independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Why was Jimi Hendrix...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/11/07 4:47pm

lonelygurl8305

Why was Jimi Hendrix...

So looked down upon by the black community back in the late 60's...I was watching this interview that he did back in the 60's on you-tube...and I scrolled down to the comments...and everyone was saying that he didnt get enough respect back in the day when it came to the black community...?

Heres the interview:

http://www.youtube.com/wa...YlWyBm7sXY
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/11/07 5:05pm

BluHaze

The answer is simple and this not only falls apon Jimi many blacks that r fame

they beileve if it aint gospel is devils music ...not to mention he dealings with drugs
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/11/07 5:46pm

lonelygurl8305

BluHaze said:

The answer is simple and this not only falls apon Jimi many blacks that r fame

they beileve if it aint gospel is devils music ...not to mention he dealings with drugs



But Motown was out back then...and that wasnt considered to be devils music, not to mention Little Richard, and Chuck Berry.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/11/07 5:48pm

theAudience

avatar

In the 60s, the accepted/expected look for a Black male artist...



...was the above.



Not this...



...And as i've heard it said, "Looking like some circus clown" (check the Are You Experienced cover)


And they certainly didn't expect to hear...

Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things they don't seem the same
Actin' funny and I don't know why
'Scuse me while I kiss the sky


...lyrically shocked


Nor the sounds emanating from his guitar...



...sonically.


Now I had some Black friends that were down, but most weren't.
The way they saw it (the ones that weren't), he was playing "that white boy music"


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/11/07 5:57pm

prettymansson

Thanks T.A ! wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/11/07 6:00pm

coolcat

theAudience said:



Now I had some Black friends that were down, but most weren't.
The way they saw it (the ones that weren't), he was playing "that white boy music"


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


That's interesting that already, in the mid 60s... rock and roll was being considered white music. Didn't Clapton, the stones etc... give credit to the black artists that started it all?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/11/07 6:14pm

riffraff

avatar

coolcat said:


That's interesting that already, in the mid 60s... rock and roll was being considered white music. Didn't Clapton, the stones etc... give credit to the black artists that started it all?


they did.
they gave credit to black blues by whitening it into rock and roll.
basically.

i always thought the question of Jimi not being the black community's hero was that he mingled with the white establishment more than, say, Sly Stone, George Clinton, or indeed James Brown.
Jimi never had a song like "Say It Loud (I'm Black And I'm Proud)".
he finally formed Band Of Gypsys hoping to change it, but it was generally considered too late, too un-spontaneuous.
he wasn't 4 Real.
new to funk, naive in every way
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/11/07 6:38pm

theAudience

avatar

coolcat said:

That's interesting that already, in the mid 60s... rock and roll was being considered white music. Didn't Clapton, the stones etc... give credit to the black artists that started it all?

But just like most Black folks didn't initially listen to Hendrix, they definitely didn't listen to Clapton or The Stones during that time period either.


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/11/07 10:01pm

JesseDezz

riffraff said:


he finally formed Band Of Gypsys hoping to change it, but it was generally considered too late, too un-spontaneuous.
he wasn't 4 Real.


How was Band of Gypsys "unspontaneous"? Some of Jimi's best freeform playing came from this outfit. And how can it be said that he wasn't "4 real"? In what way was he less than real?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 04/11/07 10:02pm

JesseDezz

theAudience said:

coolcat said:

That's interesting that already, in the mid 60s... rock and roll was being considered white music. Didn't Clapton, the stones etc... give credit to the black artists that started it all?

But just like most Black folks didn't initially listen to Hendrix, they definitely didn't listen to Clapton or The Stones during that time period either.


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


Reminds me of Fayne Pidgeon's reaction when Jimi played her some Bob Dylan...She definitely wasn't feelin' that...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 04/11/07 10:55pm

jacktheimprovi
dent

theAudience said:

coolcat said:

That's interesting that already, in the mid 60s... rock and roll was being considered white music. Didn't Clapton, the stones etc... give credit to the black artists that started it all?

But just like most Black folks didn't initially listen to Hendrix, they definitely didn't listen to Clapton or The Stones during that time period either.


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


I've never understood why hard rock/prominent guitar driven rock is considered "white". Most of the early white guitar heroes were biting heavily off of electric blues players, and as far back as the fifties blues and R&B guitarists were the first to use distortion and heavy riffing. Wasn't Buddy Guy pushing the envelope in terms of loudness, wildness and amplification before Cream OR Hendrix? granted Leonard Chess didn't want that stuff to be recorded and asked Buddy to kick him in the ass when Cream and Hendrix sold millions off it, but still, I've never heard anyone impugn Buddy's "blackness".

Besides there've been plenty of other black musicians since Hendrix who haven't been afraid to rock out. Funkadelic rocked about as hard as any of their white contemporaries (when they wanted to). Hell a non-soul fan coming from a hard rock background would probably be surprised at how hard Sly, the Isleys, even Otis Redding could rock. Then of course there's The Bad Brains one of the hardest rocking bands EVER who were the exact opposite of the stereotype of the genre they helped found (black rasta virtuosos in contrast to white atheist amateurs)....bah, I'm done ranting.
[Edited 4/11/07 23:04pm]
[Edited 4/11/07 23:04pm]
[Edited 4/11/07 23:05pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 04/11/07 11:09pm

theAudience

avatar

jacktheimprovident said:


I've never understood why hard rock/prominent guitar driven rock is considered "white". Most of the early white guitar heroes were biting heavily off of electric blues players, and as far back as the fifties blues and R&B guitarists were the first to use distortion and heavy riffing. Wasn't Buddy pushing the envelope in terms of loudness, wildness and amplification before Cream OR Hendrix? granted Leonard Chess didn't want that stuff to be recorded and asked Buddy to kick him in the ass when Cream and Hendrix sold millions off it, but still, I've never heard anyone impugn Buddy's "blackness".

That's because most Blacks had already dumped the Blues.
The Black Rock & Rollers (Chuck Berry, Little Richard, etc.) were the next to get dumped.

Keep in mind that i'm speaking in general terms and don't mean all Blacks.

I don't get it either. The Blues/Gospel/Jazz/Jump/R&R/R&B historic lineage should be obvious.


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
[Edited 4/11/07 23:13pm]
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 04/12/07 2:59am

SPYZFAN1

Aud is right. The "Band Of Gypsys" documentary explains it the best. Black radio wouldn't play Jimi because it didn't fit their format style. And a lot of black folks at that time considered him a sellout and too wild.

I used to catch hell as a kid (from other black folks in the 80's) for listening to Jimi and wearing Jimi shirts. These were the same folks who loved Parliament but hated Funkadelic.. But once I started running into other brothers that were musicians that loved Jimi, all that went out the window.

Then by the late 80's and early 90's, Living Colour, Fishbone, Spyz, Bad Brains,
etc were out in the front and Jimi was getting his major props..and black folks (some older and some younger) were tuned into him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 04/12/07 2:59am

prettymansson

BLACK PEOPLE LIKE BEATS AND BASS !!!!!
ALTHOUGH JIMI HAD BOTH THOSE THINGS IN HIS MUSIC..THEY WERE NOT COMING FROM AFRICA AS MUCH AS THEY WERE COMING FROM EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD OF SOUND/CULTURE..JIMI WAS A COSMIC BEING WILLING TO GO TO PLACES IN HIS MUSIC THAT WERE BEYOND CHORDS/BEATS/NOTES/AND GROOVES..HE WENT PLACES THAT CONJURED UP ANGELS AND DEMONS AND THE UNKNOWN (feedback..pure sound experiments..ect)
THESE WERE NOT THEN ...and STILL AREN'T WHAT MOST BLACK PEOPLE CAN GET INTO !
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 04/12/07 3:05am

Miles

theAudience said:

jacktheimprovident said:


I've never understood why hard rock/prominent guitar driven rock is considered "white". Most of the early white guitar heroes were biting heavily off of electric blues players, and as far back as the fifties blues and R&B guitarists were the first to use distortion and heavy riffing. Wasn't Buddy pushing the envelope in terms of loudness, wildness and amplification before Cream OR Hendrix? granted Leonard Chess didn't want that stuff to be recorded and asked Buddy to kick him in the ass when Cream and Hendrix sold millions off it, but still, I've never heard anyone impugn Buddy's "blackness".

That's because most Blacks had already dumped the Blues.
The Black Rock & Rollers (Chuck Berry, Little Richard, etc.) were the next to get dumped.

Keep in mind that i'm speaking in general terms and don't mean all Blacks.

I don't get it either. The Blues/Gospel/Jazz/Jump/R&R/R&B historic lineage should be obvious.


tA


I think we need to view Hendrix in the context of his times, and those he grew up in. Maybe the music and image of people like Hendrix and George Clinton was part of what more 'traditional' blacks were trying to get away from. Remember, when Hendrix first exploded in Britain, he was often (offensively) nick-named 'The Wild Man of Borneo' and the like. His wild hair and music, though 'futuristic' to some whites (and blacks) may well have been considered 'regressive' from a traditional black viewpoint, reasserting ignorant white sterotypes of blacks as wild and untamed.

As the Audience showed, all the 'respectable' black performers of the '60s were clean and wore suits and kept the drugs out of the public eye - they were more 'tasteful' and 'wholesome'. They were all about integration in the MLK mould - well, excepting Malcolm X and up to King's murder anyway, which then radicalised a lot more blacks (and racist whites in opposition to them).

And a lot of the old black electric and acoustic blues players didn't like Hendrix because they didn't understand him (he was no Southerner for a start), he was too coarse and unkempt, his guitar was too loud with no clean, pure tone and he hung with far too many white boys to be 'real'. And he was too unsubtly sexual, with all his guitar thrusts and so on.

What these folks didn't get imo is that the likes of Jimi, Sly, Clinton and co were also about integration, but a more far-reaching kind of musical integration that the traditionalists on all sides just weren't ready for - including the possibility of sexual integration, one of the real taboos of society in the '50s at least, which was also the implicit 'threat' coming from Elvis being white and sounding black in the mid-'50s. Both Jimi and Elvis personified unbridled integration, beyond anyone's control, which scared ig'nant folks everywhere.

In short, Jimi had the wrong kind of 'blackness' at the wrong time. He was too 'black' for some and too 'white' for others. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 04/12/07 3:06am

Miles

Double post lol
[Edited 4/12/07 3:08am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 04/12/07 7:51am

calldapplwonde
ry83

Very nice post, Miles! nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 04/12/07 8:10am

Graycap23

theAudience said:

In the 60s, the accepted/expected look for a Black male artist...



...was the above.



Not this...



...And as i've heard it said, "Looking like some circus clown" (check the Are You Experienced cover)


And they certainly didn't expect to hear...

Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things they don't seem the same
Actin' funny and I don't know why
'Scuse me while I kiss the sky


...lyrically shocked


Nor the sounds emanating from his guitar...



...sonically.


Now I had some Black friends that were down, but most weren't.
The way they saw it (the ones that weren't), he was playing "that white boy music"


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431



That sums it up NICELY.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 04/12/07 9:40am

jacktheimprovi
dent

Miles said:

theAudience said:


That's because most Blacks had already dumped the Blues.
The Black Rock & Rollers (Chuck Berry, Little Richard, etc.) were the next to get dumped.

Keep in mind that i'm speaking in general terms and don't mean all Blacks.

I don't get it either. The Blues/Gospel/Jazz/Jump/R&R/R&B historic lineage should be obvious.


tA


I think we need to view Hendrix in the context of his times, and those he grew up in. Maybe the music and image of people like Hendrix and George Clinton was part of what more 'traditional' blacks were trying to get away from. Remember, when Hendrix first exploded in Britain, he was often (offensively) nick-named 'The Wild Man of Borneo' and the like. His wild hair and music, though 'futuristic' to some whites (and blacks) may well have been considered 'regressive' from a traditional black viewpoint, reasserting ignorant white sterotypes of blacks as wild and untamed.

As the Audience showed, all the 'respectable' black performers of the '60s were clean and wore suits and kept the drugs out of the public eye - they were more 'tasteful' and 'wholesome'. They were all about integration in the MLK mould - well, excepting Malcolm X and up to King's murder anyway, which then radicalised a lot more blacks (and racist whites in opposition to them).

And a lot of the old black electric and acoustic blues players didn't like Hendrix because they didn't understand him (he was no Southerner for a start), he was too coarse and unkempt, his guitar was too loud with no clean, pure tone and he hung with far too many white boys to be 'real'. And he was too unsubtly sexual, with all his guitar thrusts and so on.

What these folks didn't get imo is that the likes of Jimi, Sly, Clinton and co were also about integration, but a more far-reaching kind of musical integration that the traditionalists on all sides just weren't ready for - including the possibility of sexual integration, one of the real taboos of society in the '50s at least, which was also the implicit 'threat' coming from Elvis being white and sounding black in the mid-'50s. Both Jimi and Elvis personified unbridled integration, beyond anyone's control, which scared ig'nant folks everywhere.

In short, Jimi had the wrong kind of 'blackness' at the wrong time. He was too 'black' for some and too 'white' for others. smile


Which blues players didn't like or get Hendrix? From what I understood B.b., Buddy and Albert King (I think) and perhaps some others all liked him and saw him as a peer.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 04/12/07 9:50am

Slave2daGroove

theAudience said:




I don't need to add anything as it's been said already, I just love this shot of the ripped Marshall cabinets with jimi's shadow
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 04/12/07 10:36am

chuckaducci

God damn that was one cool ass cat!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 04/13/07 12:23pm

Miles

jacktheimprovident said:

Miles said:



I think we need to view Hendrix in the context of his times, and those he grew up in. Maybe the music and image of people like Hendrix and George Clinton was part of what more 'traditional' blacks were trying to get away from. Remember, when Hendrix first exploded in Britain, he was often (offensively) nick-named 'The Wild Man of Borneo' and the like. His wild hair and music, though 'futuristic' to some whites (and blacks) may well have been considered 'regressive' from a traditional black viewpoint, reasserting ignorant white sterotypes of blacks as wild and untamed.

As the Audience showed, all the 'respectable' black performers of the '60s were clean and wore suits and kept the drugs out of the public eye - they were more 'tasteful' and 'wholesome'. They were all about integration in the MLK mould - well, excepting Malcolm X and up to King's murder anyway, which then radicalised a lot more blacks (and racist whites in opposition to them).

And a lot of the old black electric and acoustic blues players didn't like Hendrix because they didn't understand him (he was no Southerner for a start), he was too coarse and unkempt, his guitar was too loud with no clean, pure tone and he hung with far too many white boys to be 'real'. And he was too unsubtly sexual, with all his guitar thrusts and so on.

What these folks didn't get imo is that the likes of Jimi, Sly, Clinton and co were also about integration, but a more far-reaching kind of musical integration that the traditionalists on all sides just weren't ready for - including the possibility of sexual integration, one of the real taboos of society in the '50s at least, which was also the implicit 'threat' coming from Elvis being white and sounding black in the mid-'50s. Both Jimi and Elvis personified unbridled integration, beyond anyone's control, which scared ig'nant folks everywhere.

In short, Jimi had the wrong kind of 'blackness' at the wrong time. He was too 'black' for some and too 'white' for others. smile


Which blues players didn't like or get Hendrix? From what I understood B.b., Buddy and Albert King (I think) and perhaps some others all liked him and saw him as a peer.


Of, course, there were a lot more blues players around in those days than just the Three Kings and Buddy. If you read around, there were certainly a few of the electric blues cats who had no time for Hendrix when he was on this earth, didn't think he was playing 'real blues' etc, but as soon as he stepped off, they said they were tight with him, jammed with him and taught him everything he knew (and of course, only Little Richard could say that with authority lol). That's human nature. Happens everytime someone dies young and unexpectedly.

And as for the old time acoustic survivors like Bukka White, Son House and Junior Lockwood, Jimi might as well have come from the moons of Saturn as far as they were concerned. smile

If only Jimi had lived a little longer, to see the full blooming of Clinton's funk revolution. I was playing some good ole' Funkadelic today, and I'd bet Eddie Hazel's guitar pick that Jimi would have gotten up onstage and jammed with those guys had he lived. They were (part of) his vision given reality. fro
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 04/13/07 12:40pm

jacktheimprovi
dent

Miles said:

jacktheimprovident said:



Which blues players didn't like or get Hendrix? From what I understood B.b., Buddy and Albert King (I think) and perhaps some others all liked him and saw him as a peer.


Of, course, there were a lot more blues players around in those days than just the Three Kings and Buddy. If you read around, there were certainly a few of the electric blues cats who had no time for Hendrix when he was on this earth, didn't think he was playing 'real blues' etc, but as soon as he stepped off, they said they were tight with him, jammed with him and taught him everything he knew (and of course, only Little Richard could say that with authority lol). That's human nature. Happens everytime someone dies young and unexpectedly.

And as for the old time acoustic survivors like Bukka White, Son House and Junior Lockwood, Jimi might as well have come from the moons of Saturn as far as they were concerned. smile

If only Jimi had lived a little longer, to see the full blooming of Clinton's funk revolution. I was playing some good ole' Funkadelic today, and I'd bet Eddie Hazel's guitar pick that Jimi would have gotten up onstage and jammed with those guys had he lived. They were (part of) his vision given reality. fro


I'm just curious which bluesmen specifically expressed dislike for him or were dismissive of him. Buddy himself was pretty radical and probably got a lot of flack from blues purists, so obviously he wouldn't represent what the majority of blues players thought, and I'm not positive what other ones have spoken his praises or were friendly with him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 04/13/07 1:22pm

blackguitarist
z

avatar

theAudience said:

In the 60s, the accepted/expected look for a Black male artist...



...was the above.



Not this...



...And as i've heard it said, "Looking like some circus clown" (check the Are You Experienced cover)


And they certainly didn't expect to hear...

Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things they don't seem the same
Actin' funny and I don't know why
'Scuse me while I kiss the sky


...lyrically shocked


Nor the sounds emanating from his guitar...



...sonically.


Now I had some Black friends that were down, but most weren't.
The way they saw it (the ones that weren't), he was playing "that white boy music"


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431

lonelygurl, if Aud's post doesn't answer your question, then NOTHING will.
SynthiaRose said "I'm in love with blackguitaristz. Especially when he talks about Hendrix."
nammie "What BGZ says I believe. I have the biggest crush on him."
http://ccoshea19.googlepa...ssanctuary
http://ccoshea19.googlepages.com
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 04/13/07 4:25pm

vainandy

avatar

prettymansson said:

[i]BLACK PEOPLE LIKE BEATS AND BASS !!!!!


Tell that to the shit hoppers. They only like weak beats and fake bass (if any). I've heard harder drums and bass in country music. lol
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 04/14/07 12:56am

Lammastide

avatar

Miles said:

...but as soon as he stepped off, they said they were tight with him, jammed with him and taught him everything he knew (and of course, only Little Richard could say that with authority lol). That's human nature. Happens everytime someone dies young and unexpectedly.

The Isley Bros. could also claim to have worked with him... though I've heard he ended up getting booted from their camp because his style was too wild even for them.
Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 04/14/07 6:23am

SPYZFAN1

According to Frankie "Kash" (P-Funk drummer), he and some of the other P-Funk members knew Jimi and did jam with him. No word if any of it was recorded. I could have defintely seen Jimi and Eddie trading off on "Hardcore Jollies". That would have been cool.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 04/14/07 7:32am

Lammastide

avatar

SPYZFAN1 said:

According to Frankie "Kash" (P-Funk drummer), he and some of the other P-Funk members knew Jimi and did jam with him. No word if any of it was recorded. I could have defintely seen Jimi and Eddie trading off on "Hardcore Jollies". That would have been cool.

Can you imagine Jimi doing Maggotbrain!!?!? eek
Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 04/14/07 8:08am

missfee

avatar

because he wasn't singing R&B or what some considered to be "black" music at the time. they thought that he had sold out by playing "white" music.... which is disbelief but....

from the different documentaries that I have viewed, SOME african american music lovers weren't "musically" open. If it wasn't motown, or a sho-wop bee-bop type tune, it was like "what the hell is this"...???

do you really think if prince had come out before Jimi did, that his music would had been appreciated back then like it is now??? i don't think so.
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 04/14/07 11:22am

laurarichardso
n

BluHaze said:

The answer is simple and this not only falls apon Jimi many blacks that r fame

they beileve if it aint gospel is devils music ...not to mention he dealings with drugs

-----
Jimi used drugs. I have never read anything about Jimi selling drugs. Black people did not get a chance to hear Jim's music since black stations played RnB music only. I think you guys need to remember this was the 1960's.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Why was Jimi Hendrix...