VoicesCarry said: meow85 said: Did I say I was talking about you? Check my numerous other responses about the qualifiers on my question. As far as I can tell, you're not part of the group I was asking about. My statement was addressing the concept of stereotypes in general, not your statements in this thread. As a gay man, yes, I am insulted when I am stereotyped by people who paint in broad strokes. And like I said, I really wish my own experience hadn't lead me to ask this question, but it has. It is a stereotype without a doubt, but it's not an unfounded one. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jthad1129 said: This thread is so stupid. How about all black men like rap or all lesbians like the Indigo Girls. Please grow up. You like what you like.
no, i don't like showtunes Agreed. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Timmy84 said: You too? Every time me and mom be Christmas shopping, I'd be hearing that bullshit they play. I'd be wanting to change it my damn self. About 2002, a local Top 40 radio station in Kelowna was highjacked, and whoever did it programmed nothing but Bob Marley and was never caught. A week full of Marley was a bit much, but whoever was responsible for that is my hero. That's cool. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: meow85 said: Did I say I was talking about you? Check my numerous other responses about the qualifiers on my question. As far as I can tell, you're not part of the group I was asking about. My statement was addressing the concept of stereotypes in general, not your statements in this thread. As a gay man, yes, I am insulted when I am stereotyped by people who paint in broad strokes. Sterotypes are a natural way of seeing the world. Otherwise we'd go crazy from all the information. I don't care at all when Im getting stereotyped. It's funny, and can be easily proved wrong when you interact witha person who looks at you through a streotype. For example: This girl in my class who has been courting me for a little while in a very innocent way found out i was gay. Next class she asked me to go shopping with her for clothes, cuz Im a "fashionista." The gayz are fashionistas, she said. Whe she said that i was wearing my 3yo oversized white T and 8 yo jeans, way way too tight in waist so I had to take one button off. I smelled like turpentine. I said: "Oh my, thank you, but I'm booked for this week. Im shopping with britney spears for her new meltdown era, starting spring 2009" and I started laughing so bad, every body else in class started giggling. My other firend, Kim, was quick to point out that this comment was rude, but I said its okay and i went to explain how I absolutely hate shopping, especially for clothes, as I am clueless about fashion. She was a bit perplexed but she def understood that not all gayz love shopping. [Edited 12/17/08 20:13pm] I'm not mad at you, I'm mad at the dirt. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rushing07 said: VoicesCarry said: My statement was addressing the concept of stereotypes in general, not your statements in this thread. As a gay man, yes, I am insulted when I am stereotyped by people who paint in broad strokes. Sterotypes are a natural way of seeing the world. Otherwise we'd go crazy from all the information. I don't care at all when Im getting stereotyped. It's funny, and can be easily proved wrong when you interact witha person who looks at you through a streotype. For example: This girl in my class who has been courting me for a little while in a very innocent way found out i was gay. Next class she asked me to go shopping with her for clothes, cuz Im a "fashionista." Whe she said that i was wearing my 3yo oversized white T and 8 yo jeans, way way too tight in waist so I had to take one button off. I smelled like turpentine. I said: "Oh my, thank you, but I'm booked for this week. Im shopping with britney spears for her new meltdown era, starting spring 2009" and I started laughing so bad, every body else in class started giggling. My other firend, Kim, was quick to point out that this comment was rude, but I said its okay and i went to explain how I absolutely hate shopping, especially for clothes, as I am clueless about fashion. She was a bit perplexed but she def understood that not all gayz love shopping. Yeah, that works if people are willing to listen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: rushing07 said: Sterotypes are a natural way of seeing the world. Otherwise we'd go crazy from all the information. I don't care at all when Im getting stereotyped. It's funny, and can be easily proved wrong when you interact witha person who looks at you through a streotype. For example: This girl in my class who has been courting me for a little while in a very innocent way found out i was gay. Next class she asked me to go shopping with her for clothes, cuz Im a "fashionista." Whe she said that i was wearing my 3yo oversized white T and 8 yo jeans, way way too tight in waist so I had to take one button off. I smelled like turpentine. I said: "Oh my, thank you, but I'm booked for this week. Im shopping with britney spears for her new meltdown era, starting spring 2009" and I started laughing so bad, every body else in class started giggling. My other firend, Kim, was quick to point out that this comment was rude, but I said its okay and i went to explain how I absolutely hate shopping, especially for clothes, as I am clueless about fashion. She was a bit perplexed but she def understood that not all gayz love shopping. Yeah, that works if people are willing to listen. It's unfortunate it's not though. But I love the way Rushing handled that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: jthad1129 said: This thread is so stupid. How about all black men like rap or all lesbians like the Indigo Girls. Please grow up. You like what you like.
no, i don't like showtunes Agreed. This is not what this thread is about. Re-read the question. I'm not mad at you, I'm mad at the dirt. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rushing07 said: VoicesCarry said: Agreed. This is not what this thread is about. Re-read the question. I was agreeing with the sentiment. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: VoicesCarry said: My statement was addressing the concept of stereotypes in general, not your statements in this thread. As a gay man, yes, I am insulted when I am stereotyped by people who paint in broad strokes. And like I said, I really wish my own experience hadn't lead me to ask this question, but it has. It is a stereotype without a doubt, but it's not an unfounded one. Yo, Meow, can I ask you this? When you asked your gay friends why they like the artists you mention, what did they say? Did they give their reasons as to why they like them? [Edited 12/17/08 20:24pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i love pop divas!!! i have since i was a little boy. my mom says she can't hear Madonna, Britney, Christina, Beyonce, Lady Gaga or whatever pop diva is hot at the moment and not think of me.
everyone else i know that has the pop diva gene says the same thing. it has always been my primary obession when it comes to music. from the time i got my first tapes of Control, Electric Youth, Let It Loose, Like A Prayer to everything i buy or download now if it's a pop diva i'm there. when my ex and i broke up a year and half ago we got mad and hurled Kylie Minogue Tour Programs at each other, how gay is that? cause we both ADORE her and he had just gone to Oz to see her and blah blah blah they were handy and we threw them LOL [Edited 12/17/08 20:27pm] You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I guess it's like saying the same thing about Diana Ross, Dusty Springfield, Aretha Franklin, Bette Midler, Barbra Streisand, Judy Garland and 'em. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: I guess it's like saying the same thing about Diana Ross, Dusty Springfield, Aretha Franklin, Bette Midler, Barbra Streisand, Judy Garland and 'em.
i think Harry Hay's Mother Goddess theory has alot of weight. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: Timmy84 said: I guess it's like saying the same thing about Diana Ross, Dusty Springfield, Aretha Franklin, Bette Midler, Barbra Streisand, Judy Garland and 'em.
i think Harry Hay's Mother Goddess theory has alot of weight. Good point. I guess it comes with the territory, lol. Like if you were gay and you said shit about a pop diva, some will look at you like "what's your problem, she's the greatest!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: ehuffnsd said: i think Harry Hay's Mother Goddess theory has alot of weight. Good point. I guess it comes with the territory, lol. Like if you were gay and you said shit about a pop diva, some will look at you like "what's your problem, she's the greatest!" the premise of Harry's essay was that spirituality and religion exist because gay men and women were free of the responsiblity of child therefore able to focus on things like the unknown. if you look at native cultures alot of shamans are homosexual/transgender and or thirdgender. as we through time devloped our pattern of being spiritual guides we devloped an affection for the Mother Goddessses of our tribes which is represented to day as pop divas. it was a really interesting essay. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't think this topic is homophobic, but it is necessarily objectifying... and folk don't like to be objectified. So we need to recognize upfront there will be fallout.
Here's my contribution: After Stonewall and up through the '70s, dance music became a bit of an aesthetic pillar in the LGBT community, because at that very formative time in our development as a political and cultural bloc, it was the music of the club, one of the few places we could go out, have fun, be ourselves -- even being "flambuoyant" -- without being the proverbial elephants in the room, as VoicesCarry mentioned. It involved itself in carefree fun, abandon and even a certain cheekiness and occasional reflexive hedonism. While this was simply freeing music to most, it was perhaps the music of survival to the LGBT community. That cultural tradition, like most cultural traditions, trickled down generations to remain something key to many of us. And, these days, it just so happens that much of popular club music is easily accessible to young, untested talents like the bubblegum acts like you've mentioned, meow. That young girls share a mutual interest in this style should come as no surprise. Perhaps like no other social group aside from gay men, they too struggle to self-define with respect to sexual expectations, who they are as whole people in relation to their sexuality, and what respect they would eventually command in society. In this respect, this shared music of survival and empowerment, of "becoming the diva," might also be considered the music of adolescence -- and, as Imago suggested, its not uncommon to hear of LGBT people, perhaps especially gay men, undergoing a deferred or prolonged adolescence as we, like burgeoning young women, must protractedly contend with claiming ourselves, our sexualities and our station in life commensurate to societal expectations. Something else, though, about gay men that I think this conversation has overlooked thus far: We are often aesthetes both by default and necessity. When you're in chains, the world of the imagination -- art, music, poetry, literature -- becomes your sanctuary. So the more one would get out and intimately know LGBT people, the more they'll likely see that the world of the arts is extraordinarily explored by us. Common wisdom suggests we are overrepresented in domains like fashion, visual arts and design, culinary arts, literature, theatre, travel and, indeed, music. I say this as more a suspicion than a criticism, meow, but if the gay men you've met leave you with the impression we have some "sameness" in musical taste -- and that said sameness is poised toward dancy, poppy boy bands and divas-in-training -- you are perhaps meeting gay men still overwhelmingly in their deferred adolescence. I don't mean this as a form of cultural cheerleading, but I've met few people as expansive where music, art, etc. is concerned (all things being equal) than older, more self-actualized gay men. [Edited 12/17/08 20:46pm] Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rushing07 said: VoicesCarry said: My statement was addressing the concept of stereotypes in general, not your statements in this thread. As a gay man, yes, I am insulted when I am stereotyped by people who paint in broad strokes. Sterotypes are a natural way of seeing the world. Otherwise we'd go crazy from all the information. I don't care at all when Im getting stereotyped. It's funny, and can be easily proved wrong when you interact witha person who looks at you through a streotype. For example: This girl in my class who has been courting me for a little while in a very innocent way found out i was gay. Next class she asked me to go shopping with her for clothes, cuz Im a "fashionista." The gayz are fashionistas, she said. Whe she said that i was wearing my 3yo oversized white T and 8 yo jeans, way way too tight in waist so I had to take one button off. I smelled like turpentine. I said: "Oh my, thank you, but I'm booked for this week. Im shopping with britney spears for her new meltdown era, starting spring 2009" and I started laughing so bad, every body else in class started giggling. My other firend, Kim, was quick to point out that this comment was rude, but I said its okay and i went to explain how I absolutely hate shopping, especially for clothes, as I am clueless about fashion. She was a bit perplexed but she def understood that not all gayz love shopping. [Edited 12/17/08 20:13pm] That's a great response. My music-loving buddy is similarly clueless about fashion and shopping, so he's also come up with some snappy answers for girls that want to drag him along shopping as a guide. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: Timmy84 said: Good point. I guess it comes with the territory, lol. Like if you were gay and you said shit about a pop diva, some will look at you like "what's your problem, she's the greatest!" the premise of Harry's essay was that spirituality and religion exist because gay men and women were free of the responsiblity of child therefore able to focus on things like the unknown. if you look at native cultures alot of shamans are homosexual/transgender and or thirdgender. as we through time devloped our pattern of being spiritual guides we devloped an affection for the Mother Goddessses of our tribes which is represented to day as pop divas. it was a really interesting essay. I can believe his theory. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: meow85 said: And like I said, I really wish my own experience hadn't lead me to ask this question, but it has. It is a stereotype without a doubt, but it's not an unfounded one. Yo, Meow, can I ask you this? When you asked your gay friends why they like the artists you mention, what did they say? Did they give their reasons as to why they like them? I tried asking both my friends and just casual aquaintances about their taste in music. A lot of the responses were along the lines of, "Cuz Britney's my girl, yo!" That really doesn't answer anything. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: I don't think this topic is homophobic, but it is necessarily objectifying... and folk don't like to be objectified. So we need to recognize upfront there will be fallout.
Here's my contribution: After Stonewall and up through the '70s, dance music became a bit of an aesthetic pillar in the LGBT community, because at that very formative time in our development as a political and cultural bloc, it was the music of the club, one of the few places we could go out, have fun, be ourselves -- even being "flambuoyant" -- without being the proverbial elephants in the room, as VoicesCarry mentioned. It involved itself in carefree fun, abandon and even a certain cheekiness and occasional reflexive hedonism. While this was simply freeing music to most, it was perhaps the music of survival to the LGBT community. That cultural tradition, like most cultural traditions, trickled down generations to remain something key to many of us. And, these days, it just so happens that much of popular club music is easily accessible to young, untested talents like the bubblegum acts like you've mentioned, meow. That young girls share a mutual interest in this style should come as no surprise. Perhaps like no other social group aside from gay men, they too struggle to self-define with respect to sexual expectations, who they are as whole people in relation to their sexuality, and what respect they would eventually command in society. In this respect, this shared music of survival, of becoming the diva, might also be considered the music of adolescence -- and, as Imago suggested, its not uncommon to hear of LGBT people, perhaps especially gay men, undergoing a deferred or prolonged adolescence as we, like burgeoning young women, must protractedly contend with claiming ourselves, our sexualities and our station in life commensurate to societal expectations. Something else, though, about gay men that I think this conversation has overlooked thus far: We are often aesthetes both by default and necessity. When you're in chains, the world of the imagination -- art, music, poetry, literature -- becomes your sanctuary. So the more one would get out and intimately know LGBT people, the more they'll likely see that the world of the arts is extraordinarily explored by us. Common wisdom suggests we are overrepresented in domains like fashion, visual arts and design, culinary arts, literature, theatre, travel and, indeed, music. I say this as more a suspicion than a criticism, meow, but if the gay men you've met leave you with the impression we have some "sameness" in musical taste -- and that said sameness is poised toward dancy, poppy boy bands and divas-in-training -- you are perhaps meeting gay men still overwhelmingly in their deferred adolescence. I don't mean this as a form of cultural cheerleading, but I've met few people as expansive where music, art, etc. is concerned (all things being equal) than older, more self-actualized gay men. [Edited 12/17/08 20:42pm] Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Timmy84 said: Yo, Meow, can I ask you this? When you asked your gay friends why they like the artists you mention, what did they say? Did they give their reasons as to why they like them? I tried asking both my friends and just casual aquaintances about their taste in music. A lot of the responses were along the lines of, "Cuz Britney's my girl, yo!" That really doesn't answer anything. That is to be expected. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Lammastide said: I don't think this topic is homophobic, but it is necessarily objectifying... and folk don't like to be objectified. So we need to recognize upfront there will be fallout.
Here's my contribution: After Stonewall and up through the '70s, dance music became a bit of an aesthetic pillar in the LGBT community, because at that very formative time in our development as a political and cultural bloc, it was the music of the club, one of the few places we could go out, have fun, be ourselves -- even being "flambuoyant" -- without being the proverbial elephants in the room, as VoicesCarry mentioned. It involved itself in carefree fun, abandon and even a certain cheekiness and occasional reflexive hedonism. While this was simply freeing music to most, it was perhaps the music of survival to the LGBT community. That cultural tradition, like most cultural traditions, trickled down generations to remain something key to many of us. And, these days, it just so happens that much of popular club music is easily accessible to young, untested talents like the bubblegum acts like you've mentioned, meow. That young girls share a mutual interest in this style should come as no surprise. Perhaps like no other social group aside from gay men, they too struggle to self-define with respect to sexual expectations, who they are as whole people in relation to their sexuality, and what respect they would eventually command in society. In this respect, this shared music of survival, of becoming the diva, might also be considered the music of adolescence -- and, as Imago suggested, its not uncommon to hear of LGBT people, perhaps especially gay men, undergoing a deferred or prolonged adolescence as we, like burgeoning young women, must protractedly contend with claiming ourselves, our sexualities and our station in life commensurate to societal expectations. Something else, though, about gay men that I think this conversation has overlooked thus far: We are often aesthetes both by default and necessity. When you're in chains, the world of the imagination -- art, music, poetry, literature -- becomes your sanctuary. So the more one would get out and intimately know LGBT people, the more they'll likely see that the world of the arts is extraordinarily explored by us. Common wisdom suggests we are overrepresented in domains like fashion, visual arts and design, culinary arts, literature, theatre, travel and, indeed, music. I say this as more a suspicion than a criticism, meow, but if the gay men you've met leave you with the impression we have some "sameness" in musical taste -- and that said sameness is poised toward dancy, poppy boy bands and divas-in-training -- you are perhaps meeting gay men still overwhelmingly in their deferred adolescence. I don't mean this as a form of cultural cheerleading, but I've met few people as expansive where music, art, etc. is concerned (all things being equal) than older, more self-actualized gay men. [Edited 12/17/08 20:42pm] Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. outside of pornstars there is little adoration i see for male celebrities in the gay community. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Lammastide said: I don't think this topic is homophobic, but it is necessarily objectifying... and folk don't like to be objectified. So we need to recognize upfront there will be fallout.
Here's my contribution: After Stonewall and up through the '70s, dance music became a bit of an aesthetic pillar in the LGBT community, because at that very formative time in our development as a political and cultural bloc, it was the music of the club, one of the few places we could go out, have fun, be ourselves -- even being "flambuoyant" -- without being the proverbial elephants in the room, as VoicesCarry mentioned. It involved itself in carefree fun, abandon and even a certain cheekiness and occasional reflexive hedonism. While this was simply freeing music to most, it was perhaps the music of survival to the LGBT community. That cultural tradition, like most cultural traditions, trickled down generations to remain something key to many of us. And, these days, it just so happens that much of popular club music is easily accessible to young, untested talents like the bubblegum acts like you've mentioned, meow. That young girls share a mutual interest in this style should come as no surprise. Perhaps like no other social group aside from gay men, they too struggle to self-define with respect to sexual expectations, who they are as whole people in relation to their sexuality, and what respect they would eventually command in society. In this respect, this shared music of survival, of becoming the diva, might also be considered the music of adolescence -- and, as Imago suggested, its not uncommon to hear of LGBT people, perhaps especially gay men, undergoing a deferred or prolonged adolescence as we, like burgeoning young women, must protractedly contend with claiming ourselves, our sexualities and our station in life commensurate to societal expectations. Something else, though, about gay men that I think this conversation has overlooked thus far: We are often aesthetes both by default and necessity. When you're in chains, the world of the imagination -- art, music, poetry, literature -- becomes your sanctuary. So the more one would get out and intimately know LGBT people, the more they'll likely see that the world of the arts is extraordinarily explored by us. Common wisdom suggests we are overrepresented in domains like fashion, visual arts and design, culinary arts, literature, theatre, travel and, indeed, music. I say this as more a suspicion than a criticism, meow, but if the gay men you've met leave you with the impression we have some "sameness" in musical taste -- and that said sameness is poised toward dancy, poppy boy bands and divas-in-training -- you are perhaps meeting gay men still overwhelmingly in their deferred adolescence. I don't mean this as a form of cultural cheerleading, but I've met few people as expansive where music, art, etc. is concerned (all things being equal) than older, more self-actualized gay men. [Edited 12/17/08 20:42pm] Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. Boy band music is not a good turn-on anyway. Who would wanna dance their ass to "The Right Stuff" or "I Think I Love You"? Plus many of them act like some pussies. Fuck outta here. "I care about the animals and the planet and the world and love" would be their response on teenybopper magazines. Fuck outta here. [Edited 12/17/08 20:49pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: meow85 said: Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. Boy band music is not a good turn-on anyway. Who would wanna dance their ass to "The Right Stuff" or "I Think I Love You"? yeah because singing along to ROL is soo much better in the heat of the moment... not that i've ever caught myself doing that.... You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
meow85 said: Lammastide said: I don't think this topic is homophobic, but it is necessarily objectifying... and folk don't like to be objectified. So we need to recognize upfront there will be fallout.
Here's my contribution: After Stonewall and up through the '70s, dance music became a bit of an aesthetic pillar in the LGBT community, because at that very formative time in our development as a political and cultural bloc, it was the music of the club, one of the few places we could go out, have fun, be ourselves -- even being "flambuoyant" -- without being the proverbial elephants in the room, as VoicesCarry mentioned. It involved itself in carefree fun, abandon and even a certain cheekiness and occasional reflexive hedonism. While this was simply freeing music to most, it was perhaps the music of survival to the LGBT community. That cultural tradition, like most cultural traditions, trickled down generations to remain something key to many of us. And, these days, it just so happens that much of popular club music is easily accessible to young, untested talents like the bubblegum acts like you've mentioned, meow. That young girls share a mutual interest in this style should come as no surprise. Perhaps like no other social group aside from gay men, they too struggle to self-define with respect to sexual expectations, who they are as whole people in relation to their sexuality, and what respect they would eventually command in society. In this respect, this shared music of survival, of becoming the diva, might also be considered the music of adolescence -- and, as Imago suggested, its not uncommon to hear of LGBT people, perhaps especially gay men, undergoing a deferred or prolonged adolescence as we, like burgeoning young women, must protractedly contend with claiming ourselves, our sexualities and our station in life commensurate to societal expectations. Something else, though, about gay men that I think this conversation has overlooked thus far: We are often aesthetes both by default and necessity. When you're in chains, the world of the imagination -- art, music, poetry, literature -- becomes your sanctuary. So the more one would get out and intimately know LGBT people, the more they'll likely see that the world of the arts is extraordinarily explored by us. Common wisdom suggests we are overrepresented in domains like fashion, visual arts and design, culinary arts, literature, theatre, travel and, indeed, music. I say this as more a suspicion than a criticism, meow, but if the gay men you've met leave you with the impression we have some "sameness" in musical taste -- and that said sameness is poised toward dancy, poppy boy bands and divas-in-training -- you are perhaps meeting gay men still overwhelmingly in their deferred adolescence. I don't mean this as a form of cultural cheerleading, but I've met few people as expansive where music, art, etc. is concerned (all things being equal) than older, more self-actualized gay men. [Edited 12/17/08 20:42pm] Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. That's true. They're not. They are nice to look at from a sort of "straight boy fantasy" angle, but they have no real rapport with most gay men like a burgeoning young female artist or an older, self-honed diva might. Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.” | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: Timmy84 said: Boy band music is not a good turn-on anyway. Who would wanna dance their ass to "The Right Stuff" or "I Think I Love You"? yeah because singing along to ROL is soo much better in the heat of the moment... not that i've ever caught myself doing that.... It's tempting, lol. Just play some Vanity 6, you won't be ashamed to catch yourself in that heat of the moment, lol! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: meow85 said: Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. That's true. They're not. They are nice to look at from a sort of "straight boy fantasy" angle, but they have no real rapport with most gay men like a burgeoning young female artist or an older, self-honed diva might. that's where the harry hay theory comes in. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: ehuffnsd said: yeah because singing along to ROL is soo much better in the heat of the moment... not that i've ever caught myself doing that.... It's tempting, lol. Just play some Vanity 6, you won't be ashamed to catch yourself in that heat of the moment, lol! inaya day had a great cover of that You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: meow85 said: I tried asking both my friends and just casual aquaintances about their taste in music. A lot of the responses were along the lines of, "Cuz Britney's my girl, yo!" That really doesn't answer anything. That is to be expected. Maybe that's what's really behind my objections with the situation. Anyone else I've asked about their taste in music has been able to give a coherent reply. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lammastide said: meow85 said: Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. That's true. They're not. They are nice to look at from a sort of "straight boy fantasy" angle, but they have no real rapport with most gay men like a burgeoning young female artist or an older, self-honed diva might. Teen idols have a carefully crafted image, divas have more emotion and honestly could give a fuck (Aretha, Diana, Bette, etc.). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: meow85 said: Thanks for the thought-out answer. I am referring specifically to younger gay men, so perhaps this "delayed adolescence" theory has a bit of truth to it. Boybands, oddly enough, are not really as much in favour with young gay guys in spite of their sports team-like homoeroticism as young female singers are. outside of pornstars there is little adoration i see for male celebrities in the gay community. That by itself would be one hell of an interesting thing to look into. "A Watcher scoffs at gravity!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |