DarlingDiana said: This is what Katt Williams said about Michael - http://vids.myspace.com/i...1387262263
Warning: don't watch if you are a really sensitive MJ fan. He really bags Michael out something chronic, talks about him like he's a dog. It's pretty pathetic on Katt William's part. You don't need to talk about someone like that. That's crossing the line in stand-up comedy. It's not crossing the line if it's true and many people believe Michael is a pedophile. Pedophiles don't deserve respect of any kind | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PurpleRighteous1 said: DarlingDiana said: This is what Katt Williams said about Michael - http://vids.myspace.com/i...1387262263
Warning: don't watch if you are a really sensitive MJ fan. He really bags Michael out something chronic, talks about him like he's a dog. It's pretty pathetic on Katt William's part. You don't need to talk about someone like that. That's crossing the line in stand-up comedy. I don't know that I'd say he's pathetic, but I'm sure it's hurtful. I don't think Katt would think it's disrespectful because he doesn't feel a pedophile deserves respect. I've heard him an interview and he was speaking a little more candidly about that joke and he pretty much made it clear that he thinks Michael actually committed the crimes he's been accused of. So to me it sounds more like Katt made his real opinion into a funny joke. I usually view disrespect from a comedian as attacking someone for no reason or when you know full well what you're saying isn't even close to true. Other than that, it's par for the course, and I just change the channel. It still sucks when your favorite entertainer is talked about, but what are you gonna? True dat true dat. I like Katt, but I can just change the station, just like when he got egotistical on the "Best Damn Sports Show Period" Music over comedy for me "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: It's not crossing the line if it's true and many people believe Michael is a pedophile. Pedophiles don't deserve respect of any kind
Just because there are people in the world who believe it, that doesn't mean it's true. His remarks were very disrespectful and slanderous (comedy or not) in my opinion, but, aside from that, i do find some of his other stuff funny. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
...
I know I'm old, but Nobody remembers that SNL "Weekend Update" sketch back in the 80's when Eddie Murphy was playing with the Michael Jackson Doll, and pulls its pants down, and then says to the audience, "You know, they say that these dolls are anatomically correct---and they are--Just as I suspected!!" --and shows the audience that there's nothing in the doll's front lower regions.... Not long after that, Eddie was presenting him with A Grammy.... ... [Edited 12/12/06 15:16pm] " I've got six things on my mind --you're no longer one of them." - Paddy McAloon, Prefab Sprout | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
paligap said:[quote]...
I know I'm old, but Nobody remembers that SNL "Weekend Update" sketch back in the 80's when Eddie Murphy was playing with the Michael Jackson Doll, and pulls its pants down, and then says to the audience, "You know, they say that these dolls are anatomically correct---and they are--Just as I suspected!!" --and shows the audience that there's nothing in the doll's front lower regions.... Not long after that, Eddie was presenting him with A Grammy.... And then. http://www.youtube.com/wa...7SIVOV3joc "The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scorp84 said: Janfriend said: It's not crossing the line if it's true and many people believe Michael is a pedophile. Pedophiles don't deserve respect of any kind
Just because there are people in the world who believe it, that doesn't mean it's true. His remarks were very disrespectful and slanderous (comedy or not) in my opinion, but, aside from that, i do find some of his other stuff funny. Do you say the same thing about O.J? At the same time, just because people believe it's not true doesn't mean it's false. I wasn't there, but I believe Michael is a pedophile based on his public behavior. At the same time, because I wasn't there, I can't say I know 100%. His aquittal doesn't mean anything. Cases of molestation and rape are difficult to prove when there is no physical evidence I'll tell you this, if Prince was accused of molestation TWICE, I couldn't defend him. That ain't a coincidence | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
EmbattledWarrior said: Use to love chris tuckers, Michael Jackson on crack routine was f*ckin hilarious
I think you mean Eddie Griffin. Chris Tucker used to do the routine with MJ as a pimp, riding around with Tito. "Come here, girl!" I'm sick and tired of the Prince fans being sick and tired of the Prince fans that are sick and tired! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: Do you say the same thing about O.J? At the same time, just because people believe it's not true doesn't mean it's false. I wasn't there, but I believe Michael is a pedophile based on his public behavior. At the same time, because I wasn't there, I can't say I know 100%. His aquittal doesn't mean anything. Cases of molestation and rape are difficult to prove when there is no physical evidence I'll tell you this, if Prince was accused of molestation TWICE, I couldn't defend him. That ain't a coincidence I could care less about O.J. MJ's acquittal means something.It just doesn't mean anything to you. Would it mean anything if the verdict was the other way around? Of course it would. We'll all believe what we choose to believe, but grown men and women (among impressionable, but well-aware youngsters) coming forward to "tell-all" only after money is exchanged and other allegations surface reeks of more than a coincidence. Yes, I am defending Michael Jackson, but I only speak for me and make up my own mind. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scorp84 said: Janfriend said: Do you say the same thing about O.J? At the same time, just because people believe it's not true doesn't mean it's false. I wasn't there, but I believe Michael is a pedophile based on his public behavior. At the same time, because I wasn't there, I can't say I know 100%. His aquittal doesn't mean anything. Cases of molestation and rape are difficult to prove when there is no physical evidence I'll tell you this, if Prince was accused of molestation TWICE, I couldn't defend him. That ain't a coincidence I could care less about O.J. MJ's acquittal means something.It just doesn't mean anything to you. Would it mean anything if the verdict was the other way around? Of course it would. We'll all believe what we choose to believe, but grown men and women (among impressionable, but well-aware youngsters) coming forward to "tell-all" only after money is exchanged and other allegations surface reeks of more than a coincidence. Yes, I am defending Michael Jackson, but I only speak for me and make up my own mind. What I meant about his aquittal not meaning anything is that it only means there wasn't enough evidence to prove his guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. With so little evidence, how could there be? When you said "His remarks were very disrespectful and slanderous (comedy or not)..." does this only apply to comedians talking about Michael or does it apply to any comedian talking about any celebrity facing trial or who has been aquitted of a crime? This is why I asked you about O.J. How can you ignore his blatant inappropriate behavior with children? I'm not trying to argue here, it's just that any parent would find it all too close for comfort. Katt is a father of 7 and is protective of them. He was speaking as a father | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasonStar said: EmbattledWarrior said: i still find it hilarious that Jay Leno, fuckin saved his ass at the trial... He didn't. Chris Tucker and Debbie Rowe did if anyone did. Or wait..maybe it was the case was BS. Lol, Tom Sneddon the fool was more helpful than hurtful to MJ during the trial. Everything the dumbass said ended up making MJ look good. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janfriend said: scorp84 said: I could care less about O.J. MJ's acquittal means something.It just doesn't mean anything to you. Would it mean anything if the verdict was the other way around? Of course it would. We'll all believe what we choose to believe, but grown men and women (among impressionable, but well-aware youngsters) coming forward to "tell-all" only after money is exchanged and other allegations surface reeks of more than a coincidence. Yes, I am defending Michael Jackson, but I only speak for me and make up my own mind. What I meant about his aquittal not meaning anything is that it only means there wasn't enough evidence to prove his guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. With so little evidence, how could there be? When you said "His remarks were very disrespectful and slanderous (comedy or not)..." does this only apply to comedians talking about Michael or does it apply to any comedian talking about any celebrity facing trial or who has been aquitted of a crime? This is why I asked you about O.J. How can you ignore his blatant inappropriate behavior with children? I'm not trying to argue here, it's just that any parent would find it all too close for comfort. Katt is a father of 7 and is protective of them. He was speaking as a father The bolded part proves a point. There must be a good side to Michael, the REAL Michael. Not a molester. Not a freak. But a kind man. That being said, if the parents thought their child was in danger, they wouldn't allow them to get close to him. Parents aren't going to like pimp the kids. Haters or people who think Mike is guilty will go to MORE lengths to show how bad Michael is, and ignore more facts, the most of the MJ Drones. (And yes I'm a proud MJ Drone.) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JasonStar said: Janfriend said: What I meant about his aquittal not meaning anything is that it only means there wasn't enough evidence to prove his guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. With so little evidence, how could there be? When you said "His remarks were very disrespectful and slanderous (comedy or not)..." does this only apply to comedians talking about Michael or does it apply to any comedian talking about any celebrity facing trial or who has been aquitted of a crime? This is why I asked you about O.J. How can you ignore his blatant inappropriate behavior with children? I'm not trying to argue here, it's just that any parent would find it all too close for comfort. Katt is a father of 7 and is protective of them. He was speaking as a father The bolded part proves a point. There must be a good side to Michael, the REAL Michael. Not a molester. Not a freak. But a kind man. That being said, if the parents thought their child was in danger, they wouldn't allow them to get close to him. Parents aren't going to like pimp the kids. Haters or people who think Mike is guilty will go to MORE lengths to show how bad Michael is, and ignore more facts, the most of the MJ Drones. (And yes I'm a proud MJ Drone.) I shouldn't have said any. I should have said most. Not every parent is a good parent. There are parents that pimp their kids. Look at the children who are runaways. Not all of them are runaways because they were bad children. A lot, if not most, ran away from their wretched parents who abused and/or neglected them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DarlingDiana said: JasonStar said: He didn't. Chris Tucker and Debbie Rowe did if anyone did. Or wait..maybe it was the case was BS. Lol, Tom Sneddon the fool was more helpful than hurtful to MJ during the trial. Everything the dumbass said ended up making MJ look good. Welcome to the family! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JackieBlue said: Katt's pretty funny. What'd he say about MJ?
It was HARDCORE. Try to have a look on Youtube to see if you can find a clip from his HBO special 'Pimp Chronicles Pt.1'. it would be the 5th, or last installment of the show, a (maybe?) 9 minute finale, where he rips Michael to shreads about being a a lying, delusional child molestor who's lied to black American public that spent all their time and money supporting him before he became a 'pork faced' white woman (referring to his multiple surgies that he consistently lies about). As you can imagine, given the wildly controversial themes and Katt's soaring popularity every time someone puts up the Pimp Chronicles they get snatched down within a few days for copyright infingement. But give it a try, you might find a clip. Be forewarned though, he is Richard Pryor harsh to the NTH power in his use of cursing. But once you get past that, some of views are on the money, even though it hurts to hear...who was it that once said 'comedy ain't nonthin' but the blues for people who can't sing...'? Yeah, I doubt very seriously you'd see Katt presenting Mike with an award any time soon... especially as a father (ghetto as he may be), who declared 'f*** Michael!'....' I got BABIES, you nasty ?&"§!#+!!' ----- | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Have you been up my ...Wishing Tree? Tuh! It's where I come to think and dream. And now I'd like to show you my ...Wishing Tree. Jam on! Where we can laugh and giggle and scream. Hee hee! Imagination is the key. Jejabee durtah! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't know about thati, MJ seem to have a pussy control over them for some reason. I'd have more respect for them if they won't kiss his ass after the routines they did on him.
But doing a Joke on MJ is the oldest cliche in the book. Thats like a safe territory from getting booed. Katt's a funny cat though, I enjoyed this per4mance MUCH better than the Chronicles: http://www.youtube.com/wa...TZUmbmnPa4 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Harlepolis said: Don't know about thati, MJ seem to have a pussy control over them for some reason. I'd have more respect for them if they won't kiss his ass after the routines they did on him.
But doing a Joke on MJ is the oldest cliche in the book. Thats like a safe territory from getting booed. Katt's a funny cat though, I enjoyed this per4mance MUCH better than the Chronicles: http://www.youtube.com/wa...TZUmbmnPa4 That's so true. Whether the allegations are true or not MJ is so easy to do. Why not do jokes about Woody Allen or Pete Townsend who was caught with Child Porn on his computer. Better still R.kelly, where there is a hard-core video showing what he is doing with a 13 yr old girl. ? I hate it when so called comedians become selective about who they joke about, especially when pedophilia is such heinous crime, if Katt wants to make jokes about MJ, who was found not guilty(and had less evidence against him than some of the others I have mentioned)than do the same to others who have been accused of the same thing. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whatsgoingon said: Harlepolis said: Don't know about thati, MJ seem to have a pussy control over them for some reason. I'd have more respect for them if they won't kiss his ass after the routines they did on him.
But doing a Joke on MJ is the oldest cliche in the book. Thats like a safe territory from getting booed. Katt's a funny cat though, I enjoyed this per4mance MUCH better than the Chronicles: http://www.youtube.com/wa...TZUmbmnPa4 That's so true. Whether the allegations are true or not MJ is so easy to do. Why not do jokes about Woody Allen or Pete Townsend who was caught with Child Porn on his computer.,Better still R.kelly where there is a hard-core video showing what he is doing with a 13 yr old girl. ? I hate it when so called comedians become selective about who they joke about, especially when pedophilia is such heinous crime, if Katt wants to make jokes about MJ, who was found not guilty(and had less evidence against him than some of the others I have mentioned)than do the same to others who have been accused of the same thing. That's what I'm talking about right there! That muthafucker needs to be talked about like a dog. Michael's an easy target. And Katt talking about MJ using the black community, hasn't he heard of what rap has done? "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: whatsgoingon said: That's so true. Whether the allegations are true or not MJ is so easy to do. Why not do jokes about Woody Allen or Pete Townsend who was caught with Child Porn on his computer.,Better still R.kelly where there is a hard-core video showing what he is doing with a 13 yr old girl. ? I hate it when so called comedians become selective about who they joke about, especially when pedophilia is such heinous crime, if Katt wants to make jokes about MJ, who was found not guilty(and had less evidence against him than some of the others I have mentioned)than do the same to others who have been accused of the same thing. That's what I'm talking about right there! That muthafucker needs to be talked about like a dog. Michael's an easy target. And Katt talking about MJ using the black community, hasn't he heard of what rap has done? True. Katt may think MJ is "scum", but I like to think he thinks R.kelly is "scum" too. I am not an apologist for Michael, but neither am I an apologist for the likes of R.Kelly, Bill Wyman and all those other people that the media and public keeps quiet about, even though the evidence against them is even more blatant than that of MJ.. I mean some times you get the impression that the media and public at large are very selective on who they dog, even if the offence is the same; Take for instant Gary Glitter and Pete Townsend, they were both caught with child porn, the only difference was Gary Glitter had a lot more child porn, so he got a custodial sentence and Townsend got a cautious and is on the sex offenders list, but Townsend is still glorified...Why for god sake.? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |