New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
do Paul,John,Ringo&George Solo Measure up to the Beatles as a Band? meaning as Solo Artist's Combined do they measure up for you with what they did as a Band?? do you think John&Paul wrote Better or Played Better Solo than as Band Members?? same goes for Ringo&George?? mistermaxxx | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
No. The collective sum of their parts exceeded them individually.
But Paul became a much more pronounced bass player on his solo recordings than he was overall with the Beatles. And with the Beatles his playing wasn't shabby either. [This message was edited Wed Aug 14 14:55:15 PDT 2002 by Supernova] This post not for the wimp contingent. All whiny wusses avert your eyes. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. They were better as a group, each one sort of checking each other. John refused 2 do some of Paul's cornier,sillier songs while Paul kind of softened John's hardness with some really nice harmonies. That's the way I c it. 
But George Harrison, IMO, really had the most individual style once The Beatles disbanded. George was the first Beatle to succeed with a solo album, initially, after the break-up. But then again,u knew I would say that.
. [This message was edited Wed Aug 14 13:34:04 PDT 2002 by Nep2nes] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |