This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.
New topic PrintableByron said: BlaqueKnight said: You bitches are funny; really freakin' funny. This whole thread has me crackin' up as you reinforce exactly what dude was talking about.
Let's clear up a couple of things first - HE DIDN'T COME TO PRINCE.ORG, he posted on HIS blog. Someone else (Utopia 7) REPOSTED HIS THOUGHTS FROM HIS BLOG HERE. You jokers are ranting on and on like he came here and wrote "Prince sucks ass" on a blackboard 100 times or something. Secondly, for the most part he is right. You can play semantics all day long and rewrite history and romanticize Prince's musical journey but "Soft and Wet" started Prince's career, not "Sign Of The Times", so GTFOH with that b.s. about Prince starting out to be some "great songwriter" when its the glitz and glam that he does so well that is a large part of what has acquired him so many fans over the years. His crowd would be a lot different if he went the Stevie Wonder route and you all know it. Play semantics all day long but you KNOW its true. You fanbot zealots are the funniest. You run to Prince's defense even though he damn near had this place closed down. Dude don't "love" y'all. Prince fans are like the obsessed girls who leave a thousand messages on an answering machine or the obsessed guy who stalks a woman all evening and parks outside her house. Pathetically and desperately seeking to appease someone who doesn't even know you exist and doesn't care is worthy of a sit down on "the couch" with a professional of the psychiatric sort. People take shots at Sananda on here but who gave their CD away to their fans first? NOT PRINCE. Who decided to use the idea as a promotional tool to get heads into a concert in theaters? Hmmm....I wonder? Then on top of that, he got praise as if he was the first to do it. No one has criticized Prince's ability to create music but you fanatics with this "ranking system" in your heads are hilariously embarrassing when you speak of what other artists have earned the right to say and do in comparison to Prince. You act like dude is the only person writing music; maybe its just all you listen to. There's plenty more. All artists have the right of expression. ALL. When you don't like it, that's part of what makes it art, be it opinion or song. PRINCE'S MUSIC IS NO MORE OR LESS IMPORTANT THAN ANYONE ELSE'S. You may believe the contrary but in truth, its all art and all individual perception. I've had a good laugh from this thread. Prince.org is entertaining if nothing else. Sometimes its nothing else. I don't give a fuck what he said about Prince...his response/thoughts/what-the-fuck-ever was both arrogant and transparent. He could have been talking about Soupy Sales and I would have thought the same thing. He came across as one of those Star Trek geeks naming every cast member from episode 9 of season two while talking about how the magna-three turbo thrust boosters on the third starship from the left had their heating coil on the outside when everyone knows that magna-three turbo thrust boosters on starships have their heating coils on the inside...and all in an effort to prove his point that Kirk would have kicked Picard's ass in a fight ... And it hardly matters where he did it...it's still pathetically arrogant no matter where it was posted, or why. yeah.....I sorta said that to him. I just felt he was whining AND doing the very thing he claims others were doing to him. but as he said...he's qualified to make those critiques. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: BlaqueKnight said: You bitches are funny; really freakin' funny. This whole thread has me crackin' up as you reinforce exactly what dude was talking about.
Let's clear up a couple of things first - HE DIDN'T COME TO PRINCE.ORG, he posted on HIS blog. Someone else (Utopia 7) REPOSTED HIS THOUGHTS FROM HIS BLOG HERE. You jokers are ranting on and on like he came here and wrote "Prince sucks ass" on a blackboard 100 times or something. Secondly, for the most part he is right. You can play semantics all day long and rewrite history and romanticize Prince's musical journey but "Soft and Wet" started Prince's career, not "Sign Of The Times", so GTFOH with that b.s. about Prince starting out to be some "great songwriter" when its the glitz and glam that he does so well that is a large part of what has acquired him so many fans over the years. His crowd would be a lot different if he went the Stevie Wonder route and you all know it. Play semantics all day long but you KNOW its true. You fanbot zealots are the funniest. You run to Prince's defense even though he damn near had this place closed down. Dude don't "love" y'all. Prince fans are like the obsessed girls who leave a thousand messages on an answering machine or the obsessed guy who stalks a woman all evening and parks outside her house. Pathetically and desperately seeking to appease someone who doesn't even know you exist and doesn't care is worthy of a sit down on "the couch" with a professional of the psychiatric sort. People take shots at Sananda on here but who gave their CD away to their fans first? NOT PRINCE. Who decided to use the idea as a promotional tool to get heads into a concert in theaters? Hmmm....I wonder? Then on top of that, he got praise as if he was the first to do it. No one has criticized Prince's ability to create music but you fanatics with this "ranking system" in your heads are hilariously embarrassing when you speak of what other artists have earned the right to say and do in comparison to Prince. You act like dude is the only person writing music; maybe its just all you listen to. There's plenty more. All artists have the right of expression. ALL. When you don't like it, that's part of what makes it art, be it opinion or song. PRINCE'S MUSIC IS NO MORE OR LESS IMPORTANT THAN ANYONE ELSE'S. You may believe the contrary but in truth, its all art and all individual perception. I've had a good laugh from this thread. Prince.org is entertaining if nothing else. Sometimes its nothing else. Good post. And without being nasty or cynical. Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: Byron said: I don't give a fuck what he said about Prince...his response/thoughts/what-the-fuck-ever was both arrogant and transparent. He could have been talking about Soupy Sales and I would have thought the same thing. He came across as one of those Star Trek geeks naming every cast member from episode 9 of season two while talking about how the magna-three turbo thrust boosters on the third starship from the left had their heating coil on the outside when everyone knows that magna-three turbo thrust boosters on starships have their heating coils on the inside...and all in an effort to prove his point that Kirk would have kicked Picard's ass in a fight ... And it hardly matters where he did it...it's still pathetically arrogant no matter where it was posted, or why. yeah.....I sorta said that to him. I just felt he was whining AND doing the very thing he claims others were doing to him. but as he said...he's qualified to make those critiques. Exactly... However, he's not "qualified" to make the critiques...he just has the right. Just as we all do. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: JackieBlue said: Good post. And without being nasty or cynical. Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... No, I meant talking about Van Hunt. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rhondab said: Well...I wasn't going to post what his message was to me since it was a private note on myspace BUT I think he can add to the discussion.
"i am guilty of judging Prince's songwriting. but, i am qualified to do that. i have met the man on several occassions. talked to him and the people who work for him. for me, there is no doubt about Prince's ambitions and talents. it is NOT songwriting. he spends little time on it. and, at this point in his career he doesn't have to. that wasn't the case earlier in his career. but, as i explained to another person earlier. it is the greatest compliment to his WILL that he wrote such brilliant songs. he MADE himself do it. because he knew he had to in order to show the world what he was capable of as a MUSICIAN. just as i have to MAKE myself practice my instrumentation and my singing. it is not my strongest talent, nor what i love to do most. but, i will myself to being a better musician in order to show the world what i can do as a writer." v h . See, now that was a far less arrogant reply (although the "but i am qualified to do that" has the b.o. of arrogance on it lol)...and it makes sense as an explanation to his views. Can't say whether or not he's right, but at least it makes sense and comes off as more mature than his previous rant. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Byron said: Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... No, I meant talking about Van Hunt. Well, his post really didn't go into Van Hunt at all...it was 99.9% slamming posters and calling them names for their views, telling us all that we "know" he's right about Prince, and even throwing Sananda in there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BartVanHemelen said: lastdecember said: Very true, Prince on his first 4 records was not what you will call a "commerical" artist,
Oh please, get real. lastdecember said: and seriously through most of his career he hasnt. 1999 and Purple Rain exploded mainly because there was nothing like it anywhere out there,
BULLSHIT. PR was DESIGNED to be a smash. "Oh please, get real"??...Man, your debating skills have bottomed out lol ... And while you addressed PR, you somehow left out the view that 1999 was not designed to be commercial, and that its uniqueness was a large driving force behind its success. Is that your way of saying he was right on that point? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: JackieBlue said: No, I meant talking about Van Hunt. Well, his post really didn't go into Van Hunt at all...it was 99.9% slamming posters and calling them names for their views, telling us all that we "know" he's right about Prince, and even throwing Sananda in there. BUt he's right though. Van's doesn't sound ANYTHING like Prince and Prince isn't the only artist out there. I don't really understand that comparison, to me it seems like it's the "Oh, it's a brother playing guitar, he's gotta either be like Prince or Jimi." If folks on the internet have a right to trash him, doesn't he have a right to respond if he wants to? That, and like Blaque said, he posted it on his Myspace. It's not like he came up in here, got a screenname and made a "YOU guys are all assholes" topic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: JackieBlue said: No, I meant talking about Van Hunt. Well, his post really didn't go into Van Hunt at all...it was 99.9% slamming posters and calling them names for their views, telling us all that we "know" he's right about Prince, and even throwing Sananda in there. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
guitarslinger44 said: Byron said: Well, his post really didn't go into Van Hunt at all...it was 99.9% slamming posters and calling them names for their views, telling us all that we "know" he's right about Prince, and even throwing Sananda in there. BUt he's right though. Van's doesn't sound ANYTHING like Prince and Prince isn't the only artist out there. I don't really understand that comparison, to me it seems like it's the "Oh, it's a brother playing guitar, he's gotta either be like Prince or Jimi." If folks on the internet have a right to trash him, doesn't he have a right to respond if he wants to? That, and like Blaque said, he posted it on his Myspace. It's not like he came up in here, got a screenname and made a "YOU guys are all assholes" topic. I think i would have appreciated it more. Go to the ppl who are getting on your nerves. He knew it would get back to the Org and okayplayer. He's not dumb. passive aggressiveness really. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
guitarslinger44 said: Byron said: Well, his post really didn't go into Van Hunt at all...it was 99.9% slamming posters and calling them names for their views, telling us all that we "know" he's right about Prince, and even throwing Sananda in there. BUt he's right though. Van's doesn't sound ANYTHING like Prince and Prince isn't the only artist out there. I don't really understand that comparison, to me it seems like it's the "Oh, it's a brother playing guitar, he's gotta either be like Prince or Jimi." If folks on the internet have a right to trash him, doesn't he have a right to respond if he wants to? That, and like Blaque said, he posted it on his Myspace. It's not like he came up in here, got a screenname and made a "YOU guys are all assholes" topic. I was only responding to the view that BlaqueKnight did so "without being nasty or cynical" lol ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: JackieBlue said: Good post. And without being nasty or cynical. Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... I would like to take a moment to call all of you "muthafuckas" Thank you, that is all | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Byron said: Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... I would like to take a moment to call all of you "muthafuckas" Thank you, that is all I find the banana dance more offensive than "muthafuckas" lol ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: CalhounSq said: I would like to take a moment to call all of you "muthafuckas" Thank you, that is all I find the banana dance more offensive than "muthafuckas" lol ... HOW DARE YOU! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Byron said: I find the banana dance more offensive than "muthafuckas" lol ... HOW DARE YOU! Oh, hun... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: CalhounSq said: HOW DARE YOU! Oh, hun... GAT DAMMIT, that "hun" shit is uncalled for, man! I'mma banana-dance you to death! [Edited 1/14/08 8:26am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Byron said: Oh, hun... GAT DAMMIT, that "hun" shit is uncalled for, man! I'mma banana-dance you to death! [Edited 1/14/08 8:26am] heh heh... Btw, you fucked up like three times on your post lol ...I had to wait until you were thru before I could respond lol ... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: CalhounSq said: GAT DAMMIT, that "hun" shit is uncalled for, man! I'mma banana-dance you to death! [Edited 1/14/08 8:26am] heh heh... Btw, you fucked up like three times on your post lol ...I had to wait until you were thru before I could respond lol ... STFU!!!!! COLD!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Co-Sign He lost on
Bishop31 said: utopia7 said: well well ! you see this is why Threads like these create problems ,when VAN has been nothing but a supporter of Prince ! last show at BB Kings the music playing prior was all Prince.How cool to be able to bump a fellow artist msuic whom you appreciate and still know you can hold your own. AND HE CAN !
Well if it was attention that this thread was seeking it got back to VAN in a not so good way while he was on the internet with his own child . so this is what VAN has to say. Via his myspace page "What they don't know is that 'their man', while he is an incredible talent and entertainer, he willed his biggest hits into being. Because he HAD to be a star. He no longer writes great songs because being a great songwriter was never his goal. Being relevant was/is." [Edited 1/13/08 10:54am] This statement really stood out to me. I think thats a very bold statement for him to make about a great songwriter such as Prince (who in my opinion is a much better songwriter than Van). How in the hell does he know that it wasn't Prince's goal to be a great songwriter?! He lost me after that statement... --- He lost me as well. Some people don't care for Van's music and he needs to accept that. He needs to get a thicker skin. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, well my nephew said this about Van:
Is it wrong that this is cute to me? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Byron said: heh heh... Btw, you fucked up like three times on your post lol ...I had to wait until you were thru before I could respond lol ... STFU!!!!! COLD!! That "hun" must have really thrown your thought process off the tracks, I figured lol ... [Edited 1/14/08 8:35am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: JackieBlue said: Good post. And without being nasty or cynical. Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... Actually, "fantbot zealots" should only apply to you if you ARE ONE. "You bitches" was intended as a casual urban colloqualism. And, opinions don't require qualification, Byron. Again, refer to my point about "ranking systems". Peace. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BlaqueKnight said: Byron said: Um, you may have missed the parts where he called people "bitches", "jokers", and "fanbot zealots"... Actually, "fantbot zealots" should only apply to you if you ARE ONE. "You bitches" was intended as a casual urban colloqualism. And, opinions don't require qualification, Byron. Again, refer to my point about "ranking systems". Peace. Um, ok then lol... I guess when you said "Pathetically and desperately seeking to appease someone who doesn't even know you exist and doesn't care is worthy of a sit down on "the couch" with a professional of the psychiatric sort." was a non-nasty and non-cynical urban colloquialism, too... And btw, it was not Prince's "glitz and glam that he does so well that is a large part of what has acquired him so many fans over the years." The glitz and glam may draw attention, but it doesn't keep people on as fans for decades. It's the music, pure and simple. A lot of people became fans of Prince's music almost immediately upon hearing it on the radio or from a friend, without ever having seen the guy, seen his videos or seen him in concert. I played Controversy and 1999 for many friends back when both came out, and none of them even knew he was black, none the less wore bikini briefs and leg warmers or licked his guitar during a solo. They became instant fans nonetheless. They didn't need to see "glitz and glamour" to want to hear more. In fact it was the desire to hear more and experience more that lead them to the glitz and glamour of Prince, not the other way around. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Gotta agree with Van The brotha makes great music btw "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lspear76 said: I had to go to his blog and bash him, simply because he expects critical immunity, but that doesn't stop him from bashing Prince's songwriting. What an idiot. Typical of a current r&b artist -- thinks he's a great musician even though he's about 2/10 as original and 1/10 as meaningful as artists before him.
Are you serious?? "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Byron said: BlaqueKnight said: Actually, "fantbot zealots" should only apply to you if you ARE ONE. "You bitches" was intended as a casual urban colloqualism. And, opinions don't require qualification, Byron. Again, refer to my point about "ranking systems". Peace. Um, ok then lol... I guess when you said "Pathetically and desperately seeking to appease someone who doesn't even know you exist and doesn't care is worthy of a sit down on "the couch" with a professional of the psychiatric sort." was a non-nasty and non-cynical urban colloquialism, too... And btw, it was not Prince's "glitz and glam that he does so well that is a large part of what has acquired him so many fans over the years." The glitz and glam may draw attention, but it doesn't keep people on as fans for decades. It's the music, pure and simple. A lot of people became fans of Prince's music almost immediately upon hearing it on the radio or from a friend, without ever having seen the guy, seen his videos or seen him in concert. I played Controversy and 1999 for many friends back when both came out, and none of them even knew he was black, none the less wore bikini briefs and leg warmers or licked his guitar during a solo. They became instant fans nonetheless. They didn't need to see "glitz and glamour" to want to hear more. In fact it was the desire to hear more and experience more that lead them to the glitz and glamour of Prince, not the other way around. The funny thing is i often hear people talk about Prince as if they know this guy. They'll say he's this or that, and its never right. Prince seems to be someoone that you may think you have pegged but than he will do something you never thought he would do. When Planet Earth came out and hit its peak week 1 and then was falling, people were talking about him not selling and crap like that, and as i pointed out then, Prince has only had a handful of what people might call "big sellers", Prince's first 5 albums all benefited from sales from people who were curious about him after Purple Rain came out, people were going back and getting into him at that point for the most part, as proven all his certifications on those albums came after Purple Rain. I remember in the mid 90's when prince was going against WB, and no one was coming to his defense, not one artist ever rallied behind him, until years later when people jumped on his bandwagon with label fights and ownership issues. I also remember during this time talking to someone in Chicago who was talking to alot of people in Prince's circle at the time, and him telling me, that people were confused about where he was going, and what he wanted to do, some said he wanted a commercial spotlight, others said it was last thing on his mind. I think to Prince IMO he tends to use the spotlight as his way to change things, as i said before Prince made the mainstream, it didnt make him. Meaning that he didnt jump on something that sounded a certain way to sell, to cash in on it, he more or less created something that wasnt out there, and sorry for those who think differently, but in the 80's, the whole idea was to be different, that was the challenge, this would also be the reason why Van Hunt speaks of RB radio being "invisible" mainly because of the lack of trying to be different as opposed to just cashing in. "We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sorry but, Van’s response was arrogant and childish. He is not even attacking the fans he is attacking Prince.
I am sorry you got to log some miles before you can knock Prince and Van has not logged enough miles and no I do not think P is the greatest song writer on the earth I just don’t think Van is either. He also started bringing up all these other artist WTF!!!! BlaqueKnight said: You bitches are funny; really freakin' funny. This whole thread has me crackin' up as you reinforce exactly what dude was talking about.
Let's clear up a couple of things first - HE DIDN'T COME TO PRINCE.ORG, he posted on HIS blog. Someone else (Utopia 7) REPOSTED HIS THOUGHTS FROM HIS BLOG HERE. You jokers are ranting on and on like he came here and wrote "Prince sucks ass" on a blackboard 100 times or something. Secondly, for the most part he is right. You can play semantics all day long and rewrite history and romanticize Prince's musical journey but "Soft and Wet" started Prince's career, not "Sign Of The Times", so GTFOH with that b.s. about Prince starting out to be some "great songwriter" when its the glitz and glam that he does so well that is a large part of what has acquired him so many fans over the years. His crowd would be a lot different if he went the Stevie Wonder route and you all know it. Play semantics all day long but you KNOW its true. You fanbot zealots are the funniest. You run to Prince's defense even though he damn near had this place closed down. Dude don't "love" y'all. Prince fans are like the obsessed girls who leave a thousand messages on an answering machine or the obsessed guy who stalks a woman all evening and parks outside her house. Pathetically and desperately seeking to appease someone who doesn't even know you exist and doesn't care is worthy of a sit down on "the couch" with a professional of the psychiatric sort. People take shots at Sananda on here but who gave their CD away to their fans first? NOT PRINCE. Who decided to use the idea as a promotional tool to get heads into a concert in theaters? Hmmm....I wonder? Then on top of that, he got praise as if he was the first to do it. No one has criticized Prince's ability to create music but you fanatics with this "ranking system" in your heads are hilariously embarrassing when you speak of what other artists have earned the right to say and do in comparison to Prince. You act like dude is the only person writing music; maybe its just all you listen to. There's plenty more. All artists have the right of expression. ALL. When you don't like it, that's part of what makes it art, be it opinion or song. PRINCE'S MUSIC IS NO MORE OR LESS IMPORTANT THAN ANYONE ELSE'S. You may believe the contrary but in truth, its all art and all individual perception. I've had a good laugh from this thread. Prince.org is entertaining if nothing else. Sometimes its nothing else. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lastdecember said: Rowdy said: What I've heard of Van Hunt has been good music, and on a creative level, it's hard to fault someone who's clearly paid their dues to carve out a career where they can bring their work to a global audience.
That said, I think it's a bad move to get confrontational with people like this, particularly as his appeal becomes ever more selective. Famous people will always get criticism, and I think he should feel pleased that his art has been sufficiently exposed and has sufficient respect to be debated online. Ultimately, the general public pay for the time and space required for him to work professionally as a creative musician - he needs to sell records and concert tickets, and telling the consumer to kiss his ass whilst he sails on towards an artistically perfect obscurity seems like denial. I also think it's unwise of him to imply that he isn't a major star because he simply chose not to be, unlike Prince who did choose to be. And also to imply that somehow this has a bearing on the quality and validity of either man's music. Very true, Prince on his first 4 records was not what you will call a "commerical" artist, and seriously through most of his career he hasnt. 1999 and Purple Rain exploded mainly because there was nothing like it anywhere out there, whether anyone can admit this or not, Prince did lay that groundwork for others to come, and by him FIGHTING his commercial appeal and challenging his audience he showed that you can create the mainstream not have the mainstream create you. So true. "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wow, with a rant that unfocused and angry, VH could make a great orger! My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Van should keep his kids off the Internet as should most parents.
His arrogance is a lot like most musicians, reality just isn't a part of it. Van should let his music do the talking and when he finally finds a place to distribute this record I've been hearing about, I actually hear what he has to say. The rest of this shit is Internet fodder for people to chew on when their not debating one band vs. another. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.