This could've been a thread that faded away quickly....but since all of you like takin' shit to another level, it was almost like you ASKED me to fuck it up

Rodya24 said:

because I didn't know it would be taken this far. Does it always have to be like this? No, but it seems you all want it this way

bboy87 said:

Bring it on! All the animations and pictures to fuck up this thread! I am sure lilgish will not mind -- I hope!
[Edited 1/17/08 17:54pm]

What do you mean you didn't know it would be taken this far?

1) It has Michael Jackson in the title.
2) It has children in the title.
3) It has his kids in the title.

(Although the latter two will be discussed irregardless anyway).

You know damn well every MJ thread is at least 5 pages...

Rodya24 said:

Speaking of whom, homegirl needs to find and reupload them MJ dance videos

Rodya24 said:

People would be far more generous to Mike on this and all other issues if he weren't so clearly lying about it. To try and palm those white kids off as his own is an insult to all of us. We are not morons, but he obviously thinks we must be. The other reason people use hostile language about this issue is because they suspect (quite reasonably) that he chose not to have a child from his own seed because he didn't want to see a reflection of his own blackness. And there is another reason. In 1993 Michael was arrested on charges of paedophilia. Ask yourself, how many suspected paedophiles are normally allowed to raise other people's children? Adoption procedures are extremely rigorous, and under normal circumstances no-one who had ever been arrested on those charges would be allowed to adopt. Mike was obviously able to bypass all the normal procedures, and his money was what made it possible. That's why people use the word "bought".

I don't know what your circumstances were, but they were probably different. I had a friend who was adopted in school, and I never heard anyone tease him about it. Sorry, you found yourself with a nastier bunch of people.

floetcist said:

It's almost as if when the name "Michael Jackson" comes up on the org, the purest hate or immaturity, or simple disdain pours out. I understand. You don't like Michael Jackson, that doesn't mean you have to rain on his fans' parade and talk shit about them.

And MJ fans, stop being overdefensive. Every fan of Michael Jackson has to have this thing called "PATIENCE". I grew up with people making fun of me because I was a fan of Michael, Prince, and George, but it's something you're going to deal with, especially here on the org

midnightmover said:

I am going to take the advice of bboy87 and spare myself from having a stroke.

I see you all the time in Jackson-related threads. If you are so interested in Michael Jackson, why not take the time to read the court transcripts and other documents and do research on vitiligo. That is all I am going to say on these matters to you from now on.
[Edited 1/17/08 18:03pm]

bboy87 said:

floetcist said:

Rodya24 said:

Exactly. I have it all right here. Do what with you will. http://www.box.net/shared/09zmi31anq

floetcist said:

Didn't he settle with these families aka.....pay them off?

BREAKING NEWS: ANOTHER THREAD FOCUSED ON MICHAEL JACKSON HAS BECOME UTTER BULLSHIT

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Again, read the appropriate documents if you are so interested in Michael Jackson. floetcist has been kind enought to provide a link.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

This thread has put R. Kelly at ease

Rodya24 said:

I am not reading through 5 pages of PDFs

True or not. Did Michael settle with the families? 15 million in 2004:

http://www.thesmokinggun....acko1.html

Are you saying this did not happen?
[Edited 1/17/08 18:16pm]

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Yes he did. If that were me and I knew I didn't molest anyone, we would be all up in that courtroom. I'll be damned if I let you drag my good name in the mud with allegations as serious as child molestation. I firmly believe that he did that cause he was guilty as sin. I've heard arguments that he just wanted it to go away and that it would be easier if he'd pay them off but I can't see an innocent man let something like that go down that easily. MJ is a mess and a dirty mess at that.

bboy87 said:

His day is coming. That dirty piece of dog shit.

Lil Oprah does not approve this thread, either

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I take it you didn't read than? lol? You need help? Do you want me to hold your hand to? You may also need to read this as well, seeing that your vocabulary is limited, and unaware of anything that isn't ABC simple. http://en.wikipedia.org/w...urt_of_law

AGAIN. When MJ paid his settlement, he was settling a civil case not a criminal case; he was not being prosecuted, he was being sued. There is a clause in the settlement which states that MJ in no way acknowledges any wrongdoing by signing the settlement. There is another clause which specifically states that a settlement in the civil case in no way affects the recipients’ right to testify in a criminal case. The DA presented the case to two grand juries, and both of them turned them down because there was not enough evidence. MJ did not offer money, he was being sued by the father.

Entire document
http://www.sbscpublicacce...prtobj.pdf

purplecam said:

And just because some parents were bought off and decided not to pursue to a guilty plea does not mean the man is innocent. MJ fans have Saturn sized blinders on

.
[Edited 1/17/08 18:18pm]

purplecam said:

His insurance company did and not him. There is a difference. If one reads the documents from the 1993 investigation and the civil settlement, one will be surprised at what this "settlement" entails.

SupaFunkyOrgangriderSexy: Read the documents instead of depending on a paraphrased reading of them. And the "settlement" was made for the 1993 investigation not the 2005 court trial.

floetcist said:

So you are playing fucking SEMANTICS. Michael didn't personally pay off the family, his insurance company did. THAT MEANS THERE WAS A SETTLEMENT WITH THE FAMILY!. And why is the insurance company paying for something that never happened?

midnightmover said:

Well I don't know about any of that, I can't say I agree there and I'm a big Michael fan but for once I have to say that you have brought up some valid points.

I just think it's too much of a coincidence that not only has Michael's skin color changed (due to vitiligo or skin bleaching, depends on what you believe) and being that he is someone who is seen as a self hating black man (and understandably so) would have three children who all look almost completely white. I've often wondered if Michael would ever have a child with a black woman or adopt a black child but who know's really? I would really like to see Michael do an interview one day where he finally addresses all of this (i.e. allegations, self hate issues, etc.). And I mean do an HONEST/candid interview this time and not just gloss over things he doesn't want to talk about or blame other people for his problems, which is something he does all too often in interviews i've seen of him.

purplecam said:

puts GIFs back in shelf to talk with purplecam
I believe Michael was a complete dumbass for settling with the Chandler family.
I don't think he did the crime, reading the transcripts and all and remembering what the Jackson family was going through at the time.

It's also well documented that Johnnie Cochran wanted to settle although Michael's advisors felt it was a terrible idea.
In the end, nobody won.
But the 2003-2005 was a complete joke hence my laughter

Nothing more need be said. Ding dong.

floetcist said: