independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > #47 JANET JACKSON DEF JAM/IDJMG 12,201
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 14 of 14 « First<567891011121314
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #390 posted 04/08/08 6:45am

midnightmover

Just saw this Timberlake interview on Letterman from a few years later. He's also uncomfortable talking about Nipplegate, and tap dances a bit, but makes it clear to anyone with a brain, that yes, it was all worked out. Point blank, anyone who can watch this interview and not see that the whole thing was premeditated, is mentally retarded. There is no other way to put it. Go to 2.05


[Edited 4/8/08 9:14am]
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #391 posted 04/08/08 7:15am

Isel

SoulAlive said:



See,this just proves what I was saying earlier.Madonna has never gotten a "pass".She's gotten way more criticism than Janet ever received.I don't know why some folks think she gets away with murder.I remember during the Sex/Erotica era,she was being bashed left and right.The critics were brutal.In 1993,I recall seeing several "Is Madonna Over?"-type articles in major magazines.The reason why she's survived the backlash is because she's extremely smart and has a strong personality.She had a tough,defiant "fuck you" attitude back then,which Janet simply doesn't have.I remember seeing Janet last year on that news interview,where they embarassed her by asking about the SuperBowl.She appeared weak,with no backbone at all.


This will be my final "essay" on the subject because I've already addressed most of these points throughout the course of discussion on this thread. lol lol

IN SUMMATION lol

The difference is Madonna has been allowed to come back! Soulalive, I don't have anything against Madonna fans or Madonna herself actually. But I HONESTLY don't see that Madonna has grown that much as an artist at all. From my observation, she's doing the same thing she's always done, and making shitloads of money off it. That's her strength, really. You're talking to someone who isn't all that impressed with her in the first place. I don't get involved in any of her threads as a rule because I don't have much good to say about her. I don't play any Madonna "games" on this site. lol lol I just don't see where she's that great except for convincing her fans that she's great.. really going for more..of a sound having more worldwide appeal at the RIGHT time in her career.

A lot of Madonna's fans keep telling me how's she's changed it up and how interesting she is--much more so than Janet. However, I just don't agree. "Musically" and even image-wise I don't think Madonna has necessarily "reinvented" herself all that match. As I said about Janet, if Madonna dropped the dancers, the "theatre," and focused only on the music, now I'd be impressed by that. I'd be impressed even by her efforts; however, would she still be the same Madonna to her hard-core fans? Now to me just because Madonna shifts to "pop with a techno twist," since I don't particularly like techno and have never been a fan of "poppish" sound, well I'm not too impressed: I just don't think that's such a big "reinvention." And what has she done that's so interesting: found religion, had kids, gotten married, adopted an impoverished kid from another country, bought a lot of real estate, gotten involved in her "causes" of choice.. what else?? I do respect her efforts as a mom and a person of charity, but a lot of celebrites are good moms and have their own "causes" or even foundations. So some if not a lot of Madonna is nearly "celebrity cliché," ya know?

And not to bring-up old wounds, but when push comes to shove, I don't think she's particularly brave in the face of REAL controversy: didn't she change a video. lyrics, or something like that because she didn't want to be Dixie-chicked? Plus I recall a little that really pissed me off at the time when she said at a concert in Great Britain, something like the stupidest Brit is still smarter than any American? Well I would assume she's not including her Amerian "fans" in that statement? neutral So.. I'm just not overly impressed. But it's fine with me if others are. I don't think she's a bad person: I just don't think she's better than Janet.

Now as I've said in the course of this thread, Janet has definitely made some very dumb, very damaging moves as a very precarious time in her career--when most would think she'd be OLD enough to know better, costing her tremendously. Janet should be embarrassed about the Super Bowl because it was a stupid, unnecessary move, and yeah she was "weak" to even go there; however, I also think the media and viewing public overreacted just tad. Given the climate of that time period, the decision to bare her breast was career suicide for Janet. But years have past and the climate has changed, so why is the press still harping on it anyway? Frankly, I think the media are baiting Janet for some quip maybe about Bush.. or the moral majority just to sell their own “story,” BUT SHE WON’T BITE, and maybe for good reason because I’m not so sure if the public would think she was all that “brave,” but more defiant? I think the public wouldn't trust her motives whatever she might say about the incident, so it might be best not to comment any further.

Now regarding personal growth, Janet has talked about being spiritual, but she hasn't harped on it. She talked about politics, but hasn't harped on it. She's talked about her various "causes." She hasn't had kids, but a lot celebs wait until their 40's to adopt or have kids. However, maybe she might not want kids, too? Would it make Janet more interesting to do what exactly besides cutting the explicitly sexual lyrics in some of her songs? Now musically, Janet is doing what she has always done in much the same way as Madonna except she hasn't taken-up the guitar of piano to give herself more cred. But for Janet,.. and now maybe even finally for Madonna from what I read in that thread--it's not working for her anymore because they BOTH risk becoming charicatures of their former selves as age takes its toll. The difference is that I'm not sure if Janet has that many hard-core fans left worldwide if she's only sold half-a million doing what she made her "famous." It might be worth a shot for her to really change it up because it can't get much worse. LOL She's REALLY going to have to do some reinventing; however, then her hard-core fans might leave, so she'd break even, so her sales might never be the same no matter what she does--as midnightmover has stated numerous times in this thread.

Finally, I know a lot of people don't agree, but I do think there is an element of racism going-on just by virtue of the entertainment business and more specifically the music business itself much less society as a whole. I think it's going to be harder for Janet to make a comeback because of all the things I've mentioned in this thread. As documented by those articles I posted, opportunities have gotten better, but still not equal in the music business as well as in Hollywood. It's very difficult for older women in more traditional pop music--much less an older or even up-and-coming young woman of color comparatively-speaking. I agree, once again, with a few people on this thread that Madonna is the exception not the rule, but I'm not convinced it's due to her talent as a "music artist." Of course, even she might as well forget about it as far as acting is concerned since she's what a white 50-year-old with not a lot of past success? lol But generally speaking, good roles for people of color are few and far between compared to those of whites, for example. And good roles for women of color are even fewer. Good roles for women-of-color-in-their-40's are virtually non-existent: they are nearly non-existent for white women except for Meryl Streep! lol

I'm not suggesting Janet is a martyr any more than any other 40+ year-old, woman of color in the business. I'm just stating the facts. So Janet definitely has her work cut-out for her on many levels.

P.S. I agree Janet could have handled the SB better, but weren't there lawsuits and stuff being filed? There could have been liability issues. Her attorneys may have advised her against being too accepting of full responsibilty. (I took responsibility for collision once.. when I friggin should have kept my mouth shut because it wasn't may fault! mad But I digress...)

I'll say this much: I think she was too "lenient" due to blind loyalty on people who got her into this mess in the first place.. and very NAIVE to be talked into baring her breast on national television. It's one thing to do it on MTV, and quite another on CBS, and she should have known better. Justin should have known better, ya know? Her advisors should have known better: her creative team--responsible for putting her in the best light should have known better, but I guess they all wanted to make an "impact, " at the risk of throwing her under a bus. Janet was just plain stupid to trust their judgment with their "work" nearly irreparably damaging her career to where she’s in the position of making a comeback at this stage in the game. So it might be in her best interest to rethink some of her associations because I’m not sure if they really have her best interest at heart anyway.

Suffice to say Jamie King, Barry Lather, Marty Kudelka, Tina Landon just to name a few NOBODY with any sense of professionalism or grain of intelligence would have allowed her to get into the damn mess in the first place. Do I sound bitter? lol lol

Oh.. and P.S.S. I mentioned this convo to husband--mainly concerning my comment about Bonnie Raitt. And yeah..he said there is no way Janet is on anywhere near the same level as Bonnie. But he also said, "Neither is Madonna"! LOL So there ya go.
[Edited 4/8/08 10:12am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #392 posted 04/08/08 10:03am

carlluv

avatar

I just have one question to ask. Why do people keep comparing Janet to Madonna. two different artists with different styles. I thought we were talking about why Janet lastest album is not doing well wink
why in God's name do u wanna make me cry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #393 posted 04/08/08 11:09am

TotalAlisa

avatar

SoulAlive said:



See,this just proves what I was saying earlier.Madonna has never gotten a "pass".She's gotten way more criticism than Janet ever received.I don't know why some folks think she gets away with murder.I remember during the Sex/Erotica era,she was being bashed left and right.The critics were brutal.In 1993,I recall seeing several "Is Madonna Over?"-type articles in major magazines.The reason why she's survived the backlash is because she's extremely smart and has a strong personality.She had a tough,defiant "fuck you" attitude back then,which Janet simply doesn't have.I remember seeing Janet last year on that news interview,where they embarassed her by asking about the SuperBowl.She appeared weak,with no backbone at all.

WHO CARES ABOUT CRITICISM.. im sorry but madonna is still being supported.. HOW DID THAT CRAP.. 4 minutes with JT go to number 3 eek and even touch my body... out of the big three female artist this year.. feedback was truely the best released single... maybe not janet's best song.. but better then 4min and TMB... and even with a better song.. janet still doesn't get support

those are the worst songs those women have released..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #394 posted 04/08/08 12:06pm

Martinelli

avatar

Every artist goes through periods where they're not being supported.

Feedback was doing decently 4 a while..but IDJ turned Discipline
in2 a stillborn baby sending 4 fucking singles 2 radio. Those clowns know
fuck all. Janet needs 2 stop working with Dupri. 20YO was the same
disaster with the whole 'let's push her towards the urban market
'cuz that's her roots.'
...Your coochie gonna swell up and fall apart...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #395 posted 04/08/08 12:13pm

Martinelli

avatar

Isel said:

SoulAlive said:



See,this just proves what I was saying earlier.Madonna has never gotten a "pass".She's gotten way more criticism than Janet ever received.I don't know why some folks think she gets away with murder.I remember during the Sex/Erotica era,she was being bashed left and right.The critics were brutal.In 1993,I recall seeing several "Is Madonna Over?"-type articles in major magazines.The reason why she's survived the backlash is because she's extremely smart and has a strong personality.She had a tough,defiant "fuck you" attitude back then,which Janet simply doesn't have.I remember seeing Janet last year on that news interview,where they embarassed her by asking about the SuperBowl.She appeared weak,with no backbone at all.


This will be my final "essay" on the subject because I've already addressed most of these points throughout the course of discussion on this thread. lol lol

IN SUMMATION lol

The difference is Madonna has been allowed to come back! Soulalive, I don't have anything against Madonna fans or Madonna herself actually. But I HONESTLY don't see that Madonna has grown that much as an artist at all. From my observation, she's doing the same thing she's always done, and making shitloads of money off it. That's her strength, really. You're talking to someone who isn't all that impressed with her in the first place. I don't get involved in any of her threads as a rule because I don't have much good to say about her. I don't play any Madonna "games" on this site. lol lol I just don't see where she's that great except for convincing her fans that she's great.. really going for more..of a sound having more worldwide appeal at the RIGHT time in her career.

A lot of Madonna's fans keep telling me how's she's changed it up and how interesting she is--much more so than Janet. However, I just don't agree. "Musically" and even image-wise I don't think Madonna has necessarily "reinvented" herself all that match. As I said about Janet, if Madonna dropped the dancers, the "theatre," and focused only on the music, now I'd be impressed by that. I'd be impressed even by her efforts; however, would she still be the same Madonna to her hard-core fans? Now to me just because Madonna shifts to "pop with a techno twist," since I don't particularly like techno and have never been a fan of "poppish" sound, well I'm not too impressed: I just don't think that's such a big "reinvention." And what has she done that's so interesting: found religion, had kids, gotten married, adopted an impoverished kid from another country, bought a lot of real estate, gotten involved in her "causes" of choice.. what else?? I do respect her efforts as a mom and a person of charity, but a lot of celebrites are good moms and have their own "causes" or even foundations. So some if not a lot of Madonna is nearly "celebrity cliché," ya know?

And not to bring-up old wounds, but when push comes to shove, I don't think she's particularly brave in the face of REAL controversy: didn't she change a video. lyrics, or something like that because she didn't want to be Dixie-chicked? Plus I recall a little that really pissed me off at the time when she said at a concert in Great Britain, something like the stupidest Brit is still smarter than any American? Well I would assume she's not including her Amerian "fans" in that statement? neutral So.. I'm just not overly impressed. But it's fine with me if others are. I don't think she's a bad person: I just don't think she's better than Janet.

Now as I've said in the course of this thread, Janet has definitely made some very dumb, very damaging moves as a very precarious time in her career--when most would think she'd be OLD enough to know better, costing her tremendously. Janet should be embarrassed about the Super Bowl because it was a stupid, unnecessary move, and yeah she was "weak" to even go there; however, I also think the media and viewing public overreacted just tad. Given the climate of that time period, the decision to bare her breast was career suicide for Janet. But years have past and the climate has changed, so why is the press still harping on it anyway? Frankly, I think the media are baiting Janet for some quip maybe about Bush.. or the moral majority just to sell their own “story,” BUT SHE WON’T BITE, and maybe for good reason because I’m not so sure if the public would think she was all that “brave,” but more defiant? I think the public wouldn't trust her motives whatever she might say about the incident, so it might be best not to comment any further.

Now regarding personal growth, Janet has talked about being spiritual, but she hasn't harped on it. She talked about politics, but hasn't harped on it. She's talked about her various "causes." She hasn't had kids, but a lot celebs wait until their 40's to adopt or have kids. However, maybe she might not want kids, too? Would it make Janet more interesting to do what exactly besides cutting the explicitly sexual lyrics in some of her songs? Now musically, Janet is doing what she has always done in much the same way as Madonna except she hasn't taken-up the guitar of piano to give herself more cred. But for Janet,.. and now maybe even finally for Madonna from what I read in that thread--it's not working for her anymore because they BOTH risk becoming charicatures of their former selves as age takes its toll. The difference is that I'm not sure if Janet has that many hard-core fans left worldwide if she's only sold half-a million doing what she made her "famous." It might be worth a shot for her to really change it up because it can't get much worse. LOL She's REALLY going to have to do some reinventing; however, then her hard-core fans might leave, so she'd break even, so her sales might never be the same no matter what she does--as midnightmover has stated numerous times in this thread.

Finally, I know a lot of people don't agree, but I do think there is an element of racism going-on just by virtue of the entertainment business and more specifically the music business itself much less society as a whole. I think it's going to be harder for Janet to make a comeback because of all the things I've mentioned in this thread. As documented by those articles I posted, opportunities have gotten better, but still not equal in the music business as well as in Hollywood. It's very difficult for older women in more traditional pop music--much less an older or even up-and-coming young woman of color comparatively-speaking. I agree, once again, with a few people on this thread that Madonna is the exception not the rule, but I'm not convinced it's due to her talent as a "music artist." Of course, even she might as well forget about it as far as acting is concerned since she's what a white 50-year-old with not a lot of past success? lol But generally speaking, good roles for people of color are few and far between compared to those of whites, for example. And good roles for women of color are even fewer. Good roles for women-of-color-in-their-40's are virtually non-existent: they are nearly non-existent for white women except for Meryl Streep! lol

I'm not suggesting Janet is a martyr any more than any other 40+ year-old, woman of color in the business. I'm just stating the facts. So Janet definitely has her work cut-out for her on many levels.

P.S. I agree Janet could have handled the SB better, but weren't there lawsuits and stuff being filed? There could have been liability issues. Her attorneys may have advised her against being too accepting of full responsibilty. (I took responsibility for collision once.. when I friggin should have kept my mouth shut because it wasn't may fault! mad But I digress...)

I'll say this much: I think she was too "lenient" due to blind loyalty on people who got her into this mess in the first place.. and very NAIVE to be talked into baring her breast on national television. It's one thing to do it on MTV, and quite another on CBS, and she should have known better. Justin should have known better, ya know? Her advisors should have known better: her creative team--responsible for putting her in the best light should have known better, but I guess they all wanted to make an "impact, " at the risk of throwing her under a bus. Janet was just plain stupid to trust their judgment with their "work" nearly irreparably damaging her career to where she’s in the position of making a comeback at this stage in the game. So it might be in her best interest to rethink some of her associations because I’m not sure if they really have her best interest at heart anyway.

Suffice to say Jamie King, Barry Lather, Marty Kudelka, Tina Landon just to name a few NOBODY with any sense of professionalism or grain of intelligence would have allowed her to get into the damn mess in the first place. Do I sound bitter? lol lol

Oh.. and P.S.S. I mentioned this convo to husband--mainly concerning my comment about Bonnie Raitt. And yeah..he said there is no way Janet is on anywhere near the same level as Bonnie. But he also said, "Neither is Madonna"! LOL So there ya go.
[Edited 4/8/08 10:12am]


It's like u r comparing Robbie Williams 2 David Bowie.

it's really quite easy 2 summarize..:

Janet released 3 'mediocre' to 'poor' albums in a row being promoted by amateurs.
...Your coochie gonna swell up and fall apart...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #396 posted 04/08/08 12:16pm

midnightmover

Martinelli said:

Isel said:



This will be my final "essay" on the subject because I've already addressed most of these points throughout the course of discussion on this thread. lol lol

IN SUMMATION lol

The difference is Madonna has been allowed to come back! Soulalive, I don't have anything against Madonna fans or Madonna herself actually. But I HONESTLY don't see that Madonna has grown that much as an artist at all. From my observation, she's doing the same thing she's always done, and making shitloads of money off it. That's her strength, really. You're talking to someone who isn't all that impressed with her in the first place. I don't get involved in any of her threads as a rule because I don't have much good to say about her. I don't play any Madonna "games" on this site. lol lol I just don't see where she's that great except for convincing her fans that she's great.. really going for more..of a sound having more worldwide appeal at the RIGHT time in her career.

A lot of Madonna's fans keep telling me how's she's changed it up and how interesting she is--much more so than Janet. However, I just don't agree. "Musically" and even image-wise I don't think Madonna has necessarily "reinvented" herself all that match. As I said about Janet, if Madonna dropped the dancers, the "theatre," and focused only on the music, now I'd be impressed by that. I'd be impressed even by her efforts; however, would she still be the same Madonna to her hard-core fans? Now to me just because Madonna shifts to "pop with a techno twist," since I don't particularly like techno and have never been a fan of "poppish" sound, well I'm not too impressed: I just don't think that's such a big "reinvention." And what has she done that's so interesting: found religion, had kids, gotten married, adopted an impoverished kid from another country, bought a lot of real estate, gotten involved in her "causes" of choice.. what else?? I do respect her efforts as a mom and a person of charity, but a lot of celebrites are good moms and have their own "causes" or even foundations. So some if not a lot of Madonna is nearly "celebrity cliché," ya know?

And not to bring-up old wounds, but when push comes to shove, I don't think she's particularly brave in the face of REAL controversy: didn't she change a video. lyrics, or something like that because she didn't want to be Dixie-chicked? Plus I recall a little that really pissed me off at the time when she said at a concert in Great Britain, something like the stupidest Brit is still smarter than any American? Well I would assume she's not including her Amerian "fans" in that statement? neutral So.. I'm just not overly impressed. But it's fine with me if others are. I don't think she's a bad person: I just don't think she's better than Janet.

Now as I've said in the course of this thread, Janet has definitely made some very dumb, very damaging moves as a very precarious time in her career--when most would think she'd be OLD enough to know better, costing her tremendously. Janet should be embarrassed about the Super Bowl because it was a stupid, unnecessary move, and yeah she was "weak" to even go there; however, I also think the media and viewing public overreacted just tad. Given the climate of that time period, the decision to bare her breast was career suicide for Janet. But years have past and the climate has changed, so why is the press still harping on it anyway? Frankly, I think the media are baiting Janet for some quip maybe about Bush.. or the moral majority just to sell their own “story,” BUT SHE WON’T BITE, and maybe for good reason because I’m not so sure if the public would think she was all that “brave,” but more defiant? I think the public wouldn't trust her motives whatever she might say about the incident, so it might be best not to comment any further.

Now regarding personal growth, Janet has talked about being spiritual, but she hasn't harped on it. She talked about politics, but hasn't harped on it. She's talked about her various "causes." She hasn't had kids, but a lot celebs wait until their 40's to adopt or have kids. However, maybe she might not want kids, too? Would it make Janet more interesting to do what exactly besides cutting the explicitly sexual lyrics in some of her songs? Now musically, Janet is doing what she has always done in much the same way as Madonna except she hasn't taken-up the guitar of piano to give herself more cred. But for Janet,.. and now maybe even finally for Madonna from what I read in that thread--it's not working for her anymore because they BOTH risk becoming charicatures of their former selves as age takes its toll. The difference is that I'm not sure if Janet has that many hard-core fans left worldwide if she's only sold half-a million doing what she made her "famous." It might be worth a shot for her to really change it up because it can't get much worse. LOL She's REALLY going to have to do some reinventing; however, then her hard-core fans might leave, so she'd break even, so her sales might never be the same no matter what she does--as midnightmover has stated numerous times in this thread.

Finally, I know a lot of people don't agree, but I do think there is an element of racism going-on just by virtue of the entertainment business and more specifically the music business itself much less society as a whole. I think it's going to be harder for Janet to make a comeback because of all the things I've mentioned in this thread. As documented by those articles I posted, opportunities have gotten better, but still not equal in the music business as well as in Hollywood. It's very difficult for older women in more traditional pop music--much less an older or even up-and-coming young woman of color comparatively-speaking. I agree, once again, with a few people on this thread that Madonna is the exception not the rule, but I'm not convinced it's due to her talent as a "music artist." Of course, even she might as well forget about it as far as acting is concerned since she's what a white 50-year-old with not a lot of past success? lol But generally speaking, good roles for people of color are few and far between compared to those of whites, for example. And good roles for women of color are even fewer. Good roles for women-of-color-in-their-40's are virtually non-existent: they are nearly non-existent for white women except for Meryl Streep! lol

I'm not suggesting Janet is a martyr any more than any other 40+ year-old, woman of color in the business. I'm just stating the facts. So Janet definitely has her work cut-out for her on many levels.

P.S. I agree Janet could have handled the SB better, but weren't there lawsuits and stuff being filed? There could have been liability issues. Her attorneys may have advised her against being too accepting of full responsibilty. (I took responsibility for collision once.. when I friggin should have kept my mouth shut because it wasn't may fault! mad But I digress...)

I'll say this much: I think she was too "lenient" due to blind loyalty on people who got her into this mess in the first place.. and very NAIVE to be talked into baring her breast on national television. It's one thing to do it on MTV, and quite another on CBS, and she should have known better. Justin should have known better, ya know? Her advisors should have known better: her creative team--responsible for putting her in the best light should have known better, but I guess they all wanted to make an "impact, " at the risk of throwing her under a bus. Janet was just plain stupid to trust their judgment with their "work" nearly irreparably damaging her career to where she’s in the position of making a comeback at this stage in the game. So it might be in her best interest to rethink some of her associations because I’m not sure if they really have her best interest at heart anyway.

Suffice to say Jamie King, Barry Lather, Marty Kudelka, Tina Landon just to name a few NOBODY with any sense of professionalism or grain of intelligence would have allowed her to get into the damn mess in the first place. Do I sound bitter? lol lol

Oh.. and P.S.S. I mentioned this convo to husband--mainly concerning my comment about Bonnie Raitt. And yeah..he said there is no way Janet is on anywhere near the same level as Bonnie. But he also said, "Neither is Madonna"! LOL So there ya go.
[Edited 4/8/08 10:12am]


It's like u r comparing Robbie Williams 2 David Bowie.

it's really quite easy 2 summarize..:

Janet released 3 'mediocre' to 'poor' albums in a row being promoted by amateurs.

Nonsense. "Feedback" is a far better track than anything Madonna has released in years. And were Virgin amateurs when they successfully promoted her earlier albums?
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #397 posted 04/08/08 1:42pm

Martinelli

avatar

midnightmover said:

Martinelli said:



It's like u r comparing Robbie Williams 2 David Bowie.

it's really quite easy 2 summarize..:

Janet released 3 'mediocre' to 'poor' albums in a row being promoted by amateurs.

Nonsense. "Feedback" is a far better track than anything Madonna has released in years. And were Virgin amateurs when they successfully promoted her earlier albums?


No I'm saying her NEW label screwed up. Yes 4minutes is one of the worst
records of 2008 already..but 'Feedback' is hardly inspired..or better than any
of the Confessions singles.
...Your coochie gonna swell up and fall apart...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #398 posted 04/08/08 2:22pm

TotalAlisa

avatar

Martinelli said:

midnightmover said:


Nonsense. "Feedback" is a far better track than anything Madonna has released in years. And were Virgin amateurs when they successfully promoted her earlier albums?


No I'm saying her NEW label screwed up. Yes 4minutes is one of the worst
records of 2008 already..but 'Feedback' is hardly inspired..or better than any
of the Confessions singles.

its all opinion... i truely believe if janet released any of those songs 4 mins or TMB... or even a song from confessions on a dance.. it would still go NO WHERE on the charts...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #399 posted 04/08/08 2:33pm

midnightmover

Martinelli said:

midnightmover said:


Nonsense. "Feedback" is a far better track than anything Madonna has released in years. And were Virgin amateurs when they successfully promoted her earlier albums?


No I'm saying her NEW label screwed up. Yes 4minutes is one of the worst
records of 2008 already..but 'Feedback' is hardly inspired..or better than any
of the Confessions singles.

You said she'd released three mediocre albums promoted by amateurs. Well, Virgin promoted the last two and they still flopped..... And Madonna's output has been garbage for years.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #400 posted 04/08/08 2:40pm

midnightmover

TotalAlisa said:

Martinelli said:



No I'm saying her NEW label screwed up. Yes 4minutes is one of the worst
records of 2008 already..but 'Feedback' is hardly inspired..or better than any
of the Confessions singles.

its all opinion... i truely believe if janet released any of those songs 4 mins or TMB... or even a song from confessions on a dance.. it would still go NO WHERE on the charts...

You are correct. Def Jam did the best they could in promoting it, and the singles were better than a lot of successful junk released by other artists. Fans are looking for a scapegoat, but the truth is people are just not interested in Janet anymore. She will never be a hot, contemporary pop star again. Those days are gone. The question is whether she can reclaim some dignity and a sense of direction in this next phase of her career, like Prince has, or whether she will just drift about aimlessly. The jury's still out on that one.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #401 posted 04/08/08 3:13pm

TotalAlisa

avatar

midnightmover said:

TotalAlisa said:


its all opinion... i truely believe if janet released any of those songs 4 mins or TMB... or even a song from confessions on a dance.. it would still go NO WHERE on the charts...

You are correct. Def Jam did the best they could in promoting it, and the singles were better than a lot of successful junk released by other artists. Fans are looking for a scapegoat, but the truth is people are just not interested in Janet anymore. She will never be a hot, contemporary pop star again. Those days are gone. The question is whether she can reclaim some dignity and a sense of direction in this next phase of her career, like Prince has, or whether she will just drift about aimlessly. The jury's still out on that one.

i agree.. janet is really not popular.. i have always thought that... and i think because people feel they can't relate to her.... a lot people like artist.. not necessarily for their music.. but a lot to do with relating to that artist..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #402 posted 04/08/08 10:23pm

OfftheWall

avatar

The thing is how will Janet gain the respect from radio and mainstream America to get the credit and play she deserves.

Why I brought up Madonna was because she has been there, been through the scrutiny, and she handled it by sticking by it and staying true to her word. Not regretting. I wouldnt say she got through it cause shes white. That may be an advantage to her, and I do not deny the racism in the industry, but Madonna wasn't the American Sweetheart with blonde hair and blue eyes. White people hated her because she was ruining that image, and pushing buttons that most people wouldn't even attempt to push. But she handled it, by being Madonna. She gained fans and fame for being outspoken, not binding by the rules. People like that in an artist. Who wants to play by the rules its boring? She lost some fans, but she gained some during that period, regardless of the press.

Will Janet ever be forgiven? Or will she need to face upto the whole ordeal honestly. Whether its through her music or what? Madonna created hype around her, and she had her less popular records, but she kept honest to herself etc. And when she came out with Ray Of Light, radio and everyone loved her again. Its like... is it really the music that gets you over the obstacle or is it your attitude?

Janet I think can get through the backlash, but how I don't know. Cause radio is just ignoring her. Theres no hype around her name at all.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #403 posted 04/09/08 3:10am

SoulAlive

Isel said:[quote]

SoulAlive said:



See,this just proves what I was saying earlier.Madonna has never gotten a "pass".She's gotten way more criticism than Janet ever received.I don't know why some folks think she gets away with murder.I remember during the Sex/Erotica era,she was being bashed left and right.The critics were brutal.In 1993,I recall seeing several "Is Madonna Over?"-type articles in major magazines.The reason why she's survived the backlash is because she's extremely smart and has a strong personality.She had a tough,defiant "fuck you" attitude back then,which Janet simply doesn't have.I remember seeing Janet last year on that news interview,where they embarassed her by asking about the SuperBowl.She appeared weak,with no backbone at all.


This will be my final "essay" on the subject because I've already addressed most of these points throughout the course of discussion on this thread. lol lol
IN SUMMATION lol The difference is Madonna has been allowed to come back!


rolleyes I'm only gonna say this one more time,so pay close attention:
Madonna was allowed to "come back" because SHE took control of the situation.She changed the subject,re-invented herself,and put the focus back on HER MUSIC,reminding many people why they liked her in the first place.After the Sex/Erotica phase,critics said she was over.They said she would never bounce back,the public was tired of her,blah blah blah.I remember reading several "Is Madonna over?"-type articles in 1993.But she wisely chose to make an excellent album ('Bedtime Stories'),containing strong,melodic singles like "Secret" and "Take A Bow" (which went straight to Number One in America).The focus wasn't on her sex life anymore.The focus wasn't on her vagina anymore.She was getting attention and praise for putting out a good album,but she didn't stop there.A year or so later,she worked with David Foster and released an adult contemporary single ("You'll See"),then went on to 'Evita',which gained her even more respect and critical acclaim.Then,of course,she did another career-defining album 'Ray Of Light' and won a few Grammys.By the end of the 90s,nobody was even talking or thinking about her 1993 backlash anymore.

After the SuperBowl fiasco,what did Janet do? She released 'Damita Jo',a sex-themed R&B album that featured her topless on the cover (hands over her boobs,but still...).In interviews,she continuted talking boldly about her sex life.Even though the public clearly wasn't interested,she continued down this unfortunate path for the next album '20 YO' (yet another sex-themed R&B album),keeping the focus on her boobs and her sex life.It's like she had nothing else to offer.She became a one-dimensional sex-obsessed artist (in one interview,she talked about the sex videos/home movies that she and Jermaine like to make).She presented herself as a smiling,half-dressed sex kitten with whispery vocals and songs like "Get It Out Me" and "So Excited",promising to "open my spot for you,anytime that you want me to".This is the same,tired act she's been doing since 1993.The public is not gonna allow Janet to "come back" until she does something new,fresh and exciting.I don't think it's a stretch to say that,since 1993,Madonna has certainly grown and evolved.She's proven that there's alot more to her than just her sexuality.She has much more to offer than that.


Soulalive, I don't have anything against Madonna fans or Madonna herself actually. But I HONESTLY don't see that Madonna has grown that much as an artist at all. From my observation, she's doing the same thing she's always done,and making shitloads of money off it.That's her strength, really.


When critics and reporters talk about Madonna,the word "re-invention" is used frequently.Why do you think that is? YOU may think she's doing the same thing over and over,but much of the world disagrees with you.I challenge you to name two Madonna albums that sound alike.From the very beginning,she has changed her sound,tried new styles and beats,worked with producers of different genres,and came up with some truly edgy albums.She's even recorded albums with producers who weren't even known/famous before they worked with her.Her tours are certainly not the "same old thing".Each tour is different and better than the previous one.There's always a different theme/purpose.If Madonna had made a career out of "doing the same old thing",she never would have survived past the 80s.People would have got sick of her by the late 80s and discarded her,like they did with so many of her contemporaries.After 26 years,she still hold people's interest.The ironic thing about Janet's situation is,most people don't even care about her flashing a boob at the SuperBowl.That's old news.Many of her fans still think the Superbowl is the reason why her career is suffering,but they're wrong,wrong,wrong.The public couldn't care less about her boobs.Her career is suffering because she's not doing anything new and interesting.That's why her CDs aren't selling well.


You're talking to someone who isn't all that impressed with her in the first place. I don't get involved in any of her threads as a rule because I don't have much good to say about her. I don't play any Madonna "games" on this site. lol lol I just don't see where she's that great except for convincing her fans that she's great.. really going for more..of a sound having more worldwide appeal at the RIGHT time in her career.


You may not think she's great,but you DO enjoy discussing her.That's the kind of artist Madonna is.She evokes strong opinions,pro and con.There are many people who despise her,but they still keep an eye on her and what she does.Madonna is one of those artists who is not easy to ignore.

A lot of Madonna's fans keep telling me how's she's changed it up and how interesting she is--much more so than Janet. However, I just don't agree. "Musically" and even image-wise I don't think Madonna has necessarily "reinvented" herself all that match.



So,you're telling me that an album like 'Ray Of Light' is similiar to the previous 'Bedtime Stories'? Or that 'I'm Breathless' sounded just like the previous album 'Like A Prayer'? Like I said before,I challenge you to name two Madonna albums that sound exactly the same.



And not to bring-up old wounds, but when push comes to shove, I don't think she's particularly brave in the face of REAL controversy: didn't she change a video. lyrics, or something like that because she didn't want to be Dixie-chicked?



Yeah,she pulled her "American Life" video in 2003.I don't know if you've ever seen it,but it's a bold,hard-hitting video that shows alot of war violence and blood.It probably would have been insensitive to release it while our soldiers were being sent to war.Do you really think their families needed Madonna to remind them of what their sons/daughers were facing? While I disagreed with her decision to pull it (I think it made a strong statement),I totally understand her reasons for doing so.

Plus I recall a little that really pissed me off at the time when she said at a concert in Great Britain, something like the stupidest Brit is still smarter than any American? Well I would assume she's not including her Amerian "fans" in that statement? neutral


America elected Bush for two terms lol I think that's what she was talking about.Obviously,she doesn't mean every American,just the ones who voted for Bush and it's hard to argue with that,lol.




Now as I've said in the course of this thread, Janet has definitely made some very dumb, very damaging moves as a very precarious time in her career--when most would think she'd be OLD enough to know better, costing her tremendously. Janet should be embarrassed about the Super Bowl because it was a stupid, unnecessary move, and yeah she was "weak" to even go there; however, I also think the media and viewing public overreacted just tad. Given the climate of that time period, the decision to bare her breast was career suicide for Janet. But years have past and the climate has changed, so why is the press still harping on it anyway? Frankly, I think the media are baiting Janet for some quip maybe about Bush.. or the moral majority just to sell their own “story,” BUT SHE WON’T BITE, and maybe for good reason because I’m not so sure if the public would think she was all that “brave,” but more defiant? I think the public wouldn't trust her motives whatever she might say about the incident, so it might be best not to comment any further.



Yeah,Janet was dumb for the whole SuperBowl thing,but she could have easily recovered from the backlash by now.She could have changed the subject by now.

Now regarding personal growth, Janet has talked about being spiritual, but she hasn't harped on it. She talked about politics, but hasn't harped on it. She's talked about her various "causes." She hasn't had kids, but a lot celebs wait until their 40's to adopt or have kids. However, maybe she might not want kids, too? Would it make Janet more interesting to do what exactly besides cutting the explicitly sexual lyrics in some of her songs? Now musically, Janet is doing what she has always done in much the same way as Madonna except she hasn't taken-up the guitar of piano to give herself more cred. But for Janet,.. and now maybe even finally for Madonna from what I read in that thread--it's not working for her anymore because they BOTH risk becoming charicatures of their former selves as age takes its toll. The difference is that I'm not sure if Janet has that many hard-core fans left worldwide if she's only sold half-a million doing what she made her "famous." It might be worth a shot for her to really change it up because it can't get much worse. LOL She's REALLY going to have to do some reinventing; however, then her hard-core fans might leave, so she'd break even, so her sales might never be the same no matter what she does--as midnightmover has stated numerous times in this thread.


It's not really about big record sales anymore.Madonna and Janet will never sell records like they did in the 80s,nor should they be expected to.It's more important,at this point,for Janet to regain some respect and credibility as an artist.As a performer too.She hasn't toured in awhile.A successful,soldout world tour is an achievable goal for Janet.Madonna has done three big tours in this decade alone.That's where the real money is,anyway.

I'll say this much: I think she was too "lenient" due to blind loyalty on people who got her into this mess in the first place.. and very NAIVE to be talked into baring her breast on national television. It's one thing to do it on MTV, and quite another on CBS, and she should have known better. Justin should have known better, ya know? Her advisors should have known better: her creative team--responsible for putting her in the best light should have known better, but I guess they all wanted to make an "impact, " at the risk of throwing her under a bus. Janet was just plain stupid to trust their judgment with their "work" nearly irreparably damaging her career to where she’s in the position of making a comeback at this stage in the game. So it might be in her best interest to rethink some of her associations because I’m not sure if they really have her best interest at heart anyway.


Janet seriously needs a new manager and team of advisors.A smart,focused,aggressive manager could get her out of this mess.

.
[Edited 4/9/08 3:58am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #404 posted 04/09/08 6:00am

midnightmover

SoulAlive said:

Isel said:


Plus I recall a little that really pissed me off at the time when she said at a concert in Great Britain, something like the stupidest Brit is still smarter than any American? Well I would assume she's not including her Amerian "fans" in that statement?

America elected Bush for two terms I think that's what she was talking about.Obviously,she doesn't mean every American,just the ones who voted for Bush and it's hard to argue with that,lol.
[Edited 4/9/08 3:58am]

Actually she made those comments way back in 1998 when Bill Clinton was still in the White House. For the whole late '90s and early '00s she always dissed her homeland as soon as her plane touched British soil.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #405 posted 04/09/08 6:15am

Isel

I'm only gonna say this one more time,so pay close attention:
SoulAlive

I'm going to say THIS one more time except more to the point rather than continuing a circular discussion: I don't agree with you on a variety of issues which I've already addressed throughout this particular discussion. However, if you would like to continue disagreeing with me, that's fine, but it's not going to change my opinion at all--and a few other people's opinion I might add. There IS no right or wrong: it's all just opinion.

You may not think she's great,but you DO enjoy discussing her.That's the kind of artist Madonna is.She evokes strong opinions,pro and con.There are many people who despise her,but they still keep an eye on her and what she does.Madonna is one of those artists who is not easy to ignore.


As far as discussing Madonna.. I don't even visit this forum all that much, and when I do.. it's primarily to discuss Janet. Search my post history. I don't engage in Madonna discussions very often EXCEPT when I'm trying to make a point about Janet. Ocassionally, I may have ventured into Madonna-land, but.. not so much because I think it's pointless to continue to a discuss an artist I don't like just because I think she's way overrated. What's the point of discussing with Madonna's FANS that I think she's overrated? That's a recipe for disaster, so I don't go there much.

For the record, I only have 3 Madonna cd's.. the last one being confessions because I thought I would like it.. And I did for about a week. Then it was relegated to workout music. Now.. I don't even know where it is! The other I bought were Ray of Light and Music, but I haven't listened to those IN YEARS because I don't know where they are either.

I've NEVER attended a Madonna concert or paid for any dvd, but I have seen Truth or Dare and the Confessions Tour on television.

With Janet I own most ALL of her cd's, have a variety of DVD's even though I've never seen her in concert because I never had the TIME before, frankly. That's why FOR ME, I really wanted to see her in person JUST ONCE before she retires, but I'm not sure that's going to happen.

I'm not interested in Madge except in passing. The media might interested in her, you might be interested in her, others might be interested in her, but I'm not except in comparison/contrast to Janet because TO ME---but MAYBE NOBODY ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD--they are similar artists because they both heavily use producers, they both are more music/video artists more so than someone like Bonnie Raitt, they both have used their sex appeal to sell records in varying degrees UNLIKE Bonnie Raitt or.. Susan Tedeschi, for example, and NEITHER Madonna NOR Janet are musician/vocalists, per se, or that's not how they got where they are today and they BOTH use "theatre" and dance in their music videos and concert tours.

Yeah,she pulled her "American Life" video in 2003.I don't know if you've ever seen it,but it's a bold,hard-hitting video that shows alot of war violence and blood.It probably would have been insensitive to release it while our soldiers were being sent to war.Do you really think their families needed Madonna to remind them of what their sons/daughers were facing? While I disagreed with her decision to pull it (I think it made a strong statement),I totally understand her reasons for doing so.


In the interview I saw, she said she didn't want to be "dixie-chicked." She didn't mentioned anything else.

America elected Bush for two terms I think that's what she was talking about.Obviously,she doesn't mean every American,just the ones who voted for Bush and it's hard to argue with that,lol.


She was pandering to an audience in Great Britain.. in much the same way the Dixie Chicks did. She didn't make these comments in the U.S.--I'm sure for good reason. And besides, how does she know that some of her American fans didn't vote for Bush? Once again, if you look at MY POST HISTORY, I'm far from a Bush supporter, but I didn't appreciate Madge's "generalization," too much.. particularly in front of a British audience.

There are other examples I could post because I AM interested in Madonna's hypocrisy. However, all of us are hypocrites--even Janet--from time to time, so as I've *matured* lol , I've grown to be a bit more compassionate and realistic. Frankly, I'm not all that inspired by Madonna or Janet--or any celebrity really except through their art. I don't think Madonna or Janet are any different than the rest of us except they have shitload of money and huge celebrity. They've BOTH had their fair share of struggles, too--just like that rest of us. Frankly, all of us are complex and "interesting" to a certain extent, but we don't have the means to promote ourselves outside of our daily interaction. We don't have press agents. We all might appear "boring" compared to someone like Madonna and even Janet. Then again, maybe not on a one-to-to basis, surprisingly enough.

On the other hand, a lot of artists aren't very "interesting" except for their music, films, stagework, what have you. We don't KNOW them except through what they do. They don't give a lot of interviews. They are possibly "repetitive" in their choice of lyrics (i.e. Anthony Keides' California obsession), or choice of movie roles (sometimes Johnny gets a little repetitive, but that's another "obtuse" discussion) but we still don't find them "boring," because of it. I can't relate to a lot of artists on a personal level because I don't know anything about them, but I still their art. I know NOTHING about Raul Midon except through his music and still love him. Similarly, we don't really know the ones who "promote" themselves as part of their art in order to be "popular" either because that promotion is part of the package we've bought into, ya know?

I DO REALIZE there are significant differences between Janet and Madge including but not limited being to race as well as the music they produce which I have mentioned as key elements as to why they both haven't been as equally successful.. And it might be that Madonna is more interesting TO YOU because she has used every means to stay POPULAR unlike Janet who has put-up barriors to a certain extent. But I look at Madonna as being "contrived," --even manipulative, but not particularly interesting. That's just my HUMBLE opinion. However, whether or not you agree is not going to change it.

I could go-on, but MY INTEREST was really more about "institutionalized racism" in the music business, and if you look at my post history, you will will see why. I probably should have either started a NEW thread here or in the pol/rel section, but I didn't so I made a mistake. And then got "caught-up" in defending my opinion here because I ENJOY debate--but not necessarily about Madge and Janet, per se. Again search my post history.

So give it a rest. Trust me.. I really could care less about Madonna as a rule except when she "represents" something I do care about about. Now.. Janet yeah.. I'm a huge fan of Janet's. Finally, I usually would have not even responded to your post, but I just get sick of this, "Oh you've got to be interested in Madonna since you posted about her," as if I've made a habit of posting about her in the first place. She is not one of my greatest concerns. Surprisingly enough, Janet is not one of my greatest concerns. They are both going to be just fine when all is said and done.

I will say this in closing: they BOTH need to stay from the plastic surgeon and just age gracefully. They are both on the edged of looking like charicatures, I'm tellin ya. And I think that's sad. As much as you think I've criticized Madge, I really don't want her to end-up looking like Faye Dunnaway or Sting's wife, Trudy(sp), for example. And I don't want Janet to end up looking like LaToya. It's a shame that both Madonna and Janet aren't confident to look like who they are now rather than hang-on to what they were. Now see.. that would be quite impressive to me.

edited because I messed-up my quotes...
[Edited 4/9/08 7:55am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #406 posted 04/09/08 6:33am

midnightmover

TotalAlisa said:

midnightmover said:


You are correct. Def Jam did the best they could in promoting it, and the singles were better than a lot of successful junk released by other artists. Fans are looking for a scapegoat, but the truth is people are just not interested in Janet anymore. She will never be a hot, contemporary pop star again. Those days are gone. The question is whether she can reclaim some dignity and a sense of direction in this next phase of her career, like Prince has, or whether she will just drift about aimlessly. The jury's still out on that one.

i agree.. janet is really not popular.. i have always thought that... and i think because people feel they can't relate to her.... a lot people like artist.. not necessarily for their music.. but a lot to do with relating to that artist..

Yeah, Rihanna and Beyonce could release any old crap right now, and it would be a hit because they are "in". Janet could release the best song known to man and it would bomb because she is "out". It's that simple.
“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #407 posted 04/09/08 8:18am

ehuffnsd

avatar

OfftheWall said:

The thing is how will Janet gain the respect from radio and mainstream America to get the credit and play she deserves.

Why I brought up Madonna was because she has been there, been through the scrutiny, and she handled it by sticking by it and staying true to her word. Not regretting. I wouldnt say she got through it cause shes white. That may be an advantage to her, and I do not deny the racism in the industry, but Madonna wasn't the American Sweetheart with blonde hair and blue eyes. White people hated her because she was ruining that image, and pushing buttons that most people wouldn't even attempt to push. But she handled it, by being Madonna. She gained fans and fame for being outspoken, not binding by the rules. People like that in an artist. Who wants to play by the rules its boring? She lost some fans, but she gained some during that period, regardless of the press.

Will Janet ever be forgiven? Or will she need to face upto the whole ordeal honestly. Whether its through her music or what? Madonna created hype around her, and she had her less popular records, but she kept honest to herself etc. And when she came out with Ray Of Light, radio and everyone loved her again. Its like... is it really the music that gets you over the obstacle or is it your attitude?

Janet I think can get through the backlash, but how I don't know. Cause radio is just ignoring her. Theres no hype around her name at all.

you are right. there is some dishonesty in the way Janet handles things and the public can see right through it.
You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #408 posted 04/09/08 1:42pm

TotalAlisa

avatar

midnightmover said:

TotalAlisa said:


i agree.. janet is really not popular.. i have always thought that... and i think because people feel they can't relate to her.... a lot people like artist.. not necessarily for their music.. but a lot to do with relating to that artist..

Yeah, Rihanna and Beyonce could release any old crap right now, and it would be a hit because they are "in". Janet could release the best song known to man and it would bomb because she is "out". It's that simple.

I AGREE... good music doesn't sell any more.. its the artist popularity... its all about image, marketing and popularity..

i think if rihanna released feedback... that would atleast be top 10..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #409 posted 04/09/08 3:05pm

VinnyM27

avatar

I wouldn't say that the "jump up" in number is a second life (I'm realistic) but it hasn't sank like a stone for an album that isn't getting the singles out there as far as airplay (or sales).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 14 of 14 « First<567891011121314
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > #47 JANET JACKSON DEF JAM/IDJMG 12,201