independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > 1988, USA: Who was greater - MJ or George Michael?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 12/23/08 8:31am

alphastreet

yes I agree there are many veteran superstars today and mj is definitely one of the big ones

and I'm one of those mj fans that also looooves Madonna and can admit she's a bigger star than him today. However, I wish he would come back and crush her like in the old days
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 12/23/08 8:47am

speeddemon

LiveToTell86 said:

speeddemon said:

MJ is ranked among the top 20 best selling album artists of the year in the US without realising anything, probably higher on a worldwide level. That's superstar status to me.
Now, if you mean active superstar, I agree with you.But don't spoil the word Superstar to the one who probably is most synonymous with. There have never been any bigger superstar than Michael Jackson and there certainly never will be.
/


Honestly, is album sales the only argument MJ fans can bring in? Yes, he released the 25th anniversary edition of the best selling album of all time and also yet another compilation that features like half of the mentioned album, of course he still sells well. ABBA sold more than MJ in 2008 yet they didn't release anything new since 1982 and no new compilations this year, does it make them huge superstars as of today as well?

I understand that a fan will most likely say that their idol is the best etc, but why ALWAYS pretend MJ is the only superstar and nobody every came close to him? In the 80s he was the biggest superstar but since then Madonna definitely eclipsed his superstar status. The only way MJ gets in the public's mind nowadays is a bad paparazzi pic or rumours about a disease.


And MJ is the biggest superstar overall, so what?
Yes, it's a pity he doesn't release new material, but that doesn't erase his past career. MJ was a biggest superstar than Madonna from 1969 to 2000. And, he still sells more albums than her today. And no, Abba didn't sell more albums than MJ this year.
Just accept the fact that no matter what he does, he'll always be bigger than Madonna in the eyes of the world.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 12/23/08 9:08am

graecophilos

avatar

I think MJ fans just come up with sales and figures. There are people that sold more and who had more influence on culture and music than MJ. The Beatles definitively and some say Elvis.
The Beatles sold more than MJ, had more impact and more and bigger hits. They may not have sold 50 mio of their album (although they come very close to that figure) but the 60s was anothjer period. You have to analyze the cultural and historical context to understand WHY Mj has sold so much. sure, he was big and made great music. But it's a fact in the 80s everyone sold shit loads of records.

Btw, this topic is about GM being bigger than MJ in 1988 in the USA?

And what do some of you consider big? Big means imo having an impact, reaching people's souls and minds...
and I think it's right to ask that. Because certainly MJ became a freak sensationa nd a big joke for many in 1988.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 12/23/08 9:16am

alphastreet

even if mj was kind of a joke in 1988, it's better having mj as a joke in 1988 than 2008

anyways this thread got me listening to some george michael, it's been awhile!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 12/23/08 9:18am

dreamfactory31
3

Hasn't Thriller sold over 100 million copies.? No one has even come close to that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 12/23/08 9:46am

graecophilos

avatar

alphastreet said:

even if mj was kind of a joke in 1988, it's better having mj as a joke in 1988 than 2008

anyways this thread got me listening to some george michael, it's been awhile!


that's great. what are you listenting to???
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 12/23/08 9:46am

graecophilos

avatar

dreamfactory313 said:

Hasn't Thriller sold over 100 million copies.? No one has even come close to that.

noone knows but I sooo doubt this figure. 100 Mio? That's rubbish.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 12/23/08 10:23am

alphastreet

graecophilos said:

alphastreet said:

even if mj was kind of a joke in 1988, it's better having mj as a joke in 1988 than 2008

anyways this thread got me listening to some george michael, it's been awhile!


that's great. what are you listenting to???


I was listening to I Want Your Sex, Freedom 90' and Too Funky. I was singing Wham's Freedom also.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 12/23/08 11:27am

Timmy84

alphastreet said:

graecophilos said:



that's great. what are you listenting to???


I was listening to I Want Your Sex, Freedom 90' and Too Funky. I was singing Wham's Freedom also.


That's similar to what I was listening to from George and more. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 12/23/08 11:58am

alphastreet

Timmy84 said:

alphastreet said:



I was listening to I Want Your Sex, Freedom 90' and Too Funky. I was singing Wham's Freedom also.


That's similar to what I was listening to from George and more. nod


when I was little, I was listening to Wham and Faith though I didn't realize until the 90's that George Michael IS Wham lolll
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 12/23/08 12:06pm

Timmy84

alphastreet said:

Timmy84 said:



That's similar to what I was listening to from George and more. nod


when I was little, I was listening to Wham and Faith though I didn't realize until the 90's that George Michael IS Wham lolll


I kinda noticed in 1990, lol. I listened to "Careless Whisper", the original "Freedom", "I'm Your Man" and "Wake Me Up" and I knew it was George Michael but it sounded different from "Faith", then I looked at MTV and they played old videos and that's when I knew of Wham! And I was like "oh I see why he left!" lol But I loved Wham!'s music though. :p I also knew George had done the duet with Aretha. It was a huge song back then so I couldn't miss it. I don't remember seeing the actual video because I was two and a half but I do remember that my dad taped Aretha videos and the GM duet happened to be one of probably two or three Aretha videos dad taped. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 12/23/08 12:07pm

alphastreet

yeah I was a Wham fan for years and loving Faith from hearing it endlessly but didn't put the two together till later hehe
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 12/23/08 12:11pm

Timmy84

alphastreet said:

yeah I was a Wham fan for years and loving Faith from hearing it endlessly but didn't put the two together till later hehe


But you know the strangest thing when I first knew of MJ I heard of the J5 the same time since Motown music was and is always played and I could actually differentiate. With George, it was the videos. lol Since he emerged during the video era.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 12/23/08 12:13pm

alphastreet

that is interesting for sure. I think around the black or white premiere I heard of jackson 5 and the cartoons, but didn't realize he was in it and thought it was his brothers though I knew he had a family in the business since michael and jermaine were the first 2 jacksons I knew of

I discovered ABC in like 1993 and put it on tape and would constantly play it but didn't realize it was mj until I saw the jacksons american dream movie a few years later and was crazy about him already!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 12/23/08 12:16pm

graecophilos

avatar

Timmy84 said:

alphastreet said:



when I was little, I was listening to Wham and Faith though I didn't realize until the 90's that George Michael IS Wham lolll


I kinda noticed in 1990, lol. I listened to "Careless Whisper", the original "Freedom", "I'm Your Man" and "Wake Me Up" and I knew it was George Michael but it sounded different from "Faith", then I looked at MTV and they played old videos and that's when I knew of Wham! And I was like "oh I see why he left!" lol But I loved Wham!'s music though. :p I also knew George had done the duet with Aretha. It was a huge song back then so I couldn't miss it. I don't remember seeing the actual video because I was two and a half but I do remember that my dad taped Aretha videos and the GM duet happened to be one of probably two or three Aretha videos dad taped. smile


ThT's what I wanted to add as well: The Aretha song was #1 and though it wasn't on Faith it was basically a #1 during hat era. So GM had felt 6 #1s.
Anyway, the only thing that maters is how many people a song affects and if it's gonna stand the test of time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 12/23/08 12:19pm

Timmy84

alphastreet said:

that is interesting for sure. I think around the black or white premiere I heard of jackson 5 and the cartoons, but didn't realize he was in it and thought it was his brothers though I knew he had a family in the business since michael and jermaine were the first 2 jacksons I knew of

I discovered ABC in like 1993 and put it on tape and would constantly play it but didn't realize it was mj until I saw the jacksons american dream movie a few years later and was crazy about him already!


Even stranger, I was five when I knew Michael was in the Jackson 5. I saw it first on "Moonwalker" but it didn't really HIT me until "The Making of Thriller" and John Landis was talking about Michael approaching him and they cut to the Ed Sullivan performance. I think I saw "The Legend Continues" at three or four (I think it was 1988) and saw other footage. It made sense by five. "Ah he's been around for a LONG time, huh!?" lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 12/23/08 12:20pm

Timmy84

graecophilos said:

Timmy84 said:



I kinda noticed in 1990, lol. I listened to "Careless Whisper", the original "Freedom", "I'm Your Man" and "Wake Me Up" and I knew it was George Michael but it sounded different from "Faith", then I looked at MTV and they played old videos and that's when I knew of Wham! And I was like "oh I see why he left!" lol But I loved Wham!'s music though. :p I also knew George had done the duet with Aretha. It was a huge song back then so I couldn't miss it. I don't remember seeing the actual video because I was two and a half but I do remember that my dad taped Aretha videos and the GM duet happened to be one of probably two or three Aretha videos dad taped. smile


ThT's what I wanted to add as well: The Aretha song was #1 and though it wasn't on Faith it was basically a #1 during hat era. So GM had felt 6 #1s.
Anyway, the only thing that maters is how many people a song affects and if it's gonna stand the test of time.


Like "Careless Whisper", "One More Try", "I Knew You Were Waiting..." and stuff like that. "Careless Whisper" will have me be a fan of GM for life tho. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 12/23/08 12:23pm

alphastreet

I'm not a george fan though I think he's very talented, but I will always like him from afar cause careless whisper is one of my first memories ever and timeless. And I have the Faith album too which I like.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 12/23/08 12:25pm

graecophilos

avatar

Timmy84 said:

graecophilos said:



ThT's what I wanted to add as well: The Aretha song was #1 and though it wasn't on Faith it was basically a #1 during hat era. So GM had felt 6 #1s.
Anyway, the only thing that maters is how many people a song affects and if it's gonna stand the test of time.


Like "Careless Whisper", "One More Try", "I Knew You Were Waiting..." and stuff like that. "Careless Whisper" will have me be a fan of GM for life tho. nod


The song that will have me be a fan of GM (and made me a fan) is Fastlove... Man, I loved this in 1996 but i didn't understand a word (couldn't speak English back then) and I didn't know who it was...
And then, 8 years later I got the Older CD and suddenly there was this great song that reminded me of the summer of 96....
That beautiful, gentle voice, the smooth sax...

Would have been too cool if the duet with Stevie Wonder would have been possible!

Timmy84, have you watched the Rock in Rio and the C2C clips on youtube? At the moment I love this George the most. His voice was at its peak during the 1991-1993 period. He looked different with that cropped hair but he was thin and stuff...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 12/24/08 12:52am

speeddemon

graecophilos said:

I think MJ fans just come up with sales and figures. There are people that sold more and who had more influence on culture and music than MJ. The Beatles definitively and some say Elvis.
The Beatles sold more than MJ, had more impact and more and bigger hits. They may not have sold 50 mio of their album (although they come very close to that figure) but the 60s was anothjer period. You have to analyze the cultural and historical context to understand WHY Mj has sold so much. sure, he was big and made great music. But it's a fact in the 80s everyone sold shit loads of records.

Btw, this topic is about GM being bigger than MJ in 1988 in the USA?

And what do some of you consider big? Big means imo having an impact, reaching people's souls and minds...
and I think it's right to ask that. Because certainly MJ became a freak sensationa nd a big joke for many in 1988.


If MJ was a freak, why was he the #1 superstar in the world in 1988? Why his tour attracted 4.5 million people? Why his songs and videos were constantly played on heavy rotation in every formats?

Otherwise, MJ's contribution to culture and music is indeed on par with the Beatles, but it's impossible to know who've been more influential? The Beatles indeed sold more records but today, MJ's influence is more visible on culture. Plus, MJ reached every people of different greed, colors and race, not the Beatles.
At last, if everybody was selling more records in the 80's, why MJ wasn't outsold by the Police, Culture Club or Duran Duran?
MJ revolutionised culture by turning the industry upside down and changing the rules. He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.
/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 12/24/08 3:14am

graecophilos

avatar

speeddemon said:

graecophilos said:

I think MJ fans just come up with sales and figures. There are people that sold more and who had more influence on culture and music than MJ. The Beatles definitively and some say Elvis.
The Beatles sold more than MJ, had more impact and more and bigger hits. They may not have sold 50 mio of their album (although they come very close to that figure) but the 60s was anothjer period. You have to analyze the cultural and historical context to understand WHY Mj has sold so much. sure, he was big and made great music. But it's a fact in the 80s everyone sold shit loads of records.

Btw, this topic is about GM being bigger than MJ in 1988 in the USA?

And what do some of you consider big? Big means imo having an impact, reaching people's souls and minds...
and I think it's right to ask that. Because certainly MJ became a freak sensationa nd a big joke for many in 1988.


If MJ was a freak, why was he the #1 superstar in the world in 1988? Why his tour attracted 4.5 million people? Why his songs and videos were constantly played on heavy rotation in every formats?

Otherwise, MJ's contribution to culture and music is indeed on par with the Beatles, but it's impossible to know who've been more influential? The Beatles indeed sold more records but today, MJ's influence is more visible on culture. Plus, MJ reached every people of different greed, colors and race, not the Beatles.
At last, if everybody was selling more records in the 80's, why MJ wasn't outsold by the Police, Culture Club or Duran Duran?
MJ revolutionised culture by turning the industry upside down and changing the rules. He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.
/


he was considered freak by the general audience. He still had and has a big following. The general consence still was: He's wack.
The Beatles have had and still have more influence. They influenced people since the 60s. It's not visible? Well, the Beatles were pre-MTV, so they did not have the influence MJ had in terms of performing. But MJ never had at any point the influence the Beatles had on the 60s generation.

Still, you gotta consider the circumstances Jackson was in in the 1980s. You only read what you wanted to read, right? I said he was better than others, his music is timeless and stuff that's why he deserved his huge success. Still in the 1980s every one-hit-wonder could earn millions with just one hit song since albums and singles sold like bread. MJ reached more people because of MTV. Without this medium he would not have been as big as he became. Period.

And wtf he didn't have airplay on MTV? Which current songs did he have from 1981 til the end of 1982? What was MTV supposed to play??

But anyway, if it makes you happy that MJ had more influence than anyone else, be happy. personally I'm not listening to only one artist.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 12/24/08 4:21am

speeddemon

he was considered freak by the general audience. He still had and has a big following. The general consence still was: He's wack.


Who are you to know what was going on on the minds of the general public in 1988?
Yes, the media portrayed MJ as a loon and weird person. Still, people flucked on stores and box offices to buy everything related to him. Radios and video networks played him to death. Magazines graced their covers of MJ's photos.
There's a gap between public perceptions and actions and media's intentions.

The Beatles have had and still have more influence. They influenced people since the 60s. It's not visible? Well, the Beatles were pre-MTV, so they did not have the influence MJ had in terms of performing. But MJ never had at any point the influence the Beatles had on the 60s generation.


I never said MJ was more influential than the Beatles, but I didn't see anythin that could make me think the Beatles are more influential than MJ. They predated MJ, so what? Does that make Louis Armstrong more influential than the Beatles?
Which criteria are u using to say their influence on the 60's is greater than MJ's influence on the 80's?


And wtf he didn't have airplay on MTV? Which current songs did he have from 1981 til the end of 1982? What was MTV supposed to play??


Are u stupid? MTV didn't play black videos up until MJ.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 12/24/08 5:50am

graecophilos

avatar

speeddemon said:

he was considered freak by the general audience. He still had and has a big following. The general consence still was: He's wack.


Who are you to know what was going on on the minds of the general public in 1988?
Yes, the media portrayed MJ as a loon and weird person. Still, people flucked on stores and box offices to buy everything related to him. Radios and video networks played him to death. Magazines graced their covers of MJ's photos.
There's a gap between public perceptions and actions and media's intentions.



I never said MJ was more influential than the Beatles, but I didn't see anythin that could make me think the Beatles are more influential than MJ. They predated MJ, so what? Does that make Louis Armstrong more influential than the Beatles?
Which criteria are u using to say their influence on the 60's is greater than MJ's influence on the 80's?


And wtf he didn't have airplay on MTV? Which current songs did he have from 1981 til the end of 1982? What was MTV supposed to play??


Are u stupid? MTV didn't play black videos up until MJ.


Excuse me? That's what you said:

He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.

Probably you don't know much about the Beatles so you don't realize their influence. Musically they were more groundbreaking and innovative than Mr. Jackson. They influenced a lot more musicians than MJ did or will. MJ relates more on images and performances then on music. I'm a big fan by myself and don't see much innovation in his music?

Oh, btw. The people that bought his records were certainly not the ones who gossiped about him. And talking about fucking record sales: More people went to buy George Michael's Faith than BAD. George Michael even sold more singles. He had a bigger following. Again, we're talking about the USA in 1988. One can't deny that.

And I don't wish to talk with Mj loonatics anymore. It's boring to discuss with freaks. As said before, if in your world MJ is the biggest star of all time, go with it. It just bores me to death that his fans are spoiled by MJ's stupid record breaking attitude. I mean,m how fucking crazy is it to list all your awards and sales in your Cd booklet.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 12/24/08 6:21am

alphastreet

Yes mj was the biggest seller ever and outsold george worldwide though definitely not in the states. But it's silly to compare him to u2, sting, culture club etc. and say he's bigger and better just cause of sales. I'm going to play devil's advocate, but Britney outsold so many artists too in the last 10 years and she really sucks in comparison and had mj-like fame as well, though she does not match him in talent at all. Numbers are not relevant anymore.

And I'm not going to lie, though I liked mj as a kid, I preferred so many artists over him like Madonna, Prince, Sade, Phil Collins, Culture Club, etc. and at a young age too. Until I was a preteen, mj was just an entertainer to me who did fun videos, but then I realized there is more to him than that when I actually started buying the albums and discovered more of his music.


[Edited 12/24/08 6:22am]
[Edited 12/24/08 6:23am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 12/24/08 8:03am

speeddemon

He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.


Are u aware that, one upon a time, a channel named MTV, the first 24 hour channel dedicated to music, didn't play any music videos by black artists up until MJ in 1983. That was an argument I used against your argument that MJ had all the media tools in his hand, so he could only succeed. That's stupid! That was pretty much the opposite. He wasn't on a dominant position. Radios stopped favorising R&B on their playlists, MTV played only so called Rock & Roll and music magazines like Rolling Stone barely showed black faces on their covers.
But MJ single handedly changed everything. By becoming the greatest celebrity in the world, he convinced the medias to change their attitudes towards black stars. hence, people like Prince were the first to benefit of that revolution.


Probably you don't know much about the Beatles so you don't realize their influence. Musically they were more groundbreaking and innovative than Mr. Jackson. They influenced a lot more musicians than MJ did or will. MJ relates more on images and performances then on music. I'm a big fan by myself and don't see much innovation in his music?


I probably know more about the Beatles than you, an again you didn't bring any arguments that prove they're more influential than MJ. Yes, they were musically innovative so was MJ, but he also influenced video, stage performance and dance among others.
The Beatles influenced a lot of musicians? Cool, MJ influenced musicians, dancers, rappers, R&B artists, Rock artists,...
Just come with better arguments.

Oh, btw. The people that bought his records were certainly not the ones who gossiped about him.


There still were more people buying his records than for anybody else. If he was seen as a loony, wouldn't they been alienated to buy anything related by him? I think they made a distinction between the talented guy and the image portrayed by the media.

And talking about fucking record sales: More people went to buy George Michael's Faith than BAD. George Michael even sold more singles. He had a bigger following. Again, we're talking about the USA in 1988. One can't deny that.


You're right, so what?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 12/24/08 3:19pm

bboy87

avatar

graecophilos said:

speeddemon said:



If MJ was a freak, why was he the #1 superstar in the world in 1988? Why his tour attracted 4.5 million people? Why his songs and videos were constantly played on heavy rotation in every formats?

Otherwise, MJ's contribution to culture and music is indeed on par with the Beatles, but it's impossible to know who've been more influential? The Beatles indeed sold more records but today, MJ's influence is more visible on culture. Plus, MJ reached every people of different greed, colors and race, not the Beatles.
At last, if everybody was selling more records in the 80's, why MJ wasn't outsold by the Police, Culture Club or Duran Duran?
MJ revolutionised culture by turning the industry upside down and changing the rules. He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.
/


he was considered freak by the general audience. He still had and has a big following. The general consence still was: He's wack.
The Beatles have had and still have more influence. They influenced people since the 60s. It's not visible? Well, the Beatles were pre-MTV, so they did not have the influence MJ had in terms of performing. But MJ never had at any point the influence the Beatles had on the 60s generation.

Still, you gotta consider the circumstances Jackson was in in the 1980s. You only read what you wanted to read, right? I said he was better than others, his music is timeless and stuff that's why he deserved his huge success. Still in the 1980s every one-hit-wonder could earn millions with just one hit song since albums and singles sold like bread. MJ reached more people because of MTV. Without this medium he would not have been as big as he became. Period.

And wtf he didn't have airplay on MTV? Which current songs did he have from 1981 til the end of 1982? What was MTV supposed to play??

But anyway, if it makes you happy that MJ had more influence than anyone else, be happy. personally I'm not listening to only one artist.


[/quote]

I'm looking at several articles from the 1985-1989 period and it seems mixed. Some are saying Bad was a mixed album but by the time the tour came around, it was completely different.

You also have to remember BEFORE Thriller, Off The Wall was a huge success as was the Triumph album and tour. MTV's exposure helped. But what about the success in the UK, who I believe didn't have MTV in 1983?

If anything, he was seen as "bizarre" and a complete mystery









"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 12/24/08 4:32pm

graecophilos

avatar

speeddemon said:

He was a black man who didn't have airplay on MTV who suddenly became the most talked about and visible star on the planet.


Are u aware that, one upon a time, a channel named MTV, the first 24 hour channel dedicated to music, didn't play any music videos by black artists up until MJ in 1983. That was an argument I used against your argument that MJ had all the media tools in his hand, so he could only succeed. That's stupid! That was pretty much the opposite. He wasn't on a dominant position. Radios stopped favorising R&B on their playlists, MTV played only so called Rock & Roll and music magazines like Rolling Stone barely showed black faces on their covers.
But MJ single handedly changed everything. By becoming the greatest celebrity in the world, he convinced the medias to change their attitudes towards black stars. hence, people like Prince were the first to benefit of that revolution.




There still were more people buying his records than for anybody else. If he was seen as a loony, wouldn't they been alienated to buy anything related by him? I think they made a distinction between the talented guy and the image portrayed by the media.

And talking about fucking record sales: More people went to buy George Michael's Faith than BAD. George Michael even sold more singles. He had a bigger following. Again, we're talking about the USA in 1988. One can't deny that.


You're right, so what?


thank you, so the answer in your original posting should have been

YES.

Btw, I'm sure most people would agree with me the Beatles had much bigger influence on MUSIC (not on fucking videos) than MJ. To this day I don't see much innovation in his music. His songs are well crafted, but he and Quincy didn't invent a new sound. Quincy is such a fabolous yet "conservative" producer. Prince was much more innovative in music than Mj ever was. This is another thing MJ implied to his fans: "I am innovative and the best has yet to come".

Guess, what? He said that right before the Invincible release as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 12/24/08 4:33pm

graecophilos

avatar

bboy87 said:

graecophilos said:





I'm looking at several articles from the 1985-1989 period and it seems mixed. Some are saying Bad was a mixed album but by the time the tour came around, it was completely different.

You also have to remember BEFORE Thriller, Off The Wall was a huge success as was the Triumph album and tour. MTV's exposure helped. But what about the success in the UK, who I believe didn't have MTV in 1983?

If anything, he was seen as "bizarre" and a complete mystery











biboy87, you're scans are always welcomed. Did you collect some about George as well???
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 12/24/08 4:45pm

bboy87

avatar

graecophilos said:

bboy87 said:



I'm looking at several articles from the 1985-1989 period and it seems mixed. Some are saying Bad was a mixed album but by the time the tour came around, it was completely different.

You also have to remember BEFORE Thriller, Off The Wall was a huge success as was the Triumph album and tour. MTV's exposure helped. But what about the success in the UK, who I believe didn't have MTV in 1983?

If anything, he was seen as "bizarre" and a complete mystery











biboy87, you're scans are always welcomed. Did you collect some about George as well???

No unfortunately

You know how hard it is to get scans from GeorgeMichaelForums.com lol


I got these from The Michael Jackson Archives. 2 of my friends (the authors who released "For The Record") compiled the whole site
[Edited 12/24/08 16:46pm]
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 12/24/08 10:55pm

trueiopian

IMO- Bad is a bad album, with the exception of 2 songs.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > 1988, USA: Who was greater - MJ or George Michael?