independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Dylan: modern music is "worthless" . . . is it content or the recording?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 08/22/06 1:44pm

namepeace

Dylan: modern music is "worthless" . . . is it content or the recording?

Story on www.aol.com

LOS ANGELES (Aug. 22) - Bob Dylan says the quality of modern recordings is "atrocious," and even the songs on his new album sounded much better in the studio than on disc.

"I don't know anybody who's made a record that sounds decent in the past 20 years, really," the 65-year-old rocker said in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine.

Dylan, who released eight studio albums in the past two decades, returns with his first recording in five years, "Modern Times," next Tuesday.

Noting the music industry's complaints that illegal downloading means people are getting their music for free, he said, "Well, why not? It ain't worth nothing anyway."

"You listen to these modern records, they're atrocious, they have sound all over them," he added. "There's no definition of nothing, no vocal, no nothing, just like ... static."

Dylan said he does his best to fight technology, but it's a losing battle.

"Even these songs probably sounded ten times better in the studio when we recorded 'em. CDs are small. There's no stature to it."

Come on, Bob. Most modern music pales in comparison to yours, but there are several cats from'86 on who've been making meaningful, even legendary music.

If you believe albums like Sign O' The Times, Nation of Millions, Passion, Bitter, OK Computer, etc. are worthless I don't care who you are. Every orger on here can name a different album, but if you say something silly like that you have zero credibility when talking about modern music.

[Edited 8/22/06 13:44pm]
[Edited 8/22/06 13:45pm]
[Edited 8/23/06 9:08am]
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 08/22/06 1:54pm

NDRU

avatar

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself. Of course that doesn't make him right. Some stuff sounds 1000 times better than Dylan's 60's recordings in terms of production.

Moreover, he could just be hearing the ringing in his ears, who knows?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 08/22/06 1:55pm

Slave2daGroove

My guitar teacher just last week said "Bob Dylan sucked as soon as he went electric" and that was 30 years ago. lol

Artists without perspective are like a foot without a pinky toe. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 08/22/06 2:08pm

FuNkeNsteiN

avatar

NDRU said:

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself

nod
It is not known why FuNkeNsteiN capitalizes his name as he does, though some speculate sunlight deficiency caused by the most pimpified white guy afro in Nordic history.

- Lammastide
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 08/22/06 2:12pm

dammme

avatar

CDs are small


omfg but iPod are even smaller!
"Todo está bien chévere" Stevie
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 08/22/06 2:27pm

theAudience

avatar

NDRU said:

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself. Of course that doesn't make him right. Some stuff sounds 1000 times better than Dylan's 60's recordings in terms of production.
Moreover, he could just be hearing the ringing in his ears, who knows?

Reading into the paragraphs, i'd have to agree that he's referring to the recordings themselves.
And maybe, reading into it further than I should, to their "over-produced" sound?


Dylan as curmudgeon is pretty normal at this point. wink


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 08/22/06 2:29pm

NDRU

avatar

theAudience said:


And maybe, reading into it further than I should, to their "over-produced" sound?



Definitely, that's what he meant by "sound all over them...just static."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 08/22/06 2:31pm

theAudience

avatar

Slave2daGroove said:

"Bob Dylan sucked as soon as he went electric"

I seem to remember folks saying the same thing...



...about this guy. cool


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 08/22/06 2:35pm

CinisterCee

FuNkeNsteiN said:

NDRU said:

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself

nod


Yeah. I think he's basically talking about analog versus digital recording techniques.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 08/22/06 3:28pm

vainandy

avatar

Bob Dylan's music bores the living hell out of me but I agree with him about the 20 year part. His timing is absolutely correct because 1985 is when I first started bitching about music going downhill.

The only difference is, he said he couldn't think of anyone (meaning not one person) who has made anything decent in the last 20 years. Good music was getting much thinner and thinner during the late 1980s but at least there were still a lot of artists I liked.....just not near as many as before. By the time the 1990s came around, with the exception of house music and Prince, I could list on one hand the artists I liked. Now I can list on two fingers.....Prince and Jamiroquai. The rest of them can go to hell.
.
.
[Edited 8/22/06 15:30pm]
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 08/22/06 4:27pm

damosuzuki

First of all, Bob’s a legend and one of the greatest figures in popular music of the last ½ century or so, so I think he’s earned the right to be a curmudgeon, a musical misanthrope.

I certainly won’t agree that there’s been nothing of value in the last twenty years, but if you were to revise his statement to something along the lines of “music has been on a consistent decline since the sixties to the extent that the assets that I appreciate most in music (melody, song construction, organic production values) are fundamentally non-existent” then I would be in complete conformity with him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 08/22/06 4:45pm

lilgish

avatar

FuNkeNsteiN said:

NDRU said:

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself

nod


Exactly, Bob has stated many times that the new recording technologies are inferior.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 08/22/06 4:50pm

damosuzuki

lilgish said:

FuNkeNsteiN said:


nod


Exactly, Bob has stated many times that the new recording technologies are inferior.




He made very similar statements in a RS interview in '87. I vaguely remember him bemoaning CDs and the separation of sound, and expressing a preference for the Phil Spector approach.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 08/22/06 4:53pm

NDRU

avatar

damosuzuki said:

lilgish said:



Exactly, Bob has stated many times that the new recording technologies are inferior.




He made very similar statements in a RS interview in '87. I vaguely remember him bemoaning CDs and the separation of sound, and expressing a preference for the Phil Spector approach.


Yes, and it seems all the more clear given that he's criticising his own new album, saying it sounded better in the studio than on disc.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 08/22/06 6:17pm

Lammastide

avatar

Who's stopping him from recording analog? shrug The final transfer would be to digital, but I can't imagine the sound quality would degrade so markedly in a single generation.
[Edited 8/22/06 18:18pm]
Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 08/22/06 8:03pm

WillyWonka

The times they are a-changin'.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 08/22/06 8:52pm

CinisterCee

Lammastide said:

Who's stopping him from recording analog? shrug The final transfer would be to digital, but I can't imagine the sound quality would degrade so markedly in a single generation.


That's what I'm thinkin... hmmm
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 08/23/06 1:23am

carlcranshaw

avatar

I'd like to hear Bob do a version of Usher's "Yeah".

Take a second and imagine Bob's voice singing it.

‎"The first time I saw the cover of Dirty Mind in the early 80s I thought, 'Is this some drag queen ripping on Freddie Prinze?'" - Some guy on The Gear Page
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 08/23/06 1:30am

Christopher

avatar

he should be on the org. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 08/23/06 3:27am

TonyVanDam

avatar

FuNkeNsteiN said:

NDRU said:

To be fair, I think he's talking about the quality of the recording rather than the music itself

nod


Co-sign. As much as I love the sound of digital recordings (especially keyboard recordings on Pro-Tools), most guitar works are better in analog recording, IMO.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 08/23/06 3:29am

TonyVanDam

avatar

vainandy said:

Bob Dylan's music bores the living hell out of me but I agree with him about the 20 year part. His timing is absolutely correct because 1985 is when I first started bitching about music going downhill.

The only difference is, he said he couldn't think of anyone (meaning not one person) who has made anything decent in the last 20 years. Good music was getting much thinner and thinner during the late 1980s but at least there were still a lot of artists I liked.....just not near as many as before. By the time the 1990s came around, with the exception of house music and Prince, I could list on one hand the artists I liked. Now I can list on two fingers.....Prince and Jamiroquai. The rest of them can go to hell.
.
.
[Edited 8/22/06 15:30pm]



Bob's songwritings are better than his vocals. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 08/23/06 5:12am

missfee

avatar

was he sober when he said this??? lol
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 08/23/06 5:30am

Anx

someone made a good album in 1986??
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 08/23/06 5:42am

joseph8

vainandy said:

Bob Dylan's music bores the living hell out of me but I agree with him about the 20 year part. His timing is absolutely correct because 1985 is when I first started bitching about music going downhill.

The only difference is, he said he couldn't think of anyone (meaning not one person) who has made anything decent in the last 20 years. Good music was getting much thinner and thinner during the late 1980s but at least there were still a lot of artists I liked.....just not near as many as before. By the time the 1990s came around, with the exception of house music and Prince, I could list on one hand the artists I liked. Now I can list on two fingers.....Prince and Jamiroquai. The rest of them can go to hell.
.
.
[Edited 8/22/06 15:30pm]

WOW, it's nice to know that I'm not alone clapping
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 08/23/06 8:12am

namepeace

damosuzuki said:

First of all, Bob’s a legend and one of the greatest figures in popular music of the last ½ century or so, so I think he’s earned the right to be a curmudgeon, a musical misanthrope.

I certainly won’t agree that there’s been nothing of value in the last twenty years, but if you were to revise his statement to something along the lines of “music has been on a consistent decline since the sixties to the extent that the assets that I appreciate most in music (melody, song construction, organic production values) are fundamentally non-existent” then I would be in complete conformity with him.


With all those twenty-five cent words you used, I better find a bill changer.

thumbs up!

I'll take issue with a couple things you said. I'm not saying they're wrong, I'd just take issue.

Mr. Dylan's status, while unquestioned, is irrelevant to the matter.

And as music has evolved, so have those characteristics I highlighted have evolved as well. They may be "fundamentally non-existent" because they've completely changed. That doesn't necessarily equal "consistent decline."

It's just another riff from a curmudgeon who's earned the right to be hostile, but being hostile doesn't mean he's right.

(and, I see what NRDU and others are saying, but I think BD meant what he said. I interpret what he said to mean that the sound of the music is terrible, but it really doesn't matter because the music is terrible anyway.)
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 08/23/06 8:13am

namepeace

carlcranshaw said:

I'd like to hear Bob do a version of Usher's "Yeah".

Take a second and imagine Bob's voice singing it.



I'd pay any price to hear that.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 08/23/06 8:14am

namepeace

vainandy said:

Bob Dylan's music bores the living hell out of me but I agree with him about the 20 year part. His timing is absolutely correct because 1985 is when I first started bitching about music going downhill.

The only difference is, he said he couldn't think of anyone (meaning not one person) who has made anything decent in the last 20 years. Good music was getting much thinner and thinner during the late 1980s but at least there were still a lot of artists I liked.....just not near as many as before. By the time the 1990s came around, with the exception of house music and Prince, I could list on one hand the artists I liked. Now I can list on two fingers.....Prince and Jamiroquai. The rest of them can go to hell.
.
.
[Edited 8/22/06 15:30pm]


Damn, vain . . . It ain't THAT bad!
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 08/23/06 8:20am

Slave2daGroove

theAudience said:

Slave2daGroove said:

"Bob Dylan sucked as soon as he went electric"

I seem to remember folks saying the same thing...



...about this guy. cool


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


I know what you're saying here. When people make comments like these, especially musicians, I put them in a place in my mind.

True artists grow and sometimes that means plugging in. Grow with electric Miles/Dylan or tune out, it's a choice. I love it all.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 08/23/06 8:23am

Cloudbuster

avatar

Oh, Bob. Shut the fuck up.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 08/23/06 8:49am

theghostoftony
m

avatar

dylan, remember, is the guy who put out "street legal" and "empire burlesque", two of the nastiest sounding albums i've ever heard. dylan is the guy who was willing to release a song which had the fucking cuff buttons on his shirt very audibly banging against his guitar throughout the whole thing. dylan is the guy who let daniel lanois make his harmonica sound like it was being recorded from inside a washer-dryer. dylan is the guy who put out a song (queen jane approximately) in which his guitar was completely out of tune for its entirety (that it being out of tune ultimately sounds really cool isnt the point). dylan is the guy most of whose favorite musicians (charlie patton, robert johnson, et al)'s recordings all come from behind a thick wall of pre-war crackliness. he cares about pristine recording values now?

dylan has talked contradictory shit all his life...he once said his albums meant nothing to him ("just a document of that particular time, nothing more") and that his live shows were where he was at. which i suppose is why he didn't tour at all between 1966 and 1975? rolleyes

vainandy said:

Bob Dylan's music bores the living hell out of me but I agree with him about the 20 year part. His timing is absolutely correct because 1985 is when I first started bitching about music going downhill.

The only difference is, he said he couldn't think of anyone (meaning not one person) who has made anything decent in the last 20 years. Good music was getting much thinner and thinner during the late 1980s but at least there were still a lot of artists I liked.....just not near as many as before. By the time the 1990s came around, with the exception of house music and Prince, I could list on one hand the artists I liked. Now I can list on two fingers.....Prince and Jamiroquai. The rest of them can go to hell.
.
.
[Edited 8/22/06 15:30pm]


yeah....

boards of canada
neutral milk hotel
flaming lips
joe lovano
yo la tengo
wilco
radiohead
don byron
built to spill
pavement
aphex twin
autechre
the orb
wu-tang clan
company flow
bjork
dj shadow
future sound of london
sebadoh
mary j blige
smog
jeff buckley
nas
chemical brothers
will oldham
fugazi
beck
pulp
smashing pumpkins
outkast
guided by voices
blur
underworld
lauryn hill
redman
michael brecker
the prodigy
nirvana
nils petter molvaer
global communication
meshell ndegeocello
orbital
dave douglas
elliott smith
jurassic 5
rage against the machine
belle & sebastian
manic street preachers
stereolab
tricky
erykah badu
portishead
pearl jam
my bloody valentine
primal scream
massive attack
de la soul
leftfield
mogwai
slint
the roots
olivia tremor control
pj harvey
dismemberment plan
sleater-kinney
gangstarr
modest mouse

DAMN, DID THE NINETIES SUCK OR WHAT
[Edited 8/23/06 9:13am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Dylan: modern music is "worthless" . . . is it content or the recording?