independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Marilyn Manson's Lawsuit
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 03/24/08 2:16pm

wonder505

Marilyn Manson's Lawsuit

My Goodness!! eek

http://news.yahoo.com/s/e...56c938ae5d

Marilyn Manson's Seal of Approval Gina Serpe
Mon Mar 24, 8:15 AM ET



Los Angeles (E! Online) - Marilyn Manson's private parts are officially being kept under cover.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Los Angeles judge has approved a motion filed by the shock rocker last week to keep sealed all financial and business records for the duration of the discovery process in the pending breach of contract lawsuit filed against Manson by his former keyboardist.

Los Angeles Superior Court judge Michael L. Stern ruled on the confidentiality order on Friday, despite protests from attorneys for Manson's former bandmate Madonna Wayne Gacy that the order was too broad for the needs of the case.

Gacy, whose real name is Stephen Bier, filed suit against Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, on Aug. 2, 2007, claiming the frontman misused millions of the band's money to bankroll his own eccentric whims. Manson literally followed suit, filing a countersuit against Gacy in December, accusing him of failing to meet contractual touring, recording and merchandising agreements.

Unauthorized purchases Gacy claims Manson made with group funds include the full skeleton of a four-year-old Chinese girl, various pieces of Nazi propaganda and a $150,000 engagement ring (money not so well spent, in retrospect) for ex-wife Dita Von Teese. He also claims in court papers that Manson paid for his entire wedding to Von Teese with the group's money as well as financed a drug habit.

Gacy claims the blind purchasing deprived him of more than $20 million in his cut of profits from the band's partnership, and maintains his former ally only sought the confidentiality order to hide his predilections from the public.

"He's trying to hide his skeletons from you all," Gacy's attorney, Keith A. Fink, said.

The document sealing is the same order, to the letter, as the one granted to Lindsay Lohan earlier this year in her since-settled lawsuit over a 2005 traffic accident. Manson's attorneys specifically requested the Lohan treatment from Stern, who served as judge in that case, as well.

As it stands, Gacy's attorneys, though no one else, will be allowed access to Manson's personal records. Barring any unforeseen appeals or delays in the case, a hearing in which the keyboardist's attorneys will renew their petition to depose the rocker is set for April 10.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 03/24/08 2:25pm

NDRU

avatar

falloff Madonna Wayne Gacy!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/24/08 9:38pm

novabrkr

It's quite appropriate probably. Manson definitely abused at least the writing credits for his records, he barely wrote anything else than the lyrics himself. Some of the guys who've been in the group weren't bad at writing catchy choruses, and so on, and it's a bit thick that he attempted to take the credit for all of it by being himself the person the band's name was referring to.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/24/08 10:05pm

guitarslinger4
4

avatar

novabrkr said:

It's quite appropriate probably. Manson definitely abused at least the writing credits for his records, he barely wrote anything else than the lyrics himself. Some of the guys who've been in the group weren't bad at writing catchy choruses, and so on, and it's a bit thick that he attempted to take the credit for all of it by being himself the person the band's name was referring to.


He came up with the album concepts as well which were a big part of the lyrics and the album's sound and artwork as a whole. He deserves the credit he gets as he came up with a lot of interesting stuff.
[Edited 3/24/08 22:07pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/24/08 10:36pm

novabrkr

Of course. And the concepts are obviously what made Marilyn Manson popular, and definitely not the keyboard riffs, but in musical terms he definitely always downplayed the importance of his "backing musicians" (I'm indicating here that the backing musicians really were always who did the music anyway, yet he always spoke of them like they just served him). In music business terms you still should get however compensated accordingly for your musical contributions. A bit odd in the context of a shock-rock group perhaps, but he can't make the claim that "it was my idea to wear a red paint stroke across the forehead, therefore I don't have to pay for the musical contributions like everybody else" in the court.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Marilyn Manson's Lawsuit