independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > U.S. federal copyright board to set music royalties this week
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 10/01/08 4:12pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

U.S. federal copyright board to set music royalties this week

at 18:11 on October 1, 2008, EDT.
By Ryan Nakashima, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

LOS ANGELES - Royalties that digital music companies from Apple Inc. to record labels pay songwriters for selling their music as ringtones, CDs and permanent digital downloads are to be set Thursday by a federal agency.

This is the first time in nearly three decades that the industry has been unable to decide the fee for sales of recorded music on its own.

Apple has so strongly opposed increasing the rate, now 9.1 cents per song, that it threatened to shut down the iTunes store if the rate goes up - a move experts said was unlikely.

More likely is the Copyright Royalty Board hiking the rate incrementally, in line with the fraction of a penny that it has risen every two or three years since 1981, when it was four cents per song.

"Everybody expects it to go up somewhat but nobody expects it to go up all that much," said Steve Gordon, an entertainment attorney and author of "The Future of the Music Business."

"The record business has a lot of problems. This is not going to make it much better or much worse," he said.

The last time the government had a hearing to set the so-called mechanical royalty rate was in 1980, which was triggered by a change in federal law.

The decision expected Thursday caps proceedings that began in January. Part of the current disagreement stems from the rise of digital downloads - driven by Apple's iTunes store - which had never been treated separately from CD sales, which are plummeting.

"For the last seven years, we've been fighting over those business models," said David Israelite, chief executive of the National Music Publishers' Association, which is representing songwriters and their publishers in the copyright board proceeding.

Digital downloads grew 38 per cent from 2006 to 2007 to become a US$1.26 billion business, making up 23 per cent of the market for recorded music, according to the Recording Industry Association of America.

Sales of physical music media such as CDs, cassettes and DVDs declined 19.1 per cent to $7.5 billion in the same one-year period.

Most industry players, including Warner Music Group Corp.'s chief executive, Edgar Bronfman Jr., expect digital sales to eventually surpass CD sales, which would drive the market higher for the first time since 2004.

In a deal reached last week, industry players agreed to pay songwriters and their publishing agents 10.5 per cent of all revenue made from interactive streams and limited downloads offered by subscription services like Rhapsody and Napster - minus roughly five per cent paid in performance royalties.

The copyright rate for CDs, ringtones and permanent digital downloads remained unresolved partly because they accounted for far more in sales - some $9.1 billion, or about 90 per cent of the music business, according to the RIAA.

Writing to the board last year, Apple's vice-president of iTunes, Eddy Cue, argued that the store's price of 99 cents per song was not flexible so raising the royalty could jeopardize the iTunes store's profitability.

"If (the iTunes store) were forced simply to absorb any increase in its mechanical royalty rate, the result would be to significantly increase the likelihood of the store operating at a financial loss," Cue said.

"Apple has repeatedly made clear that it is in this business to make money and most likely would not continue to operate (the iTunes store) if it were no longer possible to do so profitably."

Apple contended that it can't raise iTunes prices to compensate for higher royalties because the store is competing with pirated music available for free.


©The Canadian Press, 2008

neutral
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 10/01/08 4:58pm

lastdecember

avatar

Well its about time that "artists" get some pay for those "digital" downloads which they get nothing for, there are artists selling millions of a single and making about 10,000 dollars off it all while the others rake in the money. There are even still many artists that dont even get paid for their work being transfered over to digital, almost all of them get a smaller %% which is insane since digital has LESS overhead than physical cds and albums.

I can almost bet that somewhere along the line it will all come down too labels merging with iTunes and then those prices going up. Though people may not think that iTunes would sell itself like that, if you dangle a FAT ENOUGH carrot than they will bite.
[Edited 10/1/08 17:00pm]

"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > U.S. federal copyright board to set music royalties this week