independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Britney on the cover of Rolling Stone
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 11/26/08 4:20pm

estelle81

avatar

Cinnie said:




What's up with that red string on his wrist? Is he a Kabbalist too? confuse
[Edited 11/26/08 16:21pm]
Prince Rogers Nelson
Sunrise: June 7, 1958
Sunset: April 21, 2016
~My Heart Loudly Weeps

"My Creativity Is My Life." ~ Prince

Life is merely a dress rehearsal for eternity.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 11/26/08 5:56pm

purplesweat

overall, she's looking so fresh and great as of late, but there's something different about her face and i don't know what it is.

and i don't think its just the "expressions" because i kept noticing the very same thing on all of her recent shoots. anyone?


I see it too, I think she's holding back more. I don't think she's as confident as she once was. As well as aging etc etc
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 11/26/08 5:57pm

purplesweat

estelle81 said:

She looks good, but it looks like it took 5 minutes to take the picture. They could have come up with something a little more creative than that. She looks happy, but she looked happy on lots of magazine covers for years and that probably wasn't the case. I just hope that she's getting herself right for the sake of her children and not just to be some stupid pop icon, because they are more important than a comeback at the end of the day.


She sees her kids a lot more nowadays, even picks them up from pre school. She recently spent a week in her hometown with them and the rest of her family. So the fact she's allowed to take them out of the state again tells me she's steadily improving.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 11/26/08 6:25pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

purplesweat said:

estelle81 said:

She looks good, but it looks like it took 5 minutes to take the picture. They could have come up with something a little more creative than that. She looks happy, but she looked happy on lots of magazine covers for years and that probably wasn't the case. I just hope that she's getting herself right for the sake of her children and not just to be some stupid pop icon, because they are more important than a comeback at the end of the day.


She sees her kids a lot more nowadays, even picks them up from pre school. She recently spent a week in her hometown with them and the rest of her family. So the fact she's allowed to take them out of the state again tells me she's steadily improving.

but jamie or lynne are normally with her when she takes them out of town.

she did turn down Madonna this week. apprently she was going to do the Miami show but she backed out to spend Thanksgiving with her kids.
You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 11/26/08 6:41pm

purplesweat

ehuffnsd said:

purplesweat said:



She sees her kids a lot more nowadays, even picks them up from pre school. She recently spent a week in her hometown with them and the rest of her family. So the fact she's allowed to take them out of the state again tells me she's steadily improving.

but jamie or lynne are normally with her when she takes them out of town.

she did turn down Madonna this week. apprently she was going to do the Miami show but she backed out to spend Thanksgiving with her kids.


Her dad goes with her everywhere she goes.

I think she backed out because she travelled to Germany to perform there on Star Academy. She's there right now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 11/26/08 10:33pm

Vanilli

avatar

Arnotts said:

They should have made the last picture the cover

Co-Sign
It is strange, in some of the pictures, she is starting to show her
age and in others..she looks like it is 1999 all over again.
Does anyone know..has she had any facial surgery done over the years?
MJ Fan 1992-Forever

My Org Family: Cinnie, bboy87, Cinnamon234, AnckSuNamun, lilgish, thekidsgirl, thesexofit, Universaluv, theSpark, littlemissG, ThreadCula, badujunkie, DANGEROUSx, Timmy84, MikeMatronik, DarlingDiana, dag, Nvncible1
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 11/27/08 1:16am

purplesweat

Vanilli said:

Arnotts said:

They should have made the last picture the cover

Co-Sign
It is strange, in some of the pictures, she is starting to show her
age and in others..she looks like it is 1999 all over again.
Does anyone know..has she had any facial surgery done over the years?


There've always been rumours of a nose job. The only other thing was during her crazy era last year, she got collagen in her top lip.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Britney on the cover of Rolling Stone