Swa said:

That’s again, because Prince fans still feel that MJ is a threat to prince , that’s the only explanation why prince fans coming into this thread talking crap and nonsense and mentioning the child molestation allegations again, in a time MJ decides to resume his career....anyone can give another explanation why prince fans doing this ? i would be very happy to hear if anyone can give another explanation :roll:

There was a huge prince thread with more than 1000 pages on MJNO and you rarely see a negative comment about prince there ,fans were happy talking about their favorite artist... why? Because the problem is with you prince fans, Jealousy is what i see in your posts, .period.

And why do you feel that mj wants to break prince record by doing the o2 concerts? is prince the only single artist performed there? do you still live in the 80’s ? its really bewildering that no one can control the discussion on this board and keep it positive and the most laughable thing is when you blame Mj fans and calling them crazy and stupid , at least Mj fans never behaved like you, i have been on this board almost 2 years i have never trashed prince, I don't mind if you criticize MJ but do it when Criticism is due , don't criticize when there is really no need to do it, not in every freaking MJ thread.

Youtube posts

Marrk said:

Mark, dude, i think we should move on from this discussion about the allegations, if anyone wants to know what Truly happened in the trial and why Mj was acquitted then they should get the Court Transcript, other than that their sources are lies, fabrications and baseless. Transcripts don't lie, some people just don't want to believe that he was innocent, so the best thing to do is to move on:-D back on topic:

seeingvoices12 said:

no prince fan is "threatened" by a pop artist...if they are, they must not know prince.

reason for the mj slack, cos mj asked/asks for it with his odd and sometimes unacceptable behaviour, even music wise.

anyway, back onto more positive things, just got off the phone with the lovely lady and we decided to go to one of the dates. we know we may not like the show (big real live music lovers) but, as i said earlier, it's a tribute to our child selves....you know, before prince snatched us away into adulthood!

reason for the mj slack, cos mj asked/asks for it with his odd and sometimes unacceptable behaviour, even music wise!

seeingvoices12 said:

no prince fan is "threatened" by a pop artist...if they are, they must not know prince.

reason for the mj slack, cos mj asked/asks for it with his odd and sometimes unacceptable behaviour, even music wise.

anyway, back onto more positive things, just got off the phone with the lovely lady and we decided to go to one of the dates. we know we may not like the show (big real live music lovers) but, as i said earlier, it's a tribute to our child selves....you know, before prince snatched us away into adulthood!

oh and does anyone know if it's in the round?
[Edited 3/5/09 16:01pm]

Serena said:

WetDream said:

You aint decided shit. Tix aren't on sale yet. But don't worry MJ's back catalogue is pretty much bulletproof. Consistantly good albums and songs, Prince is well capable of throwing shit in your ears every so often.


[Edited 3/5/09 16:22pm]

Marrk said:

Maybe it's that we don't like abusers who pay off their victims to keep quiet. Someone with his visibility in the world would've surely spent their last penny, if truly innocent, to clear their name, instead of spending it to buy silence.

purplecam said:

I'm with ya purplecam! There is NO comparison, one guy is a musician/performer while the other hides behind a mask while turning 'his' poor kids into freaks.

Let me remind you that MJ is not just a pop artist, he is a legendary musician who was responisble for alot of things , everyone knows what MJ brought to the table, No one of you will re-write history, everyone knows his achievements, and his achievements do not come from a bubble-gum pop artist, Mj is lot of things.

WetDream said:

and I can understand what you are saying , but why in every MJ thread? and do you think its the right time to Criticize? the thread is not about his personal life..isn't?

Marrk said:

Regarding loving both equally, if you're talking about the old Michael, then yes, I can understand it. But loving the current him, hell no, I can't understand it one bit. What is there to love besides scandal? He sure as hell hasn't done anything of note for a long long time.

If you choose to hide your head in the sand about the truth, then stay in your world of denial and be happy!

majic said:

Gosh, do you really believe that?

Most honorable people would rather die trying to clear their name than be forever known as a pedophile.

Marrk said:

I don't understand this thinking especially in relation to Prince. Looking at Prince as a musician, I don't think anyone who is a true lover of musicianship as an art can be concerned with sales. They've never gone hand in hand. Most love it for the artistry not for it's popularity or the evidence of its acceptance by the masses. This is at least how I feel about Prince. Success is great but at what cost, by whose standards and in relation to what? I think this applies to Prince even more because of his image and lyrical content. As I mentioned, I have no problem with him not being wildly popular or having number one singles every year but that's just me. The only thing that matters is if I appreciate and enjoy what he (or anyone for that matter) is putting out and the quality of their performances.
[Edited 3/5/09 14:58pm]

JackieBlue said:

then why is there a new thread on the prince forum about his music sales every week?

Marrk said:

Dude, come on. When the allegations first came up, I defended him and thought no way could that be true. But I was convinced otherwise after his interviews and payoffs. Just like I thought O.J. couldn't have done what he did either, until the facts came out.

bboy87 said:

bboy you're always right on time.

MyNameIsPiper said:

The point is, Prince IS putting out music and performing, not whether or not someone likes the output. Since MJ hasn't done anything for a bazillion years, then it must be the old stuff that keeps folks around.

If MJ put out new music that I liked, I'd enjoy it. But, yes, you're correct, I do tend to have beef with those who've mistreated children.

Swa said:

Is there some new MJ music we can discuss? It's a little tired to keep discussing Thriller after all these years.

JackieBlue said:

JackieB, all I wanted was a positive thread.....just once


is that asking for too much?


After being a member of the Org for 4 years now, I still don't understand this place sometimes





I was gonna post videos and pictures and errthang!

Marrk said:

No thanks, I did my transcript time during the O.J. trial. So I know how things get twisted from what actually occurs in court and what comes out of lawyers' mouths and the press. That's why I say that MJ's actions and his own words told me all I needed to know.

bboy87 said:

I know and I saw your video contributions either in this one or in the other thread and I silently commended you. I thought we were finally on our way--slowly but on our way but then... well, you know.

Serena said:

translation= " i don't want to read the truth because that will take away my only valid reason for hating mj, deep down i know i hate mj beacuse I'm jealous that my prince never got the attention mj did "

cdcgold said:

mate stop making it worse. you know thats not the case. all that tells me is that you don't like the praise prince had over mj lately. just don't reply if you want it to stop, your asking for more with replies like that.
[Edited 3/5/09 17:16pm]

Michael Jackson was found not guilty

The jury could have done whatever they wanted with Michael Jackson. If he was guilty, he would have been sent to jail, period. They know more about the case than the general public does, and they all decided to go in favor of Michael Jackson. Everyone knows that the media was telling stuff to the public that was a lot different then what was going on in the actual courtroom.

The accuser's family had no credibility. They kept changing their stories. If you're a credible individual, you don't change your story over and over, if Michael supposedly did something to you.