independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Windows Media Player VS iTunes for Windows; pro's and cons...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/09/07 1:29pm

HamsterHuey

Windows Media Player VS iTunes for Windows; pro's and cons...

So, after much nagging of my sister's boyfriend, I have started the switch from Windows Media Player to iTunes for Windows...

I started getting irritated by WMP, cuz the new version SUCKS and the old version is not updated anymore and started to hick up.

So, are there any Orgers that have experience with both and can point out the pro's and cons of both systems to me?

Let me point out what I liked about the previous WMP. I have an extensive collection of songs, around 35.000. I love them listed in lines, so I can arrange them by title or artist.

For all the next options I name, can iTunes users tell me if this option also exists in iTunes?

star I have the option to click one group of songs and change all their fields (like album title).

star Is it possible to change the LOOK of iTunes? I think you call them skins. Actually, I kinda like the look, but the gray colour is getting to me. Can I just change the colour?

The off-setting thing about iTunes is that it seems that it needs to CHANGE my WMP files to MP3's to be able to play them. My first import batch is taking like HOURS already, while my WMP had an option to play everything I chose it to play.

So, tell me what you like and dislike about one or the other! Love to hear your input!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/09/07 1:40pm

MikeMatronik

HamsterHuey said:

So, after much nagging of my sister's boyfriend, I have started the switch from Windows Media Player to iTunes for Windows...

I started getting irritated by WMP, cuz the new version SUCKS and the old version is not updated anymore and started to hick up.

So, are there any Orgers that have experience with both and can point out the pro's and cons of both systems to me?

Let me point out what I liked about the previous WMP. I have an extensive collection of songs, around 35.000. I love them listed in lines, so I can arrange them by title or artist.

For all the next options I name, can iTunes users tell me if this option also exists in iTunes?

star I have the option to click one group of songs and change all their fields (like album title).

star Is it possible to change the LOOK of iTunes? I think you call them skins. Actually, I kinda like the look, but the gray colour is getting to me. Can I just change the colour?

The off-setting thing about iTunes is that it seems that it needs to CHANGE my WMP files to MP3's to be able to play them. My first import batch is taking like HOURS already, while my WMP had an option to play everything I chose it to play.

So, tell me what you like and dislike about one or the other! Love to hear your input!


This reminds when I switched to iTunes
lol
[Edited 1/9/07 13:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/09/07 2:21pm

TommyRoss

HamsterHuey said:


I started getting irritated by WMP, cuz the new version SUCKS and the old version is not updated anymore and started to hick up.


I have no input on this other than to echo your sentiment - that new WMP is terrible! Nothing about it is intuitive. It feels like they were obsessed with bells and whistles and had zero interest in making it actually functional. Irritating.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/09/07 2:23pm

MikeMatronik

What really bugs me about iTunes is the conversion of wma files
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/09/07 2:28pm

HamsterHuey

MikeMatronik said:

What really bugs me about iTunes is the conversion of wma files


That is not so much of a problem; I already started converting my newly ripped cd's to MP3 format anyways...

But the first batch of 970 songs will take 2.6 days to convert...

SIGH
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/09/07 2:44pm

HamsterHuey

Pro iTunes; I love the way the page hops to the song Itunes is playing when you use shuffle, something lacking in WMP.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/10/07 3:13pm

HamsterHuey

I gave up. Bleeding iTunes is busy for AGES to convert my WMA files. It is just too much.

Unles some of you tell me to hang in there cuz there is a bounty on the other side of all this stress...?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/10/07 3:19pm

TommyRoss

HamsterHuey said:

I gave up. Bleeding iTunes is busy for AGES to convert my WMA files. It is just too much.

Unles some of you tell me to hang in there cuz there is a bounty on the other side of all this stress...?

have you tried www.oldversion.com for the previous versions of WMP, or are you finding all of them too buggy?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/10/07 3:23pm

novabrkr

My five-year-old copy of WinAmp works just fine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/10/07 3:24pm

TommyRoss

novabrkr said:

My five-year-old copy of WinAmp works just fine.

nod I'm a WinAmp proponent as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/10/07 3:27pm

novabrkr

Foobar would be excellent, but at least my copy fails to detect wma. Maybe there's a plug-in somewhere though.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/10/07 3:33pm

FruitToAttract
Bears

avatar

Foobar is great. 100% customizable, plays every file type and there's never any lag. I love it. nod

Oh, it burns gapless too...not like ITunes gapless burning where there's an ever-so breif moment of silence, it's TOTALLY gapless.
[Edited 1/10/07 15:35pm]
"18 years old, and she knows her funk!!! headbang"
~ funkpill
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/10/07 3:59pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

WMP 10 all the way.

I didn't like it at first, but now I have got used to it, I love it. Its much more powerful than WMP 9 and Itunes.

I decided to get rid of Itunes as its too controlling. Its the big brother of the PC world.....
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/10/07 4:05pm

HamsterHuey

Oh, damn, Winamp. Forgot about that one.

I think I will stick to WMP 9...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/10/07 4:06pm

HamsterHuey

TommyRoss said:

HamsterHuey said:

I gave up. Bleeding iTunes is busy for AGES to convert my WMA files. It is just too much.

Unles some of you tell me to hang in there cuz there is a bounty on the other side of all this stress...?

have you tried www.oldversion.com for the previous versions of WMP, or are you finding all of them too buggy?


I re-installed wmp9, after my sad experience with WMP10.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/10/07 7:30pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

FruitToAttractBears said:

Foobar is great. 100% customizable, plays every file type and there's never any lag. I love it. nod

Oh, it burns gapless too...not like ITunes gapless burning where there's an ever-so breif moment of silence, it's TOTALLY gapless.

iTunes burns gapless as well. The problems were fixed months back.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Windows Media Player VS iTunes for Windows; pro's and cons...