independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > would you have accepted george michael replacing freddie mercury in queen?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/17/08 12:51pm

Fury

avatar

would you have accepted george michael replacing freddie mercury in queen?

not that he would have...but would the queen fans have been okay with it?


someone to love

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8c7x2JD_j-0


[Edited 2/17/08 13:11pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/17/08 1:07pm

JuliePurplehea
d

avatar

disbelief Don't get me wrong, I like George but NO ONE can replace Freddie Mercury.
Shake it til ya make it dancing jig
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/17/08 1:14pm

lastdecember

avatar

Yeah the term "replacing" isnt possible in any group for the most part. Whether George could tour with Queen or record with Queen, i think that would be gladly accepted. I like how Queen when they have toured now, tour or record as Queen + whomever is doing lead vocals, they are in the studio now with Paul Rodgers.

"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/17/08 2:11pm

alphastreet

I think Mika and Queen should do a collab, he's been compared to Freddie after all, even though he's not great like he was.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/17/08 2:30pm

Dance

George is like one side of Freddie magnified.

He would never be able to bring what Freddie did, and he'd have to shut off most of who he is as an artist to be a part of that band. It wouldn't be a tight fit.

So no, he could never replace Freddie.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/17/08 2:54pm

Timmy84

Eh, not really. He's one of Freddie Mercury's students though, I can't doubt it. He learned well from him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/17/08 3:01pm

carlcranshaw

avatar

Great voice but George has never had heavy guitar in his music.
‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/17/08 11:49pm

Raze

avatar

I wouldn't like for him to have replaced Freddie Mercury in Queen. Because while I think Queen is great, I'm not that into them, while I like George as a solo artist a lot.


But yeah, that performance of Somebody To Love blows me away.
"Half of what I say is meaningless; but I say it so that the other half may reach you." - Kahlil Gibran
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/18/08 1:25am

rocknrolldave

avatar

The short answer is "no".

I can't really accept Paul Rogers in the role, to be honest, and George Michael is an inferior singer to Rogers so no way, Jose.


Personally, I have no problem with a band continuing after the loss of an integral member - let them move on and see what they come up with. However, I have no interest in Queen+ Paul Rogers - Just not interested in Queen without Freddie. But if people want to listen to it/ go and see it, then fine, good luck to the band and good luck to the people who follow them.
This is not an exit
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/18/08 1:41am

rainman1985

rocknrolldave said:

The short answer is "no".

I can't really accept Paul Rogers in the role, to be honest, and George Michael is an inferior singer to Rogers so no way, Jose.


Personally, I have no problem with a band continuing after the loss of an integral member - let them move on and see what they come up with. However, I have no interest in Queen+ Paul Rogers - Just not interested in Queen without Freddie. But if people want to listen to it/ go and see it, then fine, good luck to the band and good luck to the people who follow them.

I don't understand the big deal with Paul Rodgers, his voice is average and his phrasing is okay but that's it. Could George bring it on the harder songs? Don't know if he can sing with that sort of energy plus his voice is a little softer than fred's too. Certainly he could of handled a lot of their material but not the whole package
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/18/08 3:27am

missmad

no
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 02/18/08 5:51am

dirtyman2005

freddie loved hairy cocks,

so does george

i say give george the gig

he deserves it
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 02/18/08 5:59am

b3xy

avatar

i cant imagine anyone ever replacing Freddie Mercury and i dont think they should try but i can imagine a collabration between them possible

RIP Freddie Mercury sad
With Love there is no Death
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 02/18/08 7:58am

TonyVanDam

avatar

No one can ever replace Freddie Mercury the human being or character.

But having George Michael as the new lead vocal for Queen would have sold some albums, without question.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > would you have accepted george michael replacing freddie mercury in queen?