independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > the controversy with Tammi Terrell
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 11/17/07 3:25pm

missfee

avatar

the controversy with Tammi Terrell

So we all know Tammi Terrell died of a brain tumor in 1970 at 24, but I didn't know until recently (hey that was way before my time) that it was rumored that David Ruffin was partly blamed for her death because he physically abused her. But I had read somewhere before that before she went to Motown, she was in a relationship with James Brown somewhere down the line and that he physically abused her as well. Sure I know that woman must have had a difficult life during her short time here on earth, but why was David Ruffin soley to blame? It was never proven that his abuse is what led to the tumor, but if James had started beating on her way before David did (and who knows what other men she dated did to her) then why isn't James included in the "part to blame" as well?

It's a shame when talented people do bad things and have to deal with a lot of bullshit during their lifetime. I guess that's just life. confused
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 11/17/07 4:01pm

TheWifey

Cause David Ruffin was unlikable
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 11/17/07 4:46pm

missfee

avatar

TheWifey said:

Cause David Ruffin was unlikable

unlikeable by not showing up to rehearsals?
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 11/17/07 4:49pm

hilton02895

avatar

missfee said:

TheWifey said:

Cause David Ruffin was unlikable

unlikeable by not showing up to rehearsals?


No David Ruffin became a druggie. The higher he got, the worst his behavior. It didn't help that he had a fallen out with the Temptations.
_________________________________________
You'll find the back of my hand displeasing. (Shake)
The bun is in your mind. (Meatwad)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 11/17/07 4:51pm

TheWifey

his whole personality was unlikable
he was arrogant and crude
james b was likable
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 11/17/07 5:02pm

DawnD

missfee said:

So we all know Tammi Terrell died of a brain tumor in 1970 at 24, but I didn't know until recently (hey that was way before my time) that it was rumored that David Ruffin was partly blamed for her death because he physically abused her. But I had read somewhere before that before she went to Motown, she was in a relationship with James Brown somewhere down the line and that he physically abused her as well. Sure I know that woman must have had a difficult life during her short time here on earth, but why was David Ruffin soley to blame? It was never proven that his abuse is what led to the tumor, but if James had started beating on her way before David did (and who knows what other men she dated did to her) then why isn't James included in the "part to blame" as well?

It's a shame when talented people do bad things and have to deal with a lot of bullshit during their lifetime. I guess that's just life. confused


sad Dang! I'm so sorry that happened to her. She was unbelievably talented and beautiful. I love PRECIOUS LOVE by her and Marvin Gaye. Gosh! That's such a beautiful song. sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 11/17/07 5:32pm

heybaby

DawnD said:

missfee said:

So we all know Tammi Terrell died of a brain tumor in 1970 at 24, but I didn't know until recently (hey that was way before my time) that it was rumored that David Ruffin was partly blamed for her death because he physically abused her. But I had read somewhere before that before she went to Motown, she was in a relationship with James Brown somewhere down the line and that he physically abused her as well. Sure I know that woman must have had a difficult life during her short time here on earth, but why was David Ruffin soley to blame? It was never proven that his abuse is what led to the tumor, but if James had started beating on her way before David did (and who knows what other men she dated did to her) then why isn't James included in the "part to blame" as well?

It's a shame when talented people do bad things and have to deal with a lot of bullshit during their lifetime. I guess that's just life. confused


sad Dang! I'm so sorry that happened to her. She was unbelievably talented and beautiful. I love PRECIOUS LOVE by her and Marvin Gaye. Gosh! That's such a beautiful song. sad


when she died that was a big turning point for marvin gaye sad
[Edited 11/17/07 17:32pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 11/17/07 6:46pm

Jboogiee

avatar

heybaby said:

DawnD said:



sad Dang! I'm so sorry that happened to her. She was unbelievably talented and beautiful. I love PRECIOUS LOVE by her and Marvin Gaye. Gosh! That's such a beautiful song. sad


when she died that was a big turning point for marvin gaye sad
[Edited 11/17/07 17:32pm]


After that Marvin Gaye was never the same.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 11/17/07 6:47pm

Jboogiee

avatar

heybaby said:

DawnD said:



sad Dang! I'm so sorry that happened to her. She was unbelievably talented and beautiful. I love PRECIOUS LOVE by her and Marvin Gaye. Gosh! That's such a beautiful song. sad


when she died that was a big turning point for marvin gaye sad
[Edited 11/17/07 17:32pm]


After that Marvin Gaye was never the same.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 11/17/07 6:52pm

Cinnie

I haven't heard of any of this. I wasn't even sure why she died so early.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 11/17/07 7:16pm

Timmy84

Jboogiee said:

heybaby said:



when she died that was a big turning point for marvin gaye sad
[Edited 11/17/07 17:32pm]


After that Marvin Gaye was never the same.




He sure wasn't. sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 11/17/07 8:27pm

PAPAROBBIE

avatar

TheWifey said:


james b was likable


It all depends on who you ask. Many of his band members would say different.
We run tings, tings nah run we....

www.paparobbie.podomatic.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 11/17/07 8:45pm

bboy87

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Jboogiee said:



After that Marvin Gaye was never the same.




He sure wasn't. sad

It was obvious they were in love... sad
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 11/17/07 8:45pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

PAPAROBBIE said:

TheWifey said:


james b was likable


It all depends on who you ask. Many of his band members would say different.

I think he was talking about mainstream America. In the 50s, 60s and 70s pretty clean cut guy (besides his 8 years in jail for stealing a coat out of a car in his early teens). Loved, almost worship like by the black community and the white people loved him to (until 1968).
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 11/17/07 9:34pm

PAPAROBBIE

avatar

bboy87 said:

Timmy84 said:



He sure wasn't. sad

It was obvious they were in love... sad


Nah, they were actually just very good friends...no romantic involvement.
We run tings, tings nah run we....

www.paparobbie.podomatic.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 11/17/07 10:01pm

daPrettyman

avatar

PAPAROBBIE said:

bboy87 said:


It was obvious they were in love... sad


Nah, they were actually just very good friends...no romantic involvement.

That doesn't mean they weren't in love. You can definitely love someone without having a sexual relationship with them.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 11/17/07 11:00pm

Harlepolis

Marvin was pretty intimidated by her contrary to what I've always thought.

She was a wild dame and nobody seemed to tame her(as he put it) which is the reason why she brought the worst in some of the possessive men she was with(James Brown and David Ruffin').

I think her death was a combination of things, but it sure hit home to alot of people. And yes, Marvin took it REAL HARD, she was the inspiration behind "Whats Going On", she also the reason behind his semi-retirement @ the time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 11/17/07 11:18pm

NewPowerSista

avatar

Hmmmm, I didn't remember the David Ruffin connection at all! I did, however, know about James Brown and the rumor that he was abusing her. There have been several stories about how her brain tumor developed and whether someone's abuse caused it. What we DO know for sure is the impact her death had on Marvin. As someone else said, he was never the same after she died. Also, personally, I make a distinction between loving and being "in love." I think Marvin loved Tammi, but nothing suggests that he was "in love" with her.
Never trust anything spoken in the presence of an erection.
H Michael Frase
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 11/17/07 11:52pm

Timmy84

daPrettyman said:

PAPAROBBIE said:



Nah, they were actually just very good friends...no romantic involvement.

That doesn't mean they weren't in love. You can definitely love someone without having a sexual relationship with them.


But his love for her was more of a family thing. He looked at Tammi as a sister more than a lover. And yeah, he was truly intimidated by Tammi because he was afraid of aggressive independent women. which is what Tammi was. But regardless, he was REAL close to Tammi and it hit him REAL HARD when she died. It actually tore his world apart as most of his friends from the Motown days say that Marvin was never the same after that but he bounced back somehow afterwards.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 11/18/07 3:46pm

missfee

avatar

PAPAROBBIE said:

TheWifey said:


james b was likable


It all depends on who you ask. Many of his band members would say different.

exactly what i was thinking.
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 11/18/07 3:49pm

missfee

avatar

Harlepolis said:

Marvin was pretty intimidated by her contrary to what I've always thought.

She was a wild dame and nobody seemed to tame her(as he put it) which is the reason why she brought the worst in some of the possessive men she was with(James Brown and David Ruffin').
I think her death was a combination of things, but it sure hit home to alot of people. And yes, Marvin took it REAL HARD, she was the inspiration behind "Whats Going On", she also the reason behind his semi-retirement @ the time.

Interesting, I hadn't heard that before.
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 11/18/07 4:43pm

VoicesCarry

Nobody knows (or will ever know) if the abuse "caused" the brain tumour per se, but it's highly unlikely.

Marvin went into seclusion for about 8 months after Tammi's death, and it really changed him. She had collapsed in his arms on stage in 1967 after complaining for months of relentless headaches and migraines. Then she lingered for about 3 years, with memory loss and some paralysis. I think there were eight operations. It's unknown which of the later Gaye-Terrell duets she actually sang on, as Valerie Simpson (who was able to mimic Tammi's voice very well) sang on quite a few. But Motown never kept a record, and so fans continue to debate if it's actually Tammi on some tracks to this day.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 11/18/07 4:46pm

phunkdaddy

avatar

daPrettyman said:

PAPAROBBIE said:



Nah, they were actually just very good friends...no romantic involvement.

That doesn't mean they weren't in love. You can definitely love someone without having a sexual relationship with them.


Paparobbie was correct. Marvin even acknowledged that their was
no romantic involvement between the two. They were just friends.
Marvin may have wanted to tap dat but they were never involved.
Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 11/18/07 5:01pm

missfee

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Nobody knows (or will ever know) if the abuse "caused" the brain tumour per se, but it's highly unlikely.

Marvin went into seclusion for about 8 months after Tammi's death, and it really changed him. She had collapsed in his arms on stage in 1967 after complaining for months of relentless headaches and migraines. Then she lingered for about 3 years, with memory loss and some paralysis. I think there were eight operations. It's unknown which of the later Gaye-Terrell duets she actually sang on, as Valerie Simpson (who was able to mimic Tammi's voice very well) sang on quite a few. But Motown never kept a record, and so fans continue to debate if it's actually Tammi on some tracks to this day.

I know, isn't this wild??? I read that Valerie Simpson denied singing on the later duets records while Tammi was ailing, but Marvin said that she did indeed sing Tammi's parts in his biography with David Ritz. Can you imagine how he felt with them passing off their record as if Tammi was singing where he knew the whole time that it was all a lie??? That's pressure for real....especially with him dealing with her dying.
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 11/18/07 9:23pm

Timmy84

missfee said:

VoicesCarry said:

Nobody knows (or will ever know) if the abuse "caused" the brain tumour per se, but it's highly unlikely.

Marvin went into seclusion for about 8 months after Tammi's death, and it really changed him. She had collapsed in his arms on stage in 1967 after complaining for months of relentless headaches and migraines. Then she lingered for about 3 years, with memory loss and some paralysis. I think there were eight operations. It's unknown which of the later Gaye-Terrell duets she actually sang on, as Valerie Simpson (who was able to mimic Tammi's voice very well) sang on quite a few. But Motown never kept a record, and so fans continue to debate if it's actually Tammi on some tracks to this day.

I know, isn't this wild??? I read that Valerie Simpson denied singing on the later duets records while Tammi was ailing, but Marvin said that she did indeed sing Tammi's parts in his biography with David Ritz. Can you imagine how he felt with them passing off their record as if Tammi was singing where he knew the whole time that it was all a lie??? That's pressure for real....especially with him dealing with her dying.


Valerie lying her ass off, she know her ass subbed for Tammi, their vocals are slightly different! Tammi would've given the songs on "Easy" much more umph in it than what Val was doing. She trippin' or she has her braids on too tight. I still believe what Marvin said!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 11/18/07 9:31pm

sosgemini

avatar

Timmy84 said:

missfee said:


I know, isn't this wild??? I read that Valerie Simpson denied singing on the later duets records while Tammi was ailing, but Marvin said that she did indeed sing Tammi's parts in his biography with David Ritz. Can you imagine how he felt with them passing off their record as if Tammi was singing where he knew the whole time that it was all a lie??? That's pressure for real....especially with him dealing with her dying.


Valerie lying her ass off, she know her ass subbed for Tammi, their vocals are slightly different! Tammi would've given the songs on "Easy" much more umph in it than what Val was doing. She trippin' or she has her braids on too tight. I still believe what Marvin said!


damn dude, do you really think it was easy for Valerie to lie? Sh*t like that is complicated.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 11/18/07 9:45pm

Harlepolis

sosgemini said:

Timmy84 said:



Valerie lying her ass off, she know her ass subbed for Tammi, their vocals are slightly different! Tammi would've given the songs on "Easy" much more umph in it than what Val was doing. She trippin' or she has her braids on too tight. I still believe what Marvin said!


damn dude, do you really think it was easy for Valerie to lie? Sh*t like that is complicated.


I read somewhere that she signed for a confidentiality contract, which explains the whole thing's secrecy.

If its true, she might get her ass sued BIG TIME if she opened her mouth about the subject.

It is what it is, David Ritz and Marvin revealed the source for us,,,and its enough coming from them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 11/18/07 10:17pm

Timmy84

Harlepolis said:

sosgemini said:



damn dude, do you really think it was easy for Valerie to lie? Sh*t like that is complicated.


I read somewhere that she signed for a confidentiality contract, which explains the whole thing's secrecy.

If its true, she might get her ass sued BIG TIME if she opened her mouth about the subject.

It is what it is, David Ritz and Marvin revealed the source for us,,,and its enough coming from them.


Exactly! nod It's been years since she's been with Motown? What is she gonna do? Wait until Berry croaks over and say "well ok, I did sub for her"?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 11/18/07 10:26pm

Timmy84

Anyway, I really feel sorry for Tammi and all that she went through in that period. It just makes me sad thinking of what she would accomplish had she lived. sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 11/19/07 6:53am

sosgemini

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Harlepolis said:



I read somewhere that she signed for a confidentiality contract, which explains the whole thing's secrecy.

If its true, she might get her ass sued BIG TIME if she opened her mouth about the subject.

It is what it is, David Ritz and Marvin revealed the source for us,,,and its enough coming from them.


Exactly! nod It's been years since she's been with Motown? What is she gonna do? Wait until Berry croaks over and say "well ok, I did sub for her"?


uhhh, if her confidentiality contract stipulates such.....yeah! lol
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > the controversy with Tammi Terrell