of course he was sexy.



yes, he was ugly. but extremely sexy. the sexiest people are usually not also considered classically beautiful.

Back in the day Mike Jagger was "the shit", trust me!

I can see how people perceived him as sexy

Sexy isn't about a cute face. There's a few actors I think are borderline ugly yet hella sexy & fuckable

Mick's kinda ugly, it's true. Even in his youth he'd have never won any Beautiful People awards. But he's got this incredible, sexual vibe that overrides all that. The man just oozes sex appeal in spite of his low-end-of-average visage. Especially seeing him in person. My God, he's attractive. I'd do him.

*plays intro of INCENSE AND CANDLES*

yes.

I thought he was quite attractive when he was young. But, his dancing was awful back in 1966 and it is much worse now, and there is nothing sexy about a man who is really an awful dancer, and he doesn't even seem to realize how bad he is.

The fact that he supposedly went down on five women in one night earns points for me.

Mick had ATTITUDE in spades.

YESSSSS!!!!!

whatsgoingon said:

See..I really didnt think his dancing was bad at all...I like his dancing!

AnckSuNamun said:

Whaaaaatt??? What book did you read this from???


My toes are curling at tha thought of that....



Was Prince the 'Downtown' type?? lol

lonelygurl8305 said:

I don't know someone posted this a while back on a thread.....I just know that the thought of it got me hot too. I would've been in line too Oh, Mick .....I'm next.

This discussion reminds me of Eddie Murphy's take on Mick's looks...

http://www.youtube.com/wa...3oyLRS-EUs

lonelygurl8305 said:

wtf is happening to this forum???

meow85 said:

Yeah, it's called bei9ng a wealthy rock star.

Mick Jagger/insurance salesman = no sexual vibe

whatsgoingon said:

Naw, he knows he looks friggin goofy when he dances. But the crowd loves it, and he's still limber in enough for the rooster dance/flail, so why not?

AnckSuNamun said:

uPtoWnNY said:

Not true. At least not for me. Riches don't mean much of anything to me, and honestly, that rock star thing'll only take a person so far in the sex appeal department. Mick's just one of those people that manages to be hot without being anything special to look at.

uPtoWnNY said:

Unless he was Mick Jagger/insurance salesman with a huge dick who fucked all the housewives while the hubby's were @ work Then he'd exude a certain amount of confidence, & confidence in itself is sexy. And despite any shyness or introverted ways in their private lives, what do most performers have once they hit the stage? Confidence



.
[Edited 5/7/07 2:48am]

uPtoWnNY said:

nah, there's ugly dudes working at the 7-11 that have a certain sex appeal to them. Mick's one of those guys.

RZR said:

Wow...I don't see it, but I'm a guy.

The only dude uglier than ol' Mick is Imus.

uPtoWnNY said:

I'm a guy too.

He has been the sexiest british of the 20th Century, that's for sure (I'm sorry Mr.Bowie )

Even in the mid 70's he could have been considered pretty, sort of


[Edited 5/7/07 11:44am]

JoeTyler said:

I thought David Bowie was sexy too...just weird! Mick was sooooo sexy right there!!
[Edited 5/7/07 20:13pm]

HELL YESSS Mick Jagger was sexy and still is. It's in his swagger. And Mick's swagger exudes his self-confident, laid-back-cool, enjoying-life attitude.

The same swagger my soulmate possess... and Prince too.

uPtoWnNY said:

You can't be serious.....




Eww.....Imus is the worst. Mick and Imus aren't even on the same level....not even close. Present day Keith on the other hand .....

AnckSuNamun said:

Ahhhhh, My eyes!!! My eyes!!!! He looks like a scrotum!!!!!

Harlepolis said:

Ahhhh, Eddie was sooooo wrong for that