independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael Jackson-sheik case (UPDATE: MiJac reportedly settles)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 14 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 11/17/08 1:47pm

Timmy84

asg said:

Timmy84 said:

Anyway, I think Michael's too damn trustworthy with people because, well, I think, despite his statements in his Bash-His-Ass documentary that adults "have brought the world down", he trusted "another adult" with a record deal that went bad. Now he's being sued for $7 million by some opportunist. But if you want my opinion, both sides were opportunistic.


i wont call the sheik an opportunist mainly because the money was a loan so he is just asking for his money back nothing wrong with that


Maybe the "opportunist" thing is that he had songs but then again that's probably incorrect to call the sheik one because he did loan him the money and he did do recordings with Michael so he ain't that far off from what he's doing.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 11/17/08 1:47pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

NaughtyKitty said:



mad See the thing that gets me is that--right off the heels of being acquitted in his child molestation trial--the trial he had to go thru because he made bad decisions in his personal life, made the bad decision to get involved with the shady Arviso family, didnt look out for himself, or protect himself---he went right outta that trial as a free man--but dove headfirst right into another bad situation, making yet another stupid choice, not looking out for himself...GRRRR!!! mad

Yeah... it baffles the mind! wink

And LOL @ him protesting the Sheik's calling him an experienced businessman! eek disbelief So Mike dont wanna be known as a shrewd business man anymore? confused

Well, only fans believe he's a great businessman... finally he's setting the record straight!


So basically what Michael is saying is, he is not so much of a businessman after all.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 11/17/08 1:51pm

NaughtyKitty

avatar

Timmy84 said:

I remember how we were all waiting for "I Have This Dream". Then we started arguing about whether or not it would be released. The discussion we had over that song, and the Number Ones project and the Invincible album, is similar to wonder whether or not MJ sold Neverland, and whether or not Michael will work on an album and when he does, WHO he will work with.

Also Michael chooses to stay quiet and private and "invisible" so we don't even know what the hell he's thinking when he DOES do things like this. Despite his deals with Sony and the ATV catalog and what he possibly did with Neverland, he has made bad business deals so maybe that's why he dismiss the sheik's claim that he was "an experienced businessman". Then again, if Michael is saying this, does that discredit him for everything he HAS been credited with business-wise?
Damn. lol


Yep, I would say so. For decades Michael has been thought of as a shrewd businessman as well as brilliant entertainer. So he either was never a shrewd businessman--and had other shrewd people working for him making those brilliant business decisions for him, or he actually was shrewd at one point, but has now lost his shrewdness. confused

Michael Jackson sued by Arab sheikh in UK court


11/17/2008 3:58 PM, AP


The son of an Arab monarch took the King of Pop to court Monday, charging that Michael Jackson took $7 million as an advance on an album and an autobiography that he never produced.

Lawyers for Sheikh Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa say their client paid Jackson expenses as an advance on the book and joint recording project with the sheikh, who is an amateur songwriter. Jackson claims the money was a gift.

Al Khalifa, 33, was due to testify at London's Royal Courts of Justice Wednesday. Jackson's lawyer Robert Englehart said he was seeking permission to have Jackson testify by video link from Los Angeles.

A lawyer for Al Khalifa said the royal first spoke to Jackson, 50, by telephone while the singer was on trial in California following his 2003 arrest on child molestation charges. Attorney Bankim Thanki said that Al Khalifa wanted to work with Jackson on rebuilding his career. Jackson's finances fell apart after his arrest and he was desperately short of cash.

Al Khalifa's first payment, for $35,000, went toward paying the utility bills at Neverland, Jackson's 2,500-acre (1,000 hectare) ranch and miniature amusement park in California, Thanki said. When Jackson was found innocent of the molestation charges in June 2005, Al Khalifa footed $2.2 million in legal bills, the lawyer said.

Al Khalifa said he believed the money would be repaid once Jackson's career recovered from the damaging trial.

"I saw the payment as an investment in Michael's potential," the sheikh in a statement he read out in court. "He said he would pay me back ... through our work together."

Al Khalifa moved Jackson and his entourage to Bahrain almost immediately after the trial, setting up a recording studio for him in Manama, the Gulf state's capital. The sheikh, who is the governor of the Bahrain's Southern Province, supplied Jackson with $500,000 in cash to subsidize his lifestyle and splashed out on a $350,000 European vacation for Jackson and his associates in February of 2006, Thanki said.

"The costs even included the expenses of bringing out Mr. Jackson's hairdresser," he said.

The lawyer said Jackson and the sheikh became close friends and at one time both lived in a palace in Abu Dhabi owned by Al Khalifa's father, Sheikh Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, Bahrain's king. The singer stayed nearly a year in Bahrain as a guest of the son, but the relationship soured when Jackson repudiated a business deal Thanki said they had agreed to.

Jackson's lawyers say the pair never entered a valid agreement and that Al Khalifa's money was given freely.

Thanki acknowledged that Al Khalifa gave some gifts to Jackson but said that most of what the singer received was part of a business deal.

The gifts, he said, "were essentially personal effects — watches, jewelry."

Thanki said the sheik was wealthy but that paying Jackson's bills had taken a big bite out of his finances.

"Some of the payments were staggering by any standards," Thanki said, saying the expenditure "should not be regarded as loose change for my client."

As for Jackson, he still appears to be in difficult financial straits.

Last week he was forced to give up the deed on Neverland, which is named for the mythical land of Peter Pan.

The trial is being held in London because the parties had agreed to take any disputes over their deal to an English court, Al Khalifa's representatives said. The trial is due to wrap up by the end of the month.

http://music.yahoo.com/re...s/61882079
[Edited 11/17/08 13:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 11/17/08 1:52pm

monk76

Timmy84 said:

PatrickS77 said:


Well, only fans believe he's a great businessman... finally he's setting the record straight!


So basically what Michael is saying is, he is not so much of a businessman after all.




I think Michael is a very good businessman but he has unfortunately sometimes amnesia...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 11/17/08 1:52pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Timmy84 said:

asg said:



i wont call the sheik an opportunist mainly because the money was a loan so he is just asking for his money back nothing wrong with that


Maybe the "opportunist" thing is that he had songs but then again that's probably incorrect to call the sheik one because he did loan him the money and he did do recordings with Michael so he ain't that far off from what he's doing.

Well, the "opportunist" thing is that he invited MJ to come to Bahrein to "relax" and now wants money for that.... but still, that doesn't take away MJ's responsibility!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 11/17/08 1:53pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Timmy84 said:

PatrickS77 said:


Well, only fans believe he's a great businessman... finally he's setting the record straight!


So basically what Michael is saying is, he is not so much of a businessman after all.

Exactly... well, I noticed that already in the Avram case back in '02, but fans kept insisting that he's a great businessman!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 11/17/08 1:56pm

PatrickS77

avatar

monk76 said:

Timmy84 said:



So basically what Michael is saying is, he is not so much of a businessman after all.




I think Michael is a very good businessman but he has unfortunately sometimes amnesia...

Well, then he's a "perjurer"! Is that a word?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 11/17/08 1:56pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

Timmy84 said:



So basically what Michael is saying is, he is not so much of a businessman after all.

Exactly... well, I noticed that already in the Avram case back in '02, but fans kept insisting that he's a great businessman!


Damn! I forgot about that case. That wasn't a great deal at all and Michael was forced to pay up. Remember Michael being on the stand. I think that was around the time the nose collapsing stories were reported. Then apparently he didn't answer questions, kept on asking questions, DENIED EVERYTHING he was questioned about when it came to business deals and made faces in front of photographers who were taking pictures.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 11/17/08 1:57pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

monk76 said:





I think Michael is a very good businessman but he has unfortunately sometimes amnesia...

Well, then he's a "perjurer"! Is that a word?


Yeah, you ain't too far from "perjurer" being a word. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 11/17/08 2:04pm

kibbles

PatrickS77 said:

Timmy84 said:



Maybe the "opportunist" thing is that he had songs but then again that's probably incorrect to call the sheik one because he did loan him the money and he did do recordings with Michael so he ain't that far off from what he's doing.

Well, the "opportunist" thing is that he invited MJ to come to Bahrein to "relax" and now wants money for that.... but still, that doesn't take away MJ's responsibility!


exactly. i think this guy was on the take. but now that mj knows this money wasn't a 'gift' or an expression of concern or friendship or whatever, or that he made a mistake in his debilitated state of mind by signing the contract, or whatever, it's time for him to pay up. he made the mistake. he's paying these lawyers to fight a bad case since i don't see him winning this at all. when all is said and done, he's going to be on the hook for close to $10M. he should have settled with the guy; he would have taken $4M, i'm sure. but no, he wants to be stubborn and now he's generated more bad publicity and bad blood.

people who might have gone into business with him are watching this; what do you think they're thinking? but i've said before, i've never put any stock in talk of mj returning to music. he's done.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 11/17/08 2:10pm

monk76

Breaking News: CNN just aired that Uri Geller is helping Michael and giving him the 7 millions plus 5 millions more for a project Uri is working with Michael.
Turn on CNN.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 11/17/08 2:10pm

Timmy84

monk76 said:

Breaking News: CNN just aired that Uri Geller is helping Michael and giving him the 7 millions plus 5 millions more for a project Uri is working with Michael.
Turn on CNN.


disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 11/17/08 2:16pm

kibbles

Timmy84 said:

monk76 said:

Breaking News: CNN just aired that Uri Geller is helping Michael and giving him the 7 millions plus 5 millions more for a project Uri is working with Michael.
Turn on CNN.


disbelief


i hope this isn't true. god, i hope it isn't.

yeah, he's done. he's so over, there needs to be a new word for over. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 11/17/08 2:17pm

monk76

monk76 said:

Breaking News: CNN just aired that Uri Geller is helping Michael and giving him the 7 millions plus 5 millions more for a project Uri is working with Michael.
Turn on CNN.



I´m sorry I just had a bad dream.....it´s not true just a dream.....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 11/17/08 2:18pm

Timmy84

kibbles said:

Timmy84 said:



disbelief


i hope this isn't true. god, i hope it isn't.

yeah, he's done. he's so over, there needs to be a new word for over. neutral


If he REALLY did that, Michael Jackson is one of the most dumbest people of all time. That guy USED him supposedly so why would he agree to do business for him. URI GELLER of all the mothafuckas to... pissed

I have to think this guy was fucked from the time he was born. rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 11/17/08 2:19pm

Timmy84

monk76 said:

monk76 said:

Breaking News: CNN just aired that Uri Geller is helping Michael and giving him the 7 millions plus 5 millions more for a project Uri is working with Michael.
Turn on CNN.



I´m sorry I just had a bad dream.....it´s not true just a dream.....


LMAO!

How was that a bad dream? falloff

Goodness gracious. Well he's still stupid because of this recent rambling. No wonder people think he's over because he doesn't seem to be a rational thinker.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 11/17/08 2:23pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Timmy84 said:



If he REALLY did that, Michael Jackson is one of the most dumbest people of all time. That guy USED him supposedly so why would he agree to do business for him. URI GELLER of all the mothafuckas to... :pissed

Well... whatever happened with Bashir and shit... I still think that Geller truely cared and cares for Michael... even though he was also using him for his own fame, deep down he cared for him! At least that was the feeling I got, when I saw them together in England!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 11/17/08 2:25pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

Timmy84 said:



If he REALLY did that, Michael Jackson is one of the most dumbest people of all time. That guy USED him supposedly so why would he agree to do business for him. URI GELLER of all the mothafuckas to... :pissed

Well... whatever happened with Bashir and shit... I still think that Geller truely cared and cares for Michael... even though he was also using him for his own fame, deep down he cared for him! At least that was the feeling I got, when I saw them together in England!


Images are seen to make you think otherwise than what's really going on. Otherwise it does seem he did care but something went wrong in their relationship and apparently Michael thinks he was used while Geller thought it was a big misunderstanding. Just maybe.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 11/17/08 2:30pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Images are seen to make you think otherwise than what's really going on. Otherwise it does seem he did care but something went wrong in their relationship and apparently Michael thinks he was used while Geller thought it was a big misunderstanding. Just maybe.

Well, yes.. Bashir went wrong! And in all the interviews after I could tell he was sorry about it! I did see Geller at Paddington station, when things got a bit rough around Michael... and I could tell, Geller was terrified and worried and did all he could to keep people back from Michael, to keep him safe... that wasn't an act, and I stood right next to them, as a matter of fact, I almost fell over Michael, as people were pushing from behind!! wink

Of course, maybe he just didn't want to be the one responsible for getting Michael trampled to death! wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 11/17/08 2:33pm

bboy87

avatar

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 11/17/08 2:39pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

Timmy84 said:

Images are seen to make you think otherwise than what's really going on. Otherwise it does seem he did care but something went wrong in their relationship and apparently Michael thinks he was used while Geller thought it was a big misunderstanding. Just maybe.

Well, yes.. Bashir went wrong! And in all the interviews after I could tell he was sorry about it! I did see Geller at Paddington station, when things got a bit rough around Michael... and I could tell, Geller was terrified and worried and did all he could to keep people back from Michael, to keep him safe... that wasn't an act, and I stood right next to them, as a matter of fact, I almost fell over Michael, as people were pushing from behind!! wink

Of course, maybe he just didn't want to be the one responsible for getting Michael trampled to death! wink


Seriously though, can't anyone handle those fans all up in his grill! lol

He needed more than Geller and the bodyguards, where was the guards at? falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 11/17/08 2:44pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Well, they were all around... it was kinda strange! Before I knew it I was right next to Michael and almost tripping over him, when he crouched down! LOL in a way it was fun... he wasn't as terrified as Geller, he's used to it... actually he was a bit laughing! biggrin But when he got nearer to the train some pap was shoving a camera in his face... that's when he got mad... they had to hold him (MJ) back, he was about to punch that pap! eek biggrin And I realize this is totally off-topic... ah, well... at least it was also in London... so there is some connection! razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 11/17/08 2:46pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

Well, they were all around... it was kinda strange! Before I knew it I was right next to Michael and almost tripping over him, when he crouched down! LOL in a way it was fun... he wasn't as terrified as Geller, he's used to it... actually he was a bit laughing! biggrin But when he got nearer to the train some pap was shoving a camera in his face... that's when he got mad... they had to hold him (MJ) back, he was about to punch that pap! eek biggrin And I realize this is totally off-topic... ah, well... at least it was also in London... so there is some connection! razz


falloff I think I remember hearing about that. Didn't he give them the finger? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 11/17/08 2:46pm

monk76

Timmy84 said:

PatrickS77 said:


Well, yes.. Bashir went wrong! And in all the interviews after I could tell he was sorry about it! I did see Geller at Paddington station, when things got a bit rough around Michael... and I could tell, Geller was terrified and worried and did all he could to keep people back from Michael, to keep him safe... that wasn't an act, and I stood right next to them, as a matter of fact, I almost fell over Michael, as people were pushing from behind!! wink

Of course, maybe he just didn't want to be the one responsible for getting Michael trampled to death! wink


Seriously though, can't anyone handle those fans all up in his grill! lol

He needed more than Geller and the bodyguards, where was the guards at? falloff



Don´t underestimate the great mind power of Uri Geller!!!!

"achat - schtajim - schalosch"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 11/17/08 2:48pm

JackieBlue

avatar

I stopped believing Michael was a 'shrewd businessman' a long time ago when his early ventures and ideas never panned out. He may have had some good deals here and there but I don't think he's some exceptional talent. He can have all the great ideas and best intentions in the world but at the end of the day it's the output that people will look out. With his track record MJ is a big no-no but if I were a predator he might be nice target.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 11/17/08 2:49pm

Timmy84

JackieBlue said:

I stopped believing Michael was a 'shrewd businessman' a long time ago when his early ventures and ideas never panned out. He may have had some good deals here and there but I don't think he's some exceptional talent. He can have all the great ideas and best intentions in the world but at the end of the day it's the output that people will look out. With his track record MJ is a big no-no but if I were a predator he might be nice target.


Honestly. That's one of the most overrated stories about MJ. lol Problem for me is I actually believed that. Well there goes that story. neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 11/17/08 2:50pm

monk76

JackieBlue said:

I stopped believing Michael was a 'shrewd businessman' a long time ago when his early ventures and ideas never panned out. He may have had some good deals here and there but I don't think he's some exceptional talent. He can have all the great ideas and best intentions in the world but at the end of the day it's the output that people will look out. With his track record MJ is a big no-no but if I were a predator he might be nice target.



Not if Uri is looking after him he ´ll protect him.....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 11/17/08 2:51pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Timmy84 said:

falloff I think I remember hearing about that. Didn't he give them the finger? lol

Yeah, he did... I guess that was only the second time he ever gave someone the finger! biggrin cool wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 11/17/08 2:58pm

Timmy84

PatrickS77 said:

Timmy84 said:

falloff I think I remember hearing about that. Didn't he give them the finger? lol

Yeah, he did... I guess that was only the second time he ever gave someone the finger! biggrin cool wink


I had to be honest when I saw a picture of that, I didn't initially know what triggered it. Obviously Michael was upset but it's clear who he was directing it at. I remember the 1997 picture where he's wearing his mask and holding Prince and he sees paparazzi and gives them the finger. lol
[Edited 11/17/08 14:58pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 11/17/08 3:01pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Yeah! I love those pictures.. Michael showing some attitude!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 14 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Michael Jackson-sheik case (UPDATE: MiJac reportedly settles)