independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > American Idol Thread - April 10th (Special Guest: J To Tha LO!)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/10/07 3:57pm

amit1234

avatar

American Idol Thread - April 10th (Special Guest: J To Tha LO!)

These Tuesday night AI threads sure are fun, aren't they? wink

The party begins in one hour!
I can't wait to see how my baby Sanjaya tackles songs from the Latin invasion!! music

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/10/07 4:04pm

asg

avatar

last weeks voting results


1. Melinda 27%
2. Sanjaya 25%
3. Chis 11%
4. Blake 10%
5. Jordin 10%
6. Lakisha 8%
7. Phil 4%
8. Haley 3%
9. Gina 2%
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/10/07 4:08pm

VANITYSprisonB
YTCH

amit1234 said:

These Tuesday night AI threads sure are fun, aren't they? wink

The party begins in one hour!
I can't wait to see how my baby Sanjaya tackles songs from the Latin invasion!! music




So fun...heard a lil spoiler...not sure if it's true...

Jordin sings 'Rhythm Is Gonna Get You'..by Gloria E...

again...not sure how good the source was...
Every minute of last night is on my face today....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/10/07 4:34pm

amit1234

avatar

Great article.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18014242/

"There Are Plenty Of Reasons To Defend Sanjaya

Controversial 'Idol' contestant just isn't that bad


To hear critics talk, Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy to the final eight on "American Idol" is a travesty, threatening the success of the show's brand name and the credibility of the musical competition. That couldn't be further from the truth.

Sanjaya is not the best singer in the history of the competition. He's not even the best of this season's finalists. But he's not a disaster either. In fact, those who are looking to tear him down or use him as an example of the show's weakness need to keep a few things in mind before ranting away.

Sanjaya's not the one who put himself into the semifinals
Every time the judges rip on Sanjaya, or insinuate that he shouldn't be on the show, keep in mind that it wasn't the show's viewers who made him a candidate in the first place. That honor belongs to none other than the three judges; Randy Jackson, Paula Abdul, and Simon Cowell.

Those are the three who pick the show's 24 semifinalists, and the viewers have no say in the process until that stage of the game. Moreover, the producers, editors and judges set Malakar up in a great position to succeed by giving him a ton of airtime on the audition episodes, then making him the only teenager among the 12 male finalists. In a crowded semifinal field, he stood out for his youth, giving him an early voting bloc at a time when some rivals were struggling to get their names out there.

So if the viewers are being dumb and short-sighted by continuing to vote for Sanjaya, what does that make the people who put his candidacy forward in the first place?

His success is not the result of an Internet conspiracy
Don't overestimate the effects of the Howard Stern show, much less Web sites like votefortheworst.com . Their effect on the results is likely negligible, because the producers make it difficult for that sort of effort to succeed.

The phone numbers for each contestant change every week. That means that someone who hates the show enough to want to see it fail has to watch it anyway on Tuesday nights in order to get the phone number to call. They then have to wait until 9 p.m. in their time zone to call in, and probably will have to keep trying for at least several minutes in order to get through. How many people who don't even like the show are putting in that kind of effort each week?

Also keep in mind that the naysayer Web sites simply pick a new candidate once the old one is voted off. Sanjaya wasn't the first to be targeted by the Web sites this season; that was Antonella Barba. And if Web sites can't keep a contestant who has risqué pictures (some apparently real, some not) added to the Internet by the day, what are the odds that they can lead someone like Malakar to glory?

There's always a worst-case option to vote for; when Sanjaya goes it will simply be Phil Stacey, or Haley Scarnato, or one of the other finalists. So the explanation for Sanjaya's success isn't the Internet. It's more likely that:

In popularity contests, nice guys finish first
Love his singing or hate it, there's no way Sanjaya comes across as anything but likeable. He's a 17-year-old kid in an adult competition, hearing every week that he isn't good enough to be there. How many teenagers could handle that strain without attacking the judges with a music stand?

Yet Malakar doesn't react as though he's bothered by the criticism. He knows the judges don't like him, but he reacts with a smile and an occasional half-hearted barb to their comments. He has nothing but good cheer for everyone each week, and indeed tends to come across as one of the calmer, more self-assured competitors.

In addition, Sanjaya's strategy has been more than a little brilliant. The Mohawk haircut he sported a couple of weeks ago got him a ton of extra attention, to the point where Ryan Seacrest sported a faux-hawk while hosting the next day's show. Sure, he looked ridiculous. But he got people interested in him, to the point where some watch the show now to see what Sanjaya will do next. That's not something many of his rivals can say.

Even when he dresses normally, he looks and acts like a nice kid that the big mean adults are picking on, and that's always going to win some sympathy votes. That's why the judges have gone easier on him in recent weeks, knowing that their vitriol is counterproductive. Alas, for the judges, there's one more problem.

Sanjaya's not a bad singer
Sanjaya Malakar has a melodious voice that legitimately has captured a fan base. It might not be everyone's cup of tea, and it's not the best in the field, but nor does he sound like a karaoke king who got lost on his way to the bar and wound up onstage.

Malakar suffers from what every teenage male on the show has always suffered from; he's a boy among men, and his voice isn't as developed as his rivals. There's nothing he can do about that, unless one of his fans invents an aging machine over the next few days. But that's the worst thing his critics can say about him; if he doesn't do much to inspire raves, he also doesn't sing poorly enough to risk being pelted by rotten tomatoes.

Ultimately, Sanjaya is an adequate singer in a field that lacks depth. Sure, he's nowhere close to the best singer out there, but Melinda Doolittle is so far ahead of the pack in that regard that seven of the eight remaining contestants are in the same boat. Even including fellow teen Jordin Sparks and LaKisha Jones as strong contenders, and throwing in Blake Lewis as the strongest of the men, that leaves four candidates remaining with little chance of winning; Malakar, Phil Stacey, Haley Scarnato and Chris Richardson.

Is Malakar really that much worse than the other three? Is his future in the pop music industry worse than Stacey's, or Scarnato's? Probably not, but he's the one who has inspired the derision.

But ultimately, the dirty little secret of the show is:

Even if Sanjaya wins, who cares?
"American Idol" is in business for two things; building ratings and discovering and creating pop stars. It's the king of the former, and the Sanjaya story is only adding to that. What better reason to watch each week than to see how the latest pop-culture prince will fare?

The odds of him winning are infinitesimal. Every year, a candidate or two lasts much longer than expected, fueling the annual "what happens if [that year's fall guy] actually wins" stories. Every year, that candidate eventually gets sent packing. Anyone remember season four's Scott Savol? Or season three's John Stevens?

But say this year is different, and Sanjaya shocks the world and wins it all. What happens?

The answer is that not many people will remember that in a couple of years, and "Idol" won't be reminding its viewers either. Quick, who won the second season of the show, Clay Aiken or Ruben Studdard? Who won last year, Taylor Hicks or Chris Daughtry? In both cases, the also-rans have had a larger profile, both on the show and off, than the winners.

That's because "Idol" is all about pop success. If Melinda Doolittle comes in second and Jordin Sparks third, but both have debut albums that leave the winner's in the dust, they'll be the ones pointed to as examples of the show's success. Oscar-winner Jennifer Hudson got voted off season three's competition before several rivals who fell off the pop landscape soon afterwards -- but nobody remembers that she came in seventh. All anyone knows is that she was on the show.

The sixth season of "Idol" will be a disappointment if all of its finalists strike out in the music business, but that's unlikely to happen. Doolittle, Sparks, Jones or someone else will sell enough to carry the banner for this year's crew, and the successful ones will be the performers remembered.

In the meantime Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy only helps. It's the sixth season of a glorified talent show that doesn't change much from year to year, but the ratings dominance has continued because there's always a reason to watch. Though he isn't among the most talented singers, Sanjaya is certainly one of those reasons, which is probably what the show was hoping for in the first place. "American Idol" producers can be accused of many things, but stupidity isn't among them.

Sanjaya Malakar is being talked about as though his survival on the program is the worst thing that could ever happen to "American Idol." In fact, it's one of the best.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/10/07 5:41pm

amit1234

avatar

Wow! Is there an American Idol boycott going on here tonight?!?

I was expecting more replies...

confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/10/07 5:46pm

CinisterCee

asg said:

last weeks voting results


1. Melinda 27%
2. Sanjaya 25%
3. Chis 11%
4. Blake 10%
5. Jordin 10%
6. Lakisha 8%
7. Phil 4%
8. Haley 3%
9. Gina 2%


This just makes me giggle giggle
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/10/07 5:46pm

CHIC0

avatar

i'll be watching this show for one reason only.....




























































































razz jerkoff music dancing jig
heart
LOVE
♪♫♪♫

♣¤═══¤۩۞۩ஜ۩ஜ۩۞۩¤═══¤♣
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/10/07 5:49pm

CinisterCee

I hope Paula Abdul and Jennifer Lopez have a sing-off!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/10/07 5:50pm

Mong

Please no, that will sound like ten cats being raped by an elephant.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 04/10/07 6:34pm

lameless

avatar

This was the worst episode of AI yet. So boring!

My prediction: Phil goes home.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 04/10/07 9:01pm

skyecute

I thought that Sanjaya pulled it off AGAIN this week. He was understated and refreshing. Vocally, Melinda is ALWAYS the best;however, Sanjaya's performance had me cheering because he was interesting and entertaining. I love how we never know what he is going to do next. His performances have never been boring and that is the key. Blake is always interesting and exceptionally well done vocally. Tonight was no different. IMO,Blake has IDOL written all over him. I can also see Sanjaya as an IDOL. Melinda is the best vocalist in the competition and will do well whatever place she ends up. She is definently going to get offers from all over the place when this season is over.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 04/10/07 9:04pm

skyecute

amit1234 said:

Great article.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18014242/

"There Are Plenty Of Reasons To Defend Sanjaya

Controversial 'Idol' contestant just isn't that bad


To hear critics talk, Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy to the final eight on "American Idol" is a travesty, threatening the success of the show's brand name and the credibility of the musical competition. That couldn't be further from the truth.

Sanjaya is not the best singer in the history of the competition. He's not even the best of this season's finalists. But he's not a disaster either. In fact, those who are looking to tear him down or use him as an example of the show's weakness need to keep a few things in mind before ranting away.

Sanjaya's not the one who put himself into the semifinals
Every time the judges rip on Sanjaya, or insinuate that he shouldn't be on the show, keep in mind that it wasn't the show's viewers who made him a candidate in the first place. That honor belongs to none other than the three judges; Randy Jackson, Paula Abdul, and Simon Cowell.

Those are the three who pick the show's 24 semifinalists, and the viewers have no say in the process until that stage of the game. Moreover, the producers, editors and judges set Malakar up in a great position to succeed by giving him a ton of airtime on the audition episodes, then making him the only teenager among the 12 male finalists. In a crowded semifinal field, he stood out for his youth, giving him an early voting bloc at a time when some rivals were struggling to get their names out there.

So if the viewers are being dumb and short-sighted by continuing to vote for Sanjaya, what does that make the people who put his candidacy forward in the first place?

His success is not the result of an Internet conspiracy
Don't overestimate the effects of the Howard Stern show, much less Web sites like votefortheworst.com . Their effect on the results is likely negligible, because the producers make it difficult for that sort of effort to succeed.

The phone numbers for each contestant change every week. That means that someone who hates the show enough to want to see it fail has to watch it anyway on Tuesday nights in order to get the phone number to call. They then have to wait until 9 p.m. in their time zone to call in, and probably will have to keep trying for at least several minutes in order to get through. How many people who don't even like the show are putting in that kind of effort each week?

Also keep in mind that the naysayer Web sites simply pick a new candidate once the old one is voted off. Sanjaya wasn't the first to be targeted by the Web sites this season; that was Antonella Barba. And if Web sites can't keep a contestant who has risqué pictures (some apparently real, some not) added to the Internet by the day, what are the odds that they can lead someone like Malakar to glory?

There's always a worst-case option to vote for; when Sanjaya goes it will simply be Phil Stacey, or Haley Scarnato, or one of the other finalists. So the explanation for Sanjaya's success isn't the Internet. It's more likely that:

In popularity contests, nice guys finish first
Love his singing or hate it, there's no way Sanjaya comes across as anything but likeable. He's a 17-year-old kid in an adult competition, hearing every week that he isn't good enough to be there. How many teenagers could handle that strain without attacking the judges with a music stand?

Yet Malakar doesn't react as though he's bothered by the criticism. He knows the judges don't like him, but he reacts with a smile and an occasional half-hearted barb to their comments. He has nothing but good cheer for everyone each week, and indeed tends to come across as one of the calmer, more self-assured competitors.

In addition, Sanjaya's strategy has been more than a little brilliant. The Mohawk haircut he sported a couple of weeks ago got him a ton of extra attention, to the point where Ryan Seacrest sported a faux-hawk while hosting the next day's show. Sure, he looked ridiculous. But he got people interested in him, to the point where some watch the show now to see what Sanjaya will do next. That's not something many of his rivals can say.

Even when he dresses normally, he looks and acts like a nice kid that the big mean adults are picking on, and that's always going to win some sympathy votes. That's why the judges have gone easier on him in recent weeks, knowing that their vitriol is counterproductive. Alas, for the judges, there's one more problem.

Sanjaya's not a bad singer
Sanjaya Malakar has a melodious voice that legitimately has captured a fan base. It might not be everyone's cup of tea, and it's not the best in the field, but nor does he sound like a karaoke king who got lost on his way to the bar and wound up onstage.

Malakar suffers from what every teenage male on the show has always suffered from; he's a boy among men, and his voice isn't as developed as his rivals. There's nothing he can do about that, unless one of his fans invents an aging machine over the next few days. But that's the worst thing his critics can say about him; if he doesn't do much to inspire raves, he also doesn't sing poorly enough to risk being pelted by rotten tomatoes.

Ultimately, Sanjaya is an adequate singer in a field that lacks depth. Sure, he's nowhere close to the best singer out there, but Melinda Doolittle is so far ahead of the pack in that regard that seven of the eight remaining contestants are in the same boat. Even including fellow teen Jordin Sparks and LaKisha Jones as strong contenders, and throwing in Blake Lewis as the strongest of the men, that leaves four candidates remaining with little chance of winning; Malakar, Phil Stacey, Haley Scarnato and Chris Richardson.

Is Malakar really that much worse than the other three? Is his future in the pop music industry worse than Stacey's, or Scarnato's? Probably not, but he's the one who has inspired the derision.

But ultimately, the dirty little secret of the show is:

Even if Sanjaya wins, who cares?
"American Idol" is in business for two things; building ratings and discovering and creating pop stars. It's the king of the former, and the Sanjaya story is only adding to that. What better reason to watch each week than to see how the latest pop-culture prince will fare?

The odds of him winning are infinitesimal. Every year, a candidate or two lasts much longer than expected, fueling the annual "what happens if [that year's fall guy] actually wins" stories. Every year, that candidate eventually gets sent packing. Anyone remember season four's Scott Savol? Or season three's John Stevens?

But say this year is different, and Sanjaya shocks the world and wins it all. What happens?

The answer is that not many people will remember that in a couple of years, and "Idol" won't be reminding its viewers either. Quick, who won the second season of the show, Clay Aiken or Ruben Studdard? Who won last year, Taylor Hicks or Chris Daughtry? In both cases, the also-rans have had a larger profile, both on the show and off, than the winners.

That's because "Idol" is all about pop success. If Melinda Doolittle comes in second and Jordin Sparks third, but both have debut albums that leave the winner's in the dust, they'll be the ones pointed to as examples of the show's success. Oscar-winner Jennifer Hudson got voted off season three's competition before several rivals who fell off the pop landscape soon afterwards -- but nobody remembers that she came in seventh. All anyone knows is that she was on the show.

The sixth season of "Idol" will be a disappointment if all of its finalists strike out in the music business, but that's unlikely to happen. Doolittle, Sparks, Jones or someone else will sell enough to carry the banner for this year's crew, and the successful ones will be the performers remembered.

In the meantime Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy only helps. It's the sixth season of a glorified talent show that doesn't change much from year to year, but the ratings dominance has continued because there's always a reason to watch. Though he isn't among the most talented singers, Sanjaya is certainly one of those reasons, which is probably what the show was hoping for in the first place. "American Idol" producers can be accused of many things, but stupidity isn't among them.

Sanjaya Malakar is being talked about as though his survival on the program is the worst thing that could ever happen to "American Idol." In fact, it's one of the best.


This is a great article and I am in total agreement with it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 04/10/07 9:18pm

lastdecember

avatar

People that think idol doesnt fall into the "reality" show category are mistaken. Producers do as they do on Reality and search for who and what they think will garner ratings and cash in on it, so if its a Sanjaya and his hair or Haley and her Legs or that other girl early on that had nude photos and already has gotten label and modeling deals because of it, its all a ratings game at this point, and nothing more than another reality show, except here people in america are calling it, but honsetly its not a big step up from something like "I love new York" or anything else like that.

"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 04/10/07 9:41pm

live4lust

I really wanted to see Sanjaya do "Living La Vida Loca", but it was not to be. He surprised me by not sucking tonight, or at least not as much as he usually does. And Haley thinks she's gonna stick around by showing her (very impressive) legs. She's got legs for days but not much else. Phil and Haley--bottom two.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 04/10/07 9:54pm

CinisterCee

lastdecember said:

People that think idol doesnt fall into the "reality" show category are mistaken. Producers do as they do on Reality and search for who and what they think will garner ratings and cash in on it, so if its a Sanjaya and his hair or Haley and her Legs or that other girl early on that had nude photos and already has gotten label and modeling deals because of it, its all a ratings game at this point, and nothing more than another reality show, except here people in america are calling it, but honsetly its not a big step up from something like "I love new York" or anything else like that.


I believe the producers ultimately decide.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 04/10/07 11:09pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

amit1234 said:

Great article.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18014242/

"There Are Plenty Of Reasons To Defend Sanjaya

Controversial 'Idol' contestant just isn't that bad


To hear critics talk, Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy to the final eight on "American Idol" is a travesty, threatening the success of the show's brand name and the credibility of the musical competition. That couldn't be further from the truth.

Sanjaya is not the best singer in the history of the competition. He's not even the best of this season's finalists. But he's not a disaster either. In fact, those who are looking to tear him down or use him as an example of the show's weakness need to keep a few things in mind before ranting away.

Sanjaya's not the one who put himself into the semifinals
Every time the judges rip on Sanjaya, or insinuate that he shouldn't be on the show, keep in mind that it wasn't the show's viewers who made him a candidate in the first place. That honor belongs to none other than the three judges; Randy Jackson, Paula Abdul, and Simon Cowell.

Those are the three who pick the show's 24 semifinalists, and the viewers have no say in the process until that stage of the game. Moreover, the producers, editors and judges set Malakar up in a great position to succeed by giving him a ton of airtime on the audition episodes, then making him the only teenager among the 12 male finalists. In a crowded semifinal field, he stood out for his youth, giving him an early voting bloc at a time when some rivals were struggling to get their names out there.

So if the viewers are being dumb and short-sighted by continuing to vote for Sanjaya, what does that make the people who put his candidacy forward in the first place?

His success is not the result of an Internet conspiracy
Don't overestimate the effects of the Howard Stern show, much less Web sites like votefortheworst.com . Their effect on the results is likely negligible, because the producers make it difficult for that sort of effort to succeed.

The phone numbers for each contestant change every week. That means that someone who hates the show enough to want to see it fail has to watch it anyway on Tuesday nights in order to get the phone number to call. They then have to wait until 9 p.m. in their time zone to call in, and probably will have to keep trying for at least several minutes in order to get through. How many people who don't even like the show are putting in that kind of effort each week?

Also keep in mind that the naysayer Web sites simply pick a new candidate once the old one is voted off. Sanjaya wasn't the first to be targeted by the Web sites this season; that was Antonella Barba. And if Web sites can't keep a contestant who has risqué pictures (some apparently real, some not) added to the Internet by the day, what are the odds that they can lead someone like Malakar to glory?

There's always a worst-case option to vote for; when Sanjaya goes it will simply be Phil Stacey, or Haley Scarnato, or one of the other finalists. So the explanation for Sanjaya's success isn't the Internet. It's more likely that:

In popularity contests, nice guys finish first
Love his singing or hate it, there's no way Sanjaya comes across as anything but likeable. He's a 17-year-old kid in an adult competition, hearing every week that he isn't good enough to be there. How many teenagers could handle that strain without attacking the judges with a music stand?

Yet Malakar doesn't react as though he's bothered by the criticism. He knows the judges don't like him, but he reacts with a smile and an occasional half-hearted barb to their comments. He has nothing but good cheer for everyone each week, and indeed tends to come across as one of the calmer, more self-assured competitors.

In addition, Sanjaya's strategy has been more than a little brilliant. The Mohawk haircut he sported a couple of weeks ago got him a ton of extra attention, to the point where Ryan Seacrest sported a faux-hawk while hosting the next day's show. Sure, he looked ridiculous. But he got people interested in him, to the point where some watch the show now to see what Sanjaya will do next. That's not something many of his rivals can say.

Even when he dresses normally, he looks and acts like a nice kid that the big mean adults are picking on, and that's always going to win some sympathy votes. That's why the judges have gone easier on him in recent weeks, knowing that their vitriol is counterproductive. Alas, for the judges, there's one more problem.

Sanjaya's not a bad singer
Sanjaya Malakar has a melodious voice that legitimately has captured a fan base. It might not be everyone's cup of tea, and it's not the best in the field, but nor does he sound like a karaoke king who got lost on his way to the bar and wound up onstage.

Malakar suffers from what every teenage male on the show has always suffered from; he's a boy among men, and his voice isn't as developed as his rivals. There's nothing he can do about that, unless one of his fans invents an aging machine over the next few days. But that's the worst thing his critics can say about him; if he doesn't do much to inspire raves, he also doesn't sing poorly enough to risk being pelted by rotten tomatoes.

Ultimately, Sanjaya is an adequate singer in a field that lacks depth. Sure, he's nowhere close to the best singer out there, but Melinda Doolittle is so far ahead of the pack in that regard that seven of the eight remaining contestants are in the same boat. Even including fellow teen Jordin Sparks and LaKisha Jones as strong contenders, and throwing in Blake Lewis as the strongest of the men, that leaves four candidates remaining with little chance of winning; Malakar, Phil Stacey, Haley Scarnato and Chris Richardson.

Is Malakar really that much worse than the other three? Is his future in the pop music industry worse than Stacey's, or Scarnato's? Probably not, but he's the one who has inspired the derision.

But ultimately, the dirty little secret of the show is:

Even if Sanjaya wins, who cares?
"American Idol" is in business for two things; building ratings and discovering and creating pop stars. It's the king of the former, and the Sanjaya story is only adding to that. What better reason to watch each week than to see how the latest pop-culture prince will fare?

The odds of him winning are infinitesimal. Every year, a candidate or two lasts much longer than expected, fueling the annual "what happens if [that year's fall guy] actually wins" stories. Every year, that candidate eventually gets sent packing. Anyone remember season four's Scott Savol? Or season three's John Stevens?

But say this year is different, and Sanjaya shocks the world and wins it all. What happens?

The answer is that not many people will remember that in a couple of years, and "Idol" won't be reminding its viewers either. Quick, who won the second season of the show, Clay Aiken or Ruben Studdard? Who won last year, Taylor Hicks or Chris Daughtry? In both cases, the also-rans have had a larger profile, both on the show and off, than the winners.

That's because "Idol" is all about pop success. If Melinda Doolittle comes in second and Jordin Sparks third, but both have debut albums that leave the winner's in the dust, they'll be the ones pointed to as examples of the show's success. Oscar-winner Jennifer Hudson got voted off season three's competition before several rivals who fell off the pop landscape soon afterwards -- but nobody remembers that she came in seventh. All anyone knows is that she was on the show.

The sixth season of "Idol" will be a disappointment if all of its finalists strike out in the music business, but that's unlikely to happen. Doolittle, Sparks, Jones or someone else will sell enough to carry the banner for this year's crew, and the successful ones will be the performers remembered.

In the meantime Sanjaya Malakar's ascendancy only helps. It's the sixth season of a glorified talent show that doesn't change much from year to year, but the ratings dominance has continued because there's always a reason to watch. Though he isn't among the most talented singers, Sanjaya is certainly one of those reasons, which is probably what the show was hoping for in the first place. "American Idol" producers can be accused of many things, but stupidity isn't among them.

Sanjaya Malakar is being talked about as though his survival on the program is the worst thing that could ever happen to "American Idol." In fact, it's one of the best.



Good article. Except that I'm one of the few that will always remember that Jennifer did get screwed in season 3. That was when I stop taking AI so seriously.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 04/11/07 9:56am

asg

avatar

This gambling website which is rite on the mark the last 3 weeks i have checked ( I believe they r paying someone on the inside to get the results )


b3 lakisha jordin haley

b2 laskisha jordin


goin lakisha
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 04/11/07 10:24am

VANITYSprisonB
YTCH

asg said:

This gambling website which is rite on the mark the last 3 weeks i have checked ( I believe they r paying someone on the inside to get the results )


b3 lakisha jordin haley

b2 laskisha jordin


goin lakisha



If this happens...I think I may be done

sad sad sad
Every minute of last night is on my face today....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 04/11/07 11:48am

Moonwalkbjrain

avatar

nvm, just saw the other thread. he looked soooo cute! wasnt feelin the hair too much but he sang beautifully
[Edited 4/11/07 11:55am]
Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 04/11/07 12:02pm

NDRU

avatar

Phil & Haley are in trouble
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 04/11/07 12:51pm

daPrettyman

avatar

asg said:

last weeks voting results


1. Melinda 27%
2. Sanjaya 25%
3. Chis 11%
4. Blake 10%
5. Jordin 10%
6. Lakisha 8%
7. Phil 4%
8. Haley 3%
9. Gina 2%

How accurate is this?
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 04/11/07 2:18pm

asg

avatar

daPrettyman said:

asg said:

last weeks voting results


1. Melinda 27%
2. Sanjaya 25%
3. Chis 11%
4. Blake 10%
5. Jordin 10%
6. Lakisha 8%
7. Phil 4%
8. Haley 3%
9. Gina 2%

How accurate is this?


i got it from another forum but someone later said its not accurate but one thing is for sure sanjayas phone lines r always busy cant get thru at all he must be doin so well
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 04/11/07 2:52pm

uPtoWnNY

CinisterCee said:

I hope Paula Abdul and Jennifer Lopez have a sing-off!



Just reading this hurts my ears.

And these no-talents have the nerve to give young singers advice.


disbelief
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 04/11/07 5:52pm

CinisterCee

uPtoWnNY said:

CinisterCee said:

I hope Paula Abdul and Jennifer Lopez have a sing-off!



Just reading this hurts my ears.

And these no-talents have the nerve to give young singers advice.


disbelief


ok but when jennifer lopez was showing that girl how to dance, that made sense.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 04/11/07 6:10pm

live4lust

I don't think anyone even did a JLO song because she just sucks too much. Watching her tell people how to sing is ridiculous, but not any more than Paula Abdul doing the same. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 04/11/07 6:14pm

Illustrator

J-Lo's booty or Simon Cowell:
Which is the bigger ass?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 04/11/07 6:15pm

ABeautifulOne

avatar

Why did they waste their time to invite Akon?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 04/11/07 6:45pm

asg

avatar

ABeautifulOne said:

Why did they waste their time to invite Akon?


He was also there last week I guess he will become an idol judge when his career is over like in 2months
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 04/11/07 7:19pm

lastdecember

avatar

So Haley is off the show but already has a label and modeling offer similar to the 6 figure deal Mcphee landed for her "Sexy Hair" commercials. So what really is the point of this show if everyone gets deals and albums. The show is a mess, its mocking itslef with the sanjaya kid, you have producers blasting last years winner saying he didnt deserve it, which was ture but you set the system up so why complain?

"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 04/11/07 7:22pm

lastdecember

avatar

And i know some people are gonna say Jennifer Lopez cant sing, but what are we comparing that too? Aretha and Mariah, ok then really who can sing compared to those, but compare her LIVE to Madonna and Janet and Kylie and you know there isnt much in the way of amazing vocals there, plus Jennifer has the better body of all, and honestly Beyonce and Shakira have got nothing on JLO's ass.

"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > American Idol Thread - April 10th (Special Guest: J To Tha LO!)