Another day, another wacky lawsuit

http://www.tmz.com/2006/0...t-alleges/

Jackson Tampered With My Food, Suit Alleges
Posted Jun 15th 2006 6:16PM by TMZ Staff
Michael Jackson unmercifully harassed a Los Angeles woman, tampering with her food and water and threatening her life, according to a lawsuit obtained by TMZ.

The bizarre case, filed by Helen Harris-Scott, alleges that she began sending Jackson cards and letters in 1986, declaring her "love and admiration" for the singer. The plaintiff claims Jackson was "shy" and communicated with her through others and through his music.

Harris-Scott claims things turned ugly around 1987 when Jackson, who was "connected with criminals," flattened her tires and tampered with her brake system. She also says a GPS tracking device was secretly installed in her car, tracking her every move. She says her phone was also wiretapped.

Harris-Scott claims it got even worse, alleging Jackson had "organized criminals watching me inside my house in L.A. and reporting to him."

She is asking the court to order a public apology from Jackson and "immediate disconnection of all the surveillance and wiretapping equipment." By the way, she also wants $100 million.

Michael Jackson's rep Raymone Bain says "Wonders never cease to amaze me" and said Mr. Jackson has not been advised of the case. She would not comment past this.
Court Documents:

http://cdn.digitalcity.co...awsuit.pdf

I believe it.

I say give the public apology

Ellie said:

I'm not a MJ apologist but this chick is a nutball.

mj is devilish...an evil evil man...


mj is a cold cold man....

mj is a cold cold man...

This woman is about as crazy as Janet or Jordy or Gavin or any or Sneddon or Diane Dimond....

They should all seriously start a TV show called, "We are crazy." The audience of Court TV and some really uninformed and crude minded people would LOOOVE it.

JasonStar said:

or mj?

sosgemini said:

MJ is misunderstood.

Krytonite said:

so is dubya.

lilgish said:

sosgemini said:

or Nancy Grace, or Jordy's Mom, or Jordy's Dad, or the maid who took the big pay out cus her son was "tickled" by Michael. Seriously. I've "tickled" my cousin. I wasn't seducing him. And new flash, I've slept in the same bed with friends of mine. I didn't molest them. And I'm willing to bet a large sum of money, Michael didn't either. And until the "Michael Jackson" sex tape comes out, filmed at Neverland, I'm caling BS on ALL of the 93-present bullshit. So should you.Reason? THE VERDICT. If Sneddon couldn't convince all those people to at least charge Michael one time, (they had tons of charges they could have given him one if they suspected he was even partially guilty.) you shouldn't let the media and Sneddon's croonies convince you. I'm sorry to see you are on the dark side.

Ah well, screw this thread and screw this lame-o lawsuit. I'm off to watch Motown 25. And later today play "Blood On The Dance Floor" in my car.

CalhounSq said:

So sad that certain people have to poke fun at MJ fans, when 1) There are Prince fans who are probably just as nuts, if not worse. They need to quit focusing on the fans, and quit bitching about the fact that, Sneddon lost because, NOTHING EVER HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE. And if you have to resort to poking fun at MJ fans, I think you need a reminder of this:



In the words of Weird Al, "Eat It."

JasonStar said:

1) feel free to seduce me anytime.

2) i never questioned mj's guilt...i questioned if he was crazy.

first there was the cat who wants to start up a National Whitney Houston Appreciation Day, and now there's this chick.

just how many faces will i have to request to be promptly laughed in?

JasonStar said:

OMG You're right, you really have shown me the light with this. I am so sorry...




















... that I never recognized you really are the corniest muthafucka here

I want to know more about which songs were used to communicate to her.

It would have been more credible if it was against Prince

jn2 said:

Mike a made man?

sure why not...

stranger things have happened

CalhounSq said:

Some of his fans are more fucked up than he is.

CalhounSq said:

I still crack up when I see this picture. She looks kinda like she works in ladies apparel at JC Penney or something innocent like that. The reality is probably that she operated the carousel at Neverland and bought that outfit at JC Penney special for that event right after she stopped into the mall pet shop to buy the dove. Maybe it's not even a dove. Maybe her crazy ass raided Debo's pigeon coup and spray painted them mugs white.
[Edited 6/16/06 18:42pm]

RipHer2Shreds said:

She's a house wife from Eygpt. Yea I know these things.

Damn that!! Prince has been communicating with me through his music since '78! I want $500,000,000.00 and the keys to the vault!!















[Edited 6/16/06 19:35pm]

lilgish said:

JasonStar said:

BRAVO!!! I agree with every word that you said.

What's ever sadder is that people are so GUILLIBLE and not able to think for themselves. They allow the media to do that for them.Another thing is that these same people are the ones who say that he did it because of his "looks." I have news for those people- 100% of the REAL pedophiles look nothing like Michael. They are your average-looking Joe's-fathers,uncles, next door neighbors, best friends-who are the real molesters. I can guarantee you that if the public had gotten the real story from the media and not the biased pro-prosecution spin they would KNOW that not only was THIS case a scam and set-up, but so were the 1993 allegations. It should ring some bells if a CONSERVATIVE jury from a CONSERVATIVE town saw through this scam, ANYONE should. That jury said that there were NO credible witnesses on the prosecution, ESPECIALLY the accuser. In fact, it was HIS deamonor,contradictory statements on the timeline, the fact that he was mad at Michael for NOT wanting to be around him, the fact that he begged Chris Tucker to tell him where Michael was; his denial of anything happening to him UNTIL he met with the SAME lawyer as the 1993 accuser,the fact that he only became angry when Michael stopped helping the family and many other inconsistencies, that convinced this very intuitive and intelligent jury that this case was a bunch of horse crap.These are all things that are in the actual COURT TRANSCRIPTS for anyone(non-fans,media, skeptics et.al) to read.

skyecute said:

So true.
But the non-fans, media, skeptics et. will all just choose to ignore that and print a new round of BS.

One time,
I caught a couple of guys trying to let the air out of my tires.

They ran off before I could get a good look at 'em, but from what I did see , I coulda sworn one of 'em look a helluva lot like Tito.
And when I yelled "You better run, fuckers!", I could hear the other one go "HEEE_HEE!!"

CalhounSq said:

CalhounSq said: