Records that have become "redundant" after an artist releases a new album?

Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Records that have become "redundant" after an artist releases a new album?

« Previous topic

Next topic »

Page 2 of 2 <12

New topic

Printable (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)

Reply #30 posted 07/03/06 10:53pm

CinisterCee	AlexdeParis said: CinisterCee said: The Fugees' 1994 debut Blunted On Reality became redundant... ...after the release of The Score. Sorry, but my copy of The Score doesn't have "Nappy Heads" on it. ooooh shit you pulled that out haha
	- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator

Reply #31 posted 07/04/06 5:30am

MartyMcFly	CinisterCee said: The Fugees' 1994 debut Blunted On Reality became redundant... ...after the release of The Score. ...after which the entire band became redundant...
	- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator

Reply #32 posted 07/04/06 5:39am

Anx

Dayspring said:

Anx said:

i disagree. i think both of those albums have their own thing going on, and that while he's certainly drawn from the styles of those albums in years since, nothing has matched the mood of either of those releases.

yes, he's evolved TONS since those albums. obviously. but i don't think these albums were made redundant by what he's done since.

I think you missed the point. The one that followed made the first one redundant. In this instance, "Prince" expanded on and perfected what he was trying to achieve with "For You."

i think you missed my point, which was simply that i disagree. there's a difference between evolving as an artist and correcting a flawed album by "correcting" one's sound for the next project.

thanks for trying to clarify, though. as you know, i'm not the sharpest tool in the drawer. but i am a tool, and that's a start. hug

- E-mail - orgNote -