guitarslinger44 said: murph said: Well, if u were following the entire conversation you would see that I brought it up as a response of people saying that New Edition didn't "crossover"...I then followed that up with my underlining point: That their impact went beyond going platinum... As for the other acts you named, they don't have the longevity or influence... And if you don't know the difference between N'Sync and Jodeci, that's the problem right there...lol...Seriously...That's like saying Guns & Roses and Winger were the same group... [Edited 6/26/08 11:22am] Yeah, I've been following it, but what does crossing over have to do with it? Who cares if they crossed over? That has nothing to do with membership to the RRHOF. It's a moot point from the beginning. And I know the difference between Jodeci & NSYNC. Don't patronize me dude. I'm using them as an example. If NE were influenced by J5 and the J5 are already there, then why should NE get a spot? J5 were MORE influential. Am I typing backwards?....lol...I said I was commenting on a statement someone made about New Edition not having enough crossover history for the 'white" rock establishment for them to get in the Hall... And I'm not patronizing u homie...I'm saying u made a silly statement by comparing N'Sync to Jodeci...A very silly and uninformed statement...And yeah, J5 was more influential overall...Who said they weren't? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
murph said: Graycap23 said: U are killing me. I like N.E. but they don't belong in the Hall. I already know you don't take their genre of music seriously...So it is what it is...U are also the same cat that says Madonna shouldn't be in...And on the real Cap, we can agree that she is overrated as all hell...lol But to say that she shouldn't be in the Hall shows me where your head is at...I don't go into whether or not I like an act to admit that they have had an influence on music and culture...Madonna did...A huge one..And yes, she's still overrated...lol lol...the mere fact that Madonna is there, means I don't take the Hall seriously. They should just let everyone in. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wanna know when the movie is coming out!!?>?!?!?!?!? Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paisleypark4 said: I wanna know when the movie is coming out!!?>?!?!?!?!?
They're still trying to find a way around it getting the film done, least that's the gist of what Michael Bivins said in a recent article. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: murph said: I already know you don't take their genre of music seriously...So it is what it is...U are also the same cat that says Madonna shouldn't be in...And on the real Cap, we can agree that she is overrated as all hell...lol But to say that she shouldn't be in the Hall shows me where your head is at...I don't go into whether or not I like an act to admit that they have had an influence on music and culture...Madonna did...A huge one..And yes, she's still overrated...lol lol...the mere fact that Madonna is there, means I don't take the Hall seriously. They should just let everyone in. The most successful female artist of her time (..Damn, I can't believe I'm taking up for Madonna...lol....someone take a picture of this shit...) doesn't belong in the Hall? Again, don't let how u feel about a particular act get in the way of acknowldeging their impact...God knows I've kicked Madonna enough on this site...But you will never hear me say that she didn't have a huge impact... It seems like folks do that a lot here...Shit, I would say the same for folks that shit on Donna Summers...To me I'm talking about impact and not whether or not they are too low brow for your taste... [Edited 6/26/08 12:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
murph said: Graycap23 said: lol...the mere fact that Madonna is there, means I don't take the Hall seriously. They should just let everyone in. The most successful female artist of her time (..Damn, I can't believe I'm taking up for Madonna...lol....someone take a picture of this shit...) doesn't belong in the Hall? Again, don't let how u feel about a particular act get in the way of acknowldeging their impact...God knows I've kicked Madonna enough on this site...But you will never hear me say that she didn't have a huge impact... It seems like folks do that a lot here...Shit, I would say the same for folks that shit on Donna Summers...To me I'm talking about impact and not whether or not they are too low brow for your taste... [Edited 6/26/08 12:18pm] Serious q: Is IMPACT the criteria? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: murph said: I already know you don't take their genre of music seriously...So it is what it is...U are also the same cat that says Madonna shouldn't be in...And on the real Cap, we can agree that she is overrated as all hell...lol But to say that she shouldn't be in the Hall shows me where your head is at...I don't go into whether or not I like an act to admit that they have had an influence on music and culture...Madonna did...A huge one..And yes, she's still overrated...lol lol...the mere fact that Madonna is there, means I don't take the Hall seriously. They should just let everyone in. yeah the criteria is obviously not about actually being a musician. As for New Edition, they were certainly big, though probably the sum of their parts (ie Johnny Gill, Bobby Brown, BBD) was greater than the N.E. whole. They never did anything particularly "new," but they were pleasant enough, and kind of ushered in the modern (ech) boy band era. For that alone they should probably be banned My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And all we're talking about is New Edition. Who knew N.E could raise hackles after all these years. I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
murph said: guitarslinger44 said: Yeah, I've been following it, but what does crossing over have to do with it? Who cares if they crossed over? That has nothing to do with membership to the RRHOF. It's a moot point from the beginning. And I know the difference between Jodeci & NSYNC. Don't patronize me dude. I'm using them as an example. If NE were influenced by J5 and the J5 are already there, then why should NE get a spot? J5 were MORE influential. Am I typing backwards?....lol...I said I was commenting on a statement someone made about New Edition not having enough crossover history for the 'white" rock establishment for them to get in the Hall... And I'm not patronizing u homie...I'm saying u made a silly statement by comparing N'Sync to Jodeci...A very silly and uninformed statement...And yeah, J5 was more influential overall...Who said they weren't? Grandmaster Flash got in over the Dave Clark Five. What's your point? I'll give you that Jodeci started much more organically than NSYNC, but they're basically the same formula a generation apart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
its ridiculous to say madonna dont deserve to be there, its not called the musician's hall of fame its called rock n roll. whatever you stuck up prince fans think of the madonnas and janets of the world you cant deny their impact.they are responsible for some of the most popular music in the last 25 years and i've seen their influence on more artists then most of the people who are in the hall of fame. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have to agree with Gray here as far as how much the Hall means and that even if we push that aside, NE(and I love NE)doesn't belong there.There are a lot of actual BANDS who WROTE and PLAYED their OWN STUFF that were solid artists, who don't even belong there, so how does a pack of kids snatched out of the hood who did a song and dance routine and had some hits belong there? I mean they were decent, but can they compete with real voices? With people who made up their own steps, had their own style, didn't need to pay Right On to boost them up in the eyes of little black girls everywhere? And really, Ralphie had an okay perm, but we've seen far better. And most people are yammering about their sales, crossover success, and popularity as if those things mean something. As much lip synching as I've done to "Can You Stand the Rain," the sad fact is that acts like NE led to the cheapening of music.
The Hall has become the Grammys and a lot of other awards/symbols. Now these things never meant that much, but over the last ten plus years it's become clear that they've lost almost all meaning and that's only going to get worse as the arts sink deeper and deeper into the outhouse pit of corporate disease. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dance said: Ralphie had an okay perm, but we've seen far better.
My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: murph said: The most successful female artist of her time (..Damn, I can't believe I'm taking up for Madonna...lol....someone take a picture of this shit...) doesn't belong in the Hall? Again, don't let how u feel about a particular act get in the way of acknowldeging their impact...God knows I've kicked Madonna enough on this site...But you will never hear me say that she didn't have a huge impact... It seems like folks do that a lot here...Shit, I would say the same for folks that shit on Donna Summers...To me I'm talking about impact and not whether or not they are too low brow for your taste... [Edited 6/26/08 12:18pm] Serious q: Is IMPACT the criteria? Yes: Artists become eligible for induction 25 years after the release of their first record. Criteria include the influence and significance of the artists’ contributions to the development and perpetuation of rock and roll. "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: murph said: The most successful female artist of her time (..Damn, I can't believe I'm taking up for Madonna...lol....someone take a picture of this shit...) doesn't belong in the Hall? Again, don't let how u feel about a particular act get in the way of acknowldeging their impact...God knows I've kicked Madonna enough on this site...But you will never hear me say that she didn't have a huge impact... It seems like folks do that a lot here...Shit, I would say the same for folks that shit on Donna Summers...To me I'm talking about impact and not whether or not they are too low brow for your taste... [Edited 6/26/08 12:18pm] Serious q: Is IMPACT the criteria? Answer: Yes How else would you measure an artist? Whether it's impact of the way people evolved their songwriting from just love songs to left field, serious subject matter (Sam Cooke, Bob Dylan, The Beatles, Johnny Cash, Joni Mitchell, Stevie Wonder) Whether it's an act that made an imapact by creating new rhythms, song AND vocal templates, and a blueprint stage prowess (Chuck Berry, Ray Charles, James Brown, Smokey Robinson, Areatha Fraklin, Luther Vandross) Whether it's an act that made an impact on the way we looked at a particular instrument (Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, Eric Clapton, Jimi Hendrix, Bootsy ect..) Whether it's an act that changed the way we perceive artistry and musical genres by blurring them in unique ways (Sly Stone, David Bowie, Prince) Acts that ushered in a new genre of music, influencing trends, politics and culture for years to (Grand Master Flash & The Furious 5, Run DMC, NWA, Eric B & Rakim) Acts that impacted the feel, trend, and culture of modern R&B (New Edition, Teddy Riley, Timbaland )... Or populist acts whose sheer impact changed the way music was released, viewed, and thought about by the general public (Michael Jackson, Madonna...), they all deserve their due... They all had their own specific impact... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Dance said: I have to agree with Gray here as far as how much the Hall means and that even if we push that aside, NE(and I love NE)doesn't belong there.There are a lot of actual BANDS who WROTE and PLAYED their OWN STUFF that were solid artists, who don't even belong there, so how does a pack of kids snatched out of the hood who did a song and dance routine and had some hits belong there? I mean they were decent, but can they compete with real voices? With people who made up their own steps, had their own style, didn't need to pay Right On to boost them up in the eyes of little black girls everywhere? And really, Ralphie had an okay perm, but we've seen far better. And most people are yammering about their sales, crossover success, and popularity as if those things mean something. As much lip synching as I've done to "Can You Stand the Rain," the sad fact is that acts like NE led to the cheapening of music.
The Hall has become the Grammys and a lot of other awards/symbols. Now these things never meant that much, but over the last ten plus years it's become clear that they've lost almost all meaning and that's only going to get worse as the arts sink deeper and deeper into the outhouse pit of corporate disease. i think the problem is fans are trying to turn the hall into something it never was, where did it say you had to be a musician to get in? if that was the case alot of the great motown acts wouldnt be in..the supremes, temptations,four tops,ect were not musicians, they never wrote their own music, all those 60's groups were products of their labels. you cant judge the younger hall candidates on a different criteria. people who grew up listening to new edition would argue that they were just as important as some of the older groups who are in the hall. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlexdeParis said:[quote] Graycap23 said: Yes: Artists become eligible for induction 25 years after the release of their first record. Criteria include the influence and significance of the artists’ contributions to the development and perpetuation of rock and roll. Wow.....my usefulness of the Hall just dropped a few more notches. Oh well. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have to agree with murph and lowkey. Some of you are so biased toward your thinking that it's affected your reasoning. New Edition had a Jackson 5-style sound on their FIRST ALBUM 25 years ago. And if you actually think Madonna should not be inducted in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (keep in mind, in this context "rock and roll" is used as a euphemism for "U.S. popular music") then you clearly are speaking out of your heads. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
guitarslinger44 said: murph said: Am I typing backwards?....lol...I said I was commenting on a statement someone made about New Edition not having enough crossover history for the 'white" rock establishment for them to get in the Hall... And I'm not patronizing u homie...I'm saying u made a silly statement by comparing N'Sync to Jodeci...A very silly and uninformed statement...And yeah, J5 was more influential overall...Who said they weren't? Grandmaster Flash got in over the Dave Clark Five. What's your point? I'll give you that Jodeci started much more organically than NSYNC, but they're basically the same formula a generation apart. Again...there's way to even say they were the same formula for a generation...It's an uninformed statement...And that's no disrespect...It just gives context to your previous statements... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: Dance said: I have to agree with Gray here as far as how much the Hall means and that even if we push that aside, NE(and I love NE)doesn't belong there.There are a lot of actual BANDS who WROTE and PLAYED their OWN STUFF that were solid artists, who don't even belong there, so how does a pack of kids snatched out of the hood who did a song and dance routine and had some hits belong there? I mean they were decent, but can they compete with real voices? With people who made up their own steps, had their own style, didn't need to pay Right On to boost them up in the eyes of little black girls everywhere? And really, Ralphie had an okay perm, but we've seen far better. And most people are yammering about their sales, crossover success, and popularity as if those things mean something. As much lip synching as I've done to "Can You Stand the Rain," the sad fact is that acts like NE led to the cheapening of music.
The Hall has become the Grammys and a lot of other awards/symbols. Now these things never meant that much, but over the last ten plus years it's become clear that they've lost almost all meaning and that's only going to get worse as the arts sink deeper and deeper into the outhouse pit of corporate disease. i think the problem is fans are trying to turn the hall into something it never was, where did it say you had to be a musician to get in? if that was the case alot of the great motown acts wouldnt be in..the supremes, temptations,four tops,ect were not musicians, they never wrote their own music, all those 60's groups were products of their labels. you cant judge the younger hall candidates on a different criteria. people who grew up listening to new edition would argue that they were just as important as some of the older groups who are in the hall. True, but as was pointed out in the En Vouge vs DC thread, neither group has the material on the level of Be My Baby, Can't Hurry Love, I'll be There... New Edition was decent, but Candy Girl & Mr Telephone Man have no resonance. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2 be honest, I just learned something new today. I never realized that IMPACT was a part of the criteria. I stand corrected. Based on that, Madonna should be in, but N.E.? The answer is still NO. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: 2 be honest, I just learned something new today. I never realized that IMPACT was a part of the criteria. I stand corrected. Based on that, Madonna should be in, but N.E.? The answer is still NO.
How in did you figure musical and cultural impact would NOT be an issue? I believe that is a consideration in practically every such hall of fame-type honor. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: 2 be honest, I just learned something new today. I never realized that IMPACT was a part of the criteria. I stand corrected.
Serious question: What would you personally have the criteria be? I'm just having a hard time imagining a way impact wouldn't be part of the selection process. "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlexdeParis said: Graycap23 said: 2 be honest, I just learned something new today. I never realized that IMPACT was a part of the criteria. I stand corrected.
Serious question: What would you personally have the criteria be? I'm just having a hard time imagining a way impact wouldn't be part of the selection process. My criteria would be: Musicianship Vocal ability Writing skills Performance skills Innovative position Impact would be on the list but NOT that high. Seriously, Madonna has no MUSICAL skills that I can see or hear. NONE. Seems she ONLY made it because of the Video age and her marketing skills. That is NOt enough in my book. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlexdeParis said: Serious question: What would you personally have the criteria be? I'm just having a hard time imagining a way impact wouldn't be part of the selection process.
It sounds like this is becoming more of a case of overcoming some people's biases and opinionated views vs. a case of looking at facts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleAmy said: AlexdeParis said: Serious question: What would you personally have the criteria be? I'm just having a hard time imagining a way impact wouldn't be part of the selection process.
It sounds like this is becoming more of a case of overcoming some people's biases and opinionated views vs. a case of looking at facts. See reply #112. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: AlexdeParis said: Serious question: What would you personally have the criteria be? I'm just having a hard time imagining a way impact wouldn't be part of the selection process. My criteria would be: Musicianship Vocal ability Writing skills Performance skills Innovative position Impact would be on the list but NOT that high. Seriously, Madonna has no MUSICAL skills that I can see or hear. NONE. Seems she ONLY made it because of the Video age and her marketing skills. That is NOt enough in my book. I'm certainly no big fan, but it is a hall of FAME. Madonna had a lot of hits, big hits over 20 years. I totally agree with you about her talent, but she has to go in over a better singer that we've never heard of, I think. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: LittleAmy said: It sounds like this is becoming more of a case of overcoming some people's biases and opinionated views vs. a case of looking at facts. See reply #112. You named several subjective criteria, as equally as subjective as impact. The only difference is how YOU weigh them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleAmy said: Graycap23 said: See reply #112. You named several subjective criteria, as equally as subjective as impact. The only difference is how YOU weigh them. Musicianship is an subjective as impact when one of the candidates CAN'T play? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: LittleAmy said: You named several subjective criteria, as equally as subjective as impact. The only difference is how YOU weigh them. Musicianship is an subjective as impact when one of the candidates CAN'T play? Michael Jackson doesn't play instruments. Does that mean he's less qualified? Do you actually see how SUBJECTIVE that can be? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleAmy said: Graycap23 said: See reply #112. You named several subjective criteria, as equally as subjective as impact. The only difference is how YOU weigh them. It's all good either way. I've never really paid any attention 2 the Hall until Prince got in. The ONLY real HALL is when I invest my time and money into an artist. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |