Xagain said: How many black heavy metal groups can you name? Living Colour. Fishbone. Who else? There aren't many. Bad Brains...there's many mixed ones. I'm not sure if you're a rock person, but Black Rock bands were like the red headed step child in the rock industry and they did get looked down upon amongst their peers. So no, in the rock circles, the majority of white fans weren't too ecstatic about Black rock bands. There are a number of people who can probably attest to this. Why a band like Kings X never had one hit is beyond me? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: Afronomical said: Hip Hop, not Soul music, is what's selling the most. That's what I was referring to. And what makes you think ALL that's on the radio is R&B and Soul music? Have you heard of Pop music? Pop and R&B are pretty much interchangable terms. "Pop" is just more inclusive. Next time I go into a record store I'm gonna go and look for Earth Wind and Fire in the pop section and then look for Britney Spears in the R&B section, since they're "interchangeable". Or maybe I'll turn on an urban radio station so I can hear Avril Levigne and then turn on a pop station to hear Jaheim. Wrong. Which is exactly why I said you need to do MUCH more research before you comment on the issue of music genres. Make Afros not War | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: But the main issue is, Black people don't support Black rock acts.
But why should they? I mean, why should anyone either support or ignore an act because of their race? Well, one would hope if an artist is making good music, or music that transcends the sonic landscape, it would be recognized and accepted by the group of people that artists comes from, especially if that sound is a result of what's come before. More Blacks should have loved Jimi, I'll never steer away from that pov. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Afronomical said: Xagain said: Pop and R&B are pretty much interchangable terms. "Pop" is just more inclusive. Next time I go into a record store I'm gonna go and look for Earth Wind and Fire in the pop section and then look for Britney Spears in the R&B section, since they're "interchangeable". Or maybe I'll turn on an urban radio station so I can hear Avril Levigne and then turn on a pop station to hear Jaheim. Wrong. Which is exactly why I said you need to do MUCH more research before you comment on the issue of music genres. Oh please. Yeah, Avril Levigne sounds different than Jaheim. True. But these days there's so little difference between people on the radio that most music stores simply sort cds according the color of the singer when they bother to distinguish them at all. Anyone on this thread has said there's a big lack of quality musicians these days, and most of them aren't on the radio at all. You're just grasping at straws. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Again, can we drop this notion that LC wasn't popular. I don't know any musician who wouldn't love to have had their level of notoriety. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: Afronomical said: Next time I go into a record store I'm gonna go and look for Earth Wind and Fire in the pop section and then look for Britney Spears in the R&B section, since they're "interchangeable". Or maybe I'll turn on an urban radio station so I can hear Avril Levigne and then turn on a pop station to hear Jaheim. Wrong. Which is exactly why I said you need to do MUCH more research before you comment on the issue of music genres. Oh please. Yeah, Avril Levigne sounds different than Jaheim. True. But these days there's so little difference between people on the radio that most music stores simply sort cds according the color of the singer when they bother to distinguish them at all. Anyone on this thread has said there's a big lack of quality musicians these days, and most of them aren't on the radio at all. You're just grasping at straws. You're not making any sense whatsoever. Seriously, do some real research on this. It's not rocket science: R&B and Pop = 2 different music genres. You're the one depserately grasping at straws here. Make Afros not War | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Xagain said: But why should they? I mean, why should anyone either support or ignore an act because of their race? Well, one would hope if an artist is making good music, or music that transcends the sonic landscape, it would be recognized and accepted by the group of people that artists comes from, especially if that sound is a result of what's come before. More Blacks should have loved Jimi, I'll never steer away from that pov. But when an artist makes good music that transcends the sonic landscape, then it should be recognized and appreciated by people of all groups, regardless of their race or frame of reference. That's why music is what it is, the language of the soul. That's not to say that musicians shouldn't try to play to a specific audience. But when they do that, and reach that audience, then people outside that group will get something from it. If not, there wouldn't be so many white folks digging Bob Marley. His audience was very specific, yet people far removed from that audience are enlightened by it. [Edited 6/4/07 19:13pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Afronomical said: Xagain said: Oh please. Yeah, Avril Levigne sounds different than Jaheim. True. But these days there's so little difference between people on the radio that most music stores simply sort cds according the color of the singer when they bother to distinguish them at all. Anyone on this thread has said there's a big lack of quality musicians these days, and most of them aren't on the radio at all. You're just grasping at straws. You're not making any sense whatsoever. Seriously, do some real research on this. It's not rocket science: R&B and Pop = 2 different music genres. You're the one depserately grasping at straws here. Ok fine. For the sake of the discussion I'll give it to you. I know the difference between Pop and R&B. It's all just radio friendly bullocks to me anyhow. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't feel sorry for them because of how they fucked up the remake to "17 Days". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good night. Much love to LC and all y'all. Thanks for the chain yankin'. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: Well, one would hope if an artist is making good music, or music that transcends the sonic landscape, it would be recognized and accepted by the group of people that artists comes from, especially if that sound is a result of what's come before. More Blacks should have loved Jimi, I'll never steer away from that pov. But when an artist makes good music that transcends the sonic landscape, then it should be recognized and appreciated by people of all groups, regardless of their race or frame of reference. That's why music is what it is, the music of the soul. That's not to say that musicians shouldn't try to play to a specific audience. But when they do that, and reach that audience, then people outside that group will get something from it. If not, there wouldn't be so many white folks digging Bob Marley. His audience was very specific, yet people far removed from that audience are enlightened by it. So what do you say about the Blacks who missed out on Jimi because his sound was "White". If the you're a Black artist that can't connect with your own people, what do you do? This question was an issue for Jimi and probably LC. Jimi did his Band of Gypsys thing, who knows how that would have turned out, LC went more black power with Time's Up. It's almost like when an artist finds popularity outside their home country, they always want to be recognized at home. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Mozorro said: I don't feel sorry for them because of how they fucked up the remake to "17 Days".
Never liked that song...no matter who did it. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
coolcat said: bellanoche said: Yes, white audiences support black performers who do what black performers are "expected" to do, i.e. "stay in their place" - rapping, singing soul/R&B, playing funk, etc. There is not debate there. The point of this thread was that white audiences do not support black rock acts. Where is your evidence to refute that? Please avoid using red herrings to distract from your argument. They do nothing to support what you are saying. Btw, when was Kanye West appointed the spokesperson for black audiences? He's one person. He definitely does not speak for me, because I am black and I listen to everything from Hector Lavoe to Black Sabbath. Xagain's point is that there aren't huge drones of black rock bands the way that there are huge drones of white R & B artists. Plus rock is pretty much dead... A successful white rock band is rare... A successful black rock band would obviously be more rare considering there are fewer black rock bands than white rock bands... Comparing R & B and rock is just not a fair comparison... All audiences white and black largely prefer R & B over rock today. I am not talking about today. The original post was about Living Colour, a band that made its debut in the 1980s. The conversation that I am engaged in is regarding the historical treatment of black rock bands. Xagain is so desperate to support his weak argument that he is the one mixing in today's audience. Today's audiences haven't been conditioned to like good music of any genre. Anything outside of the crappy R&B/Pop/Rap hodgepodge that passes for music today doesn't have a chance, no matter what color the artists are. So there is no sense in comparing today's music/audiences to the past. Finally, regardless of the number of past white soul acts compared to black rock acts, the fact remains that the black rock acts did not (past tense) receive the same acceptance from white audiences that white soul acts received (past tense) from black audiences. There are white soul acts who have made their livings almost exclusively off black audiences. That is what I am talking about. If Xagain would stop getting off topic to distract from his weak points, then there would be less confusion here. perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: So there is no sense in comparing today's music/audiences to the past. Agreed. There are white soul acts who have made their livings almost exclusively off black audiences. Which ones? Jimi Hendrix is an example of a black rock artist with an exclusively white audience... I don't see why he shouldn't count. Like lilgish, I'm having trouble with the premise of the thread. Living Colour and Fishbone are hugely successful bands. Are their audiences mostly white or black? This whole thread has pretty much focussed on those two black bands, two bands that are successful imo... I could name 50 white bands that have been rejected by white audiences over the 80s and that couldn't bring the white audience that LC or Fishbone could bring... Let's talk about all the black bands that were rejected by white audiences... not just these 2. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Xagain said: How many black heavy metal groups can you name? Living Colour. Fishbone. Who else? There aren't many. Bad Brains...there's many mixed ones. I'm not sure if you're a rock person, but Black Rock bands were like the red headed step child in the rock industry and they did get looked down upon amongst their peers. So no, in the rock circles, the majority of white fans weren't too ecstatic about Black rock bands. There are a number of people who can probably attest to this. Why a band like Kings X never had one hit is beyond me? The black in black rock is quite a misnomer. The bands, as well as the fans, range from Black to Latino to Asian to White to Native American to Middle Easterners to Mediterrean European to Brits and Anglos to Jamaican Rastafarian to Blonde Rastafarian etc etc Almost any kind of racial mix is on the scene. The scene is quite active in Los Angeles, New York SF area and ATL among others. I could roll off a list of bands, but if you ain't into 'em you'll say "I've never heard of 'em". Yeah sucka that's cuz it's underground. In any case I'm putting together a cross-reference that will have myspace and website urls so folks around here can get a funkin' clue. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
coolcat said: bellanoche said: So there is no sense in comparing today's music/audiences to the past. Agreed. There are white soul acts who have made their livings almost exclusively off black audiences. Which ones? Jimi Hendrix is an example of a black rock artist with an exclusively white audience... I don't see why he shouldn't count. Like lilgish, I'm having trouble with the premise of the thread. Living Colour and Fishbone are hugely successful bands. Are their audiences mostly white or black? This whole thread has pretty much focussed on those two black bands, two bands that are successful imo... I could name 50 white bands that have been rejected by white audiences over the 80s and that couldn't bring the white audience that LC or Fishbone could bring... Let's talk about all the black bands that were rejected by white audiences... not just these 2. Are you serious? Do you really think that Jimi's audience was "exclusively" white? Majority white, yes, but exclusively - no. Contrary to what some might think, there are many blacks who dig R&R. And in terms of white soul acts who have made their livings "almost" exclusively off blacks, two people who immediately come to mind are Teena Marie and Jon B. perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: coolcat said: Which ones? Jimi Hendrix is an example of a black rock artist with an exclusively white audience... I don't see why he shouldn't count. Like lilgish, I'm having trouble with the premise of the thread. Living Colour and Fishbone are hugely successful bands. Are their audiences mostly white or black? This whole thread has pretty much focussed on those two black bands, two bands that are successful imo... I could name 50 white bands that have been rejected by white audiences over the 80s and that couldn't bring the white audience that LC or Fishbone could bring... Let's talk about all the black bands that were rejected by white audiences... not just these 2. Are you serious? Do you really think that Jimi's audience was "exclusively" white? Majority white, yes, but exclusively - no. Contrary to what some might think, there are many blacks who dig R&R. And in terms of white soul acts who have made their livings "almost" exclusively off blacks, two people who immediately come to mind are Teena Marie and Jon B. So you don't think Jimi had an "almost" exclusively white audience? [Edited 6/5/07 9:53am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PFunkjazz said: lilgish said: Bad Brains...there's many mixed ones. I'm not sure if you're a rock person, but Black Rock bands were like the red headed step child in the rock industry and they did get looked down upon amongst their peers. So no, in the rock circles, the majority of white fans weren't too ecstatic about Black rock bands. There are a number of people who can probably attest to this. Why a band like Kings X never had one hit is beyond me? The black in black rock is quite a misnomer. The bands, as well as the fans, range from Black to Latino to Asian to White to Native American to Middle Easterners to Mediterrean European to Brits and Anglos to Jamaican Rastafarian to Blonde Rastafarian etc etc Almost any kind of racial mix is on the scene. The scene is quite active in Los Angeles, New York SF area and ATL among others. I could roll off a list of bands, but if you ain't into 'em you'll say "I've never heard of 'em". Yeah sucka that's cuz it's underground. In any case I'm putting together a cross-reference that will have myspace and website urls so folks around here can get a funkin' clue. Well, my statement was more about the past, I freely admit to being ignorant about any current underground scenes, and the hard time Black rockers experienced in the past is based on what I've heard many of them say. Interested in seeing the list though. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Contrary to what some might think, there are many blacks who dig R&R.
I'm not going to argue with how many, I'll just say that it's an experience. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Me personally, I usually have problems trying to feel sorry for people who made millions during the peak of their professional careers. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: coolcat said: Xagain's point is that there aren't huge drones of black rock bands the way that there are huge drones of white R & B artists. Plus rock is pretty much dead... A successful white rock band is rare... A successful black rock band would obviously be more rare considering there are fewer black rock bands than white rock bands... Comparing R & B and rock is just not a fair comparison... All audiences white and black largely prefer R & B over rock today. I am not talking about today. The original post was about Living Colour, a band that made its debut in the 1980s. The conversation that I am engaged in is regarding the historical treatment of black rock bands. Xagain is so desperate to support his weak argument that he is the one mixing in today's audience. Today's audiences haven't been conditioned to like good music of any genre. Anything outside of the crappy R&B/Pop/Rap hodgepodge that passes for music today doesn't have a chance, no matter what color the artists are. So there is no sense in comparing today's music/audiences to the past. Finally, regardless of the number of past white soul acts compared to black rock acts, the fact remains that the black rock acts did not (past tense) receive the same acceptance from white audiences that white soul acts received (past tense) from black audiences. There are white soul acts who have made their livings almost exclusively off black audiences. That is what I am talking about. If Xagain would stop getting off topic to distract from his weak points, then there would be less confusion here. You are right. I made this post about LIVING COLOUR, FUNKADELIC and the like...black bands that get ignored. I read a lot of guitar magazines and I'm sure you have seen where they do their "top 10 guitarists" of all times. Its like they ignore all the blacks that has ever played rock. Not that I care about a silly magazine's poll but I just find it interesting that I can RARELY recall hearing any black artists on any of the rock stations that I have ever listened to. I think I will call and request CULT OF PERSONALITY one day and see what they would say..LOL! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
edit. [Edited 6/6/07 11:37am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
novabrkr said: Me personally, I usually have problems trying to feel sorry for people who made millions during the peak of their professional careers.
They did okay but they didn't make anywhere near millions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I love this band.
Race, industry horseshit and everything else aside, I bought their solo stuff and it was good too. I can't wait until people judge others based on talent and their actions rather than bullshit standards or the color of their skin. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveAlive said: Afronomical said: Funkadelic is highly recognized. But yeah, a black rock group was destined for radio failure on 2 fronts: 1 - Black audiences weren't really feeling them. 2 - White audiences didn't really accept them. Who's left? my question is WHY. Who cares the color? Well... clearly the Classic Rock radio stations do, because I could name several artists and bands that don't get any play there... ...and the best example of all is Prince. Have U ever heard any Prince songs on a classic rock station? I haven't. "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: Afronomical said: Funkadelic is highly recognized. But yeah, a black rock group was destined for radio failure on 2 fronts: 1 - Black audiences weren't really feeling them. 2 - White audiences didn't really accept them. Who's left? Ok...I have to ask. Why would they not have been accepted by white audiences? I mean, I'm white and dug a few of their songs, but "Living Colour" wasn't all that. If they had been, white audiences would have had no problem accepting them. They weren't that terribly great. [Edited 5/27/07 12:59pm] Living Color WAS accepted by "white" audiences, but when U talk about the owners and program directors of classic rock stations, it IS about color, clearly. "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
rebelsoldier said: Then why are the RHCP the biggest band in the world when fishbone clearly has the better songs, better musicians and a more talented/charismatic frontman in Angelo Moore.
RHCP has made a career eating out of Funkadelic's ass. And most white folks would swear that Flea is better than Bootsy. Why does everyone worship Jim Morrison and the doors when they are simply a clone of Arthur Lee and Love. Jim wanted to be Arthur Lee so bad that he dressed like him, dated his ex girlfriend and got the same dog as Arthur. And by the way Jimi is white to most folks so his success doesn't count. Rock and Roll is still the most racist industry in the world. WORD. Hell, Flea got so damn popular, that there were times (in D.C.!!!) that I'd be playing an up-tempo funk bassline - all thumb and pop, and inevitably some fool would mention Flea. I was like... "ever hear of Larry Graham, Jamaaladeen Tacuma, Stanley Clarke, or Louis Johnson?" "He's a musician's musician..." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Giovanni777 said: Xagain said: Ok...I have to ask. Why would they not have been accepted by white audiences? I mean, I'm white and dug a few of their songs, but "Living Colour" wasn't all that. If they had been, white audiences would have had no problem accepting them. They weren't that terribly great. [Edited 5/27/07 12:59pm] Living Color WAS accepted by "white" audiences, but when U talk about the owners and program directors of classic rock stations, it IS about color, clearly. Thats OBVIOUS! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveAlive said: Giovanni777 said: Living Color WAS accepted by "white" audiences, but when U talk about the owners and program directors of classic rock stations, it IS about color, clearly. Thats OBVIOUS! So the fact that there are so few black rockers has nothing to do with it? I've heard Living Colour on our classic rock stations. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |