daPrettyman said: MJ only released 2 albums in the 90s. Did those albums out perform Janet's in Europe? Dangerous with 23 million, HIStory with 15 million and BOTDF with 3 million sold (outside the US)! All 3 albums UK #1 plus 4 UK #1 singles plus 8 UK top 5 singles? Several european #1 singles and albums? I would say, yes! And for the US I would say it was neck on neck! Both Dangerous and Janet. got certifications for 7 million copies shipped! And both Velvet Rope and HIStory got certifications for 3 million copies shipped (with HIStory it's actually eventually 7 mio, but 1 box set counts twice)! But yes, her singles in the US probably were more successful than his in the 90ies! [Edited 10/3/07 15:23pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
daPrettyman said: RodeoSchro said: Michael still ruled in the late '80's. I don't think Janet surpassed him until she released "Design of a Decade". It wasn't that her greatest hits package was all that - it was good, but that was when MJ really started his troubles, IIRC.
Janet started to surpass Michael after Rhythm Nation. She really BLEW UP during the Rhythm Nation era. When she did "janet.", she EXPLODED. All of this was prior to Design of a Decade. You must remember that MJ had started to decline in popularity around the time when Dangerous came out. That was about the time when the first round of allegations of child molestation came about. It was also around that time when he turned completely WHITE. Not to mention the Black or White video where people were in an uproar over the panther segment. MJ's popularity didn't start to increase (again) until after the Oprah interview. This applies (if it does at all) ONLY when you look at their popularity in the US. Michael Jackson exploded as a global icon with the Bad and Dangerous tours. While Thriller made him a superstar amongst superstars in the US, the latter two tours were huge worldwide. Of course, in album sales as well, he surpassed Janet Jackson, like PatrickS77 has noted in his above post. I wish people would be less US-centric when comparing these two artists.... EDIT: This should have been a response to your question of their comparative success in Europe. Also while Janet Jackson was more popular within the urban community during the late '80s, I think overall in the US, Michael was still more popular. [Edited 10/3/07 16:52pm] [Edited 10/3/07 17:43pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PatrickS77 said: daPrettyman said: MJ only released 2 albums in the 90s. Did those albums out perform Janet's in Europe? Dangerous with 23 million, HIStory with 15 million and BOTDF with 3 million sold (outside the US)! All 3 albums UK #1 plus 4 UK #1 singles plus 8 UK top 5 singles? Several european #1 singles and albums? I would say, yes! And for the US I would say it was neck on neck! Both Dangerous and Janet. got certifications for 7 million copies shipped! And both Velvet Rope and HIStory got certifications for 3 million copies shipped (with HIStory it's actually eventually 7 mio, but 1 box set counts twice)! But yes, her singles in the US probably were more successful than his in the 90ies! [Edited 10/3/07 15:23pm] No, Janet NEVER reached Mike's popularity - to this day, even in the US. He was always more FAMOUS, more the genius, more intriguing. Like he could never go out shopping, etc. without mass hysteria . Janet always could. Like he shut down Times Square in 2001. Like 27 million tuned in for MSG concert. Janet would never have gotten those numbers. Dangerous would have sold more than Bad, if not for the allegations, imo. I think MJ's ONLY rival in the US, fame-wise (to this day) is the Purple Midget. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I just had a look though on Janet's discography on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/w...iscography
Her singles did extraordinerally well in Japan though! I didn't know that! She racked up 21 #1 singles (with the last one being "Enjoy") and 6 #2 singles! [Edited 10/3/07 16:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrsnet said: No, Janet NEVER reached Mike's popularity - to this day, even in the US. He was always more FAMOUS, more the genius, more intriguing. . Well, I can't comment on the popularity, as I'm not american! I can only go for numbers, but good to hear! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PatrickS77 said: I just had a look though on Janet's discography on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/w...iscography
Her singles did extraordinerayly well in Japan though! I didn't know that! She racked up 21 #1 singles (with the last one being "Enjoy") and 6 #2 singles! Yes, like Mariah, Janet is popular in Japan. We Asians love shit music. Just kidding. As a matter of fact, I believe both Madonna and Janet have done better chart-wise than Michael Jackson in Japan. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And to be perfectly honest, the ONLY other American entertainer to cause the type of hysteria in the US as Michael was Elvis. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janet was definitely an Icon for black girls, she came across down to earth and she wasn't some svelt, skinny girl like Whitney. She had meat on her bones something that black girls could relate to.
Initially, people did see her has "Michael's little sister", she danced like him and she looked like him. But by the time of her second album I would say in the black community, at least, she was probably more popular than Michael, simply because her music was more urban and she came across as more down to earth, whereas by that time it seem that Michael had completely lost the plot; people thought Michael was losing the plot way before the child abuse allegations. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: Yes, like Mariah, Janet is popular in Japan. We Asians love shit music. Just kidding. Ah, I see... that's why Michael didn't do that well there! LOL I wonder though how his japanese singles stats are... they are not really listed on wikipedia! [Edited 10/3/07 16:05pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrsnet said: And to be perfectly honest, the ONLY other American entertainer to cause the type of hysteria in the US as Michael was Elvis.
That makes sense. Both are the most commercially successful male popular artists. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ah, I see... that's why Michael didn't do that well there! LOL
I wonder though how his japanese singles stats are... they are not really listed on wikipedia! I am not sure... All I know is that my father used to be obsessed with Off The Wall and Thriller. Played "Human Nature" and "Beat It" ALL THE TIME. In fact, to be honest, I sort of disliked Michael Jackson because of all the overexposure to his music at home until a couple of years ago. And of course, I still remember my cousins going insane when Michael Jackson came here for his world tours. He often gets more police escort than a visiting diplomat. [Edited 10/3/07 16:09pm] [Edited 10/3/07 16:09pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PatrickS77 said: mrsnet said: No, Janet NEVER reached Mike's popularity - to this day, even in the US. He was always more FAMOUS, more the genius, more intriguing. . Well, I can't comment on the popularity, as I'm not american! I can only go for numbers, but good to hear! Yeah, when Michael did that interview with Oprah in '93, it was the largest viewing audience in the history of television. And his superbowl viewership was one of the largest in history. So no Janet was NEVER as famous as her brother. . No one was . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PatrickS77 said: Rodya24 said: Yes, like Mariah, Janet is popular in Japan. We Asians love shit music. Just kidding. Ah, I see... that's why Michael didn't do that well there! LOL I wonder though how his japanese singles stats are... they are not really listed on wikipedia! [Edited 10/3/07 16:05pm] He has much more success with album sales than with charts for some reason here. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: Janet was definitely an Icon for black girls, she came across down to earth and she wasn't some svelt, skinny girl like Whitney. She had meat on her bones something that black girls could relate to.
Initially, people did see her has "Michael's little sister", she danced like him and she looked like him. But by the time of her second album I would say in the black community, at least, she was probably more popular than Michael, simply because her music was more urban and she came across as more down to earth, whereas by that time it seem that Michael had completely lost the plot; people thought Michael was losing the plot way before the child abuse allegations. As I said in another thread, in '98 when Michael came to Detroit just for a business trip 6,000 (mostly Black) people met him at the airport. That NEVER would have happened with Janet. Even with his less than stellar "You Rock My World' video, he won over Janet's ALL for You at the BET awards (They were both up for video of the year). So no, she's never been a match for her brother. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: daPrettyman said: Janet started to surpass Michael after Rhythm Nation. She really BLEW UP during the Rhythm Nation era. When she did "janet.", she EXPLODED. All of this was prior to Design of a Decade. You must remember that MJ had started to decline in popularity around the time when Dangerous came out. That was about the time when the first round of allegations of child molestation came about. It was also around that time when he turned completely WHITE. Not to mention the Black or White video where people were in an uproar over the panther segment. MJ's popularity didn't start to increase (again) until after the Oprah interview. This applies (if it does at all) ONLY when you look at their popularity in the US. Michael Jackson exploded as a global icon with the Bad and Dangerous tours. While Thriller made him a superstar amongst superstars in the US, the latter two tours were huge worldwide. Of course, in album sales as well, he surpassed Janet Jackson, like PatrickS77 has noted in his above post. I wish people would be less US-centric when comparing these two artists.... Michael became a global Icon/Superstar with Off The Wall. His peak even worldwide was Thriller, not Bad or Dangerous. More current fans should stop looking at Thriller as an America thing, it wasn't. The impact of that album was global, from Europe to Africa to Asia you felt it. Infact apart from one or two places in the world Thriller practically outsold Bad and Dangerous in almost every country it was released. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: Rodya24 said: This applies (if it does at all) ONLY when you look at their popularity in the US. Michael Jackson exploded as a global icon with the Bad and Dangerous tours. While Thriller made him a superstar amongst superstars in the US, the latter two tours were huge worldwide. Of course, in album sales as well, he surpassed Janet Jackson, like PatrickS77 has noted in his above post. I wish people would be less US-centric when comparing these two artists.... Michael became a global Icon/Superstar with Off The Wall. His peak even worldwide was Thriller, not Bad or Dangerous. More current fans should stop looking at Thriller as an America thing, it wasn't. The impact of that album was global, from Europe to Africa to Asia you felt it. Infact apart from one or two places in the world Thriller practically outsold Bad and Dangerous in almost every country it was released. Yes. But his world tours helped him to become a global star. Album sales are not the only factor that determines one's popularity and name recognition. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrsnet said: whatsgoingon said: Janet was definitely an Icon for black girls, she came across down to earth and she wasn't some svelt, skinny girl like Whitney. She had meat on her bones something that black girls could relate to.
Initially, people did see her has "Michael's little sister", she danced like him and she looked like him. But by the time of her second album I would say in the black community, at least, she was probably more popular than Michael, simply because her music was more urban and she came across as more down to earth, whereas by that time it seem that Michael had completely lost the plot; people thought Michael was losing the plot way before the child abuse allegations. As I said in another thread, in '98 when Michael came to Detroit just for a business trip 6,000 (mostly Black) people met him at the airport. That NEVER would have happened with Janet. Even with his less than stellar "You Rock My World' video, he won over Janet's ALL for You at the BET awards (They were both up for video of the year). So no, she's never been a match for her brother. I still believe at one time she was more popular than Michael in the black community. I am not saying overall she is Bigger than him, he is in general more of an Icon, because he has achieved bigger things. But I do remember that there was a time at black clubs and parties you were more likely to hear Janet's latest hit than anything from Bad or Dangerous, so in that way she was more popular than him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: mrsnet said: As I said in another thread, in '98 when Michael came to Detroit just for a business trip 6,000 (mostly Black) people met him at the airport. That NEVER would have happened with Janet. Even with his less than stellar "You Rock My World' video, he won over Janet's ALL for You at the BET awards (They were both up for video of the year). So no, she's never been a match for her brother. I still believe at one time she was more popular than Michael in the black community. I am not saying overall she is Bigger than him, he is in general more of an Icon, because he has achieved bigger things. But I do remember that there was a time at black clubs and parties you were more likely to hear Janet's latest hit than anything from Bad or Dangerous, so in that way she was more popular than him. I wonder if anyone has statistics on the demography of the people who bought their albums in the late '80s and '90s.... It would be interesting to read. [Edited 10/3/07 16:24pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: whatsgoingon said: Michael became a global Icon/Superstar with Off The Wall. His peak even worldwide was Thriller, not Bad or Dangerous. More current fans should stop looking at Thriller as an America thing, it wasn't. The impact of that album was global, from Europe to Africa to Asia you felt it. Infact apart from one or two places in the world Thriller practically outsold Bad and Dangerous in almost every country it was released. Yes. But his world tours helped him to become a global star. Album sales are not the only factor that determines one's popularity and name recognition. He was already a global star. I am sure 99.999% of those who went to his concerts knew him and his music, or at least some of his music, well before they went to his concerts, so in that way he was already a global star. The worldwide tours just consolidated it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: whatsgoingon said: Michael became a global Icon/Superstar with Off The Wall. His peak even worldwide was Thriller, not Bad or Dangerous. More current fans should stop looking at Thriller as an America thing, it wasn't. The impact of that album was global, from Europe to Africa to Asia you felt it. Infact apart from one or two places in the world Thriller practically outsold Bad and Dangerous in almost every country it was released. Yes. But his world tours helped him to become a global star. Album sales are not the only factor that determines one's popularity and name recognition. Yes, I agree. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: Rodya24 said: Yes. But his world tours helped him to become a global star. Album sales are not the only factor that determines one's popularity and name recognition. He was already a global star. I am sure 99.999% of those who went to his concerts knew him and his music, or at least some of his music, well before they went to his concerts, so in that way he was already a global star. The worldwide tours just consolidated it. I am not disagreeing with you. I am just saying that outside of the US these tours had a huge impact on his popularity and iconic status. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: mrsnet said: As I said in another thread, in '98 when Michael came to Detroit just for a business trip 6,000 (mostly Black) people met him at the airport. That NEVER would have happened with Janet. Even with his less than stellar "You Rock My World' video, he won over Janet's ALL for You at the BET awards (They were both up for video of the year). So no, she's never been a match for her brother. I still believe at one time she was more popular than Michael in the black community. I am not saying overall she is Bigger than him, he is in general more of an Icon, because he has achieved bigger things. But I do remember that there was a time at black clubs and parties you were more likely to hear Janet's latest hit than anything from Bad or Dangerous, so in that way she was more popular than him. In the Black community, MJ has always been considered an extraordinary talent, a genius, a one of a kind; whereas Janet never has. It was ALWAYS - 'Janet can't sing' - always. She NEVER had the Black community heart like her brother - no matter what. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: alphastreet said: Was Janet Jackson loved by everyone among the urban crowd and/or teenagers from the 86 to 92 period? Or were there people who thought Jody Watley, Karyn White, Pebbles and the like shit all over her? It seems to me like people thought there were better female artists than her in the 90's, though they were all licking her behind during the Janet. album.
And were they more into MJ or JJ in this time period? Or both? Hella YEAH she was HELLA big among the urban crowd, In every black family, there was a Janet fan... My older sister (who is 3 year younger than Janet) loved her... My other sister was more a Whitney fanatic. For millions of black girls, she was an example, she was a very successful and very young black artist (don't forget that it was still new to see black artists selling 5,6 or 7 million albums), she was like our Madonna... She was trully an Icon for the young generation. I don't think we loved her the way we love Beyonce. Janet's appeal has to do with her tomboy style. Black girls in inner cities could easily relate to her because of her tomboy style. She wasn't classy like Whitney. I think, It also explains the success of TLC. Jody Watley, Karyn White, Pebbles never came close. To be honest I've never been a fan of Janet Jackson (she is a really poor singer ), but during the RN1814, she was the shit !!!!! I think people have always questioned her singing skills, but to be honest nobody cared. Because we loved the way she danced. Concerning her popularity between MJ or JJ, I trully believe that during the Rythm NAtion era, she was definitely more popular than MJ among young african americans, simply because her music was so... BLACK, FUNKY... She gave us what we wanted, up tempo and funky tracks with strong basslines. She also could appeal to both male and female audiences. Black men really respected her for her dancing skills, black girls adolized her for her success. [Edited 10/3/07 13:21pm] How is Beyonce viewed amongst young African-Americans? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was a few months from graduating from high school when Janet Jackson's "Control" was released (age 17), so I would imagine I'm in the sweet spot as far as the demographic in question.
The general consensus in the late 1980s is that Michael Jackson was an extraordinary talent who didn't come across as emotionally mature and now was becoming eccentric. By the late 1980s a lot of people I know could see that MJ was very much showing he apparently followed a white standard of beauty to the point he wanted to emulate it. As for Janet Jackson, she was the forerunner and template of the soul/pop/dance female singer, a la Jody Watley, Pebbles, Paula Abdul, Karyn White, Vanessa Williams to a degree and Lisa Lisa. It's fair to say they duplicated the formula for "Control" and JJ made it cool for the second wave of video stars to emerge -- namely, heavily choreographed dance moves. I would say by that time it was far more common to hear JJ's music more on black radio stations and in black public music joints than MJ's. [Edited 10/3/07 17:40pm] THE TRAFFIC JAMMERS, The Org's house band: VAINANDY -- lead singer; NAJEE -- bass; THE AUDIENCE -- guitar; PHUNKDADDY -- rhythm guitar; ALEX de PARIS -- keyboards; Da PRETTYMAN -- keyboards; FUNKENSTEIN -- drums. HOLD ON TO YOUR DRAWERS! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: alphastreet said: Was Janet Jackson loved by everyone among the urban crowd and/or teenagers from the 86 to 92 period? Or were there people who thought Jody Watley, Karyn White, Pebbles and the like shit all over her? It seems to me like people thought there were better female artists than her in the 90's, though they were all licking her behind during the Janet. album.
And were they more into MJ or JJ in this time period? Or both? Hella YEAH she was HELLA big among the urban crowd, In every black family, there was a Janet fan... My older sister (who is 3 year younger than Janet) loved her... My other sister was more a Whitney fanatic. For millions of black girls, she was an example, she was a very successful and very young black artist (don't forget that it was still new to see black artists selling 5,6 or 7 million albums), she was like our Madonna... She was trully an Icon for the young generation. I don't think we loved her the way we love Beyonce. Janet's appeal has to do with her tomboy style. Black girls in inner cities could easily relate to her because of her tomboy style. She wasn't classy like Whitney. I think, It also explains the success of TLC. Jody Watley, Karyn White, Pebbles never came close. To be honest I've never been a fan of Janet Jackson (she is a really poor singer ), but during the RN1814, she was the shit !!!!! I think people have always questioned her singing skills, but to be honest nobody cared. Because we loved the way she danced. Concerning her popularity between MJ or JJ, I trully believe that during the Rythm NAtion era, she was definitely more popular than MJ among young african americans, simply because her music was so... BLACK, FUNKY... She gave us what we wanted, up tempo and funky tracks with strong basslines. She also could appeal to both male and female audiences. Black men really respected her for her dancing skills, black girls adolized her for her success. [Edited 10/3/07 13:21pm] So you think during that time if the two of them were appearing at an urban setting of some sort (separate, of course), that Janet would have attracted the larger crowd?? No way. Michael could go nowhere without mass hysteria. Janet never really had that problem. As far as popularity, MJ has always been in a class by himself. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrsnet said: So you think during that time if the two of them were appearing at an urban setting of some sort (separate, of course), that Janet would have attracted the larger crowd?? No way. Michael could go nowhere without mass hysteria. Janet never really had that problem. As far as popularity, MJ has always been in a class by himself.
I agree with krayzie. By the late 1980s, Michael Jackson's fan base was becoming more white and his music from the "Bad" album wasn't something I saw my peers buy and listen to wholesale. Meanwhile, Janet Jackson's music was considered a near-obligatory buy with artists like New Edition, Guy, Keith Sweat, Al B. Sure! and Bobby Brown on the soul music front. He didn't say anything about a hypothetical crowd erputing if MJ appeared at one place and JJ at another place. [Edited 10/3/07 17:10pm] THE TRAFFIC JAMMERS, The Org's house band: VAINANDY -- lead singer; NAJEE -- bass; THE AUDIENCE -- guitar; PHUNKDADDY -- rhythm guitar; ALEX de PARIS -- keyboards; Da PRETTYMAN -- keyboards; FUNKENSTEIN -- drums. HOLD ON TO YOUR DRAWERS! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Najee said: mrsnet said: So you think during that time if the two of them were appearing at an urban setting of some sort (separate, of course), that Janet would have attracted the larger crowd?? No way. Michael could go nowhere without mass hysteria. Janet never really had that problem. As far as popularity, MJ has always been in a class by himself.
I agree with krayzie. By the late 1980s, Michael Jackson's fan base was becoming more white and his music from the "Bad" wasn't something I rarely saw my peers buy and listen to nor hear on the radio. Meanwhile, Janet Jackson's music was considered a near-obligatory buy with artists like New Edition, Guy, Keith Sweat and Bobby Brown on the soul music front. He didn't say anything about a hypothetical crowd erputing if MJ appeared at one place and JJ at another place. That makes sense. The sound created by Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, I would imagine, appealed more to the urban audience than songs like "Smooth Criminal" and "Heal The World." LOL. mrsnet: I agree with you that while Michael Jackson always has been and will be a bigger icon than Janet Jackson, I think during the Control and Rhythm Nation era, her music appealed more to the urban audience in the US. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: That makes sense. The sound created by Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, I would imagine, appealed more to the urban audience than songs like "Smooth Criminal" and "Heal The World." LOL.
This is one of those examples where some non-black people think that because they were hollering over post-"Thriller" Michael Jackson, Lionel Richie, Whitney Houston, Tina Turner and other such acts in the mid- to late 1980s that black people were buying them up like hotcakes. That was hardly the case -- the reception of their songs was spotty at best, and some practically were ignored by my peers. That's why some non-black music buyers look bewildered when you mention Luther Vandross' success in the 1980s -- black people for the most part weren't feeling Richie's and Billy Ocean's music as romantic lead singers, they were buying Luther's and Freddie Jackson's albums. Keep in mind a lot of non-black people never really heard of Vandross until "Here and Now" in basically 1990 and to them Jackson was a flash in the pan. [Edited 10/3/07 17:20pm] THE TRAFFIC JAMMERS, The Org's house band: VAINANDY -- lead singer; NAJEE -- bass; THE AUDIENCE -- guitar; PHUNKDADDY -- rhythm guitar; ALEX de PARIS -- keyboards; Da PRETTYMAN -- keyboards; FUNKENSTEIN -- drums. HOLD ON TO YOUR DRAWERS! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: That makes sense. The sound created by Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis, I would imagine, appealed more to the urban audience than songs like "Smooth Criminal" and "Heal The World." LOL. mrsnet: I agree with you that while Michael Jackson always has been and will be a bigger icon than Janet Jackson, I think during the Control and Rhythm Nation era, her music appealed more to the urban audience in the US. "And When The Groove Is Dead And Gone, You Know That Love Survives, So We Can Rock Forever" RIP MJ
"Baby, that was much too fast"...Goodnight dear sweet Prince. I'll love you always | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |