New topic
PrintableL4OATheOriginal said: kash said: you mean michael jackson and the jacksons just like prince and the new power generation / the revolutuion. 
[Edited 10/1/07 13:46pm] naw prince, prince and the revolution, prince and the new power generation r one entity cause at the head of it all is ..prince... the jackson 5, jacksons, MJ r seperate entity How are The Jacksons and The Jackson 5 a separate entity? | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
L4OATheOriginal said: Lovesexy82 said: No, I meant Michael Jackson solo, but that can include J5, too. And from what I've seen people are too busy dancing to much giggling and what not. IMO his musical presence still commands much respect and attention--even if his personal life doesn't. i'll say up until thriller ..after that ..music turned 2 shit, his singing was replaced by grunts ..give me the J5/Jacksons and then u'r talking about quality dance material That's your opinion. But IMO opinion a lot of his "bad" stuff is better than the "good" stuff out now. Remember the Time, The Way You Make Me Feel, hell even You Rock My World are good dance songs. BTW, the Thriller album is not the Masterpiece everyone makes it out to be. Off the Wall is a MUCH better album with better dance music. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lovesexy82 said: L4OATheOriginal said: naw prince, prince and the revolution, prince and the new power generation r one entity cause at the head of it all is ..prince... the jackson 5, jacksons, MJ r seperate entity How are The Jacksons and The Jackson 5 a separate entity? motown-the corporation wrote most of their songs which included jermaine on lead vocals as well the jacksons -this is when the jackson brothers started writting material with the help of the philly sound michael - ..quincy ....teddy riley ..etc ..etc...etc ... man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
L4OATheOriginal said: Lovesexy82 said: How are The Jacksons and The Jackson 5 a separate entity? motown-the corporation wrote most of their songs which included jermaine on lead vocals as well the jacksons -this is when the jackson brothers started writting material with the help of the philly sound michael - ..quincy ....teddy riley ..etc ..etc...etc ... If I'm not mistaken, they still didn't write that much of the material when they got to Epic, especially on the first three albums, including the ones with Gamble and Huff (i.e. Philly Sound). It wasn't until Triumph that they had more of a hand in songwriting. The way you put a song over has nothing to do with who wrote the song and the Jackson 5/The Jacksons have a very distinct sound that has nothing to do with a name change. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lovesexy82 said: L4OATheOriginal said: motown-the corporation wrote most of their songs which included jermaine on lead vocals as well the jacksons -this is when the jackson brothers started writting material with the help of the philly sound michael - ..quincy ....teddy riley ..etc ..etc...etc ... If I'm not mistaken, they still didn't write that much of the material when they got to Epic, especially on the first three albums, including the ones with Gamble and Huff (i.e. Philly Sound). It wasn't until Triumph that they had more of a hand in songwriting. The way you put a song over has nothing to do with who wrote the song and the Jackson 5/The Jacksons have a very distinct sound that has nothing to do with a name change. still u cant deny that during these times, the music was more danceable..now a days its about beats and sounds more than grooves and rythym. even his singing has change 2 the sounds of someone with emotion 2 the sounds of someone in need of exlax man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: 1. Prince (1978-1984)
2. Michael Jackson (The Jacksons years and Off The Wall....Destiny/Off The Wall/Triumph) 3. Janet Jackson (1982-1989) 4. Madonna (Vogue/Erotica era) I agree with your analysis. In their earlier years both Prince and Michael produce the most funky stuff. Even up till today not many people can sit on their arses when Don't Stop Till You Get Enough comes on. By The way The Jacksons first entire self-penned/produce album was Destiny. [Edited 10/2/07 11:29am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Mike & Janet love is a fate resigned memories mar my mind love it is a fate resigned Over futile odds and laughed at by the Gods and now the final frame Love is a losing game |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
L4OATheOriginal said: Lovesexy82 said: If I'm not mistaken, they still didn't write that much of the material when they got to Epic, especially on the first three albums, including the ones with Gamble and Huff (i.e. Philly Sound). It wasn't until Triumph that they had more of a hand in songwriting. The way you put a song over has nothing to do with who wrote the song and the Jackson 5/The Jacksons have a very distinct sound that has nothing to do with a name change. still u cant deny that during these times, the music was more danceable..now a days its about beats and sounds more than grooves and rythym. even his singing has change 2 the sounds of someone with emotion 2 the sounds of someone in need of exlax So agree. I have notice the change in Michael's vocals since the Bad era. Not that he sounds drastically different, but that melodic and smooth sound seem to have been replace with lots of grunt, screeches and strains. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |