jacktheimprovident said: NuPwr319 said: Mystic jazz??? That's a new one on me. School me, please? [Edited 4/13/07 19:13pm] Wellll I'm not sure you can say it's an official sub-genre of jazz (it has it's own itunes playlist though ) but the way I'd define mystic jazz is thus: Mystic jazz is essentially jazz that aims to create a feeling of Transcendence, or to put it another way to be evocative/transportative like psychdelic music, only not drug-oriented and with much more sparing (if any) use of electronics or amplification. Usually this means infusing elements of various "world" music (which is why "world jazz" and "mystic jazz" can be interchangeable or at least overlap) such as indian raga, indonesian gamelan, various types of african or middle eastern music etc. vis a vis use of exotic modes, or densely layered instrumentation (especially percussion or various chiming or droning instruments). A Love Supreme is often considered the first mystic/spiritually oriented jazz album, and it was just recorded with John Coltrane's "normal" quartet, though, so all these "Trappings" aren't prerequisites. I'd say the best place to go for "mystic" jazz are two of Coltrane's own former sidemen Pharoah Sanders and his widow Alice Coltrane. Karma by pharoah Sanders is perhasps the quintessential and best. "Brown Rice" by Don Cherry is also very interesting as it has elements of mystic jazz as well as the eerie "voodoo funk" of Bitches Brew and Miles' other early 70s fusion albums (fyi the funky "guitar" sounds on that album are actually an upright bass plugged into a wah wah pedal [Edited 4/14/07 20:20pm] [Edited 4/14/07 20:22pm] Ah! Thanks for that! I am familiar with Alice Coltrane, Pharoah Sanders (who actually lives down the street from me) and of course "Bitches Brew". I just never heard the term "mystic jazz" applied to this type of music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Free jazz, for me, works better live than in studio. Of course you need some sort of knowledge before picking who worth seeing live. test | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A contentious topic - how about the following thoughts:
One side of the argument says that a group of untrained musicians could come up with something sounding like "free jazz" (apparently Mingus did this on a Jazzmobile gig - had his musicians mime to a bunch of non-instrumentalist kids playing behind a screen!) - but I have never experienced this in the many improvisation workshops I have done with school children (except one, but then my daughter was playing saxophone so I could be biased!!! (daddy, are you playing your hippy music again?). The other side: If I can ever figure out what Ornette Coleman does I will die a happy man (saw Prime Time a few years ago in Wolverhampton - best gig I have ever seen, and that includes Miles at the N.E.C!!). I think if you listen to (and maybe play) a wide variety of music then you can soon tell who is faking it and who isn't. Others worth listening to IMHO are the late great Steve Lacy and Jemeel Moondoc) At the end of the day, it's all in the ear of the behearer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is an interesting thread!
I think one problem with 'free jazz' is its name. I don't have a decent alternative, other than 'free improvisation in a jazz idiom', which amounts to 'free jazz' really, but the name just bugs me. I do wonder whether, as 'free jazz' was often pioneered by politically radical black musicians like Archie Shepp among others, whether 'free' in practice actually originally meant 'whites can't play/ take this' as much as free from the 'constrictions' of familiar chords, rhythms and harmonies. Not my opinion, just an observation/ speculation in the light of those days. I also think that some artists like Ornette Coleman, Sun Ra and Anthony Braxton are unfairly labelled 'Free Jazz'. All have done far more different styles of music. For a start, Ornette has his 'harmelodic' system (which only he and James 'Blood' can understand, it seems), so how can Ornette's music be 'free' when he always uses a system, however personalised to himself? Sun Ra started out with Fletcher Henderson back in the '30s, and was profoundly influenced by Duke Ellington, especially harmonically imo (Of course, Ellington flirted with 'the free' in his '60s piano playing, as we hear on the classic 'Money Jungle'). I'm not familiar enough with Braxton enough to say, but he was influenced as much by John Cage as by Eric Dolphy or Coltrane, and I'm sure he has his own musical 'systems'. I'm glad people have mentioned Sonny Sharrock and James Blood Ulmer, both of whom I like, especially Sonny, who doesn't get enough respect imo. Sonny may have come from a music theory background, but he always said he wanted to play guitar like Coltrane played the sax. Sharrock described himself as a saxophone player who happens to use a guitar . He claimed to know and play no chords. Whatever, he had his own great sound and that's what counts. I'd recommend Sonny's classic '90s album 'Ask the Ages', where he plays with Pharoah Sanders and Elvin Jones, both in full 'Trane effect. Beautiful stuff. One of the true 'classic' jazz albums of the '90s imo. And also his album 'Guitar', which is guitar-only overdub heaven, and picks up where Hendrix's studio version of 'The Star Spangled Banner' left off. On the other hand, to show how things were going wrong in the '60s at times, take Bunk Gardner, general crazy in Frank Zappa's Mothers of Invention. According to Mothers keyboard player Don Preston, Zappa made Gardner play the sax onstage and on some of his records. Gardner had absolutely no idea how to play the instrument, other than 'blow and twiddle the buttons'. And yet, his tuneless skronks earned him a number 3 placing on a 'Downbeat' magazine 'Best Sax Players' Poll ... So, in the words of the highly quotable Frank Zappa, again in the context of the late '60s culture, 'If we cannot be free, at least we can be cheap.' And if it's a toss-up between 'free' jazz and 'cheap' jazz (imo Kenny G, Michael Buble' and their legions of hell, all of whom stand for nothing but corporatism imo), I'll take my jazz 'free' everytime. [Edited 5/7/07 13:02pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Miles said: This is an interesting thread!
I think one problem with 'free jazz' is its name. I don't have a decent alternative, other than 'free improvisation in a jazz idiom', which amounts to 'free jazz' really, but the name just bugs me. I do wonder whether, as 'free jazz' was often pioneered by politically radical black musicians like Archie Shepp among others, whether 'free' in practice actually originally meant 'whites can't play/ take this' as much as free from the 'constrictions' of familiar chords, rhythms and harmonies. Not my opinion, just an observation/ speculation in the light of those days. I also think that some artists like Ornette Coleman, Sun Ra and Anthony Braxton are unfairly labelled 'Free Jazz'. All have done far more different styles of music. For a start, Ornette has his 'harmelodic' system (which only he and James 'Blood' can understand, it seems), so how can Ornette's music be 'free' when he always uses a system, however personalised to himself? Sun Ra started out with Fletcher Henderson back in the '30s, and was profoundly influenced by Duke Ellington, especially harmonically imo (Of course, Ellington flirted with 'the free' in his '60s piano playing, as we hear on the classic 'Money Jungle'). I'm not familiar enough with Braxton enough to say, but he was influenced as much by John Cage as by Eric Dolphy or Coltrane, and I'm sure he has his own musical 'systems'. I'm glad people have mentioned Sonny Sharrock and James Blood Ulmer, both of whom I like, especially Sonny, who doesn't get enough respect imo. Sonny may have come from a music theory background, but he always said he wanted to play guitar like Coltrane played the sax. Sharrock described himself as a saxophone player who happens to use a guitar . He claimed to know and play no chords. Whatever, he had his own great sound and that's what counts. I'd recommend Sonny's classic '90s album 'Ask the Ages', where he plays with Pharoah Sanders and Elvin Jones, both in full 'Trane effect. Beautiful stuff. One of the true 'classic' jazz albums of the '90s imo. And also his album 'Guitar', which is guitar-only overdub heaven, and picks up where Hendrix's studio version of 'The Star Spangled Banner' left off. On the other hand, to show how things were going wrong in the '60s at times, take Bunk Gardner, general crazy in Frank Zappa's Mothers of Invention. According to Mothers keyboard player Don Preston, Zappa made Gardner play the sax onstage and on some of his records. Gardner had absolutely no idea how to play the instrument, other than 'blow and twiddle the buttons'. And yet, his tuneless skronks earned him a number 3 placing on a 'Downbeat' magazine 'Best Sax Players' Poll ... So, in the words of the highly quotable Frank Zappa, again in the context of the late '60s culture, 'If we cannot be free, at least we can be cheap.' And if it's a toss-up between 'free' jazz and 'cheap' jazz (imo Kenny G, Michael Buble' and their legions of hell, all of whom stand for nothing but corporatism imo), I'll take my jazz 'free' everytime. [Edited 5/7/07 13:02pm] Very well said and some great points. I forgot about the whole "harmolodic" concept...I've still been meaning to get my hands on some more James blood ulmer. Archie Shepp also never struck me as unequivocally "free" as there were definitely distinct influences/patterns from funk, gospel and african music in his work. All of this stuff makes me think that the people who dismiss most post-bop developments in jazz are missing out on some of the most interesting music in jazz history. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |