independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Torrents,,,,
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 06/17/08 10:48am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

torrents and FLAC suck!! nod

yeah i said it!!!
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 06/17/08 11:01am

Dewrede

avatar

so you prefer mp3 ; shitty sounding compromised music files over lossless ?
and you don't care for dvd boots ?
right wacky
[Edited 6/17/08 11:15am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 06/17/08 11:36am

horatio

L4OATheOriginal said:

torrents and FLAC suck!! nod

yeah i said it!!!



falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 06/17/08 12:43pm

paisleypark4

avatar

my computer has crashed violently and has been dead for 2 months downloading Purple Rain Live in New York or something...
Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 06/17/08 12:50pm

horatio

paisleypark4 said:

my computer has crashed violently and has been dead for 2 months downloading Purple Rain Live in New York or something...



lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 06/17/08 12:52pm

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

so you prefer mp3 ; shitty sounding compromised music files over lossless ?
and you don't care for dvd boots ?
right wacky
[Edited 6/17/08 11:15am]


yes i do prefer mp3's since it's easier 2 download, doesn't take up that much space on my computer, i can (if i had one) take my mp3 player and hook it up 2 my car while i'm driving


and i like dvd boots but would prefer having it in my hand instead of pressing it myself taking up all day 2 do it
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 06/17/08 1:00pm

horatio

L4OATheOriginal said:

Dewrede said:

so you prefer mp3 ; shitty sounding compromised music files over lossless ?
and you don't care for dvd boots ?
right wacky
[Edited 6/17/08 11:15am]


yes i do prefer mp3's since it's easier 2 download, doesn't take up that much space on my computer, i can (if i had one) take my mp3 player and hook it up 2 my car while i'm driving


and i like dvd boots but would prefer having it in my hand instead of pressing it myself taking up all day 2 do it


everything has its place
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 06/17/08 1:03pm

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

horatio said:

L4OATheOriginal said:



yes i do prefer mp3's since it's easier 2 download, doesn't take up that much space on my computer, i can (if i had one) take my mp3 player and hook it up 2 my car while i'm driving


and i like dvd boots but would prefer having it in my hand instead of pressing it myself taking up all day 2 do it


everything has its place


nod
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 06/17/08 3:12pm

Dewrede

avatar

L4OATheOriginal said:

Dewrede said:

so you prefer mp3 ; shitty sounding compromised music files over lossless ?
and you don't care for dvd boots ?
right wacky
[Edited 6/17/08 11:15am]


yes i do prefer mp3's since it's easier 2 download, doesn't take up that much space on my computer, i can (if i had one) take my mp3 player and hook it up 2 my car while i'm driving


and i like dvd boots but would prefer having it in my hand instead of pressing it myself taking up all day 2 do it




ok confused

you could buy a player that supports wav. too btw
[Edited 6/17/08 15:43pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 06/17/08 6:31pm

purplesweat

pjh1972 said:

Can someone tell me why torrent files are so massive ? I'm a 'newbie' at this and I don't understand why people would want to download a torrent that's 300MB when an album of MP3s is usually around 75MB.


I don't know why they're so big but people download them because it's hard to find whole albums any other way, you can find singles easy enough but if you want track 12 of some random album, you need to download the whole thing as a torrent.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 06/17/08 7:05pm

pro

avatar

FLAC does not suck

The Lossless Format is the best for audio playback and is the clone rip from CD.

Types of Lossless formats are

WAV
Lossless WMA
APE
FLAC
Apple Lossless
SHN

and each of them above is ideal for CD burning… the results are fantastic.

WAV is the full uncompressed format and others like LWMA, APE, FLAC, AL and SHN are the zip compression (like Win Zip and Win RAR). Zip Compressions are in smaller sizes to help files to be downloaded from the net in quicker time and speed.

MP3 loses quality sound from 60% to 90%... depending on the bit-rate (128 to 320). The downside to this is… the burned CD from MP3 is terrible and very noticeable… the sound is off and worse, is the gaps in between tracks during the continuous sequences like live recordings. There is no such thing as burning software to remove gaps automatically and I am not talking about DAO.

Amazes me anyone who won't spend 2 to 3 (or less) hours downloading a FLAC set but spends that same amount of time... converting MP3 to WAV and eliminate the gaps with a WAV Editor. Lossless does not create gaps during the CD rips.

MP3 is useful for portable listening like MP3 Players and that's all it is good for.

There are some audio players than can handle APE and FLAC too.

Lossless Rules!!!!!


L4OATheOriginal said:

torrents and FLAC suck!! nod

yeah i said it!!!
ieve Freedom and it should not be denied by Others.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 06/18/08 7:22am

Dewrede

avatar

amen thumbs up!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 06/18/08 7:34am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

L4OATheOriginal said:



yes i do prefer mp3's since it's easier 2 download, doesn't take up that much space on my computer, i can (if i had one) take my mp3 player and hook it up 2 my car while i'm driving


and i like dvd boots but would prefer having it in my hand instead of pressing it myself taking up all day 2 do it




ok confused

you could buy a player that supports wav. too btw
[Edited 6/17/08 15:43pm]


i do have a player that does support it, i just don't have the patience 2 "seed" it blah blah ..where as with mp3 downloads..BANG it's already done waiting 2 b pressed on2 a disc
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 06/18/08 7:39am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

pro said:

FLAC does not suck

The Lossless Format is the best for audio playback and is the clone rip from CD.

Types of Lossless formats are

WAV
Lossless WMA
APE
FLAC
Apple Lossless
SHN

and each of them above is ideal for CD burning… the results are fantastic.

WAV is the full uncompressed format and others like LWMA, APE, FLAC, AL and SHN are the zip compression (like Win Zip and Win RAR). Zip Compressions are in smaller sizes to help files to be downloaded from the net in quicker time and speed.

MP3 loses quality sound from 60% to 90%... depending on the bit-rate (128 to 320). The downside to this is… the burned CD from MP3 is terrible and very noticeable… the sound is off and worse, is the gaps in between tracks during the continuous sequences like live recordings. There is no such thing as burning software to remove gaps automatically and I am not talking about DAO.

Amazes me anyone who won't spend 2 to 3 (or less) hours downloading a FLAC set but spends that same amount of time... converting MP3 to WAV and eliminate the gaps with a WAV Editor. Lossless does not create gaps during the CD rips.

MP3 is useful for portable listening like MP3 Players and that's all it is good for.

There are some audio players than can handle APE and FLAC too.

Lossless Rules!!!!!


L4OATheOriginal said:

torrents and FLAC suck!! nod

yeah i said it!!!



i knew this would get ur attention that's y i said it big grin


and still stand by it that u can remove the gasp using nero and clicking that button that will eliminate the gaps. nod

but if u have a crappy stero system, of course the sound is going 2 sound terrible, and it also depends on the recording of the music ur trying 2 get regardless of flac, loseless etc ..if it's shit 2 begin with, it's gonna b shit afterwards
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 06/18/08 7:48am

Dewrede

avatar

L4OATheOriginal said:

Dewrede said:





ok confused

you could buy a player that supports wav. too btw
[Edited 6/17/08 15:43pm]


i do have a player that does support it, i just don't have the patience 2 "seed" it blah blah ..where as with mp3 downloads..BANG it's already done waiting 2 b pressed on2 a disc



ok confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 06/18/08 7:49am

Dewrede

avatar

L4OATheOriginal said:

pro said:

FLAC does not suck

The Lossless Format is the best for audio playback and is the clone rip from CD.

Types of Lossless formats are

WAV
Lossless WMA
APE
FLAC
Apple Lossless
SHN

and each of them above is ideal for CD burning… the results are fantastic.

WAV is the full uncompressed format and others like LWMA, APE, FLAC, AL and SHN are the zip compression (like Win Zip and Win RAR). Zip Compressions are in smaller sizes to help files to be downloaded from the net in quicker time and speed.

MP3 loses quality sound from 60% to 90%... depending on the bit-rate (128 to 320). The downside to this is… the burned CD from MP3 is terrible and very noticeable… the sound is off and worse, is the gaps in between tracks during the continuous sequences like live recordings. There is no such thing as burning software to remove gaps automatically and I am not talking about DAO.

Amazes me anyone who won't spend 2 to 3 (or less) hours downloading a FLAC set but spends that same amount of time... converting MP3 to WAV and eliminate the gaps with a WAV Editor. Lossless does not create gaps during the CD rips.

MP3 is useful for portable listening like MP3 Players and that's all it is good for.

There are some audio players than can handle APE and FLAC too.

Lossless Rules!!!!!





i knew this would get ur attention that's y i said it big grin


and still stand by it that u can remove the gasp using nero and clicking that button that will eliminate the gaps. nod

but if u have a crappy stero system, of course the sound is going 2 sound terrible, and it also depends on the recording of the music ur trying 2 get regardless of flac, loseless etc ..if it's shit 2 begin with, it's gonna b shit afterwards




Yes , but mp3 is inferior and degraded to begin with razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 06/18/08 7:53am

Dewrede

avatar

read THIS
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 06/18/08 7:56am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

L4OATheOriginal said:




i knew this would get ur attention that's y i said it big grin


and still stand by it that u can remove the gasp using nero and clicking that button that will eliminate the gaps. nod

but if u have a crappy stero system, of course the sound is going 2 sound terrible, and it also depends on the recording of the music ur trying 2 get regardless of flac, loseless etc ..if it's shit 2 begin with, it's gonna b shit afterwards




Yes , but mp3 is inferior and degraded to begin with razz


maybe inferior but still the most popular device wink and boy does my hardrive appreciates not being crammed up by flac's nod
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 06/18/08 7:57am

Dewrede

avatar

Get a 500 GB HD and you should be ok for a while
They're quite cheap nowadays smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 06/18/08 8:05am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

read THIS



what should b unacceptable during trading is rapidshare barf
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 06/18/08 8:06am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

Get a 500 GB HD and you should be ok for a while
They're quite cheap nowadays smile


i already have one thumbs up! and i love it!!!
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 06/18/08 8:15am

DaisyHall

avatar

Where's the Badu concerts damnit? LOL
Not A Newbie, Just Reinvented
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 06/18/08 8:18am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

DaisyHall said:

Where's the Badu concerts damnit? LOL



highfive cause if u find the concert from nyc @ radio city, please orgnote a brother
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 06/18/08 8:30am

Dewrede

avatar

L4OATheOriginal said:

Dewrede said:

read THIS



what should b unacceptable during trading is rapidshare barf

true
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 06/18/08 8:31am

Dewrede

avatar

L4OATheOriginal said:

Dewrede said:

Get a 500 GB HD and you should be ok for a while
They're quite cheap nowadays smile


i already have one thumbs up! and i love it!!!


then there shouldn't be a space issue smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 06/18/08 8:47am

ArielB

L4OATheOriginal said:

pro said:

FLAC does not suck

The Lossless Format is the best for audio playback and is the clone rip from CD.

Types of Lossless formats are

WAV
Lossless WMA
APE
FLAC
Apple Lossless
SHN

and each of them above is ideal for CD burning… the results are fantastic.

WAV is the full uncompressed format and others like LWMA, APE, FLAC, AL and SHN are the zip compression (like Win Zip and Win RAR). Zip Compressions are in smaller sizes to help files to be downloaded from the net in quicker time and speed.

MP3 loses quality sound from 60% to 90%... depending on the bit-rate (128 to 320). The downside to this is… the burned CD from MP3 is terrible and very noticeable… the sound is off and worse, is the gaps in between tracks during the continuous sequences like live recordings. There is no such thing as burning software to remove gaps automatically and I am not talking about DAO.

Amazes me anyone who won't spend 2 to 3 (or less) hours downloading a FLAC set but spends that same amount of time... converting MP3 to WAV and eliminate the gaps with a WAV Editor. Lossless does not create gaps during the CD rips.

MP3 is useful for portable listening like MP3 Players and that's all it is good for.

There are some audio players than can handle APE and FLAC too.

Lossless Rules!!!!!





i knew this would get ur attention that's y i said it big grin


and still stand by it that u can remove the gasp using nero and clicking that button that will eliminate the gaps. nod

but if u have a crappy stero system, of course the sound is going 2 sound terrible, and it also depends on the recording of the music ur trying 2 get regardless of flac, loseless etc ..if it's shit 2 begin with, it's gonna b shit afterwards


Every stereo, no matter if it's crappy or not, will make MP3s sound worse than wav. It's a matter of being able to hear the difference or not. Or caring about quality or not. I listen to MP3s and don't care much, but if I had a good system, I'd listen to wav.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 06/18/08 10:18am

L4OATheOrigina
l

avatar

Dewrede said:

L4OATheOriginal said:



i already have one thumbs up! and i love it!!!


then there shouldn't be a space issue smile


ah yeah there is ..cause i still can't play a flac file in my car without converting..so y make 2 steps 2 just enjoy one product?
man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 06/18/08 11:26am

pro

avatar

one component from my "crappy" sound stereo system cost more money than your computer and it's 12 years old biggrin


L4OATheOriginal said:




i knew this would get ur attention that's y i said it big grin


and still stand by it that u can remove the gasp using nero and clicking that button that will eliminate the gaps. nod

but if u have a crappy stero system, of course the sound is going 2 sound terrible, and it also depends on the recording of the music ur trying 2 get regardless of flac, loseless etc ..if it's shit 2 begin with, it's gonna b shit afterwards
ieve Freedom and it should not be denied by Others.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 06/18/08 11:41am

CosmicDancer

As long as the Mp3s are at least 192Kbps
Im cool !
I hate Flac...
They are like WAV files to me....
If its some dirty old Bootleg I think 192-320 Kbps is totally acceptable ! wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 06/18/08 11:45am

horatio

CosmicDancer said:

As long as the Mp3s are at least 192Kbps
Im cool !
I hate Flac...
They are like WAV files to me....
If its some dirty old Bootleg I think 192-320 Kbps is totally acceptable ! wink



yeah for crap recordings its fine.
To me you can tell the difference, in a flac file if its a good quality recording you can hear the air being vibrated from the instrument/vocal cords.
And hearing that air being vibrated is what music is all about, its where the soul is.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Torrents,,,,