New topic
Printabledreamfactory313 said: I put Michael Jackson as my first choice. I remember watching that performace live as it happened when I was 9 years old and I was moved.
I watched it on YouTube, and it was a phenomenal performance.  [Edited 9/13/07 13:39pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
I selected these...some of my all time favorites:
Tina Turner (1984) Eric Clapton/Babyface (1997) Prince/Beyoncé (2004) Michael Jackson (1988) RHCP/George Clinton (1993) | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Rodya24 said: dreamfactory313 said: I put Michael Jackson as my first choice. I remember watching that performace live as it happened when I was 9 years old and I was moved.
I watched it on YouTube, and it was a phenomenal performance. :nod; http://youtube.com/watch?v=2-Ue_ChceYs He is the ultimate performer. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
banks said: That's what makes this performance spectacular, I thought she was amazing and I didn't find out until later that she had stepped up to the plate with a 1/2 hr advanced notice
That's what i'm talking about. My other 4 choices in no particular order Itzhak Perlman Stevie Wonder Marvin Gaye Bette Midler tA  Tribal Disorder
http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431 "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Looking back on the 1988 Grammys, it still pisses me off that "Bad" or "Sign 'o The Times" didn't win Album of the Year, but "Joshua Tree" did
Fuck outta here with that bullshit "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I vote for Michael Jackson, Prince and Beyonce, Marvin Gaye, Red Hot Chili Peppers and George Clinton, James Brown and Usher. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Looking back on the 1988 Grammys, it still pisses me off that "Bad" or "Sign 'o The Times" didn't win Album of the Year, but "Joshua Tree" did
Fuck outta here with that bullshit There was nothing special about the Bad album at all, therefore it didn't deserve to win the Album of the Year. Sign of the Times was in a completely different league, so you could say Prince was cheated. But hey winning grammies doesn't mean much, the Beatles rarely won grammies and look how they are revered. [Edited 9/15/07 7:57am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DarlingDiana said: I vote for Michael Jackson, Prince and Beyonce, Marvin Gaye, Red Hot Chili Peppers and George Clinton, James Brown and Usher.
I have not seen or heard of the Red Hot Chili Peppers and George Clinton performance. Must go check the voting website... BTW, while I voted for James Brown and Usher, did other orgers think it was a lackluster performance? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Looking back on the 1988 Grammys, it still pisses me off that "Bad" or "Sign 'o The Times" didn't win Album of the Year, but "Joshua Tree" did
Fuck outta here with that bullshit It is only the Grammy Awards. Off The Wall did not win Album of the Year; it does not mean people like it less. Same goes with SOTT and Bad. And Joshua Tree was a good album. While I think U2 is the most overrated band of all time, Bono and Co. got something right with that album. If ONLY U2 lived up to the hype.  [Edited 9/15/07 8:17am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |