DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
please take me back in your time machine to 1968... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
please take me back in your time machine to 1968... (I'll take you though Anx. I've been working on my time machine for years now ) "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
please take me back in your time machine to 1968... Forreal. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: i used to be a huge music snob. then i lightened up. but i think i'm going to be a music snob again.
If a return to snobbery would stop you from ever including a song like My Humps on your annual compilation, I encourage you to snob-away | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
You can't truly believe that? Music snob? Music is not all subjective. It's not just a matter of personal taste. There is good music, great music and poor music. Who determines this? The basics of music itself. For those who may not be aware of this but to have sound classified as music it must have rymthm, harmony and an organize composition, otherwise the knocking of a car's engine could be music to someone's ears (an some artist songs sounds just like that). What goes into a person's ear is much like what goes into a person mouth, it will have an effect. If a person feeds on food that contains very little nutritional value the results will show up in that person's physical health. While it is a personal choice what a person eats, that choice will manifest itself for good or for bad. If a person feeds on a diet of poor music this too will manifest itself, this person will not be able to digest nor distinguish good music, for their ears are untrained. The music media is a business, and like all businesses there exist a profit margin, so the industry have discovered that it is far easier and profitable to creat "pop stars" then to discover musical talent. And as long as the public continues to eat it up, the quality of "mainstream radio" will never get better. [Edited 5/30/06 7:30am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
endorphin74 said: Anx said: i used to be a huge music snob. then i lightened up. but i think i'm going to be a music snob again.
If a return to snobbery would stop you from ever including a song like My Humps on your annual compilation, I encourage you to snob-away I hate to say it, but a strong (smelling) contender for my 2006 compilation is Peaches' answer song, "My Dumps". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 a psychotic is someone who just figured out what's going on | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sdldawn said: I listen to about 100 artists that probably half of you'z wouldn't even to begin to know about.. good music.
I just don't bother posting about them here. Most of u radio mainstream peeps wouldn't dig | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: endorphin74 said: If a return to snobbery would stop you from ever including a song like My Humps on your annual compilation, I encourage you to snob-away I hate to say it, but a strong (smelling) contender for my 2006 compilation is Peaches' answer song, "My Dumps". of COURSE it is | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
A classic example of what I'm talking about is "American Idol". Now days the average Joe Smoe can be made into a "pop star". Why? Because the music industry has gotten the public to the point where they can not distinguish musical talent. I can walk into a club in NY on any given night a hear (notice I said "hear not "see") a artist with far more musical talent than anyone on "American Idol". Close your eyes and open your ears!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
what a wonderful slammin' thread The enormous gap between what US leaders do in the world and what Americans think their leaders are doing is one of the great propaganda accomplishments of the dominant political mythology. - Michael Parenti | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ya know, Frank Zappa of all people once said that as long as any kind of music touched even one person's life, then that music isn't crap.
Of course, Zappa made fun of a LOT of music in his lifetime... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 said: A classic example of what I'm talking about is "American Idol". Now days the average Joe Smoe can be made into a "pop star". Why? Because the music industry has gotten the public to the point where they can not distinguish musical talent. I can walk into a club in NY on any given night a hear (notice I said "hear not "see") a artist with far more musical talent than anyone on "American Idol". Close your eyes and open your ears!!!
Not many are contesting that here. There are a million threads about this very subject! You're the one who should maybe open your eyes, not your ears, for a minute and check them out before making statements like this because you'd be probably the 200th person here to say that already. What people have a problem with, is the fact that you are just making a broad statement about everyone here (everyone besides yourself of course) that they all have bad taste in music and only listen to crap pop. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 said: DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
You can't truly believe that? Music snob? Music is not all subjective. It's not just a matter of personal taste. There is good music, great music and poor music. Who determines this? The basics of music itself. For those who may not be aware of this but to have sound classified as music it must have rymthm, harmony and an organize composition, otherwise the knocking of a car's engine could be music to someone's ears (an some artist songs sounds just like that). What goes into a person's ear is much like what goes into a person mouth, it will have an effect. If a person feeds on food that contains very little nutritional value the results will show up in that person's physical health. While it is a personal choice what a person eats, that choice will manifest itself for good or for bad. If a person feeds on a diet of poor music this too will manifest itself, this person will not be able to digest nor distinguish good music, for their ears are untrained. The music media is a business, and like all businesses there exist a profit margin, so the industry have discovered that it is far easier and profitable to creat "pop stars" then to discover musical talent. And as long as the public continues to eat it up, the quality of "mainstream radio" will never get better. [Edited 5/30/06 7:30am] Good music is 100% subjective. If a person likes a song, it is good to that person. That’s all that matters. You can appreciate the artistry behind a song – and that’s fine. But that doesn’t somehow make you an authority on what is and isn’t “good.” For some, music is just about having fun and bopping along. There is nothing wrong with that. I have several thousand CDs; I’ve been listening to music since I was a toddler. My dad was a musician and in bands all the time I was growing up, and I had musicians around the house constantly. Music has always been a huge part of my life - it is my hobby and my passion. That being said, I would never presume to say I know what “good” music is and that what other people listen to is “not good” or that somehow I am like Salieri and I can recognize great music when I hear it. Sure, I have my opinions, but my opinion is as valid as every other person on this forum who listens to music, whether they have 1 CD or 10,000. Music is just like food: it’s all about taste. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NorthernLad said: jw1914 said: You can't truly believe that? Music snob? Music is not all subjective. It's not just a matter of personal taste. There is good music, great music and poor music. Who determines this? The basics of music itself. For those who may not be aware of this but to have sound classified as music it must have rymthm, harmony and an organize composition, otherwise the knocking of a car's engine could be music to someone's ears (an some artist songs sounds just like that). What goes into a person's ear is much like what goes into a person mouth, it will have an effect. If a person feeds on food that contains very little nutritional value the results will show up in that person's physical health. While it is a personal choice what a person eats, that choice will manifest itself for good or for bad. If a person feeds on a diet of poor music this too will manifest itself, this person will not be able to digest nor distinguish good music, for their ears are untrained. The music media is a business, and like all businesses there exist a profit margin, so the industry have discovered that it is far easier and profitable to creat "pop stars" then to discover musical talent. And as long as the public continues to eat it up, the quality of "mainstream radio" will never get better. [Edited 5/30/06 7:30am] Good music is 100% subjective. If a person likes a song, it is good to that person. That’s all that matters. You can appreciate the artistry behind a song – and that’s fine. But that doesn’t somehow make you an authority on what is and isn’t “good.” For some, music is just about having fun and bopping along. There is nothing wrong with that. I have several thousand CDs; I’ve been listening to music since I was a toddler. My dad was a musician and in bands all the time I was growing up, and I had musicians around the house constantly. Music has always been a huge part of my life - it is my hobby and my passion. That being said, I would never presume to say I know what “good” music is and that what other people listen to is “not good” or that somehow I am like Salieri and I can recognize great music when I hear it. Sure, I have my opinions, but my opinion is as valid as every other person on this forum who listens to music, whether they have 1 CD or 10,000. Music is just like food: it’s all about taste. Good post, but I think we are wasting our time here. I don't think he even reads one word of what anyone else here has posted. He's just posting to admire his own contributions it seems. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: jw1914 said: A classic example of what I'm talking about is "American Idol". Now days the average Joe Smoe can be made into a "pop star". Why? Because the music industry has gotten the public to the point where they can not distinguish musical talent. I can walk into a club in NY on any given night a hear (notice I said "hear not "see") a artist with far more musical talent than anyone on "American Idol". Close your eyes and open your ears!!!
Not many are contesting that here. There are a million threads about this very subject! You're the one who should maybe open your eyes, not your ears, for a minute and check them out before making statements like this because you'd be probably the 200th person here to say that already. What people have a problem with, is the fact that you are just making a broad statement about everyone here (everyone besides yourself of course) that they all have bad taste in music and only listen to crap pop. Yo bro, why are you getting so bent out of shape if the comments I made do not apply to you? I did not say "everyone", I simply asked "is there anyone?" simply judging by the forum topics. I did not know you were a MJ fan, my bad, | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 said: minneapolisgenius said: Not many are contesting that here. There are a million threads about this very subject! You're the one who should maybe open your eyes, not your ears, for a minute and check them out before making statements like this because you'd be probably the 200th person here to say that already. What people have a problem with, is the fact that you are just making a broad statement about everyone here (everyone besides yourself of course) that they all have bad taste in music and only listen to crap pop. Yo bro, why are you getting so bent out of shape if the comments I made do not apply to you? I did not say "everyone", I simply asked "is there anyone?" simply judging by the forum topics. I did not know you were a MJ fan, my bad, Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yo NorthernLad, so tell me from your statement "music is like food, it's all about taste" there is not such a thing as food that's bad for you? No wonder you can't tell good music! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DarlingDiana said: Usually, most artists ands bands get record deals and get played on radio because they are good. This means that those artists who aren't being played on radio, and who aren't having their albums distributed by a major label, (unless they are purposely staying away from mainstream music) aren't as good as those who are being played on radio. So why are you wasting your time on bands that just aren't good enough? Again, not all mainstream artists are being promoting because they are musically good, and not all indie bands are indie because they aren't good enough (some would just rather not get into mainstream music). But in general, good bands get played on radio, those who aren't played on radio are just not good enough.
You have a very strange sense of humour. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: jw1914 said: Yo bro, why are you getting so bent out of shape if the comments I made do not apply to you? I did not say "everyone", I simply asked "is there anyone?" simply judging by the forum topics. I did not know you were a MJ fan, my bad, Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. Trust me I already knew you weren't a "bro", I was simply was befriending you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 said: Yo NorthernLad, so tell me from your statement "music is like food, it's all about taste" there is not such a thing as food that's bad for you? No wonder you can't tell good music!
Yeah there is. I hate onions, and I won't eat anything with onions. It doesn't make onions "bad." It simply means: "I don't like onions." I really can't stand Stevie Wonder. His voice, his musical style, his lyrics... really do nothing for me. I've tried to get into him, but he just doesn't do it for me. Does that mean I think Stevie is "bad"? Nope. Just means I don't care for him personally. I recognize his talent, but I have no desire to listen to him. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: Good post, but I think we are wasting our time here. I don't think he even reads one word of what anyone else here has posted. He's just posting to admire his own contributions it seems.
Yeah, I know. It's slow at work today, though. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: jw1914 said: Yo bro, why are you getting so bent out of shape if the comments I made do not apply to you? I did not say "everyone", I simply asked "is there anyone?" simply judging by the forum topics. I did not know you were a MJ fan, my bad, Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. After all these years, it's finally come out - you're an MJ fan! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
people who don't allow others their personal tastes aren't snobs; they're boring fascists. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jw1914 said: minneapolisgenius said: Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. Trust me I already knew you weren't a "bro", I was simply was befriending you. Sure, girlfriend! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: minneapolisgenius said: Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. After all these years, it's finally come out - you're an MJ fan! mamma say, mamma sa.... ma-ma cooo saa. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: jw1914 said: Trust me I already knew you weren't a "bro", I was simply was befriending you. Sure, girlfriend! "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: minneapolisgenius said: Wow, you really haven't read anything I've posted here. And I'm not a "bro" for the record. After all these years, it's finally come out - you're an MJ fan! The most fanatic of them all. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: people who don't allow others their personal tastes aren't snobs; they're boring fascists.
I think I'm going to do a T-shirt design for that. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |