The Beatles back catalogue should be left alone,what else do they have to prove? Next they'll have 50 cent rapping over Hey Jude.....heaven forbid. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Justin1972UK said: I've heard that this is like an 80 minute mash-up tape.
For instance, the vocals to 'Within You, Without You' are mixed into the rhythm section of 'Tomorrow Never Knows' at one point. It sounds intriguing. exactly. It's an authorized remix. I'd rather they gave the old albums a proper stereo mix & remaster. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Justin1972UK said: I've heard that this is like an 80 minute mash-up tape.
For instance, the vocals to 'Within You, Without You' are mixed into the rhythm section of 'Tomorrow Never Knows' at one point. It sounds intriguing. exactly. It's an authorized remix. I'd rather they gave the old albums a proper stereo mix & remaster. they're being remastered right now, i believe. there was a story about it a few months ago that they're remastering them for digital release AND cd re-releases. but, honestly, i'm hoping they're not in stereo. let's not re-write history. "I don't need your forgiveness, cos I've been saved by Jesus, so fuck you." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tessa said: NDRU said: exactly. It's an authorized remix. I'd rather they gave the old albums a proper stereo mix & remaster. they're being remastered right now, i believe. there was a story about it a few months ago that they're remastering them for digital release AND cd re-releases. but, honestly, i'm hoping they're not in stereo. let's not re-write history. The proper mono mixes would be fine. They were crappily mixed for stereo in the 60's and I think that's what's on cd, isn't it? Maybe I'm wrong. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
goosebumps said: The Beatles back catalogue should be left alone,what else do they have to prove? Next they'll have 50 cent rapping over Hey Jude.....heaven forbid.
Jay Z rapped already over "Yesterday" and Macca was there...The next colection should be title LOVEFORTHEMONEY "Todo está bien chévere" Stevie | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Tessa said: they're being remastered right now, i believe. there was a story about it a few months ago that they're remastering them for digital release AND cd re-releases. but, honestly, i'm hoping they're not in stereo. let's not re-write history. The proper mono mixes would be fine. They were crappily mixed for stereo in the 60's and I think that's what's on cd, isn't it? Maybe I'm wrong. i don't think so. at least not the early ones. those are in mono, i believe. except for Help... which they remixed. "I don't need your forgiveness, cos I've been saved by Jesus, so fuck you." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
YES!! If you've seen the Cirque d'Soleil show, you'll understand how awesome the music sounds, having been remastered. Celebrate this, mock it not. If you're a
beatle fan, it's a plus. [Edited 10/3/06 15:27pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tessa said: NDRU said: The proper mono mixes would be fine. They were crappily mixed for stereo in the 60's and I think that's what's on cd, isn't it? Maybe I'm wrong. i don't think so. at least not the early ones. those are in mono, i believe. except for Help... which they remixed. What about Revolver? I got to know the Beatles' music on record, which had the bad stereo mixes, so I haven't paid close attention to the mix on the cd. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Justin1972UK said: I've heard that this is like an 80 minute mash-up tape.
For instance, the vocals to 'Within You, Without You' are mixed into the rhythm section of 'Tomorrow Never Knows' at one point. It sounds intriguing. exactly. It's an authorized remix. I'd rather they gave the old albums a proper stereo mix & remaster. Give that time.. I personally am satisfied with the sound of the cd's... it aint no thing to me any longer to have them in the best quality.. I'm for experimenting with their sounds | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sdldawn said: I'm for experimenting with their sounds Me too, I mean, if anyone should mess with their catalog, mightas well be George Martin and the 2 remaining Beatles. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: Sdldawn said: I'm for experimenting with their sounds Me too, I mean, if anyone should mess with their catalog, mightas well be George Martin and the 2 remaining Beatles. Yup, I instantly felt good about it when I read that he was behind it all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
An even better stamp, to me at least is the fact that Julian, is praising it. And that is not easy considering his views on Yoko and the catalog and Johns works. [Edited 10/3/06 20:45pm] "We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sdldawn said: NDRU said: exactly. It's an authorized remix. I'd rather they gave the old albums a proper stereo mix & remaster. Give that time.. I personally am satisfied with the sound of the cd's... it aint no thing to me any longer to have them in the best quality.. I'm for experimenting with their sounds I was really pleased with Let It Be...Naked, though. It's a slippery slope, messing with the Beatles, but I think stuff like Revolver & the White Album could sound better. I'm interested in this reworking of their music too, though. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Where the hell is Moonbeam?
He must tell u all that this "new" New Age Beatles is already overrated ...Dorothy made me laugh (ha ha)...
THE ORG TOP 50 http://www.prince.org/msg/8/192731 PRINCE or MESHELL NDEGEOCELLO http://www.prince.org/msg...02?jump=51 The Funny Thread About the Album Kiss http://www.prince.org/msg...0652?&pg=1 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it will probably come out in 5.1 dvd audio! That would be fun. My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think the whole Beatles mashup idea could really sound amazing. They did do some great work with sound collages throughout the later part of their career... Can you imagine what they could do nowadays with stuff like 'I am the Walrus' or 'Strawberry Fields Forever'? Could be just worthy... I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bublebath said: Where the hell is Moonbeam?
He must tell u all that this "new" New Age Beatles is already overrated "I don't need your forgiveness, cos I've been saved by Jesus, so fuck you." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tessa said: NDRU said: The proper mono mixes would be fine. They were crappily mixed for stereo in the 60's and I think that's what's on cd, isn't it? Maybe I'm wrong. i don't think so. at least not the early ones. those are in mono, i believe. except for Help... which they remixed. I'm not sure when the starting point was, but the later Beatles albums were mixed in a 'distorted' mono fashion. It's really noticible when you have a speaker go out on you. I was in my car, and had the speaker balance shifted entirely to the left channel when a Beatles song came on my Ipod. You literally miss out on half of the song, because of how it was mixed. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Bring it on. George, Giles, John, Paul 'Hari and Ringo, lost in the mix.
At this stage, not having heard it, my ears are open and so is my mind. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: Tessa said: i don't think so. at least not the early ones. those are in mono, i believe. except for Help... which they remixed. I'm not sure when the starting point was, but the later Beatles albums were mixed in a 'distorted' mono fashion. It's really noticible when you have a speaker go out on you. I was in my car, and had the speaker balance shifted entirely to the left channel when a Beatles song came on my Ipod. You literally miss out on half of the song, because of how it was mixed. That's what I'm talking about. George Martin & Geoff Emerick worked really hard on the mono mixes, but the stereo mixes are terrible--voices to one side, music to another. I'd like to hear Revolver with a proper stereo mix, and I don't think the cd has that or even the original mono mix (maybe the early albums do, I'm not sure). My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: Axchi696 said: I'm not sure when the starting point was, but the later Beatles albums were mixed in a 'distorted' mono fashion. It's really noticible when you have a speaker go out on you. I was in my car, and had the speaker balance shifted entirely to the left channel when a Beatles song came on my Ipod. You literally miss out on half of the song, because of how it was mixed. That's what I'm talking about. George Martin & Geoff Emerick worked really hard on the mono mixes, but the stereo mixes are terrible--voices to one side, music to another. I'd like to hear Revolver with a proper stereo mix, and I don't think the cd has that or even the original mono mix (maybe the early albums do, I'm not sure). WHAT? Revolver was done after the complete split early trend of stereo mixing, it was a true stereo album! The albums were mixed in both mono and stereo records at the same time in the early days. Check the dates of the mixes. My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: NDRU said: That's what I'm talking about. George Martin & Geoff Emerick worked really hard on the mono mixes, but the stereo mixes are terrible--voices to one side, music to another. I'd like to hear Revolver with a proper stereo mix, and I don't think the cd has that or even the original mono mix (maybe the early albums do, I'm not sure). WHAT? Revolver was done after the complete split early trend of stereo mixing, it was a true stereo album! The albums were mixed in both mono and stereo records at the same time in the early days. Check the dates of the mixes. Not so sure. I believe if you listen to Taxman and adjust the balance, you'll hear the voices on one side & instruments on another. Geoff Emerick (their recording engineer) recently wrote a book in which he said that mono was the only real way to listen to Revolver, as the stereo mix is terrible. He said they did mono & stereo mixes for the albums, like you said, but didn't spend as much time on the stereo ones, and George Martin was the one who created those "voices to one side" mixes. I guess you could call that "true stereo," but not "good stereo" like you might hear on Abbey Road. [Edited 10/4/06 15:16pm] My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: ufoclub said: WHAT? Revolver was done after the complete split early trend of stereo mixing, it was a true stereo album! The albums were mixed in both mono and stereo records at the same time in the early days. Check the dates of the mixes. Not so sure. I believe if you listen to Taxman and adjust the balance, you'll hear the voices on one side & instruments on another. Geoff Emerick (their recording engineer) recently wrote a book in which he said that mono was the only real way to listen to Revolver, as the stereo mix is terrible. He said they did mono & stereo mixes for the albums, like you said, but didn't spend as much time on the stereo ones, and George Martin was the one who created those "voices to one side" mixes. I guess you could call that "true stereo," but not "good stereo" like you might hear on Abbey Road. [Edited 10/4/06 15:16pm] obviously Taxman was mixed that way, but I bet that was Paul's request... but what about all the other songs? My art book: http://www.lulu.com/spotl...ecomicskid
VIDEO WORK: http://sharadkantpatel.com MUSIC: https://soundcloud.com/ufoclub1977 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ufoclub said: NDRU said: Not so sure. I believe if you listen to Taxman and adjust the balance, you'll hear the voices on one side & instruments on another. Geoff Emerick (their recording engineer) recently wrote a book in which he said that mono was the only real way to listen to Revolver, as the stereo mix is terrible. He said they did mono & stereo mixes for the albums, like you said, but didn't spend as much time on the stereo ones, and George Martin was the one who created those "voices to one side" mixes. I guess you could call that "true stereo," but not "good stereo" like you might hear on Abbey Road. [Edited 10/4/06 15:16pm] obviously Taxman was mixed that way, but I bet that was Paul's request... but what about all the other songs? I don't have Revolver with me but I just listened to Magical Mystery Tour, and it was like that. One speaker would be complete silence until a guitar or drum came in while the other would have bass & vocals, or something like that. That is stereo in the true sense, but it's not good stereo. Isolating the drums to one side wouldn't happen nowadays, but neither would the Beatles' music...so what's my point again? My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |