New topic
Printablebboy87 said:  "You know I'm Michael motherfucking Jackson, I will bust your ass! I hear some more shit, Imma put this glove up your ass! I see you later (moonwalking)." | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: midnightmover said: Because I thought you wanted to have a reasonable, honest discussion. In reasonable discussions people make points themselves. They do not say "Oh, go and read this". That is just not a mature way to communicate. It's actually not communication at all. It's cowardice. It is cowardice for one person to have read the documents and the other person to refuse to read them. What kind of dicussion will we have if one person has read the appropriate primary sources and the other has not? After you have read the documents, I will be more than happy to engage in a reasonable and honest discussion with you. Until that happens, we are running in circles. Happy reading. Dude, if I'm gonna try and convince you that the Bible is true, it would be stupid of me to not illustrate the key things in there that are significant. That would be the first thing you would ask me and I would be happy to have the opportunity to tell you. To not answer that question would be bizarre. Your refusal to state the key things you found in these documents is just silly. “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OMG.....the downward spiral of this thread is so expected!lol
Generally, a bunch of non-thinking Prince fanatics invading another Michael Jackson thread (the same ones I might add, who go on about how many Jackson threads are on the org...but they continue to add to the thread count themselves), rehashing the same bull.... subjects without anything to back up their arguments. Stop being whiny little trolls and try being sensible for once, how hard can that be? Michael Jackson's children are'nt any of your business, whether you think he's their father or not, they are with him and he's the one caring for them. Continue to shrill like harpies all you want, at the end of the day those are his children and he is their father, suck it up! BTW.....try saying 'Michael Jackson, you are not the father!'.....over and over and see if that makes it true. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| Moderator
|
Another MJ pedo thread gone downhill 
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture! REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince "I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
moderatormidnightmover said: Rodya24 said: It is cowardice for one person to have read the documents and the other person to refuse to read them. What kind of dicussion will we have if one person has read the appropriate primary sources and the other has not? After you have read the documents, I will be more than happy to engage in a reasonable and honest discussion with you. Until that happens, we are running in circles. Happy reading. Dude, if I'm gonna try and convince you that the Bible is true, it would be stupid of me to not illustrate the key things in there that are significant. That would be the first thing you would ask me and I would be happy to have the opportunity to tell you. To not answer that question would be bizarre. Your refusal to state the key things you found in these documents is just silly. And if this scenario was occuring, it would be stupid of me to not read the Bible for myself. Again, happy reading. After you have read the documents, feel free to make a thread in this forum or General Dicussions on the 2005 Michael Jackson trial. I will be more than happy to engage in a discussion with people who have read the documents. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |