anyway. The same type who complain about CD prices when theres an indie store around corner selling it for £4 cheaper..and they know it! You can't really change that many peoples opinions, a lot of people are simply dumb.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/09/02 4:48pm

dewmass

avatar

No-one would disagree with you here, but we make fuck all difference to this bandwagen. We, speaking generally, appreciate "good" music and "artistry" and will support what we feel to be "real" artists as much as we can.

However, we are not the target audience. Popstars/Boyzone/Blue etc etc etc are for people who have no real interest in music and are happy with pop bubblegum which has little or no merit.

This fight for Xmas Number One is for those people who buy 2/3 records a year. Or for those people who are happy to accept mediocre pop. Pop has become like Cinema, a battle not for artistic merit, but for the Cineplex/Pizza Hut evening out and Record/merchandising dollars.

To be fair, record companies are only meeting the demand from those idiots that are prepared to accept such rubbish. The vast majority of people don't value music, so such a campaign is destined to fail.
-----------------------------------------
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/09/02 4:49pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

What's worse is that One True Voice have ruined one of my favourite songs from the last Bee Gees album.

WANKERS!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/09/02 5:47pm

DreZone

avatar

It's already done!

The UK NEEDS this wake up call.

'dre
Tried many flavours - but sooner or later, always go back to the Purple Kool-aid!

http://facebook.com/thedrezoneofficial
Http://Twitter.com/thedrezone
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/09/02 10:01pm

careydevi

I agree with you dewmass.
Music, at least for now, has become like cinema and not art.





btw,However, those kids who participate in the t.v. shows like American Idol,etc., have a great way of gaining reputation and ppl. listening to their abilities.
What can others do who want to be in the industry but do not want to resort to these lottery games and not get screwed or marketed like airheads by their reocrd companies?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > UK Music Fans - RE: Popstars: The Rivals Backlash