independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Jamie Lidell's "Jim" may possibly be the funkiest and soulful album of this year!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/14/08 6:32pm

Mong

And appreciate others' opinions instead of retarded "pissing in the snow" comments. It's an album full of empty and consequetly quite soulless pastiches...definitely a huge step backwards. "Multiply" was MUCH better.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/14/08 8:00pm

BlaqueKnight

avatar

Sdldawn said:

BlaqueKnight said:

Again, I say nay. This is NOT the "funkiest and most soulful album of this year"
I don't know who you all are listening to.

thanks, we got it


some people are enjoying it.. stop pissing in the snow
[Edited 7/14/08 17:56pm]



Jamie, is that you?

There's no snow pissing going on here. I just think its an absurd claim to make. I didn't say his CD was trash. As a matter of fact, I said that its not poorly done. Its just outrageous to make that claim when Marcus Miller's "Marcus" CD dropped this year. There ain't NOTHING on Jamie's CD that's even close to being as funky as M. Miller's. What's the funkiest song on Jamie's CD? "Figured Me Out". He's trying to do Funkadelic "lite". Most of it is late 60s early 70s rehash and Jamie doesn't have a "soulful" voice. He ditched his biggest asset, originality, to do what? Music that's been done previously and done better by others.
Don't talk to me about soul until you've heard Anthony David's "Acey Duecy".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/14/08 8:32pm

Sdldawn

yawn
[Edited 7/14/08 20:35pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 07/14/08 8:51pm

BlaqueKnight

avatar

Don't worry Jamie. If you wish really, really, really hard...pray
Maybe you'll be a soul man.....one day.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 07/14/08 8:59pm

Sdldawn

BlaqueKnight said:

Don't worry Jamie. If you wish really, really, really hard...pray
Maybe you'll be a soul man.....one day.


alright.. now you're just being crazy man!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 07/14/08 9:36pm

BlaqueKnight

avatar

You took me seriously?
Lighten up. You're feelin' this CD; I'm not. That's all there is to it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/14/08 9:50pm

Meloh9

avatar

BlaqueKnight said:

Sdldawn said:


thanks, we got it


some people are enjoying it.. stop pissing in the snow
[Edited 7/14/08 17:56pm]



Jamie, is that you?

There's no snow pissing going on here. I just think its an absurd claim to make. I didn't say his CD was trash. As a matter of fact, I said that its not poorly done. [b]Its just outrageous to make that claim when Marcus Miller's "Marcus" CD dropped this year.
There ain't NOTHING on Jamie's CD that's even close to being as funky as M. Miller's. What's the funkiest song on Jamie's CD? "Figured Me Out". He's trying to do Funkadelic "lite". Most of it is late 60s early 70s rehash and Jamie doesn't have a "soulful" voice. He ditched his biggest asset, originality, to do what? Music that's been done previously and done better by others.
Don't talk to me about soul until you've heard Anthony David's "Acey Duecy".[/b]



I hear you but is it fair to compare Jamie to such an established artist with a history as rich as Marcus Miller? I don't know if Jim is the funkiest or most soulful album of the year thus far, but do I think it is a decent effort, better than most newer contemporary material as of late. Maybe Jim is the kind of album that should be judged on its own terms for what it is worth in order to be appreciated.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/15/08 12:30am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

Meloh9 said:




I hear you but is it fair to compare Jamie to such an established artist with a history as rich as Marcus Miller? I don't know if Jim is the funkiest or most soulful album of the year thus far, but do I think it is a decent effort, better than most newer contemporary material as of late. Maybe Jim is the kind of album that should be judged on its own terms for what it is worth in order to be appreciated.



Its hard to judge a record on its own when every few seconds you hear something that came from another song that was hot 30 years ago. This record is unoriginal. I DON'T think its a decent effort. I think its lazy rehash. I give "Multiply" much props because it was original and solidified Jamie's identity, which is usually hard to do these days in one record. This time around, that's not the case. He sounds like a cover band singer on this record. I've been hearing a lot of good stuff lately and while this is not a badly made record, its no "masterpiece" and when somebody says its the "most soulful" and "funkiest" then yeah, that opens it up to comparison with every other artist that drops one in 2K8, including Marcus, Anthony David, Dwelé, Al Green, Mint Condition, and anybody else. When you have to start qualifying shit (This is the funkiest most soulful second record release from an artist in the first quarter this year who does pop funk but is not on the pop charts and is not a jazz artist...blah, blah, blah then somethings obviously lacking. I expected a better record from dude because what I heard on his first record made me think he was capable of more. Now I'm not so sure.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/15/08 5:23am

SoulAlive

NWF said:

I may possibly get into trouble for this, but whatever.



The point is, I love Jamie Lidell's new album, "Jim". It's funky and soulful, which is more than I can say for half these Soul artists, British, American, or otherwise. It's definitely got a classic retro soul vibe going on, but it is definitely forward thinking and pushing things forward.


Jamie's great. He's got the funkiness of Prince, the gritty soul of Otis Redding, the techno-whiz smarts of Aphex Twin, and the aesthetic quirkiness of David Byrne. And he is an absolute must-see in concert. The man sets his songs up right there on the spot like a sous chef. And he does it all by himself. Vocals, beatboxing, multi-track layering. This white boy from the UK is the bomb! Take that, Jay Kay! wink


hmmm is it anything like Jamiroquai? If so,I'd be interested.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/15/08 5:40am

JDInteractive

avatar

Unfortunately I have to say that Jamie Lidell isn't half as exciting as he used to be. I think 'Jim' is a stronger and more enjoyable listen than 'Multiply' but he's becoming to moderate and mainstream. His live shows are becoming less interesting too. I remember seeing him at the Sonar Festival back in 2003 and thought he was amazing. He layered and beatboxed and just found tunes from out of nowhere. I remember a particular highlight when he beatboxed, recorded it and sang Prince's 'Forever in my life' over the top of it. On more recent occasions when I've seen him, it's more a combination of soul numbers and the odd borish beatboxing vibe. If only we could roll back the hands of time.
There's Joy In Expatriation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 07/15/08 7:30am

Mong

His band are useless, as well. I prefer him solo live.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 07/15/08 9:20am

Meloh9

avatar

BlaqueKnight said:

Meloh9 said:




I hear you but is it fair to compare Jamie to such an established artist with a history as rich as Marcus Miller? I don't know if Jim is the funkiest or most soulful album of the year thus far, but do I think it is a decent effort, better than most newer contemporary material as of late. Maybe Jim is the kind of album that should be judged on its own terms for what it is worth in order to be appreciated.



Its hard to judge a record on its own when every few seconds you hear something that came from another song that was hot 30 years ago. This record is unoriginal. I DON'T think its a decent effort. I think its lazy rehash. I give "Multiply" much props because it was original and solidified Jamie's identity, which is usually hard to do these days in one record. This time around, that's not the case. He sounds like a cover band singer on this record. I've been hearing a lot of good stuff lately and while this is not a badly made record, its no "masterpiece" and when somebody says its the "most soulful" and "funkiest" then yeah, that opens it up to comparison with every other artist that drops one in 2K8, including Marcus, Anthony David, Dwelé, Al Green, Mint Condition, and anybody else. When you have to start qualifying shit (This is the funkiest most soulful second record release from an artist in the first quarter this year who does pop funk but is not on the pop charts and is not a jazz artist...blah, blah, blah then somethings obviously lacking. I expected a better record from dude because what I heard on his first record made me think he was capable of more. Now I'm not so sure.



point taken when you break it down like that. I still think it is decent, I guess I look at it as "well made" = 'decent' but everybody does not think in the same terms so I understand. I must admit there was a song where the bass line reminded me of If You Want Me To Stay, or that sounds like where he may have been trying to go with it. I think its hard not to rehash the past, the key is where you go with it and if you have enough of your own identity to back it up.

For example I can hear the Albert King bends in a Jimi Hendrix solo, we can all hear the Sly influence in Funkadelic, but Jimi took it some place else, and so did George and the gang, thats not an easy or overnight thing to do.

I can also admit that there is a certain fire on Multiply that 'Jim" is lacking, the later album is more restrained but pop doesn't always mean its bad, and I tried to avoid prince analogy s however P proved you can make a pop record that is still funky and yet make is commercially viable.

But all in all I get your point, you simply just don't agree this is the most soulful compared to other stuff that came out in 08, point taken
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 07/15/08 1:17pm

Sdldawn

BlaqueKnight said:

You took me seriously?
Lighten up. You're feelin' this CD; I'm not. That's all there is to it.


i was being sarcastic..


now i'm tired
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 07/15/08 5:34pm

Cinnie

Sdldawn said:

BlaqueKnight said:

You took me seriously?
Lighten up. You're feelin' this CD; I'm not. That's all there is to it.


i was being sarcastic..


now i'm tired

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 07/16/08 12:51am

Telepathy

avatar

Wow thats impressive when someone does it all themselves. I will definitely keep an eye out for this album. Cheers. thumbs up!
If a man is guilty for what goes on in his mind then give me the electric chair for all my future crimes.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Jamie Lidell's "Jim" may possibly be the funkiest and soulful album of this year!