independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What happened to Janet's tour
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 10/01/07 4:01pm

Rodya24

JackieBlue said:

I think she's an icon but I never ever thought of her in the same league or level as Prince, Michael and Madonna. They are the top whether I like(d) them or not and everyone else came after.


nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 10/01/07 4:02pm

totaldiva

avatar

Rodya24 said:

sosgemini said:

i think the revisionist history is hillarious...yes, janet was (is) an icon...so was (is) madonna...damn, i can't stand mariah, britney or b'weave but i will still acknowledge their popular appeal...

and kids, if you don't know what your talkin bout (especially if you weren't alive during that time) its probably best you stay out of the debate and learn from your elders. or at least back your sh*t up with some historical facts.
lol
i learned that lesson with a quickness.



Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone. If you can compare Madonna to Michael Jackson(not matter his downfall), your point is just shot.
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 10/01/07 4:03pm

Rodya24

sosgemini said:

i think the revisionist history is hillarious...yes, janet was (is) an icon...so was (is) madonna...damn, i can't stand mariah, britney or b'weave but i will still acknowledge their popular appeal...

and kids, if you don't know what your talkin bout (especially if you weren't alive during that time) its probably best you stay out of the debate and learn from your elders. or at least back your sh*t up with some historical facts.
lol
i learned that lesson with a quickness.


I could write the same thing to you about "revisionist history." And no, I am not a "kid." I had no idea there was ageism on this forum.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 10/01/07 4:04pm

Rodya24

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:




Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone. If you can compare Madonna to Michael Jackson(not matter his downfall), your point is just shot.


How is comparing Madonna to Michael Jackson shooting my point? I love the latter much more than the former, but I would have to be in serious denial to call Madonna anything less than a global icon.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 10/01/07 4:04pm

totaldiva

avatar

Rodya24 said:

sosgemini said:

i think the revisionist history is hillarious...yes, janet was (is) an icon...so was (is) madonna...damn, i can't stand mariah, britney or b'weave but i will still acknowledge their popular appeal...

and kids, if you don't know what your talkin bout (especially if you weren't alive during that time) its probably best you stay out of the debate and learn from your elders. or at least back your sh*t up with some historical facts.
lol
i learned that lesson with a quickness.



Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 10/01/07 4:05pm

Rodya24

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:




Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.


Refer to my above post.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 10/01/07 4:05pm

totaldiva

avatar

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:




Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.

Please, explain to me the levels of "iconism"
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 10/01/07 4:06pm

Rodya24

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:




Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.


And yes there are levels of icons. A Japanese entertainer iconic in Japan is not an icon in the US for example. Michael Jackson and Madonna, on the other hand, are know in most places around the world.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 10/01/07 4:08pm

Cinnamon234

avatar

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:




Please. I never said Janet Jackson is or was not an icon. I said she is not an icon (global, I mean) on the same level as Madonna, Michael Jackson, The Beatles, and Elvis Presley. One does not need to have been alive in the '80s to know this. shrug Why is this fact so difficult to accept amongst Janet Jackson fanatics?

I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.


Actually Madonna is in the same league as Michael Jackson if you're talking about worldwide popularity and success.
"And When The Groove Is Dead And Gone, You Know That Love Survives, So We Can Rock Forever" RIP MJ heart

"Baby, that was much too fast"...Goodnight dear sweet Prince. I'll love you always heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 10/01/07 4:09pm

Rodya24

Cinnamon234 said:

totaldiva said:


I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.


Actually Madonna is in the same league as Michael Jackson if you're talking about worldwide popularity and success.


nod

Although the latter's music has penetrated markets in Southeast Asia and Africa to a greater extent than the former's. But in the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and East Asia, both are in the same league.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 10/01/07 4:10pm

totaldiva

avatar

Rodya24 said:

totaldiva said:


I am not a fanatic of anyone (ok, maybe Prince). Last time I checked, I didn't know there was levels of iconism(my bad). But for you to put Madonna in the same level as michael Jackson (dispite his downfall), you have just shot down your own point.


And yes there are levels of icons. A Japanese entertainer iconic in Japan is not an icon in the US for example. Michael Jackson and Madonna, on the other hand, are know in most places around the world.

And so is janet jackson. If record sales made you less of an icon, what do you feel about prince now? (no I would never compare him to janet or madonna, so dont go there). Janet has sold out tours all over the world at her peak. Britney was a top seller all over the globe, so is she an icon too?
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 10/01/07 4:11pm

sosgemini

avatar

Rodya24 said:

sosgemini said:

i think the revisionist history is hillarious...yes, janet was (is) an icon...so was (is) madonna...damn, i can't stand mariah, britney or b'weave but i will still acknowledge their popular appeal...

and kids, if you don't know what your talkin bout (especially if you weren't alive during that time) its probably best you stay out of the debate and learn from your elders. or at least back your sh*t up with some historical facts.
lol
i learned that lesson with a quickness.


I could write the same thing to you about "revisionist history." And no, I am not a "kid." I had no idea there was ageism on this forum.


Can you please collect all your thoughts in one thread? lol Much easier to respond to...and note I included myself in that "stay out of the debate" statement...we are all kids to folks older then us...and when someone here at the org clocked me for speaking out on popular culture i wasn't born to witness i didn't get my panties in a bunch, i accepted the truth...i wasn't born to know the sh*t.

and back your sh*t up with facts cause i don't have the time to search the net to totally disprove you...but my memory is telling me janet was huge in places like japan and europe..i remember mtv doing a newsbreak on her 1814 tour and japanese kids were crying and screaming for her...so to say she wasn't big globely just doesn't ring like the truth.

and how you gonna tell me janet wasn't a global success when wiki states the following:

Janet's biggest selling single worldwide is "Together Again"; in 1998 it was the 4th biggest selling single of the year in Europe (2nd biggest for a female, only outsold by Celine Dion's "My Heart Will Go On"). Worldwide sales according to Virgin Records are over 6 million copies, one of the largest selling singles ever from a female artist. "Together Again" spent nearly 50 weeks in the Top 50 of the Billboard Hot 100, it also remains one of the longest charting hits in Billboard history. "Together Again" sold over 760,000 in the UK making it one of the biggest selling singles ever in the UK from a female artist, "Together Again" sold over 600,000 copies in Germany also earned a Platinum certification just 2 months after it was released. "Together Again", also went Platinum in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, South Africa, Italy, and even went Double Platinum in New Zealand.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 10/01/07 4:13pm

Rodya24

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:



And yes there are levels of icons. A Japanese entertainer iconic in Japan is not an icon in the US for example. Michael Jackson and Madonna, on the other hand, are know in most places around the world.

And so is janet jackson. If record sales made you less of an icon, what do you feel about prince now? (no I would never compare him to janet or madonna, so dont go there). Janet has sold out tours all over the world at her peak. Britney was a top seller all over the globe, so is she an icon too?


Umm... no. Janet Jackson in most places of the world is primarily known as the sister of Michael Jackson. You can throw statistics at me about her world tours and record sales, but she has never been nearly as successful as Michael Jackson and Madonna. Hell, she is on the same level as Mariah Carey in terms of name recognition around the world. Why are you so desperate to prove that Janet Jackson is as iconic as Madonna? She just is not. Get over it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 10/01/07 4:15pm

Rodya24

sosgemini said:[quote]

Rodya24 said:



Can you please collect all your thoughts in one thread? lol Much easier to respond to...and note I included myself in that "stay out of the debate" statement...we are all kids to folks older then us...and when someone here at the org clocked me for speaking out on popular culture i wasn't born to witness i didn't get my panties in a bunch, i accepted the truth...i wasn't born to know the sh*t.

and back your sh*t up with facts cause i don't have the time to search the net to totally disprove you...but my memory is telling me janet was huge in places like japan and europe..i remember mtv doing a newsbreak on her 1814 tour and japanese kids were crying and screaming for her...so to say she wasn't big globely just doesn't ring like the truth.

and how you gonna tell me janet wasn't a global success when wiki states the following:

Janet's biggest selling single worldwide is "Together Again"; in 1998 it was the 4th biggest selling single of the year in Europe (2nd biggest for a female, only outsold by Celine Dion's "My Heart Will Go On"). Worldwide sales according to Virgin Records are over 6 million copies, one of the largest selling singles ever from a female artist. "Together Again" spent nearly 50 weeks in the Top 50 of the Billboard Hot 100, it also remains one of the longest charting hits in Billboard history. "Together Again" sold over 760,000 in the UK making it one of the biggest selling singles ever in the UK from a female artist, "Together Again" sold over 600,000 copies in Germany also earned a Platinum certification just 2 months after it was released. "Together Again", also went Platinum in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, South Africa, Italy, and even went Double Platinum in New Zealand.


Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 10/01/07 4:15pm

sassybritches

tired.

currently, that's janet's career in a nutshell.

i love her. i prefer her over any other solo pop star next to prince (his ass is tired, too, by the way). but this act of hers is tired. ditching records and tours when they don't automatically generate sales? that's so much more than lame. damn, how about working for your money?

tired.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 10/01/07 4:15pm

totaldiva

avatar

sosgemini said:[quote]

Rodya24 said:



Can you please collect all your thoughts in one thread? lol Much easier to respond to...and note I included myself in that "stay out of the debate" statement...we are all kids to folks older then us...and when someone here at the org clocked me for speaking out on popular culture i wasn't born to witness i didn't get my panties in a bunch, i accepted the truth...i wasn't born to know the sh*t.

and back your sh*t up with facts cause i don't have the time to search the net to totally disprove you...but my memory is telling me janet was huge in places like japan and europe..i remember mtv doing a newsbreak on her 1814 tour and japanese kids were crying and screaming for her...so to say she wasn't big globely just doesn't ring like the truth.
Thank you, Moderator. Just because someone isn't a fan of a certain artist, or it's popular to put down an artist at a certain period, does not make them any less important to the music industry. I am not a fan of Celine Dion, but I could never take away her accomplishments.
and how you gonna tell me janet wasn't a global success when wiki states the following:

Janet's biggest selling single worldwide is "Together Again"; in 1998 it was the 4th biggest selling single of the year in Europe (2nd biggest for a female, only outsold by Celine Dion's "My Heart Will Go On"). Worldwide sales according to Virgin Records are over 6 million copies, one of the largest selling singles ever from a female artist. "Together Again" spent nearly 50 weeks in the Top 50 of the Billboard Hot 100, it also remains one of the longest charting hits in Billboard history. "Together Again" sold over 760,000 in the UK making it one of the biggest selling singles ever in the UK from a female artist, "Together Again" sold over 600,000 copies in Germany also earned a Platinum certification just 2 months after it was released. "Together Again", also went Platinum in the Netherlands, France, Belgium, South Africa, Italy, and even went Double Platinum in New Zealand.
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 10/01/07 4:15pm

PatrickS77

avatar

sosgemini said:

i think the revisionist history is hillarious...yes, janet was (is) an icon...so was (is) madonna...damn, i can't stand mariah, britney or b'weave but i will still acknowledge their popular appeal...

Well, yes they are popular, but Janet trumps Mariah, Britney and B'weave (LMAO) any day of the week!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 10/01/07 4:16pm

sassybritches

Rodya24 said:

sosgemini said:



Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek

hold up...the beatles and elvis ain't even on the same level as the beatles and elvis, let alone madonna.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 10/01/07 4:18pm

totaldiva

avatar

Rodya24 said:

totaldiva said:


And so is janet jackson. If record sales made you less of an icon, what do you feel about prince now? (no I would never compare him to janet or madonna, so dont go there). Janet has sold out tours all over the world at her peak. Britney was a top seller all over the globe, so is she an icon too?


Umm... no. Janet Jackson in most places of the world is primarily known as the sister of Michael Jackson. You can throw statistics at me about her world tours and record sales, but she has never been nearly as successful as Michael Jackson and Madonna. Hell, she is on the same level as Mariah Carey in terms of name recognition around the world. Why are you so desperate to prove that Janet Jackson is as iconic as Madonna? She just is not. Get over it.

And Britney Spears has outsold Prince, so I guess that makes her more of an icon in your book.
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 10/01/07 4:18pm

Rodya24

sassybritches said:

Rodya24 said:



Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek

hold up...the beatles and elvis ain't even on the same level as the beatles and elvis, let alone madonna.


I was going by record sales and name recognition. shrug Whether or not people dislike Madonna, she is a global icon.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 10/01/07 4:20pm

Rodya24

totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:



Umm... no. Janet Jackson in most places of the world is primarily known as the sister of Michael Jackson. You can throw statistics at me about her world tours and record sales, but she has never been nearly as successful as Michael Jackson and Madonna. Hell, she is on the same level as Mariah Carey in terms of name recognition around the world. Why are you so desperate to prove that Janet Jackson is as iconic as Madonna? She just is not. Get over it.

And Britney Spears has outsold Prince, so I guess that makes her more of an icon in your book.


Record sales are important in determining who is recognized around the world. Of course, record sales do not translate to good music. But your analogy of comparing Britney Spears to Prince and Janet Jackson to Madonna does not work because of the transparent fact that Madonna is simply a bigger icon than Janet Jackson. Not only in record sales but in terms of impact on popular culture and music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 10/01/07 4:23pm

JackieBlue

avatar

Rodya24 said:

totaldiva said:


And so is janet jackson. If record sales made you less of an icon, what do you feel about prince now? (no I would never compare him to janet or madonna, so dont go there). Janet has sold out tours all over the world at her peak. Britney was a top seller all over the globe, so is she an icon too?


Umm... no. Janet Jackson in most places of the world is primarily known as the sister of Michael Jackson. You can throw statistics at me about her world tours and record sales, but she has never been nearly as successful as Michael Jackson and Madonna. Hell, she is on the same level as Mariah Carey in terms of name recognition around the world. Why are you so desperate to prove that Janet Jackson is as iconic as Madonna? She just is not. Get over it.


When I use to get together with my friends from Europe, I remember being surprised when they told me that Janet wasn't big there like she was in the U.S. and this was years ago. So when I read that here from time to time, I believe it.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 10/01/07 4:23pm

Rodya24

totaldiva: Why does it matter to you if I think that Janet Jackson is not an icon on the same level as Madonna? This whole debate began because of your statement that she is on the same level as Madonna to which I disagreed. Does it matter that an East Asian male in his teens disagrees with you about Janet Jackson and her impact on modern popular culture and music around the world?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 10/01/07 4:25pm

Rodya24

JackieBlue said:

Rodya24 said:



Umm... no. Janet Jackson in most places of the world is primarily known as the sister of Michael Jackson. You can throw statistics at me about her world tours and record sales, but she has never been nearly as successful as Michael Jackson and Madonna. Hell, she is on the same level as Mariah Carey in terms of name recognition around the world. Why are you so desperate to prove that Janet Jackson is as iconic as Madonna? She just is not. Get over it.


When I use to get together with my friends from Europe, I remember being surprised when they told me that Janet wasn't big there like she was in the U.S. and this was years ago. So when I read that here from time to time, I believe it.


nod

She has had a consistent run of hits for about fifteen years but to put her up there with Madonna in terms of global commercial success and impact on popular culture and music is ridiculous.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 10/01/07 4:25pm

sosgemini

avatar

Rodya24 said:

sosgemini said:



Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek


Madonna isn't even on the same level of Elvis, the Beatles or MJ.

and did you just say Mariah wasn't as well known as Madonna? What crack are you smoking? lol
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 10/01/07 4:26pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

PatrickS77 said:

Yes, I'm one of the people who (still) view her as an icon... a model of a female performer, whom many of the nowadays young female performer follow!

And you're right... 1992 to 1996 was also no nice period for Madonna either... but she turned it around! Maybe Janet should also do a musical and become a momma! lol
[Edited 10/1/07 16:17pm]



between 92 and 96 she had a hit moive, 2 hit albums #2 for Erotica which has sold 3million #3 for Bedtime Stories which has sold 5million in the states.

one sold out world tour

6 top ten hits
1 number one

a slew of videos that were really good.

Yes she suffered from Major contrversy, but she was still able to produce.

Janet just has lost her touch point blank.
You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 10/01/07 4:27pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Cinnamon234 said:


Actually Madonna is in the same league as Michael Jackson if you're talking about worldwide popularity and success.

Agreed!


totaldiva said:

Rodya24 said:



And yes there are levels of icons. A Japanese entertainer iconic in Japan is not an icon in the US for example. Michael Jackson and Madonna, on the other hand, are know in most places around the world.

And so is janet jackson. If record sales made you less of an icon, what do you feel about prince now? (no I would never compare him to janet or madonna, so dont go there). Janet has sold out tours all over the world at her peak. Britney was a top seller all over the globe, so is she an icon too?

Yes, she sure is an icon, but not at the level of Michael, Madonna and Prince, who transcended their fields and are household names, even to people who don't listen to popular music! They know who Michael, Madonna and Prince are! You can't really say that about Janet... at least not in the extent of former mentioned!

But like I said before, she still trumps Mariah, Britney and Beyonce, who either are mostly american phenomeneons or not long enough (sucessfully) in the business to really count!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 10/01/07 4:27pm

totaldiva

avatar

Rodya24 said:

totaldiva said:


And Britney Spears has outsold Prince, so I guess that makes her more of an icon in your book.


Record sales are important in determining who is recognized around the world. Of course, record sales do not translate to good music. But your analogy of comparing Britney Spears to Prince and Janet Jackson to Madonna does not work because of the transparent fact that Madonna is simply a bigger icon than Janet Jackson. Not only in record sales but in terms of impact on popular culture and music.

That does not mean that Janet isn't still an icon. you don't like janet, we get it. But you cannot ake away what she has accomplished. You will not see Janet jackson on Sureal Life anytime soon. As far as talent, yes, Madonna and Janet are on the same level. Neither one are vocal powerhouses, both made careers at selling ass. Again, Just because madonna has outsold Janet worldwide (and put out more albums) does not shrink Janets improtance. Neither should be put on the same level as Prince or michael jackson, but all are very global sucessful artist. Also, let me put this out there, besides Michael Jackson, White artist (no matter how similar in style) usually outsell the Black artist(even singing the same type of music)
"POOR IS THE MAN WHO'S PLEASURES DEPEND ON THE PERMISSION OF ANOTHER" Madonna

Follow me at twitter.com/totaldiva72
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 10/01/07 4:28pm

sosgemini

avatar

sassybritches said:

Rodya24 said:



Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek

hold up...the beatles and elvis ain't even on the same level as the beatles and elvis, let alone madonna.


lol
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 10/01/07 4:29pm

Rodya24

sosgemini said:

Rodya24 said:



Sad.

Again, not NEARLY as successful as her brother or Madonna.

Are you going to argue that Janet Jackson is on the same level as The Beatles, Elvis, Madonna, and MJ? eek


Madonna isn't even on the same level of Elvis, the Beatles or MJ.

and did you just say Mariah wasn't as well known as Madonna? What crack are you smoking? lol


No, Mariah is not as well known as Madonna around the world.

I am not going to argue with you on your first statement, because I would prefer that to be the case since I am a much bigger fan of the latter. biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What happened to Janet's tour