http://www.chicagotribune...8735.story

Well it's already a three-ring circus, why not put it all out there anyway? LOL Oh I forgot, it's important to preserve privacy yet MJ's shit was all over the place, right?

"Gaughan refused the request Thursday, saying attorneys must make their arguments in private to keep prospective jurors from being prejudiced by pretrial news reports"

i'm wandering what kind of jury won't convict him. who does not know r. kelly enough to know he a freak.

Evvy said:

I bet you half of the jurors would be senile or people who don't know R. Kelly that well musically and probably had been under a rock when the allegations hit.

it will definitely work to his advantage to have all non-fans on the jury. once a fan sees and hears the crap he has pulled they gone shut him down

Evvy said:

My answer: a jury that might be presented with a reluctant, even hostile witness who is now of majority age and has settled monetarily with the defendant.

he been getting away with 3 terrible albums one after the other put him away

i wonder if this case is gonna lead to a part 2 of that one episode of the boondocks.

paisleypark4 said:

Ya know, I was watching that BBC special about the evolution of R&B and they actually said he was our generations R&B king




and they said it with a straight face!

bboy87 said:

I'm not surprised. Some people think he the second coming of old-time soul greats. I say to myself if they really reviewed the careers of Sam Cooke and Marvin Gaye and then compare that to the guy who's supposedly the second coming of the both of them and realize he's not even in THEIR level.