SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I do wonder if Michael will ever let them go to premieres or something. Like Dianas kids grew up going to shows and premieres, and Madonna takes her kids out. It would be nice to see Michael do that. But can you imagine the drama it would cause. I know Michaels neices and nephews had interviews, I wonder if Michaels kids will ever speak out about being Michael Jacksons kids.

Rodya24 said:

You don't have to get all emotional. And no, there is nothing wrong with bringing up children who are not biologically your, BUT Michael insists that all 3 children are biologically his and that's why peeps continue to bring up the fact that for him to have 3 bi-racial children and not one of them to have any African features whatsoever is rare, especially with the first two children. He continues to reinforce that he is a deluded liar and obsesse with everything white looking by pretending that they are his biological children, if really they aren't.

Dance said:

And fuck Debby Rowe for being a fucking test tube. Dumb bitch

whatsgoingon said:

And my comment had nothing to do with parenting children that aren't yours. Just Michael buying white babies from Debby Rowe

I have the utmost respect and admiration for people who adopt kids

.
[Edited 1/17/08 11:24am]

Rodya24 said:

I cannot believe you would take someone's comment about a celebrity (who, chances are, none of us no private interested vested in) so defensively that you would tell that person to "fuck off"...that's just insane

Ottensen said:

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Oh my goodness!

How can you say such a thing. Debbie Rowe is a beautiful woman that fell in love with Mike and cared for him so much that when Mike couldn't naturally conceive(who even knows why)she was loving enough to have sex with truckers until Mike had the beautiful bunch of white kids he's wanted all his life that no state would allow him to adopt.

How dare you call her a dumb bitch. She's a smart whore and a child of G-d.

alphastreet said:

Aww, blanket is adorable. You're right.

Dance said:

She a rich smart whore. Imagine how much money it must have taken to purchase her motherhood from her. Absolutely disgraceful.

MikeMatronik said:

Tell it, MikeMatronik!

Dance said:

Now, that shit NEVER should've happened! True, MJ should've known better than that! Can we move on, please org members.

Why are we still talkin shit about Michael when THIS muthafucka is still free?!

bboy87 said:

I know I'm asking the same question.

What's wrong with these people?

Can't the man have sleepovers with little boys, adopt white children, and tie sheets around their heads without EVERYBODY having something to say about it?

Damn.

OfftheWall said:

Well! Don't worry! Eventually they will! Paris is turning 10 and Prince is turning 11 this year! I'm sure within the next 5 or so years they will talk about their Dad and all the naysayers will end up with egg on their face when they hear the kids tell how much they love their Dad!

PatrickS77 said:

My nephews love their dad and he is a fucking loser piece of shit. It's natural to love your parents no matter how badly they treat you. Expect a Jacko dearest movie in the next 10 years

Oh lord...lol

First of all, unless you are a social worker who has interviewed Michael, his children, the family and his governess, you are in no way shape or form to judge the condition of his children, which is DISRESPECTFUL. How do you know how they are feeling? Anyone who has known Jackson and his family have commented that his children are well behaved and sweet kids. Steve Harvey once commented that they don’t act like ‘little rich kids’. I didn't bother to read this thread in its entirety, lord knows I've repeated myself enough times, so I resume that someone else has done it for me. Besides, everything that was said is predictable anyway LOL.

Them "little white boys" shoot. Jordan Chandler is Black, Chinese and Jewish and Gavin Arvizo is Latino. Brett Barnes, same issue. But we call them white boys now, and for what reason? DAMN! Ya'll can't even get the ethnicities right. LMAO. Look at Jordan and tell me he looks like a "blonde hair blue eyed white boy". Gavin is so painfully brown skin Hispanic/Latino that little blonde hair white boy jokes is so played, tired and laughable. For someone who has a preference, none of the accusers looked like Macaulay Culkin do they Thomas Sneddon? Like T-Mez said, 'your son doesn't look Macaulay, does he June'? PUNCH EM MEZ! (if you don't know what I'm referring to, you ain't cool like us).

Jordan Chandler











(That woman is his mother June, who is mixed with asian and black).

Brett Barnes









Gavin Arvizo





He pretty much looks the same now. Alive and well too.


[Edited 1/17/08 17:33pm]

floetcist said:

You're right. Michael has always prefered olive-skinned boys.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Oh I knew it... you would take the bait and turn it into the opposite of what I meant! So far I see only one loser! And obviously it's not obvious and not that case that you love your parents if they are crappy and treat you crappy!

Of course I meant, they will tell the world how much they love their Dad and how great he is to them! He doesn't hand them off to their nanny, like so many parents (who can afford it do)! He spents as much time with them as possible and they are clearly his priority.... okay, and now go on twisting what I said again!

midnightmover said:

yet had to buy, I mean recruit a white broad to have babies with. It's just awfully convenient that Michael has these self image issues to the point that he cut off his natural nose and dipped himself in bleach to escape the fact that he is a black man. Vitilligo I have seen a thousand times and in no instance have I ever known someone where it spread to their entire body. the man has issues and just because he likes to victimize olive skinned boys doesn't mean he'd want one as one of his children.

We need some clear pictures of those kids and like fast! For all I know he has them wearing white makeup But they did seem very white from when they were babies and they sure still look white as hell.....
[Edited 1/17/08 17:03pm]

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

We need...???

Well, you need a live! Stop worrying about other people's children, who are á) none of your business, b) whom you don't know and c) of whom you have no insight whatsoever!

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

That was actually my point. I was making fun of Floetcist not recognising that distinction.
[Edited 1/17/08 17:16pm]

whatsgoingon said:

Like I said before, I overreacted. This is an issue that is sensitive to me. As a child I was teased for being "bought" too.... People can be quite cruel as this thread demonstrates in spades.

And as for Michael Jackson, orgers go in circles about his skin color, children (biological or not), child molestation accusations. Believe what you want to believe.
[Edited 1/17/08 17:44pm]

LMFAO. I replied to one comment that had nothing to do with his children -- the myth that the accusers were white -- and somehow that was connected to Michael taking interest in darker colored children, but doesn't want them for his own. TAKE SOME READING COMPREHENSION. SEE THE SPACES AND PARAGRAPHS? You're stuck again as usual, and now you got to go find something ELSE to make sideremarks about. So when Alfonso Ribera's family was offered money to accuse Michael Jackson of child molestation, or how about Emmanuel Lewis, would that make you happy now? Its as if I'm reading from a monologue out of Katt William's playbook. This is the type of shit ya'll need to be pleased with.

And it is clear, although I'm sure you never bother to read about it, that the pictures of the above families that I posted confirmed and proven that there were no wrongdoing or any inappropriate behavior. Not that I'd expect any of you to pick that tiny piece of information though I LOVE how Michael doesn't have vitiligo, but in the case of 1993 they had stripped search him to see the marks on his genitals.So hes a child molester who doesn't have vitiligo? Sorry, you can't have it both ways.













[Edited 1/17/08 17:41pm]
[Edited 1/17/08 17:45pm]

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

You are the most ignorant person I have ever encountered on the Org. For someone who has not followed Michael Jackson music for a long time, you sure are interested in his personal life.
[Edited 1/17/08 17:37pm]
[Edited 1/17/08 17:45pm]

floetcist said:

Of course not. Both are the perfect targets of what Chomsky calls manufactured consent in the media. Neither of them has taken the time to read the court transcripts from the 2005 trial and the documents from the 1993 investigation. Neither of them has taken the time to research vitiligo. One, in particular, depends on MJ fans for information and then accuses us of being liars.
[Edited 1/17/08 17:43pm]

OMFG! Ya'll have really outdone yourselves with this one It's impossible for threads about Michael Jackson to go the positive route because ya'll always mess things up. So because of that.....

bboy87 said:

OMG. Why were you and the rest of the NWO so late messing with this thread! When I opened this thread earlier, I thought there would be pictures of wrestlers and not pictures of Jordan Chandler!

Rodya24 said:


Nope, and they never will. They actually have to READ. And those documents are pages and pages. Even though they keep demanding proof, when they're presented with it, they beat around the bush with more smiley faces and jokes.

I'd have FAR more respect for those of whom who took the time to familiarize themselves with the People v. Jackson case, analyze the given information and THAN and only than come up with their opinion. Otherwise, everything else is fraudulent. Can you review a book or a movie you've never read or watched?

But hey, its up for grabs. Who wants to start?

http://www.box.net/shared/09zmi31anq