Graycap23 said: BlaqueKnight said: Fishbone is and has been the truth. "Truth and Soul" was my favorite album from them. As for funk, you can't listen to "Bonin' In The Boneyard" and not call them funky. No way in hell. That was soooo GCS! I notice that within the industry from time to time, there are artists that other popular artists bite off of but never mention. I hear it in others' music. In the 80s, Fishbone was one of those groups. In the 90s, Mint Condition was another. All of these cats are top notch musicians and are respected among music lovers and musicians alike.
The same can be said for Living Color. When I first heard Sevendust I thought it was Corey. Interesting. 4 some reason Fishbone has always reminded me of the Busboys. The music never quite drew me in. [Edited 6/3/07 10:53am] I understand that this comes down to taste, and I have to admit that I wasn't big on listening to Fishbone records in my spare time, but I have to say if you get the chance, see them live. They put on a helluva show live and you leave them feeling really revved up. Despite the mediocrity I hear some people saying about Fishbone and LC, they still deserved to be in the mainstream. There are plenty of white rock bands that are pretty mediocre if not lame as all getout despite the one little hit they managed to push out, but manage to sell enough to shut up their record companies, so there was no reason we could have the same from a black rock band. The shit is racist, flat out and my feelings and I feel very resentful when I see Justin Timberlake and Joss Stone trying to dominate the black-dominated markets. I get sick of it really because their shit is weak, but they'll walk away with top honors like record of the year, best artist and so on. I'm not on this new age kick about being colorblind or race doesn't matter when I know it does. People just like to pretend that just because you don't speak out about it, it will just go away and if you do speak out about it you're just some whiny black person playing the race card. The only way that black people will have a presence in the rock market is to create their own and to start supporting black rock acts. White people are not going to be enough to do it. If black rock begins selling, then the industry will be forced to take notice which is what happened with hip hop and rap. LQ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LadyQ said: The shit is racist, flat out and my feelings and I feel very resentful when I see Justin Timberlake and Joss Stone trying to dominate the black-dominated markets.
You certainly picked the two biggest cornballs. No one fakes the funk like those two. [Edited 6/4/07 0:06am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: I forgot to mention Bad Brains in my list of black rock acts who never made it mainstream.
C'mon what Bad Brains song had any hint of commericialbility. They are underground artists. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LadyQ said: Graycap23 said: Interesting. 4 some reason Fishbone has always reminded me of the Busboys. The music never quite drew me in. [Edited 6/3/07 10:53am] I understand that this comes down to taste, and I have to admit that I wasn't big on listening to Fishbone records in my spare time, but I have to say if you get the chance, see them live. They put on a helluva show live and you leave them feeling really revved up. Despite the mediocrity I hear some people saying about Fishbone and LC, they still deserved to be in the mainstream. There are plenty of white rock bands that are pretty mediocre if not lame as all getout despite the one little hit they managed to push out, but manage to sell enough to shut up their record companies, so there was no reason we could have the same from a black rock band. The shit is racist, flat out and my feelings and I feel very resentful when I see Justin Timberlake and Joss Stone trying to dominate the black-dominated markets. I get sick of it really because their shit is weak, but they'll walk away with top honors like record of the year, best artist and so on. I'm not on this new age kick about being colorblind or race doesn't matter when I know it does. People just like to pretend that just because you don't speak out about it, it will just go away and if you do speak out about it you're just some whiny black person playing the race card. The only way that black people will have a presence in the rock market is to create their own and to start supporting black rock acts. White people are not going to be enough to do it. If black rock begins selling, then the industry will be forced to take notice which is what happened with hip hop and rap. LQ Supporting a group or singer just because they're black is racist too. If anyone started a thread about how we should support Eminem just because he's white, wouldn't that be branded racist? The "black dominated markets?" Give me a freakin brake. THAT'S racist. So you think black people should buy black music and white people should buy white music, then complain that Living Colour weren't accepted enough by whites? That's contradictory, and also the kind of thinking that allowed white artists of the 40's and 50's to rip off many legendary black song writers and musicians. If I were on here bitchin about how Charlie Pride was selling country music albums, you guys would blow up. I haven't heard such blatantley racist comments in a long time. My white friends buy far more albums by black artists than my black friends buy white artists. Racism is rapant, true. It influences the market, true. But soley blaming white folks for it, and blaming white entertainers for the music they're playing, is ridiculous. Assuming someone is superior because of their race is just as lame as assuming they're inferior because of their race. These days, everyone is to blame for the proliferation of racism, as your comments prove. If this were a thread of white people complaining that a white R&B artist wasn't making it big enough because they weren't black, we'd all be banned. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
agreed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
realm said: lilgish said: truth. Not true. If they were good or not so good, people can debate that til the end of time, All depends upon what you one likes. Fact is some people actually believe Prince plays garbage. Doesn't take away from the fact that people will jump onto bandwagons and ride waves. Did sellout shows like Prince does now after playing the SB? Ask people that play guitar how good Vernon Reid is! He is a guitar God, up with Vai, Nuno..but maybe not Buckethead! lol. But what does the general public know about playing guitar? They would rate the latest American Idol as better musicians than Bowie, Prince, or the Stones. Truth is Vernon Reid has more talent in his pinky than 99.9% of guitar players. Seems what LILgish is agreeing to in nova's statement has more to do with popularity or commerciality than musicality. I think they are saying LC and Fishbone are underground (probably true for the whole of blak rawk). That's fine. I see no reason to take umbrage. It is true these bands have a limited following, so what? Mavericks don't run in herds. [Edited 6/4/07 6:30am] test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
coolcat said: bellanoche said: I forgot to mention Bad Brains in my list of black rock acts who never made it mainstream.
I don't disagree that these bands were all blessed to make a living doing what they love to do, they are definitely in the minority of society there. However, I still recognize the fact that their success was tempered by racism. They're all a lot better than many white acts who received far more exposure and acclaim. I think that was the genesis of this entire thread. It's not so much a pity thing as it is an acknowledgment of the obvious role that racism played in their careers. I was just reading about Bad Brains on this page:http://www.roctober.com/r...punk1.html I hadn't heard of Bad Brains before. Those black punk bands really had guts playing for those all white audiences. Despite a long layoff, The Brains are still active. An album of new material, Build A Nation is due June 26. They've got presences on myspace: http://myspace.com/badbrains and the web: http://www.badbrains.com/ test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: bellanoche said: I forgot to mention Bad Brains in my list of black rock acts who never made it mainstream.
C'mon what Bad Brains song had any hint of commericialbility. They are underground artists. I said I forgot to mention them in my list, I never said that they would be as mainstream as Green Day. Mainstream success/exspoure varies in degrees. However, there are several white underground acts that received more exposure than the Brains. The fact remains that being black in a racist, white rock world didn't help, despite how "underground" they might be. perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: lilgish said: C'mon what Bad Brains song had any hint of commericialbility. They are underground artists. I said I forgot to mention them in my list, I never said that they would be as mainstream as Green Day. Mainstream success/exspoure varies in degrees. However, there are several white underground acts that received more exposure than the Brains. The fact remains that being black in a racist, white rock world didn't help, despite how "underground" they might be. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[/quote]If this were a thread of white people complaining that a white R&B artist wasn't making it big enough because they weren't black, we'd all be banned.[/quote]
that would never happen because Blacks/r&b has a history of supoorting white r&b acts... its just that it rarely happened the opposite way... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveAlive said: If this were a thread of white people complaining that a white R&B artist wasn't making it big enough because they weren't black, we'd all be banned.
that would never happen because Blacks/r&b has a history of supoorting white r&b acts... its just that it rarely happened the opposite way... Make Afros not War | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LoveAlive said: If this were a thread of white people complaining that a white R&B artist wasn't making it big enough because they weren't black, we'd all be banned.[/quote]that would never happen because Blacks/r&b has a history of supoorting white r&b acts... its just that it rarely happened the opposite way...[/quote] Pffft. That is just plain ridiculously wrong and I don't know where you get the idea that blacks are more supportive of white acts than whites are of black acts. That is just simply not true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: That is just plain ridiculously wrong and I don't know where you get the idea that blacks are more supportive of white acts than whites are of black acts. That is just simply not true.
Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: Xagain said: That is just plain ridiculously wrong and I don't know where you get the idea that blacks are more supportive of white acts than whites are of black acts. That is just simply not true.
Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Despite so many rappers being black, most hip hop record purchasers tend to be white, reflecting demographics and economics. According to musicologist Arthur Kempton, "Today 70 percent of hip-hop is bought by white kids". Russel Simmons has said that this percentage is upward towards 80%. According to political rapper Zion of Zion I, socially conscious hip hop has a mainly white audience: "...so many Black people don't want to hear it. They want that thug shit." In addition to Zion, several other underground rappers, such as Boots Riley of The Coup, report nearly all-white audiences. White audiences are far more accepting of black performers. Maybe they just didn't dig Living Colour because their first album didn't come out until '88, when the hard rock scene was evolving into college and independent rock, and soul. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Ok...Kanye West is who again? thats just HIS opinion... I hate when Black artists sound dumb(i.e. West) now what... all of this goes back to the fact that race does play a factor in music. Why do you think Pat Boone was stealing all those songs back in the day, watering them down and turning them into hits? Why do you think Eminem HIMSELF said in a song that he knows that his popularity is largely based on his race. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Except for Jimi there is a guetto mentality in music. No room for color. All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Very good point. Rock is dead. Metal is dead. In the mainstream anyway. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
2freaky4church1 said: Except for Jimi there is a guetto mentality in music. No room for color.
What's that supposed to mean? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R.
You need to do much more research before you post on this topic. Make Afros not War | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: There have been many talented black rock bands and black-led rock bands that have not received the attention or exposure that they should have. To ignore the role that racism has played in that is careless. Racism affected the decisions of labels and radio stations with regard to exposure/promotion of these bands. I remember back in the day when Fishbone talked about how they were told that they had to put white people in their video. Angelo (lead singer) said people who knew him knew where his heart was, but that he wasn't putting white people in his video, because no one ever tells white people that they have to put blacks in their videos. When you look at bands like Living Colour, King's X, 24-7 Spyz, Fishbone, Eric Gales Band and others it is clear that race played a factor in their lack of exposure. I don't think they were mediocre. Even if they weren't your cup of tea, they were far more talented than several white bands who received much more exposure. Groups like Thin Lizzy, Hootie & the Blowfish and even the Jimi Hendrix Experience received more exposure because they would not be considered "black" rock bands. An ingredient to their success was that though the lead was black, the remainder of the band was white. Therefore, it was easier for decision makers to promote them to white audiences. As great as Jimi was, had he not been backed by two white guys and repackaged/re-sent to the USA from London, he would have probably had a career as underrated as other great black guitarists like Eddie Hazel and Ernie Isley. It's sad, but true. Very well said. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Afronomical said: Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R.
You need to do much more research before you post on this topic. Why? What are you disputing? Rock is long dead. Soul and R&B is all that's on the radio these days. Living Colour was a heavy metal band that came on the scene when heavy metal was dieing. It's as simple as that. Doesn't matter how good they were. You can be a talented bagpipe player and it ain't going to get you props if nobody's digging the bagpipe. Are you disputing the Russel Simmons quote? You don't think Kanye West is a bigot for saying something that would have gotten any white entertainer in big trouble? Or are the rules different for one group than they are for another (the definition of prejudice)? I don't mind people lamenting that Living Colour didn't get bigger than they deserved to get. It's probably true. I have a problem when it's not related to timing, or the music, but to the ridiculous notion that white people were running around saying "Can you believe this shit? A BLACK rock group! How dare they!" That's bullshit. Alot of whites dug them. Just not enough were digging heavy metal at the end of the '80s. The notion that white people who listen to music are all racists has no credibility. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Afronomical said: LoveAlive said: that would never happen because Blacks/r&b has a history of supoorting white r&b acts... its just that it rarely happened the opposite way... Double That's why I can't stand all that race card crap. It's just a cop-out to avoid the real issue. Ignoring or failing to acknowledge racism does not make it go away. The reality remains that there's no reciprocity for black rock acts with white audiences. We can name many white soul/R&B acts who have found success with black audiences. So it doesn't make sense to speak hypothetically when reality disapproves your point. perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Despite so many rappers being black, most hip hop record purchasers tend to be white, reflecting demographics and economics. According to musicologist Arthur Kempton, "Today 70 percent of hip-hop is bought by white kids". Russel Simmons has said that this percentage is upward towards 80%. According to political rapper Zion of Zion I, socially conscious hip hop has a mainly white audience: "...so many Black people don't want to hear it. They want that thug shit." In addition to Zion, several other underground rappers, such as Boots Riley of The Coup, report nearly all-white audiences. White audiences are far more accepting of black performers. Maybe they just didn't dig Living Colour because their first album didn't come out until '88, when the hard rock scene was evolving into college and independent rock, and soul. Yes, white audiences support black performers who do what black performers are "expected" to do, i.e. "stay in their place" - rapping, singing soul/R&B, playing funk, etc. There is not debate there. The point of this thread was that white audiences do not support black rock acts. Where is your evidence to refute that? Please avoid using red herrings to distract from your argument. They do nothing to support what you are saying. Btw, when was Kanye West appointed the spokesperson for black audiences? He's one person. He definitely does not speak for me, because I am black and I listen to everything from Hector Lavoe to Black Sabbath. perfection is a fallacy of the imagination... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Afronomical said: Double That's why I can't stand all that race card crap. It's just a cop-out to avoid the real issue. Ignoring or failing to acknowledge racism does not make it go away. The reality remains that there's no reciprocity for black rock acts with white audiences. We can name many white soul/R&B acts who have found success with black audiences. So it doesn't make sense to speak hypothetically when reality disapproves your point. How many black heavy metal groups can you name? Living Colour. Fishbone. Who else? There aren't many. Reality disproves YOUR point. Especially since we're posting on a Prince site. There have been many black rock and rollers, just not heavy metal rockers like LC and FB. From Chuck Berry (the REAL King of Rock) and Little Richard, to Ike and Tina, to Prince and Kravitz. I understand that racism is alive and well. I'm not naive. But I'm baffled by your notion that black rock and rollers are underappreciated because they're black when even black hip hop artists acknowledge that whites make up a huge part of their audiences. I'm not copping out. But my reasons for why LC didn't make it bigger make a hell of lot more sense than "It's because white people couldn't tolerate a black rock and roll group" as opposed to "LC played great music, but in a genre that was quickly dropping out of the mainstream." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: lilgish said: Well, I can name more popular white soul artists than Black rock artists, why is that? Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Despite so many rappers being black, most hip hop record purchasers tend to be white, reflecting demographics and economics. According to musicologist Arthur Kempton, "Today 70 percent of hip-hop is bought by white kids". Russel Simmons has said that this percentage is upward towards 80%. According to political rapper Zion of Zion I, socially conscious hip hop has a mainly white audience: "...so many Black people don't want to hear it. They want that thug shit." In addition to Zion, several other underground rappers, such as Boots Riley of The Coup, report nearly all-white audiences. White audiences are far more accepting of black performers. Maybe they just didn't dig Living Colour because their first album didn't come out until '88, when the hard rock scene was evolving into college and independent rock, and soul. White Audiences did like Living Colour, the premise of this thread is erroneous to begin with. Rock did die. But the main issue is, Black people don't support Black rock acts. Kanye's opinion is not endemic of any audience, so his quotes on music are pretty useless. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites.
I think it's fair to say Black audiences are transient, forgetful, and have an aversion to the avant-garde. Self Identity plays a major role in how some Black Americans feel about music; it speaks to who they are as people. Black audiences don't identify with "white music", but Blacks identify with Whites playing "Black music". Whites were always welcomed in the venues of emerging Black musical movements. So it's more of a question of being prejudiced to a particular sound than a particular group of people. The notion of a particular sound being white or black is what’s really interesting. I'll think that one over. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Xagain said: Afronomical said: You need to do much more research before you post on this topic. Why? What are you disputing? Rock is long dead. Soul and R&B is all that's on the radio these days. Living Colour was a heavy metal band that came on the scene when heavy metal was dieing. It's as simple as that. Doesn't matter how good they were. You can be a talented bagpipe player and it ain't going to get you props if nobody's digging the bagpipe. Are you disputing the Russel Simmons quote? You don't think Kanye West is a bigot for saying something that would have gotten any white entertainer in big trouble? Or are the rules different for one group than they are for another (the definition of prejudice)? I don't mind people lamenting that Living Colour didn't get bigger than they deserved to get. It's probably true. I have a problem when it's not related to timing, or the music, but to the ridiculous notion that white people were running around saying "Can you believe this shit? A BLACK rock group! How dare they!" That's bullshit. Alot of whites dug them. Just not enough were digging heavy metal at the end of the '80s. The notion that white people who listen to music are all racists has no credibility. Hip Hop, not Soul music, is what's selling the most. That's what I was referring to. And what makes you think ALL that's on the radio is R&B and Soul music? Have you heard of Pop music? Make Afros not War | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Xagain said: Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Despite so many rappers being black, most hip hop record purchasers tend to be white, reflecting demographics and economics. According to musicologist Arthur Kempton, "Today 70 percent of hip-hop is bought by white kids". Russel Simmons has said that this percentage is upward towards 80%. According to political rapper Zion of Zion I, socially conscious hip hop has a mainly white audience: "...so many Black people don't want to hear it. They want that thug shit." In addition to Zion, several other underground rappers, such as Boots Riley of The Coup, report nearly all-white audiences. White audiences are far more accepting of black performers. Maybe they just didn't dig Living Colour because their first album didn't come out until '88, when the hard rock scene was evolving into college and independent rock, and soul. Yes, white audiences support black performers who do what black performers are "expected" to do, i.e. "stay in their place" - rapping, singing soul/R&B, playing funk, etc. There is not debate there. The point of this thread was that white audiences do not support black rock acts. Where is your evidence to refute that? Please avoid using red herrings to distract from your argument. They do nothing to support what you are saying. Btw, when was Kanye West appointed the spokesperson for black audiences? He's one person. He definitely does not speak for me, because I am black and I listen to everything from Hector Lavoe to Black Sabbath. West was just an example. He was being blatantly racist and exhibiting the kind of stuff you're accusing white audiences of. And that whole "keep in their place" bullshit may have been true 40-50 years ago, but it hasn't been true in decades. One minute white audiences and entertainers are being accused of emulating black artists and the next they're being accused of ignoring black artists. It's black artists who are spouting the divisive crap such as "white audiences do not support black rock acts." I quoted people who know more about music than you or I that disagree with you, but you're too conditioned into thinking that white people are just being racist when they don't take more to a black group you happen to dig. The heavy crowd wasn't there for LC, and it wasn't because they were black. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Afronomical said: Xagain said: Why? What are you disputing? Rock is long dead. Soul and R&B is all that's on the radio these days. Living Colour was a heavy metal band that came on the scene when heavy metal was dieing. It's as simple as that. Doesn't matter how good they were. You can be a talented bagpipe player and it ain't going to get you props if nobody's digging the bagpipe. Are you disputing the Russel Simmons quote? You don't think Kanye West is a bigot for saying something that would have gotten any white entertainer in big trouble? Or are the rules different for one group than they are for another (the definition of prejudice)? I don't mind people lamenting that Living Colour didn't get bigger than they deserved to get. It's probably true. I have a problem when it's not related to timing, or the music, but to the ridiculous notion that white people were running around saying "Can you believe this shit? A BLACK rock group! How dare they!" That's bullshit. Alot of whites dug them. Just not enough were digging heavy metal at the end of the '80s. The notion that white people who listen to music are all racists has no credibility. Hip Hop, not Soul music, is what's selling the most. That's what I was referring to. And what makes you think ALL that's on the radio is R&B and Soul music? Have you heard of Pop music? Pop and R&B are pretty much interchangable terms. "Pop" is just more inclusive. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bellanoche said: Xagain said: Because there are TONS more white soul singers than black rockers. Especially since rock hasn't been popular in years. Soul is what sells records these days, not R&R. Black audiences are far more prejudiced than whites. Kanye West has said: "I hate music where white people are trying to sound black. The white music I like [sounds] white". What if I said the same thing only "I hate music where black people are trying to sound white." What kind of response would that have gotten on this thread? Despite so many rappers being black, most hip hop record purchasers tend to be white, reflecting demographics and economics. According to musicologist Arthur Kempton, "Today 70 percent of hip-hop is bought by white kids". Russel Simmons has said that this percentage is upward towards 80%. According to political rapper Zion of Zion I, socially conscious hip hop has a mainly white audience: "...so many Black people don't want to hear it. They want that thug shit." In addition to Zion, several other underground rappers, such as Boots Riley of The Coup, report nearly all-white audiences. White audiences are far more accepting of black performers. Maybe they just didn't dig Living Colour because their first album didn't come out until '88, when the hard rock scene was evolving into college and independent rock, and soul. Yes, white audiences support black performers who do what black performers are "expected" to do, i.e. "stay in their place" - rapping, singing soul/R&B, playing funk, etc. There is not debate there. The point of this thread was that white audiences do not support black rock acts. Where is your evidence to refute that? Please avoid using red herrings to distract from your argument. They do nothing to support what you are saying. Btw, when was Kanye West appointed the spokesperson for black audiences? He's one person. He definitely does not speak for me, because I am black and I listen to everything from Hector Lavoe to Black Sabbath. Xagain's point is that there aren't huge drones of black rock bands the way that there are huge drones of white R & B artists. Plus rock is pretty much dead... A successful white rock band is rare... A successful black rock band would obviously be more rare considering there are fewer black rock bands than white rock bands... Comparing R & B and rock is just not a fair comparison... All audiences white and black largely prefer R & B over rock today. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: But the main issue is, Black people don't support Black rock acts.
But why should they? I mean, why should anyone either support or ignore an act because of their race? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |