independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Can Michael still bring it?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 09/12/06 7:13am

Cloudbuster

avatar

JackieBlue said:

If Michael were anyone else would his fans really be overlooking this sort of track record?


Maybe some fans have the decency to take into consideration his history and circumstance that led to such a track record.

Even as far back as the mid to late '70s (when he was still pretty much a kid himself) he said that he preferred the company of youngsters because they didn't wnt anything from him but friendship. Most of the adults in Michael's life have taken advantage of him in one way or another, including his own family for fuck's sake. He's wary of adults to this day. I wonder why.

And yeah, every kid that ever stayed at Neverland was an olive skinned male. rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 09/12/06 7:32am

JackieBlue

avatar

I'm not singling out the hanging out with kids thing and Michael is not the only guy who's been psychologically or physically abused, had to work as a child or had low self-esteem.

Many sensitive abandoned or abused adults are wary of other adults but they don't hang out with kids either but that's beside the point.

I just think if this was 50 Y.O. Michael Smith who worked at 'the office' I don't think folks would be excusing all of his behavior and preferred friendships on him being different. The women would think he was gay or downlow and the guys would think he was odd. Not like you can't be different and gay at the same time.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 09/12/06 7:56am

Cloudbuster

avatar

JackieBlue said:

I'm not singling out the hanging out with kids thing and Michael is not the only guy who's been psychologically or physically abused, had to work as a child or had low self-esteem.

Many sensitive abandoned or abused adults are wary of other adults but they don't hang out with kids either but that's beside the point.

I just think if this was 50 Y.O. Michael Smith who worked at 'the office' I don't think folks would be excusing all of his behavior and preferred friendships on him being different. The women would think he was gay or downlow and the guys would think he was odd. Not like you can't be different and gay at the same time.


Yeah, but that's exactly the point. Not many Michael Smith's have spent almost their entire lives in the public eye or forced to entertain a nightclub crowd as an infant to put money in their folk's pockets. So for better or worse, MJ is a special case whether one likes it or not.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 09/12/06 8:04am

JackieBlue

avatar

BTW, I do consider his circumstances when looking at the scope of his life but like everything else at some point enough is enough. You really have to question choices that have practically ended his career, ruined his reputation and landed him in jail.

People have all sorts of wounds that show themselves in the form of addictions, obsessions and compulsions. When any of these things get out of hand they can be detrimental. That's why there's therapy and counseling. People talk about Whitney like a dog on here. Does anyone consider her childhood, her unhealed wounds? No she's just a cracked out has been. Whitney is or was in denial and the worstthing about denial is that the person can't even see that their lives are out of balance and they need help. At some point Robert Downey admitted that he was out of control and couldn't stop. Before that, he was no different than Whitney.

I agree with what some are saying that it's time Michael take responsibility for his actions. Mistakes as well as the triumphs. Abuse can break you down but it can also make you stronger and more connected to the real world around you.
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 09/12/06 8:16am

whatsgoingon

avatar

whoknows said:

whatsgoingon said:




I have to agree with you to a certain extent here. One of the reasons why "Whoknows" analogy is unbalance is because he/she is focusing on MJ Ambigious sexuality has opposed to his overall life.


Having said that I am not going to blame his parents for alot of the decisions he made in more recent years. His been adult now for about 30 yrs and there certain things that regardless of his childhood he should have known in the long run were going to backfire.
[Edited 9/12/06 4:30am]

Of course I'm focusing on his ambiguous sexuality. Isn't that what you do when you're making the case for someone being gay? The only unbalanced thing is your response. I listed many separate different points that all built up a picture of a closet homosexual. You've ignored almost all of them except for one. The fact that his list of friends (Liberace, Liza Minelli, Liz Taylor, Diana Ross, etc.)reads like a gay man's wet dream is perfectly valid information to present as part of an overall case. The fact that these women are all surrounded by gay men, their best friends are gay, and they're actively involved in the gay community is one hell of a coincidence. btw, he described Diana Ross in 78 as someone to whom he could tell "all my deepest, darkest secrets". He wrote a song for her expressing desire for a beautiful muscle man. When she performed it on stage she introduced it saying "I'm not sure if it's meant to be my fantasy or his".
Combine all that with the fact that he's never had a real girlfriend, both his marriages were shams, none of his children were conceived naturally, and he's slept with a succession of good looking olive skinned boys and it makes a pretty strong case to anyone with any objectivity. That's not to even mention his gay manner and appearance.
If you're asking me to believe that all these separate indicators of gayness are just coincidence then I'm sorry, but that's an insult to my intelligence. What comes across pretty clearly to me is that many of you are so repelled by the idea that the man who's music you grew up on could have been gay all along that you'll come up with the most nonsensical rationalisations in order to ignore the obvious; the biggest example being the idea that he's guity of paedophilia but only for the control it gives him. In that case why not abuse little girls? Like I said before, those who deny he's gay are the ones who have the biggest questions to answer, so before attacking me in future, perhaps you'd like to come off the fence and deal with some of these points. You can make a start with the most obvious one. Why has he shared his bed over and over again with numerous good looking,olive skinned boys?


You might as well come out and say he is a Pedophil(sp), but instead you say he is a closetted homosexual, that why I believe you analogy is flawed. Your saying he surounds himself with specific people and then your going on about him bedding little boys, that to me makes him more likely to be a Pedo than a repress homosexuality. As someone says Pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality.

And if he is gay, even if he is a closeted homosexual surely by now there must be several men that he has got it on with.?

Btw Emmanuel Lewis and Maculay Culkin don't look Olive skin to me.
[Edited 9/12/06 8:28am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 09/12/06 8:21am

Cloudbuster

avatar

whatsgoingon said:

And if he is gay, even if he is a closeted homosexual surely by now there must be several men that he has got it on with.?


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 09/12/06 8:30am

JackieBlue

avatar

I don't know what the photo of Prince is to imply but the thing about Prince is he's never appeared to be afraid of sex or his sexuality, IMO. He's not afraid to be with or around grown sexual women or grown sexual men. Whatever his situation, he's grown and sexy. :
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 09/12/06 8:41am

Cloudbuster

avatar

All this talk about MJ fans being over defensive. lol

Yet when it comes to Prince... falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 09/12/06 8:52am

whoknows

whatsgoingon said:

whoknows said:


Of course I'm focusing on his ambiguous sexuality. Isn't that what you do when you're making the case for someone being gay? The only unbalanced thing is your response. I listed many separate different points that all built up a picture of a closet homosexual. You've ignored almost all of them except for one. The fact that his list of friends (Liberace, Liza Minelli, Liz Taylor, Diana Ross, etc.)reads like a gay man's wet dream is perfectly valid information to present as part of an overall case. The fact that these women are all surrounded by gay men, their best friends are gay, and they're actively involved in the gay community is one hell of a coincidence. btw, he described Diana Ross in 78 as someone to whom he could tell "all my deepest, darkest secrets". He wrote a song for her expressing desire for a beautiful muscle man. When she performed it on stage she introduced it saying "I'm not sure if it's meant to be my fantasy or his".
Combine all that with the fact that he's never had a real girlfriend, both his marriages were shams, none of his children were conceived naturally, and he's slept with a succession of good looking olive skinned boys and it makes a pretty strong case to anyone with any objectivity. That's not to even mention his gay manner and appearance.
If you're asking me to believe that all these separate indicators of gayness are just coincidence then I'm sorry, but that's an insult to my intelligence. What comes across pretty clearly to me is that many of you are so repelled by the idea that the man who's music you grew up on could have been gay all along that you'll come up with the most nonsensical rationalisations in order to ignore the obvious; the biggest example being the idea that he's guity of paedophilia but only for the control it gives him. In that case why not abuse little girls? Like I said before, those who deny he's gay are the ones who have the biggest questions to answer, so before attacking me in future, perhaps you'd like to come off the fence and deal with some of these points. You can make a start with the most obvious one. Why has he shared his bed over and over again with numerous good looking,olive skinned boys?


You might as well come out and say he is a Pedophil(sp), but instead you say he is a closetted homosexual, that why I believe you analogy is flawed. Your saying he surounds himself with specific people and then your going on about him bedding little boys, that to me makes him more likely to be a Pedo than a repress homosexuality. As someone says Pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality.

And if he is gay, even if he is a closeted homosexual surely by now there must be several men that he has got it on with.?

Btw Emmanuel Lewis and Maculay Culkin don't look Olive skin to me.
[Edited 9/12/06 8:28am]

I noticed you completely dodged the points again. btw, the vast majority of the boys have been olive skinned. Anyone who denies that is not obeying the evidence of their own eyes. Name one black boy he has spent the night with in the last 20 years. I'm unaware of any.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 09/12/06 8:53am

shorttrini

avatar

JackieBlue said:

BTW, I do consider his circumstances when looking at the scope of his life but like everything else at some point enough is enough. You really have to question choices that have practically ended his career, ruined his reputation and landed him in jail.

People have all sorts of wounds that show themselves in the form of addictions, obsessions and compulsions. When any of these things get out of hand they can be detrimental. That's why there's therapy and counseling. People talk about Whitney like a dog on here. Does anyone consider her childhood, her unhealed wounds? No she's just a cracked out has been. Whitney is or was in denial and the worstthing about denial is that the person can't even see that their lives are out of balance and they need help. At some point Robert Downey admitted that he was out of control and couldn't stop. Before that, he was no different than Whitney.

I agree with what some are saying that it's time Michael take responsibility for his actions. Mistakes as well as the triumphs. Abuse can break you down but it can also make you stronger and more connected to the real world around you.


The reason the people on here do not consider the childhood of these people mentions is because...these people are SUPPOSED to be perfect, because they are superstars. They are simply not suppose to swing on the side of human.Yes, adversity is supposed to make u stronger, but you still have bad days. I feel that they way one was brought up has alot to do with how they are going to function as an adult....many here disagree.
"Love is like peeing in your pants, everyone sees it but only you feel its warmth"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 09/12/06 8:55am

dag

avatar

JackieBlue said:

I don't know what the photo of Prince is to imply but the thing about Prince is he's never appeared to be afraid of sex or his sexuality, IMO. He's not afraid to be with or around grown sexual women or grown sexual men. Whatever his situation, he's grown and sexy. :

I think that the fact that Michael has never been really that open about sex in his music and his life in general might have to do something with him regarding that as sick, cause don´t forget what he´s been exposed to as a child in all those clubs that he performed in and he said many times that it was sick to him. He has always kept this part of his life private. That´s what created the mysterious aura that left people guessing.(Remember that nobody knew of his marriage to Lisa Marie until several weeks later. If it was such a stunt, why all the privacy? Plus Lisa does not look like someone doing things for publicity or whatever, but that´s another topic.) And if looks were to decide one´s homosexuality than most of men in showbusiness would have to be homosexual - but now we´ve discovered a new name for this - metrosexuality. Anyways, Mike has worn make-up, but I think we should notice that the make-up came with the Bad era = vitiligo spreading. But when it comes to clothes he always wore military stuff, which I would say is a very "male" clothing. Prince wore more of "gay clothes" than Mike.
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 09/12/06 9:04am

whatsgoingon

avatar

whoknows said:

whatsgoingon said:



You might as well come out and say he is a Pedophil(sp), but instead you say he is a closetted homosexual, that why I believe you analogy is flawed. Your saying he surounds himself with specific people and then your going on about him bedding little boys, that to me makes him more likely to be a Pedo than a repress homosexuality. As someone says Pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality.

And if he is gay, even if he is a closeted homosexual surely by now there must be several men that he has got it on with.?

Btw Emmanuel Lewis and Maculay Culkin don't look Olive skin to me.
[Edited 9/12/06 8:28am]

I noticed you completely dodged the points again. btw, the vast majority of the boys have been olive skinned. Anyone who denies that is not obeying the evidence of their own eyes. Name one black boy he has spent the night with in the last 20 years. I'm unaware of any.


No, you are dodging the point. I personally believe you think Michael is a Pedophil, but for some reason or another your scared to say that out, probably because you feel you will offend certain people i.e MJ fans, here. So instead you say he is a "repress Homosexual", becaus he hangs around Elizabeth Taylor, Diana Ross and Liberace, as if to say these are the only people he has ever had a friendship with.

And he had a very close relationship with Emmanuel Lewis, who happened to be black and there could have been even more, such has Macullay Culkin and Wade Robson that don't suit the Olive-skinned young boys your talking off.
[Edited 9/12/06 9:06am]
[Edited 9/12/06 9:08am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 09/12/06 9:14am

JackieBlue

avatar

Cloudbuster said:

All this talk about MJ fans being over defensive. lol

Yet when it comes to Prince... falloff



It wasn't my intent to defend Prince. He could be gay or bi too for all I know and like Michael, it doesn't really matter to me. I am not hurt, offended or turned off by the idea that they may be gay or bisexual. Prince Rogers Nelson at 'the office' would be just as questionable as Michael.

I agree with things brought up which is why I commented but my real annoyance has always been with MJ's choices. This is an on-going never-ending discussion with MJ fans--present and former--die hards and fence straddlers and it will continue. neutral
Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 09/12/06 9:16am

whoknows

whatsgoingon said:

whoknows said:


I noticed you completely dodged the points again. btw, the vast majority of the boys have been olive skinned. Anyone who denies that is not obeying the evidence of their own eyes. Name one black boy he has spent the night with in the last 20 years. I'm unaware of any.


No, you are dodging the point. I personally believe you think Michael is a Pedophil, but for some reason or another your scared to say that out, probably because you will offend certain people. So instead you say he is a "repress Homosexual", becaus he hangs around Elizabeth Taylor, Diana Ross and Liberace, as if to say these are the only people he has ever had a friendship with.


Really? This point only emerged in your last post. Before then you said your reason for disagreeing with me was that I was "focusing on his amiguous sexuality rather than his overall life". Now you say you're reason for disagreeing is because I believe he's a paedophile. Your reason for disagreeing seems to change every two minutes. Now you think you can deflect attention away from the subject of his possible gayness by making this a discussion about whether or not I believe he's a paedophile. Sorry. Won't work. This is about whether or not he's gay. I've explained why I think he is. You haven't made any real efforts to counter the overall points. Unless you're prepared to try, I suggest we agree to disagree.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 09/12/06 9:26am

thedoorkeeper

Cloudbuster said:

Even as far back as the mid to late '70s (when he was still pretty much a kid himself) he said that he preferred the company of youngsters because they didn't want anything from him but friendship. Most of the adults in Michael's life have taken advantage of him in one way or another, including his own family for fuck's sake. He's wary of adults to this day. I wonder why.


It might serve MJ well to be a little wary of the children he keeps company with. His friendship with children has cost him millions plus it has had a negative impact on his career. It would make most people cautious.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 09/12/06 9:36am

whatsgoingon

avatar

whoknows said:

whatsgoingon said:



No, you are dodging the point. I personally believe you think Michael is a Pedophil, but for some reason or another your scared to say that out, probably because you will offend certain people. So instead you say he is a "repress Homosexual", becaus he hangs around Elizabeth Taylor, Diana Ross and Liberace, as if to say these are the only people he has ever had a friendship with.


Really? This point only emerged in your last post. Before then you said your reason for disagreeing with me was that I was "focusing on his amiguous sexuality rather than his overall life". Now you say you're reason for disagreeing is because I believe he's a paedophile. Your reason for disagreeing seems to change every two minutes. Now you think you can deflect attention away from the subject of his possible gayness by making this a discussion about whether or not I believe he's a paedophile. Sorry. Won't work. This is about whether or not he's gay. I've explained why I think he is. You haven't made any real efforts to counter the overall points. Unless you're prepared to try, I suggest we agree to disagree.


When ever I put forward an alternative argument of the reasons why he may spend time with the likes of Diana ross etc and the fact that the likes of Tatum, Brooke and LMP have contradicted themselves in their statements about Michael, you go back to him sleeping with olive-skinned little, boys that proves he is "gay", when that is not necessarily so.

It's like the people who believe because the police found a whole lot of playboy mags and the fact that LMP has said they had a sexual relationship means that 100% proof he is "straight". Of course it doesn't. It just means he may or may not find women sexually attractive, but it is still not concrete proof of his sexuality.

I personally don't believe that your list is hard-core proof that he could be a closetted gay, the way you do. Your so sure that he must be Gay, I am just saying that it is not necessarily so.

But as you have said probably its best to agree to disagree.
[Edited 9/12/06 9:38am]
[Edited 9/12/06 10:30am]
[Edited 9/12/06 13:28pm]
[Edited 9/12/06 14:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 09/12/06 2:28pm

shockadelicaa

avatar

murph said:

whoknows said:


There hasn't yet been a single serious biography of Michael Jackson written. Only cheap cash ins written by tabloid hacks. In the same way that no biography written in Fredie Mercury's or Rock Hudson's lifetime would have told you they were gay(even though it was an open secret in the industry), MJ biographers also have their hands tied.



Randy Taraborrelli's first MJ book (The Magic & The Madness) was about as serious a biography you could get....It was a strong effort that didn't trail to deep in bullshit...


lol Just what I was about to post.
"You could say I'm a terminal case/You could burn up my clothes/Smash up my ride...well, maybe not the ride"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 09/12/06 2:37pm

whoknows

shockadelicaa said:

murph said:




Randy Taraborrelli's first MJ book (The Magic & The Madness) was about as serious a biography you could get....It was a strong effort that didn't trail to deep in bullshit...


lol Just what I was about to post.

Something tells me you hadn't read further down the page when you posted this lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 09/13/06 10:36am

shockadelicaa

avatar

whoknows said:

shockadelicaa said:



lol Just what I was about to post.

Something tells me you hadn't read further down the page when you posted this lol


Right you are! cool
"You could say I'm a terminal case/You could burn up my clothes/Smash up my ride...well, maybe not the ride"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 09/13/06 1:23pm

bboy87

avatar

well, damn, I thought this thread was about if Michael could make a comeback, not about his sexuality.
People have been talking about this for years. Can't we just leave it alone?

Also, didn't Michael say that Joseph was a genius and that his success was because of his father's guidance in that Take 2 special in '03? It doesn't seem like they're estranged or anything. Michael was in the front of the whole spectacle for years and alot of pressure was on him so it doesn't really suprise me that he has issues. But for all we know, he could be getting help now so we simply have to wait.

I simply don't care anymore about his sexual preference. I've been dogged by friends because I was a fan of both Michael AND Prince, and I got more jokes about Prince than I did about Michael, but it was about the music. It just doesn't matter to me. What does matter is the MUSIC
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 09/13/06 1:24pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

No. He's turned into a giant borefest yawn Musically that is lol
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 09/15/06 10:07pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

dag said:

JackieBlue said:

I don't know what the photo of Prince is to imply but the thing about Prince is he's never appeared to be afraid of sex or his sexuality, IMO. He's not afraid to be with or around grown sexual women or grown sexual men. Whatever his situation, he's grown and sexy. :

I think that the fact that Michael has never been really that open about sex in his music and his life in general might have to do something with him regarding that as sick, cause don´t forget what he´s been exposed to as a child in all those clubs that he performed in and he said many times that it was sick to him. He has always kept this part of his life private. That´s what created the mysterious aura that left people guessing.(Remember that nobody knew of his marriage to Lisa Marie until several weeks later. If it was such a stunt, why all the privacy? Plus Lisa does not look like someone doing things for publicity or whatever, but that´s another topic.) And if looks were to decide one´s homosexuality than most of men in showbusiness would have to be homosexual - but now we´ve discovered a new name for this - metrosexuality. Anyways, Mike has worn make-up, but I think we should notice that the make-up came with the Bad era = vitiligo spreading. But when it comes to clothes he always wore military stuff, which I would say is a very "male" clothing. Prince wore more of "gay clothes" than Mike.


By that statement, every man outside of the red states are a bunch of metros. New Orleans, Atlanta, & Miami excluded of course.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 09/15/06 11:30pm

CalhounSq

avatar

Well, he'll always be able to sing BUT even if he put out a killer album he'd manage to fuck it all up just being such a fucking freak... There is no more "Thriller" - that shit has past just like PR has passed for Prince. Give it up, it's a new phase man...
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 09/18/06 8:53pm

fingertips

avatar

MJ ... get on the mic .. !
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Can Michael still bring it?