independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What would have become of MJ if he were normal??
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 08/05/06 3:05pm

whoknows

HoneymoonXpress said:

I think, if MJ weren't trapped in between his Mother's religious overzealousness and his father's cruelty, he would've been a relatively normal gay man.

His father is also an open, outspoken homophobe. All Michael's problems stem from this, but don't tell his brain dead fans. They don't even realise he's gay.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 08/05/06 10:27pm

meow85

avatar

skyecute said:

darkstranger521 said:

If MJ had stayed normal-looking and normal-acting (well, relatively normal, he's a Jackson), and had the exact same musical output over the years, where would he be at in the music world today? What would have been the ideal route for him to take post-Thriller in order to stay most relevant musically? Would hip-hop have made him irrelevant anyway? Discuss.


It all depends on what you call normal. Normal by whose standards? If you are speaking of his appearance, I would say that his vitiligo(changing his skin to "white") is the biggest factor in people calling his appearance "not normal". Let's take this scenario:What if Michael had looked the exact same way all of his life/ Would we or society be discussing his looks as "not normal"? Of course, we wouldn't. I would dare say to anyone that Michael looks more normal than Mick Jagger ever could. Do we accept Mick's looks because he looks like society thinks that he should? As for Michael behaving "normal", I would say that he acts far more normal than a LOT of celebrities. Do we think that Ozzy Osbourn is normal? I don't, others dismiss his abnormal behavior as acceptable.With the intense, INTENSE scrutiny that MJ has(can't even go to take a piss without people talking about that), I would say that he is definently more normal than people WANT to believe.


Michael's abnormal because he seemingly refuses to accept that he is a 48 year old adult and because he's had his face mangled. And he does not have vitiligo, by the way, despite his claims. admittedly I'm no expert but I do know enough about skin to know that vitiligo does not affect a person the way Michael's skin has changed. I can get with wanting to defend your hero, but pick up a medical book before you buy his bullshit about a disease he can't possibly have.

Now plenty of celebrities have plastic surgery -more do than don't, I'm willing to bet -but the difference is that most of them knew when to draw the line. Michael does not.

Mick Jagger, though odd looking, came by his features by nature, not by way of an ethically questionable plastic surgeon. So your point is moot. Mick looks more normal by default because he's still got his own face.

As for your other point. No, no one thinks Ozzy is normal or certain behaviours of his acceptable either.
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 08/05/06 10:31pm

meow85

avatar

skyecute said:

whatsgoingon said:



Mick Jagger doesn't look abnormal, he just looks old, and old people pouncing around on the stage can look really at times foolish. lol

MJ on the other hand looks abnormal because he has basically gone from looking like this;



To this;




And even if you want to use the theory that the main factor is Vitligo that is what makes him looks so different, the problem is everything that MJ has done to himself that has nothing to do with Vitiligo i.e the plastic surgery, Make-up and even hairstyles is geared to make him look more "white"...and that's why the skin disease theory sounds hollow to many people.

And no, I don't think Ozzy Osbourne behaviour is normal, infact when I first watched the The Osbournes I thought he was a stroke Victim eek



"Make-up and hairstyle to make him look more white?" Isn't that a very strange statement coming from a Prince fan? Have you not noticed the make-up and hairstyle that Prince wears? There's nothing "black" about it. In case you don't know it, the STRAIGHT hair is NOT Prince's natural hair. Just wanted to get that point across.Btw, the straight hair that Snoop wears is not his natural hair, either. Is it ok for some to wear their hair straight and Michael can't? I certainly hope that is not the case. Finally, yes fans do accept that Michael has vitiligo. For the record, there is no one who would WANT to be THAT white, for ANY reason. Even bleaching can't turn you that white.


Yes it can. However, the amount it takes to lighten skin as previously dark as Michael's into the ghost-white shade and maintain it is illegal and dangerous. There are no shortages of enethical "doctors" nwilling to prescribe lightening creams and medications for the right amount of money.

The biggest hole with the vitiligo excuse is that the disease always ALWAYS strikes the person's skin in splotchy patches -never as an all-out bleached effect.
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 08/06/06 12:25am

whatsgoingon

avatar

If MJ has vitiligo, it is probably self-inflicted. It is true that ordinary bleaching creams over the counter will never make you that light, plus if you go back in the sun you will automatically get dark again. MJ seems to be permanently "white". I think MJ was probably using the cream Benequin, which is prescribe for vitligo sufferers, which evens out their skin, it practically depigmentises the skin. However, if you use it in very high dosages without having the disease yourself then you can suffer from something quite similiar to vitiligo.

And it's true vitiligo happens in patches. MJ, skin on the other hand seems to have got lighter gradually in a very even way. He went from a kind of dark caramel complexion, to a light caramel, to high yellow to completely white..vitiligo doesn't work like that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 08/06/06 2:19am

DarlingDiana

Actually, to tell you the truth, if he never got plastic surgery and acted "weird" for the public, he probably would have stopped selling records in the late 80s and early 90s. By now he'd be just some average joe who once had a successful recording career. He wouldn't be talked about except in Rolling Stone issues of the greatest albums in history and stuff like that. After Dangeorus he would've stopped recording and touring because of his lack or popularity.

So in the long run, I guess it would be good. Because he would be remember for his music only. But he would hardly be as big and as talked about as he is now if he remained "normal".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 08/06/06 2:23am

DarlingDiana

jonylawson said:

as a dad myself-what must his poor mum think-he was such a beautiful kid

Actually, his parents are really, really proud of him. Despite all the low lifes in this world constantly giving him shit, he's remained a good person. He may have changed his appearance, but he kept his soul.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 08/06/06 10:38am

whoknows

DarlingDiana said:

jonylawson said:

as a dad myself-what must his poor mum think-he was such a beautiful kid

Actually, his parents are really, really proud of him. Despite all the low lifes in this world constantly giving him shit, he's remained a good person. He may have changed his appearance, but he kept his soul.

falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 08/06/06 1:52pm

newskin69

I think, to an extent, the eccentricities helped his career in the late 80s and early 90s. He stood out more than your average pop star, and besides, the music was still good. While by early 93 he wasnt as terribly hip as he was before, he was still adored by the public.

What really fucked him over was the allegations. After that, the eccentricities got creepier, the allegations got more shocking, and the music morphed into self-indulgence and then finally transformed into an ill-fated imitation of himself.

Sad really. If the allegations hadnt come to surface(or rather, if he didn't molest children), he'd be a true music icon along the lines of James Brown. And he is still a music icon, though he's the type of icon that you put along the lines of 'when they kicked ass long, long ago'
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 08/06/06 8:59pm

uPtoWnNY

newskin69 said:

Sad really. If the allegations hadnt come to surface(or rather, if he didn't molest children), he'd be a true music icon along the lines of James Brown. And he is still a music icon, though he's the type of icon that you put along the lines of 'when they kicked ass long, long ago'




nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 08/07/06 12:31am

DarlingDiana

whoknows said:

DarlingDiana said:


Actually, his parents are really, really proud of him. Despite all the low lifes in this world constantly giving him shit, he's remained a good person. He may have changed his appearance, but he kept his soul.

falloff

I hope your laughing at MJ's parents and not me, because I was just relaying what Joe and Katherine say. That's not really my opinion.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 08/07/06 1:13am

spacedolphin

avatar

Nah, if he was a normal entertainer, there probably wouldn't have been an 18 minute short film about urban disintegration centered around a whack song like 'Bad', or the whole Smooth Criminal video, complete with the weird atmospheric breakdown in the middle and everybody making monkey sounds in the background.

Only Michael Jackson would preach peace, love and harmony while transforming into Voltron to shoot the shit out of stormtroopers with his giant gattling guns and rocket launchers. Come together right now, bitches. Who's Bad!
music I'm afraid of Americans. I'm afraid of the world. music
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 08/07/06 1:20am

DarlingDiana

spacedolphin said:

Nah, if he was a normal entertainer, there probably wouldn't have been an 18 minute short film about urban disintegration centered around a whack song like 'Bad', or the whole Smooth Criminal video, complete with the weird atmospheric breakdown in the middle and everybody making monkey sounds in the background.

Only Michael Jackson would preach peace, love and harmony while transforming into Voltron to shoot the shit out of stormtroopers with his giant gattling guns and rocket launchers. Come together right now, bitches. Who's Bad!

lol, so true. I love Moonwalker. So weird and wonderful.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 08/07/06 2:45am

shellyevon

avatar

skyecute said:

darkstranger521 said:

If MJ had stayed normal-looking and normal-acting (well, relatively normal, he's a Jackson), and had the exact same musical output over the years, where would he be at in the music world today? What would have been the ideal route for him to take post-Thriller in order to stay most relevant musically? Would hip-hop have made him irrelevant anyway? Discuss.


It all depends on what you call normal. Normal by whose standards? If you are speaking of his appearance, I would say that his vitiligo(changing his skin to "white") is the biggest factor in people calling his appearance "not normal". Let's take this scenario:What if Michael had looked the exact same way all of his life/ Would we or society be discussing his looks as "not normal"? Of course, we wouldn't. I would dare say to anyone that Michael looks more normal than Mick Jagger ever could. Do we accept Mick's looks because he looks like society thinks that he should? As for Michael behaving "normal", I would say that he acts far more normal than a LOT of celebrities. Do we think that Ozzy Osbourn is normal? I don't, others dismiss his abnormal behavior as acceptable.With the intense, INTENSE scrutiny that MJ has(can't even go to take a piss without people talking about that), I would say that he is definently more normal than people WANT to believe.


Mick Jagger has his own face, which I'm sure he has come to terms with. The rest of his body seems to be in excellent shape.
Does Michael even have a nose any more?
As for Ozzy, the poor man has Parkinson's disease. That's why he walks the way he does and has trouble talking. A lot of his swearing is from frustration caused by the disease.
Michael may have a psychological disorder that led to all the changes, and that deserves some sympathy, but he created a lot of his own problems.
There comes a point in your adult life where you have to stop blaming your parents and "bad childhood" and move on.
"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"-Dr Seuss

Pain is something to carry, like a radio...You should stand up for your right to feel your pain- Jim Morrison
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 08/07/06 3:01am

meow85

avatar

whatsgoingon said:

If MJ has vitiligo, it is probably self-inflicted. It is true that ordinary bleaching creams over the counter will never make you that light, plus if you go back in the sun you will automatically get dark again. MJ seems to be permanently "white". I think MJ was probably using the cream Benequin, which is prescribe for vitligo sufferers, which evens out their skin, it practically depigmentises the skin. However, if you use it in very high dosages without having the disease yourself then you can suffer from something quite similiar to vitiligo.

And it's true vitiligo happens in patches. MJ, skin on the other hand seems to have got lighter gradually in a very even way. He went from a kind of dark caramel complexion, to a light caramel, to high yellow to completely white..vitiligo doesn't work like that.



I think the risk of the melanin cells re-growing due to sunlight is why he's so keen on having an umbrella at all times on clear, sunny days. nod
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 08/07/06 3:08am

meow85

avatar

shellyevon said:

skyecute said:



It all depends on what you call normal. Normal by whose standards? If you are speaking of his appearance, I would say that his vitiligo(changing his skin to "white") is the biggest factor in people calling his appearance "not normal". Let's take this scenario:What if Michael had looked the exact same way all of his life/ Would we or society be discussing his looks as "not normal"? Of course, we wouldn't. I would dare say to anyone that Michael looks more normal than Mick Jagger ever could. Do we accept Mick's looks because he looks like society thinks that he should? As for Michael behaving "normal", I would say that he acts far more normal than a LOT of celebrities. Do we think that Ozzy Osbourn is normal? I don't, others dismiss his abnormal behavior as acceptable.With the intense, INTENSE scrutiny that MJ has(can't even go to take a piss without people talking about that), I would say that he is definently more normal than people WANT to believe.


Mick Jagger has his own face, which I'm sure he has come to terms with. The rest of his body seems to be in excellent shape.
Does Michael even have a nose any more?
As for Ozzy, the poor man has Parkinson's disease. That's why he walks the way he does and has trouble talking. A lot of his swearing is from frustration caused by the disease.
Michael may have a psychological disorder that led to all the changes, and that deserves some sympathy, but he created a lot of his own problems.
There comes a point in your adult life where you have to stop blaming your parents and "bad childhood" and move on.



clapping

Lots of people have had bad childhoods and worse parents, and yes, that will fuck you up. People that have had to grow up like that do deserve a bit more patience and understanding. But there's a point when you've got to learn to manage yourself -a person cannot be allowed to do whateverthefuck they please because they have the Unhappy Kid card, then cry that people are treating them unfairly when they tell them to quit being a freak.

Shit, can you imagine if the entire population of abuse cases and first-class shitty childhoods behaved like Michael? The world would come to a screeching halt.
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 08/07/06 10:20am

HoneymoonXpres
s

whoknows said:

HoneymoonXpress said:

I think, if MJ weren't trapped in between his Mother's religious overzealousness and his father's cruelty, he would've been a relatively normal gay man.

His father is also an open, outspoken homophobe. All Michael's problems stem from this, but don't tell his brain dead fans. They don't even realise he's gay.

for real
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 08/07/06 10:33am

scorp84

He accepts that everything he does isn't going to be "popular", and he still continues to live his life and make his own decisions/mistakes. Who on this world thinks they can live up to the expectations of billions of people? No one is "normal".Mike can only do what's best for him and his family. No one on this earth can judge him in the end, anyway, so why does it matter so much?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 08/07/06 11:55am

HoneymoonXpres
s

scorp84 said:

He accepts that everything he does isn't going to be "popular"



No he doesn't. He's been trying to surpass the hype of thriller for the past 20 years.


Who on this world thinks they can live up to the expectations of billions of people?


Michael Jackson, that's who.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 08/07/06 12:19pm

calldapplwonde
ry83

whatsgoingon said:

If MJ has vitiligo, it is probably self-inflicted. It is true that ordinary bleaching creams over the counter will never make you that light, plus if you go back in the sun you will automatically get dark again. MJ seems to be permanently "white". I think MJ was probably using the cream Benequin, which is prescribe for vitligo sufferers, which evens out their skin, it practically depigmentises the skin. However, if you use it in very high dosages without having the disease yourself then you can suffer from something quite similiar to vitiligo.

And it's true vitiligo happens in patches. MJ, skin on the other hand seems to have got lighter gradually in a very even way. He went from a kind of dark caramel complexion, to a light caramel, to high yellow to completely white..vitiligo doesn't work like that.



There are pictures though that VERY CLEARLY show such patches. Personally, I believe he has vitiligo and started bleaching his skin to have an even color. But what do I know.

And BTW, doesn't he have an umbrella around him all the time because vitiligo makes your skin overtly sensitive to the sun?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 08/07/06 2:36pm

murph

Imago said:

skyecute said:



Strange that with non-stop and unprecedented negativity with the release of his last album of NEW material "Invincible", he managed to OUTSELL almost every other artist during that same time period. He sold well OVER 3 million in the US and between 8-10 million worldwide. This was done with one single released, no tour, basically no promotion after the record was released, no pop radio airplay. I would say that he had very significant record sales, especially compared to his peers. He outsold every single one of them. Let's keep things in perspective with FACTS.



I should have been more specific. I meant Significant record sales with respect to what he was selling back in his prime.

Just like Prince, Emancipation was a tripple abulm that went double platinum, but it doesn't come close to 1999 or Purple Rain. Market forces change. MJ is in the same vein, although his marketing machine is a bit more agressive, and his overall appeal is a bit higher.

But my point is that much of drop off in record sales is due to his bland and pointless albums since Thriller/Bad and changing forces in the market. His molesting boys didn't help, but his downward trend was inevitable despite.



Come on??? The man had the biggest selling album of all time...He's never going to come anything remotely to those numbers...Record sales are not his problem...It's how he is perceived through his personal life and that fact that his album budgets are ridiculous...When you spend close to $30 million on producing one album (Invincible) and you only sell 2 million in the States and 6 to 8 million worldwide, that' a problem...To the record industry he is perceived as a money pit in terms of his spending habits...

In terms of if MJ staying normal, I think he would still have a healthy dose of respect from critics and the record buying public...But he was bound to tail off after Thriller...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What would have become of MJ if he were normal??