Why can't we just enjoy music anymore? RIAA has to spoil everything. Yes, they are devil.

Internet Radio Giant Pandora May Have to Shut Down
As you read this story and peep the lame excuse given by RIAA/ Sound Exchange about small webcasters not doing enough to make money, keep this thought in mind. Sound Exchange wants webcasters to basically chase down advertisers and play commercials in between songs. This is precisely why people turned to Internet Radio-to avoid hearing commercials.

The second thing to keep in mind is after you cross a certain threshold, you have to go to an ad agency to do big time ad buys. In other words many big companies will not buy ads with you directly- they do it via an ad agency. Guess who owns the dominant ad agency? Clear Channel. They own Katz Media. Guess which two companies recently launched the largest Internet Radio company? That's right you guessed it-Clear Channel and Katz Media... These large companies get around paying these crazy fees by cutting exclusive side deals with the major lables which means they will play music from a giant corporations massive catalogue and avoid paying high fees by not playing any sort of independent music where the fees still aply and they have no exclusive deal. Hopefully folks get the picture.

The saddest part to this whole thing is that the Sound Exchange fees do not apply just to Internet Radio.. They apply to all forms of digital media including the emerging new technologies. So if this hasn't hit you yet it soon will. Most people figured they can get around this by going the indy route, but the RIAA/Sound Exchange got a law passed so that you have to pay them even if its your own or indy unsigned music. They supposedly are collecting fees for everyone. Last I checked they had tens of thousands of artists who never got a check. That money has been used for lobbying efforts. Thank you RIAA. Thank you Sound Exchange and Thank You Future of Music Coalition which sits on the Sound Exchange board and supported all this bullshit...They once tried to tell me all sorts of folks are doing well under the new agreement. Out of all the artsits I know only one has gotten a Sound Exchange check. And that was for music I played...

Davey D


Giant in Internet Radio May Soon Close Its Doors


http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/15/AR2008081503367_3. html

OAKLAND, Calif. -- Pandora is one of the nation's most popular Web radio services, with about 1 million listeners daily. Its Music Genome Project allows customers to create stations tailored to their own tastes. It is one of the 10 most popular applications for Apple's iPhone and attracts 40,000 new customers a day.


..
Yet the burgeoning company may be on the verge of collapse, according to its founder, and so may be others like it.


"We're approaching a pull-the-plug kind of decision," said Tim Westergren, who founded Pandora. "This is like a last stand for webcasting."


The transformation of words, songs and movies to digital media has provoked a number of high-stakes fights between the owners of copyrighted works and the companies that can now easily distribute those works via the Internet. The doomsday rhetoric these days around the fledgling medium of Web radio springs from just such tensions.


Last year, an obscure federal panel ordered a doubling of the per-song performance royalty that Web radio stations pay to performers and record companies.


Traditional radio, by contrast, pays no such fee. Satellite radio pays a fee but at a less onerous rate, at least by some measures.


As for Pandora, its royalty fees this year will amount to 70 percent of its projected revenue of $25 million, Westergren said, a level that could doom it and other Web radio outfits.


This week, Rep. Howard L. Berman (D-Calif.) is trying to broker a last-minute deal between webcasters and SoundExchange, the organization that represents artists and record companies. The negotiations could reduce the per-song rate set by the federal panel last year.



The two sides appear to be far apart, however, with Berman frustrated.


"Most of the rate issues have not been resolved," Berman said. "If it doesn't get much more dramatic quickly, I will extricate myself from the process."


"We're losing money as it is," said Westergren, a former acoustic rocker. "The moment we think this problem in Washington is not going to get solved, we have to pull the plug because all we're doing is wasting money."


The digital reproduction of works in print, audio and video has provoked waves of lawsuits over who should benefit from copyrighted works distributed over the Internet.



The media company Viacom sued YouTube for running clips. Record companies have sought to punish file-sharers. And in radio, the digital transformation has recharged long-standing disputes over how much performers and their record companies ought to be paid when a song gets played.


..
By contrast to traditional radio, which broadcast only one song at any given time, Pandora's technology allows listeners to create their own stations, through which hundreds of thousands of song are played simultaneously.


For example, if a Pandora listener expresses a preference for "Debaser" by the Pixies, Pandora will search its catalog for songs that have similar musical qualities and create a station accordingly.


Soon after its launch, Pandora drew raves and listeners. Revenue at the growing company, which is supported by venture capital investors, was slated to rise above costs for the first time in 2009, Westergren said.


Then came the decision by the Copyright Royalty Board.


"I was on the bus when I get this message on my Treo," Westergren said. "I thought, 'We're dead.' "


SoundExchange, the organization that represents performers and record companies, said it supports the higher royalties for Internet radio because musicians deserve a bigger cut of Internet radio profits.


"Our artists and copyright owners deserve to be fairly compensated for the blood and sweat that forms the core product of these businesses," said Mike Huppe, general counsel for SoundExchange.


The Copyright Royalty Board last year decided that the fee to play a music recording on Web radio should step up from 8/100 of a cent per song per listener in 2006 to 19/100 of a cent per song per listener in 2010.



Multiplied by the millions of songs and thousands of listeners Pandora serves, that means the company will have to pay about $17 million this year, Westergren said.


The effect may be even worse for smaller outfits. Many small webcasters have said that the royalties as determined by the copyright board would be 100 percent to 300 percent of annual revenue, said David Oxenford, a lawyer who represents some of them.


"Obviously, that's not going to work," he said.



Even more galling to webcasters is the fact that they pay more for playing a song than traditional or satellite radio, a result of patchwork regulation created as each technology emerged.


..
Traditional radio pays nothing in performance royalties, though SoundExchange is pressing to change that. Satellite radio pays 6 or 7 percent of revenue. And then there are webcasters, which pay per song, per listener.


Using listener figures from Arbitron for XM Satellite Radio, it is possible to estimate that the company will pay about 1.6 cents per hour per listener when the new rates are fully adapted in 2010. By contrast, Web radio outlets will pay 2.91 cents per hour per listener.


SoundExchange officials argue that because different media have different profit margins, it is appropriate to set different royalty rates.


Moreover, they complain, Internet radio stations have done too little to make money from playing their songs.


Pandora makes advertising money only from spots placed on its Web page, not on audio ads that run between songs. Other stations are similarly struggling to persuade companies to pay for advertising in the new medium.


"We're taking this challenge very seriously," Westergren said. "When we have our board meetings, the central topic is the revenue trajectory, not how happy our users are."


He said Pandora has a 30-person ad sales operation, or about 25 percent of its workforce. The company will soon start running subtler ads similar to those on National Public Radio, too, he said.


"Something like 'The next half hour is brought to you by . . .' " he said.


Westergren and other webcasters argue that Web radio, which generally plays a far wider range of music than is offered by traditional radio, provides invaluable promotion for many independent musicians.



Matt Nathanson, a singer-songwriter who has recorded for both major and independent record labels, said he is worried that the demands placed on Internet radio could "choke" the industry before it gets its footing.


"Net radio is good for musicians like me, and I think most musicians are like me," he said. "The promotion it provides is far more important than the revenue."


Westergren, seemingly wearied by the constant haggling over the issue, signaled that Pandora's investors may also be impatient for an end.


"We're funded by venture capital," he said. "They're not going to chase a company whose business model has been broken. So if it doesn't feel like its headed towards a solution, we're done."

I hate the RIAA. They are only looking out for themselves.

superspaceboy said:

I know, right?

superspaceboy said:

the regulators really need to be regulated somehow. the RIAA has way too much bullying power.

I don't understand how or why they never saw the concept of "music on the internet", coming. It seems like they along with certain record companies are mad that they didn't jump on the internet bandwagon, sooner.

shorttrini said:

That's how senile people act. You just bless their hearts, they think they're still the authority.

Timmy84 said:

Kinda like what I do to my ex-girlfriend....

Anxiety said:

Seriously. This crap is just sickening. And it just makes people want to rip off the industry.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

That's what we've been doing for the last ten years almost.

Timmy84 said:

well let's make it another 10!

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

We are.

F**k 'em!

Who watches the watchmen

IAintTheOne said:

exactamundo

Never really got into Pandora, but sucks since I knew a lot of folks who used it.

Mara said:

I haven't use it in a while because of my times using YouTube more.

But the downfall of Pandora will only make people gamble on file-sharing more. Either way, the RIAA will die out and they don't even know it.

Timmy84 said:

I don't condone this, but I predict that eMule, Liweware, & bittorrent will make a huge comeback before the holiday season.
[Edited 8/20/08 22:58pm]

i'll miss pandora.

ehuffnsd said:

Me too. That's why I plan on listening to it as much as possible. Every few weeks when I would go to the site, there would be little enhancements to it. It has so much potential.

Timmy84 said:

..until they put a trace on your IP address..

.... and the same file-sharing companies and your Internet Provider turn-over all of that information about you to The RIAA, the companies and the authorities to keep from being sued.

I see a major attempt to lock more people away just like this.. Not for the small downloads, but believe me..

The Music Industry... BMG-Sony and the others, could be planning something huge--just like this..


The "rip-proof CD" failed. I believe all file-sharing networks (even in Europe) will be shut-down or severly altered by 2011.
[Edited 8/21/08 6:14am]

Linn4days said:

Bittorrents are still "the safest".

TonyVanDam said:

I don't condone it either. Never even used those kinds of sites. But there is a demographic who has paid considerable amounts in our lifetimes to purchasing music and would continue doing so but seriously this kind of crap makes people want to steal the music.

As an early adopter of Pandora and huge fan all I can say is...

FUCK THE RIAA!!