Mong said: I completely agree. His fans are more "wacko" than him.
I'll stop calling him Jacko though. Paedo's a much better name. Well i'm not agreeing with you there. I do dare to question Michael though, something unbearable and incomprehensible for some MJ fans it seems. Same w/ Prince, i'll question that guy too if the need arises, unlike you're average 'fam'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: Mong said: I completely agree. His fans are more "wacko" than him.
I'll stop calling him Jacko though. Paedo's a much better name. Well i'm not agreeing with you there. I do dare to question Michael though, something unbearable and incomprehensible for some MJ fans it seems. Same w/ Prince, i'll question that guy too if the need arises, unlike you're average 'fam'. looks back at thread in Music and More cringes "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ottensen said: GNS said: Acceptance is the first step towards recovery. Oh dear...okay, so mybe it's not meant to be that funny but STILL No worries. It was meant to be funny. And then some. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mong said: I completely agree. His fans are more "wacko" than him.
I'll stop calling him Jacko though. Paedo's a much better name. They're scarier than hardcore Elvis or Mariah fans. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wacko Jacko: Shirley MacLaine and Debra Winger called. They wanted to clarify to a certain someone that "Terms of Endearment" really do exist and it wasn't just a fancy name for a motion picture chick flick cult classic. [Edited 2/23/09 6:34am] This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 It's like every other month or so a train pulls into the Org and they all pile off at this stop. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 It's like every other month or so a train pulls into the Org and they all pile off at this stop. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 I think his detractors are making MJ threads on purpose. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 It's like every other month or so a train pulls into the Org and they all pile off at this stop. Even the hypocrites who thinks they're more sane and better than his fans. Some are obsessed with him and would not admit it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mysterioso said: Wacko Jacko: Shirley MacLaine and Debra Winger called. They wanted to clarify to a certain someone that "Terms of Endearment" really do exist and it wasn't just a fancy name for a motion picture chick flick cult classic.
[Edited 2/23/09 6:34am] [EDIT] i'm above my current thought of you. LOVE HARD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Marrk said: Well i'm not agreeing with you there. I do dare to question Michael though, something unbearable and incomprehensible for some MJ fans it seems. Same w/ Prince, i'll question that guy too if the need arises, unlike you're average 'fam'. looks back at thread in Music and More cringes I actually feel bad for reasonable MJ fans like you & Timmy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: looks back at thread in Music and More cringes Me too. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: bboy87 said: looks back at thread in Music and More cringes I actually feel bad for reasonable MJ fans like you & Timmy. I've never heard any of his unreleased material- nor do I collect his b-sides, news paper clippings, rare footage, rare vocals, every audio video clip- concerts,-- have never been to a concert of his- don't own a video of it- I barely have all of his solo albums... but those who do are called 'reasonable'- and I admire their passion for what makes them happy however when someone calls in with viewpoint from a "humanity" standpoint- it's 'unreasonable'- go figure LOVE HARD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think fans and semi-fans should not call him Jacko. The haters call him whatever they like anyway. jacko still being better than pedophile...
In germany many call him Jacko, but without the prefix "wacko". I doubt most Germans know what Wacko means, and it would not be funny for us to call him Wacko Jacko. Erm, and as a kid I thought Jacko sounds nice actually. I thought it was a nickname given by the people who like him, what did I know? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
angel345 said: JackieBlue said: It's like every other month or so a train pulls into the Org and they all pile off at this stop. Even the hypocrites who thinks they're more sane and better than his fans. Some are obsessed with him and would not admit it. I assume that's aimed at me cause of one my response on the previous page?, yes, i was obsessed with him as a teenager, twenty years later i'm not. Michael has made himself out to be both an idiot and genius at times, with his lifestyle choices. I alongside many others loved him as an artist and performer back in the day. Is it OK for me just to like his older music and performances and laugh at the current crop of nutjobby fans he's cultivated? He's a flawed person, like everyone else, he's not the be all and end all, for a long time i thought he was the best artist ever, simply put, he isn't. Nobody can lay claim to that. Doesn't mean i don't respect alot of his art, cause i do, and i'll defend him still to this day, if i feel it's warranted. But it's not like i know him or anything, he's not family, and a lot of his fans come across like he's more important to them than that. Just plain crazy. Most MJ threads, i'll have my say and get out. That is as much as i'm going to say on this one. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: angel345 said: Even the hypocrites who thinks they're more sane and better than his fans. Some are obsessed with him and would not admit it. I assume that's aimed at me cause of one my response on the previous page?, yes, i was obsessed with him as a teenager, twenty years later i'm not. Michael has made himself out to be both an idiot and genius at times, with his lifestyle choices. I alongside many others loved him as an artist and performer back in the day. Is it OK for me just to like his older music and performances and laugh at the current crop of nutjobby fans he's cultivated? He's a flawed person, like everyone else, he's not the be all and end all, for a long time i thought he was the best artist ever, simply put, he isn't. Nobody can lay claim to that. Doesn't mean i don't respect alot of his art, cause i do, and i'll defend him still to this day, if i feel it's warranted. But it's not like i know him or anything, he's not family, and a lot of his fans come across like he's more important to them than that. Just plain crazy. Most MJ threads, i'll have my say and get out. That is as much as i'm going to say on this one. I would say that could have been directed at someone else, not you, but I don´t know. I didn´t write it. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: Marrk said: I assume that's aimed at me cause of one my response on the previous page?, yes, i was obsessed with him as a teenager, twenty years later i'm not. Michael has made himself out to be both an idiot and genius at times, with his lifestyle choices. I alongside many others loved him as an artist and performer back in the day. Is it OK for me just to like his older music and performances and laugh at the current crop of nutjobby fans he's cultivated? He's a flawed person, like everyone else, he's not the be all and end all, for a long time i thought he was the best artist ever, simply put, he isn't. Nobody can lay claim to that. Doesn't mean i don't respect alot of his art, cause i do, and i'll defend him still to this day, if i feel it's warranted. But it's not like i know him or anything, he's not family, and a lot of his fans come across like he's more important to them than that. Just plain crazy. Most MJ threads, i'll have my say and get out. That is as much as i'm going to say on this one. I would say that could have been directed at someone else, not you, but I don´t know. I didn´t write it. I'm referring to the ones who have nothing better to do than put others down here just to make themselves feel good. You don't knock another blogger for digging one artist more than the other and accuse them for being looney. It goes on over and over. Posting gifs and all sort of silliness, how is that normal. Yes, he's a troubled man and I've even commented on it, myself. I also agree that there's a line to admiration without becoming obsessive for the MJ fans. It doesn't matter what I say, people are entitled to blog their opinions and silliness. I'm done. [Edited 2/23/09 7:51am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
angel345 said: dag said: I would say that could have been directed at someone else, not you, but I don´t know. I didn´t write it. I'm referring to the ones who have nothing better to do than put others down here just to make themselves feel good. It goes on over and over. Posting gifs and all sort of silliness, how is that normal. Yes, he's a flawed man and I've even commented on it, myself. I also agree that there's a line to admiration without becoming obsessive for MJ fans. It doesn't matter what I say, people are entitled to blog their opinions. I'm done. OK. cool. Like i said in an orgnote to someone, it was a lot more fun being a fan of things (Music, TV shows, movies etc) before the internet existed, it's just it's nature that dickheads like to trash everything they don't like. Why bother commenting on things you don't like? i just don't get the mentality. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 why didn't anyone say anthing about all those Debarge threads we had? I'm just sayin.... "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: SoulAlive said: Uh-oh! I think you guys better slow down the amount of MJ threads....
http://prince.org/msg/3/298673 why didn't anyone say anthing about all those Debarge threads we had? I'm just sayin.... They got called out too. There was a thread about the DeBarge threads during one particular day when there were about 5 or 6 in the top threads. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Lynching"? “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: bboy87 said: why didn't anyone say anthing about all those Debarge threads we had? I'm just sayin.... They got called out too. There was a thread about the DeBarge threads during one particular day when there were about 5 or 6 in the top threads. No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. And i know i undermined my previous post, but fuck it, it's worth it! [Edited 2/23/09 8:15am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: JackieBlue said: They got called out too. There was a thread about the DeBarge threads during one particular day when there were about 5 or 6 in the top threads. No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. Yep. They had about two good songs, and El Debarge sang like a whiney schoolgirl. Another case of the org over-hyping mediocrity. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midnightmover said: Marrk said: No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. Yep. They had about two good songs, and El Debarge sang like a whiney schoolgirl. Another case of the org over-hyping mediocrity. For once, it's a pleasure doing business with you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: JackieBlue said: They got called out too. There was a thread about the DeBarge threads during one particular day when there were about 5 or 6 in the top threads. No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. And i know i undermined my previous post, but fuck it, it's worth it! [Edited 2/23/09 8:15am] That's right there were 10 and couldn't understand why some of them couldn't be folded into others. Guess the DeBarge train came to town that day. It felt like an invasion from 1985. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Evvy said: Mysterioso said: Wacko Jacko: Shirley MacLaine and Debra Winger called. They wanted to clarify to a certain someone that "Terms of Endearment" really do exist and it wasn't just a fancy name for a motion picture chick flick cult classic.
[Edited 2/23/09 6:34am] [EDIT] i'm above my current thought of you. Meaning what, exactly? I'm sorry, but could you elaborate for me? This sig is just a fig of your imago-neigh-shun | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Marrk said: No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. And i know i undermined my previous post, but fuck it, it's worth it! [Edited 2/23/09 8:15am] That's right there were 10 and couldn't understand why some of them couldn't be folded into others. Guess the DeBarge train came to town that day. It felt like an invasion from 1985. There was activator....EVERYWHEEEEERE! "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Marrk said: No there were ten on the front page!, The Family, Chico and El. whatever the fuck they're called. I only think i know cause of all those fucking threads! Debarge were wank, don't think i didn't check them out after all that fuss. Shite. And i know i undermined my previous post, but fuck it, it's worth it! [Edited 2/23/09 8:15am] That's right there were 10 and couldn't understand why some of them couldn't be folded into others. Guess the DeBarge train came to town that day. It felt like an invasion from 1985. That was no train, it was a DeLorean. hope they hopped back in with Michael J. Fox. I was embarrassed, imagine someone visiting this site for the first (and last!) time and seeing all that shit. They be like, "WTF!?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marrk said: JackieBlue said: That's right there were 10 and couldn't understand why some of them couldn't be folded into others. Guess the DeBarge train came to town that day. It felt like an invasion from 1985. That was no train, it was a DeLorean. hope they hopped back in with Michael J. Fox. I was embarrassed, imagine someone visiting this site for the first (and last!) time and seeing all that shit. They be like, "WTF!?" Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |