shesoffthewall said: vainandy said: Oh how I wish I had watched it. I didn't watch it that night because I knew that she and others like her would probably dominate the show and bore me. If I had previously known what was going to happen, I wouldn't have missed that show for the WORLD! With Donna I was mainly speaking in terms of appealing largely to the white (pop) audience. She was a pop artist herself and she had no shame in it. She could care less to cater to the blacks. Atleast Whitney sat her ass at Soul Train Awards show, amongst other black award events. Even Diana will show up to the BET Awards, but I have yet to see Donna even caring to show up to events like that. Anita Baker and Michael dominated that show that year when Whitney got boo'd. But that's because Donna was and is hard to categorize. Also she had that disco stigma, lol. Plus black folks showed her respect. Diana, Dionne and Donna were more respected by black folks because their vocal styles allowed them success in other formats. The reasons why Whitney didn't get the same treatment because she sung like her mother and Dee Dee Warwick but she had an image that was more whitebread than Donna, who was really a rock chick. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: Speaking of Narada Michael Walden, if you notice, before the success of "Thriller", he was producing Stacy Lattisaw. He seemed to be concerned with having a moderately successful R&B hit and if the pop audience liked it, that was fine, but he didn't lose any sleep over them not liking it. Just picture Shitney trying to do funky jams like Stacy's "Dynamite" or "Feel My Love Tonight". She's never done anything like that and I don't think she's capable of doing something like that because she has no rhythm. I know. Clive wouldn't allow that. I would like to hear some outtakes form the "whitney houston" sessions. I'm sure there are a few songs that Clive turned down because they were too black. **--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose! http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: vainandy said: Oh how I wish I had watched it. I didn't watch it that night because I knew that she and others like her would probably dominate the show and bore me. If I had previously known what was going to happen, I wouldn't have missed that show for the WORLD! Donna was crossover in a good way anyway, she didn't whitebread her shit. That's mainly why Whitney got booed. I was only five when the incident with Whitney occurred but if I could remember, the boos were too much that Whitney tried to say something and then said "thank you", she looked on the verge of tears and then she either ran or walked off stage. It was embarrassing for her. Whitney was sitting in the audience when she got boo'd. It was during a catogory being announced and a clip from her song "Where Do Broken Hearts Go" played and all you heard was "booooo" it was so loud and so embarrasing. lol Good thing for her she didn't win, Anita did for "Giving You The Best That I Got." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: Marrk said: I saw the press conference where Michael deflected alot of flak by stating he'd decided he was doing it for nothing, he gave his cut from the entire tour to charity. Don King and his brothers were like, "well we aint, we're broke!" you could see his brothers thinking, even behind their aviators. . Yeah the brothers were like "the fuck?! " I honestly think that was the moment Michael said "Fuck ya'll, I'm gonna do my own thing from now on" Hell, remember how he didn't tell his brothers he was leaving the group UNTIL during the last Los Angeles show "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: shesoffthewall said: With Donna I was mainly speaking in terms of appealing largely to the white (pop) audience. She was a pop artist herself and she had no shame in it. She could care less to cater to the blacks. Atleast Whitney sat her ass at Soul Train Awards show, amongst other black award events. Even Diana will show up to the BET Awards, but I have yet to see Donna even caring to show up to events like that. Anita Baker and Michael dominated that show that year when Whitney got boo'd. But that's because Donna was and is hard to categorize. Also she had that disco stigma, lol. Plus black folks showed her respect. Diana, Dionne and Donna were more respected by black folks because their vocal styles allowed them success in other formats. The reasons why Whitney didn't get the same treatment because she sung like her mother and Dee Dee Warwick but she had an image that was more whitebread than Donna, who was really a rock chick. In black cirlces Whitney has won a lot of respect even more so than Janet, Donna and Diana. People be straight hatin on Diana and Janet but will praise Whitney in a heartbeat. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: shesoffthewall said: Oh no, believe me I know she's POP, I never stated that she wasn't. That's why I compared her to black female artists that were doing it before her ala Donna Summer, Diana and Dionne Warwick. They already had that ball rolling she just picked it up and ran with it. I still have the 1989 Soul Train Awards on VHS believe it or not. And yes I remember that incident. It was after that that she ran to LA and Babyface to produce her next album, "I'm Your Baby Tonight." It became her least successful album at that time and considered by the pop audience as a disappointment, only because it appealed more to the R&B audience. Ain't that odd? And unfortunately for Whitney, she struggled between wanting to be a "crossover artist" and then trying to figure out what her supposed main audience was into. She never knew what she wanted in her career. I would say Michael is in that same struggle since he's ages away from the soul music wunderkind that turned Motown and some Philadelphia International joints into gold and the boy wonder that created "Off the Wall". Take it back to Michael and a supposed "Thriller world tour", I agree that he may not have had taken part in it because he would've been criticized for not doing another tour with his brothers. But what people don't realize is that the Jacksons (as Jackie, Tito, Marlon, Michael and Randy) disbanded in 1981. Every other Jackson family project was a reunion of sorts. "Victory" was a Jacksons reunion album, lol. Not really, they were constantly working on new material from the end of 1980 to 1983. Michael and Marlon did some songs including "Doing Dirty" during the time Michael was working on Thriller. They were always going to release another album in 1984, that was the plan. Jermaine just didn't become part of the plan until months after Motown 25 Michael had alot on his plate in 1984. He was doing Victory, he was in the planning stages of Bad, he was doing that shelved Broadway play, doing that "Scared Of The Moon" project and he was in talks to buy ATV "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Timmy84 said: Yeah the brothers were like "the fuck?! " I honestly think that was the moment Michael said "Fuck ya'll, I'm gonna do my own thing from now on" Hell, remember how he didn't tell his brothers he was leaving the group UNTIL during the last Los Angeles show Oh yeah so I heard. Marlon shortly thereafter found a good excuse to leave the group too. He had to follow Michael his whole time with the Jacksons. Once MJ left, Marlon left. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Timmy84 said: Ain't that odd? And unfortunately for Whitney, she struggled between wanting to be a "crossover artist" and then trying to figure out what her supposed main audience was into. She never knew what she wanted in her career. I would say Michael is in that same struggle since he's ages away from the soul music wunderkind that turned Motown and some Philadelphia International joints into gold and the boy wonder that created "Off the Wall". Take it back to Michael and a supposed "Thriller world tour", I agree that he may not have had taken part in it because he would've been criticized for not doing another tour with his brothers. But what people don't realize is that the Jacksons (as Jackie, Tito, Marlon, Michael and Randy) disbanded in 1981. Every other Jackson family project was a reunion of sorts. "Victory" was a Jacksons reunion album, lol. Not really, they were constantly working on new material from the end of 1980 to 1983. Michael and Marlon did some songs including "Doing Dirty" during the time Michael was working on Thriller. They were always going to release another album in 1984, that was the plan. Jermaine just didn't become part of the plan until months after Motown 25 Michael had alot on his plate in 1984. He was doing Victory, he was in the planning stages of Bad, he was doing that shelved Broadway play, doing that "Scared Of The Moon" project and he was in talks to buy ATV Oh for real? I didn't know that. But yeah the Jacksons did take some pictures together in '83, a little before Jermaine reunited with them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shesoffthewall said: Timmy84 said: But that's because Donna was and is hard to categorize. Also she had that disco stigma, lol. Plus black folks showed her respect. Diana, Dionne and Donna were more respected by black folks because their vocal styles allowed them success in other formats. The reasons why Whitney didn't get the same treatment because she sung like her mother and Dee Dee Warwick but she had an image that was more whitebread than Donna, who was really a rock chick. In black cirlces Whitney has won a lot of respect even more so than Janet, Donna and Diana. People be straight hatin on Diana and Janet but will praise Whitney in a heartbeat. People hate Diana for "breaking up" the original Supremes. Janet is hated because she's a Jackson ( ) and Whitney is adored in black circles where initially it was more the opposite. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: shesoffthewall said: In black cirlces Whitney has won a lot of respect even more so than Janet, Donna and Diana. People be straight hatin on Diana and Janet but will praise Whitney in a heartbeat. People hate Diana for "breaking up" the original Supremes. Janet is hated because she's a Jackson ( ) and Whitney is adored in black circles where initially it was more the opposite. Janet is hated because of the Superbowl. **--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose! http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
daPrettyman said: Timmy84 said: People hate Diana for "breaking up" the original Supremes. Janet is hated because she's a Jackson ( ) and Whitney is adored in black circles where initially it was more the opposite. Janet is hated because of the Superbowl. That too. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: bboy87 said: I honestly think that was the moment Michael said "Fuck ya'll, I'm gonna do my own thing from now on" Hell, remember how he didn't tell his brothers he was leaving the group UNTIL during the last Los Angeles show Oh yeah so I heard. Marlon shortly thereafter found a good excuse to leave the group too. He had to follow Michael his whole time with the Jacksons. Once MJ left, Marlon left. You know that's why he made the song "Don't Go" right? PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever ----- Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleBLUECorvette said: Timmy84 said: Oh yeah so I heard. Marlon shortly thereafter found a good excuse to leave the group too. He had to follow Michael his whole time with the Jacksons. Once MJ left, Marlon left. You know that's why he made the song "Don't Go" right? I wouldn't be surprised. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
alphastreet said: It really did. I find it so weird how mj fans think Victory is so original! To me most of the tracks with the exception of State of Shock and Torture sounded like watered down versions of music that was popular at the time. Even Torture reminded me of songs like Sweet Dreams Are Made of This, Small Town Boy. And Janet did One More Chance justice.
I think pop music killed a lot of r&b/pop divas of the late 70's and early 80's. Good examples are Patrice, Donna Summer, Atlantic Star, Teena Marie, even Latoya Jackson would have been alright if she stuck to disco. [Edited 10/23/08 9:59am] Which MJ fans? That album sucked. And it was far from original- I have NO idea how it's their biggest selling. I seriously don't think launching a solo tour would have made a difference. The media treated the Victory tour like it was the Thriller tour anyway. They didn't do any songs from Victory anyways- and they did songs from Thriller and Off The Wall anyways. Plus, it was the biggest and most successful tour of its time. www.maximum-jackson.com
The Michael Jackson Fan Forum | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
marnifrances said: alphastreet said: It really did. I find it so weird how mj fans think Victory is so original! To me most of the tracks with the exception of State of Shock and Torture sounded like watered down versions of music that was popular at the time. Even Torture reminded me of songs like Sweet Dreams Are Made of This, Small Town Boy. And Janet did One More Chance justice.
I think pop music killed a lot of r&b/pop divas of the late 70's and early 80's. Good examples are Patrice, Donna Summer, Atlantic Star, Teena Marie, even Latoya Jackson would have been alright if she stuck to disco. [Edited 10/23/08 9:59am] Which MJ fans? That album sucked. And it was far from original- I have NO idea how it's their biggest selling. I seriously don't think launching a solo tour would have made a difference. The media treated the Victory tour like it was the Thriller tour anyway. They didn't do any songs from Victory anyways- and they did songs from Thriller and Off The Wall anyways. Plus, it was the biggest and most successful tour of its time. It's the biggest selling because of all of the hype behind it at the time. They did perform "Tell Me I'm Not Dreaming" from Victory. That song is good I don't care what nobody says. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shesoffthewall said: marnifrances said: Which MJ fans? That album sucked. And it was far from original- I have NO idea how it's their biggest selling. I seriously don't think launching a solo tour would have made a difference. The media treated the Victory tour like it was the Thriller tour anyway. They didn't do any songs from Victory anyways- and they did songs from Thriller and Off The Wall anyways. Plus, it was the biggest and most successful tour of its time. It's the biggest selling because of all of the hype behind it at the time. They did perform "Tell Me I'm Not Dreaming" from Victory. That song is good I don't care what nobody says. Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin isn't on Victory. It's on Jermaine's 1984 album "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: shesoffthewall said: It's the biggest selling because of all of the hype behind it at the time. They did perform "Tell Me I'm Not Dreaming" from Victory. That song is good I don't care what nobody says. Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin isn't on Victory. It's on Jermaine's 1984 album shit My Victory album has collected so much dust I've forgotten what's on it. [Edited 10/23/08 22:14pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paisleypark4 said: SoulAlive said: Michael Jackson 'Thriller' World Tour Setlist---
Wanna Be Startin' Something Rock With You Workin' Day And Night Human Nature (interlude) P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing) Baby Be Mine I Can't Help It She's Out Of My Life (interlude) Beat It Off The Wall The Lady In My Life Thriller (interlude) Encores: Don't Stop Til You Get Enough Billie Jean I wudda included some Ben and I Wanna Be WHere You Are in there for the old fans Yeah,I was thinking of his earlier solo hits but wasn't sure where to fit them in I suppose "Got To Be There" could have been included too.That was a big hit for him in the early 70s. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleBLUECorvette said: vainandy said: He did right to do a tour and album with his brothers right after the success of "Thriller". Where they fucked up though, is the shitty material they used for the "Victory" album. Michael's huge pop success with "Thriller" ruined him and a pop sound carried over into the "Victory" album.
They should have made a bad ass album like "Triumph" with lots of danceable funky type tracks. If the pop fans liked it....fine.....if they didn't.....fuck 'em. Anyway, after "Thriller", I'd rather have seen Michael go back to being in the group with his brothers and give up being a solo artist altogether because his sound was much weaker and never the same again after "Thriller". I agree, the jacksons messed up. They could have put out the best Jacksons album ever in 84, but messed up with their egos. Most of the albums was done individually instead of a collective unit (a la Triumph and Destiny.) With Jermaine in the mix, the should have been great, a double LP but Marlon and Tito just had too have solo spots. Yeah,the 'Victory' album is a very weak album.The brothers submitted some crap songs.Even Michael's two contributions ("State Of Shock" and "Be Not Always") are nothing to write home about."State Of Shock" is a funny song to me.It's supposed to be a 'Jacksons' song,but Michael chose an outsider (Mick Jagger) to sing it with him...lol...the other brothers can barely be heard on the song.That shows you how disinterested Michael was in working with his brothers.He didn't even appear in the two videos for this project ("Torture" and "Body").He was just going through the motions.I agree,this album could have been great.Maybe they have brought Quincy Jones on board to produce it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: LittleBLUECorvette said: I agree, the jacksons messed up. They could have put out the best Jacksons album ever in 84, but messed up with their egos. Most of the albums was done individually instead of a collective unit (a la Triumph and Destiny.) With Jermaine in the mix, the should have been great, a double LP but Marlon and Tito just had too have solo spots. Yeah,the 'Victory' album is a very weak album.The brothers submitted some crap songs.Even Michael's two contributions ("State Of Shock" and "Be Not Always") are nothing to write home about."State Of Shock" is a funny song to me.It's supposed to be a 'Jacksons' song,but Michael chose an outsider (Mick Jagger) to sing it with him...lol...the other brothers can barely be heard on the song.That shows you how disinterested Michael was in working with his brothers.He didn't even appear in the two videos for this project ("Torture" and "Body").He was just going through the motions.I agree,this album could have been great.Maybe they have brought Quincy Jones on board to produce it? "State of Shock" and "Be Not Always" were "Thriller" outtakes, I think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This song is better than anything on 'Victory'.They should have placed this song on the album! It would have been a strong second single!
"Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin" (Too Good To Be True)" by Jermaine and Michael Jackson (1984) Jermaine put it on his own album but the 'Victory' album desperately needed a song this good! [Edited 10/24/08 4:54am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: SoulAlive said: Yeah,the 'Victory' album is a very weak album.The brothers submitted some crap songs.Even Michael's two contributions ("State Of Shock" and "Be Not Always") are nothing to write home about."State Of Shock" is a funny song to me.It's supposed to be a 'Jacksons' song,but Michael chose an outsider (Mick Jagger) to sing it with him...lol...the other brothers can barely be heard on the song.That shows you how disinterested Michael was in working with his brothers.He didn't even appear in the two videos for this project ("Torture" and "Body").He was just going through the motions.I agree,this album could have been great.Maybe they have brought Quincy Jones on board to produce it? "State of Shock" and "Be Not Always" were "Thriller" outtakes, I think. If that's true,I can certainly see why Quincy Jones didn't use these songs on the album | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: "State of Shock" and "Be Not Always" were "Thriller" outtakes, I think.
I didn't know about "Be not always", but for "State of Shock" I'm pretty sure. he should have released the version with Freddie Mercury though, I never really liked Mick Jagger or the Stoens for that matter, so that pretty much ruins the song for me Vanglorious... this is protected by the red, the black, and the green. With a key... sissy! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dancelot said: Timmy84 said: "State of Shock" and "Be Not Always" were "Thriller" outtakes, I think.
I didn't know about "Be not always", but for "State of Shock" I'm pretty sure. he should have released the version with Freddie Mercury though, I never really liked Mick Jagger or the Stoens for that matter, so that pretty much ruins the song for me Mick Jagger is funny on "State Of Shock" His ad libs crack me up... "you know....I need mouth-to-mouth resuscitation" and the ending,when he says... "you got me....you got me...you got me in a state of shock....look at me...LOOK AT ME!.....LOOK AT ME!....oh looook at meeeee" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: Actually,LaToya's first attempt, the song "If You Feel The Funk" was pretty decent. She performed it on "Soul Train" and it actually got a little bit of radio airplay in my area. It just didn't get enough airplay to become a hit.I don't remember her doing anything else until years later with "Heart Don't Lie" which was absolutely awful. As for her becoming a joke, I don't remember people actually laughing at her (other than that horrible video) until the 1990s when she was married and saying her family was trying to kidnap her.
You don't remember her 1980 hit "Nighttime Lover"? It was written and produced by Michael and he can be heard singing background vocals.This is probably her only "great" single,lol.Like many of the songs he has written,it has haunting verses.I believe it's from the same album that has "If You Feel The Funk". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: alphastreet said: I think torture was a cute video but got lost among the millions of videos that were doing the same thing with those effects then.
I thought it was cute too when I first saw it. But over the years, to me, it's lost its value. The Jacksons in the video looked like they had no identity. It was like they were destined to be "Michael's brothers" and nothing more than that. the "Torture" video is 80s tackiness at its worst Greasy jeri curls....lame choreography....it's as if they were trying to make their own "Thriller" video,but failed miserably. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: "You Give Good Love" sounds more like adult contemporary to me and should have been played on adult contemporary stations only. The fact that the record label would even consider promoting an artist that has no rhythm to an R&B station (the "R" in R&B is short for "rhythm") is ridiculous.
Gotta disagree with you there I think "You Give Good Love" is a really soulful song.It's a slow jam.Produced by Kashif and written by R&B songwriter LaLa,it's definitely more soulful/R&B than what came later.In fact,her first album has alot of genuine R&B on it."Thinking About You" with Kashif isn't pop at all.That's a pure R&B jam.Of course,the huge crossover success of "You Give Good Love" convinced Clive Davis to turn her into a 100% pop artist.That's why her follow-up album is filled with big,commerical,pop ballads like "Didn't We Almost Have It All" and "Where Do Broken Hearts Go"....songs that have absolutely nothing to do with R&B.There's a big difference between those songs and "You Give Good Love". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
shesoffthewall said: bboy87 said: Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin isn't on Victory. It's on Jermaine's 1984 album shit My Victory album has collected so much dust I've forgotten what's on it. [Edited 10/23/08 22:14pm] Yeah, it should've been on the "Victory" album. It's a great song and I love Jermaine's vocals, but when Michael comes in he brings in that extra energy and amplifies the song I feel (just like on "Say Say Say") State of Shock with Mercury is a lot better, Jagger isn't much of a singer (he did the song live with Tina Turner too which was just okay) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: SoulAlive said: Yeah,the 'Victory' album is a very weak album.The brothers submitted some crap songs.Even Michael's two contributions ("State Of Shock" and "Be Not Always") are nothing to write home about."State Of Shock" is a funny song to me.It's supposed to be a 'Jacksons' song,but Michael chose an outsider (Mick Jagger) to sing it with him...lol...the other brothers can barely be heard on the song.That shows you how disinterested Michael was in working with his brothers.He didn't even appear in the two videos for this project ("Torture" and "Body").He was just going through the motions.I agree,this album could have been great.Maybe they have brought Quincy Jones on board to produce it? "State of Shock" and "Be Not Always" were "Thriller" outtakes, I think. State of Shock was written right after Thriller was released. He did the demos of State of Shock, There Must Be More To Life Than This, and Victory with Freddie in the summer of '83 Be Not Always was written in 1979 and was supposedly planned for another project but Michael put it on Victory instead "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |